Dear Sammy,
If you are trying to prove to me that your notion of torquing down is absolutely required in putting, you have not succeeded. You have the two common misconceptions, even if your experiment is validly conceived and executed: 1. there is something inadquate for a 12" backstroke only sending a ball 3.5 feet across a carpet; and 2. "stroking more than 12" becomes somewhat unstable".
Why do you believe these two propositions?
My core putt, with a backstroke just outside my rear foot, usually sends the balls rolling 10-12 feet on a normal green. I have no idea what is the condition of your carpet, and I also really cannot see what it is you are doing to make the stroke. Your description is very difficult to envision. All this talk about fingers means next to nothing to me for movement, as the hands as a whole are moved by the arms, and the arms are moved by the shoulders, etc. I can't tell what you mean to be happening in terms of movement of the human body.
A very simple exercise is to suspend your putter by the tips of your thumb and index finger of the left hand, draw it back 12" with the other hand, and let it go, swinging down into a ball at the bottom of the stroke. On my carpet, the balls roll at least 6 feet.
In my experience, the stroke on most greens for a 15 foot putt is not the least unstable, nor is the stroke for a 40 foot putt. Human balance and smoothness is not at all challenged when the movement is nice and easy. The belief is widely held in golf that a long backstroke "creates a bigger oppportunity to mess up the stroke" -- as it is commonly expressed. That's probably true for hack golfers, but not for expert putters. This common notion becomes transformed into "cousin" propositions like the one you express: "a stroke longer than 12" is an unstable stroke".
I don't dismiss this notion out of hand. Instead, I also used to accept this and for years putted with a rigorously controlled, short, abrupt hit stroke. I was very, very good with it for distance, too, routinely sinking 40-50 footers. But thru the years of constant experimentation, I abandoned this notion as worthless tripe. After years and years of steady comparisons of quick strokes and slow strokes, I can safely tell you there is no comparison -- a slow, even-tempo stroke (even if long by common standards) is far more accurate and consistent. My proof of this is 16 years and nearly 4 million trials. Too bad you didn't have a clipboard handy while I was doing this -- you might be less bound up in the rudiments of physics when it is the human body that matters much more.
As you are aware, I don't really teach a gravity-only stroke -- I teach a gravity-sponsored stroke. There is indeed a torquing at the bottom of the stroke prior to impact -- a mild levering up thru the ball from the shoulder frame lifting and casting the putter head thru the ball. Your focus on the minutiae of physics in PART of the stroke misses the human action I am describing.
Cheers!
Geoff Mangum
Putting Coach and Theorist
PuttingZone
http://puttingzone.com>
Golf's most advanced putting instruction -- you're either in the PuttingZone, or not.
