Hey Republicans. Have you learned anything from your mistakes? For months, you've been posting about how much trouble the Dems are in due to congress' low approval rating. Face it, America is fed up with your party and it's lack of leadership. They are ready for a change, moreso now than in 06. GW is real, some in your own party (including McCain) are finally stepping up. You lost that argument. The Iraq War was a huge mistake, no matter how you slice it. You will pay dearly for years. The economy is in the tank, thanks to Doofus and company. The right has not produced one positive thing in 7 years. Your party is history!

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Republican Election Losses Stir Fall Fears
By ADAM NAGOURNEY and CARL HULSE
WASHINGTON — The Republican defeat in a special Congressional contest in Mississippi sent waves of apprehension across an already troubled party Wednesday, with some senior Republicans urging Congressional candidates to distance themselves from President Bush to head off what could be heavy losses in the fall.

The victory by Travis Childers, a conservative Democrat elected in a once-steadfast Republican district on Tuesday, was the third defeat of a Republican in a special Congressional race this year. In addition to foreshadowing more losses for the party in November, the outcome appeared to call into question the belief that Senator Barack Obama of Illinois could be a heavy liability for his party’s down-ticket candidates in conservative regions.

Republicans had sought to link Mr. Childers to Mr. Obama in an advertising campaign there. Republican leaders said they were looking to Senator John McCain of Arizona, the likely Republican nominee, as a model whose independent reputation appears to allow him to rise above party in a year when the Republican label seems tarnished.

But Mr. McCain’s advisers said the Mississippi race underlined his intention to distance himself as much as possible from Congressional Republicans. Mr. McCain has already been openly critical of some of President Bush’s strategies.

The level of distress was evident in remarks by senior party officials throughout the day.

“This was a real wake-up call for us,” Robert M. Duncan, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, said in an interview. “We can’t let the Democrats take our issues. We can’t let them pretend to be conservatives and co-opt the middle and win these elections. We have to get the attention of our incumbents and candidates and make sure they understand this.”

Representative Tom Davis, Republican of Virginia and former leader of his party’s Congressional campaign committee, issued a dire warning that the Republican Party had been severely damaged, in no small part because of its identification with President Bush. Mr. Davis said that, unless Republican candidates changed course, they could lose 20 seats in the House and 6 in the Senate.

“They are canaries in the coal mine, warning of far greater losses in the fall, if steps are not taken to remedy the current climate,” Mr. Davis said in a memorandum. “The political atmosphere facing House Republicans this November is the worst since Watergate and is far more toxic than it was in 2006.”

The result in Mississippi, and what Republicans said was a surge in African-American turnout, suggested that Mr. Obama might have the effect of putting into play Southern seats that were once solidly Republican, rather than dragging down Democratic candidates.

Mr. McCain acknowledged the difficulties he and other Republicans face in this political environment. Asked at a news conference on Wednesday in Columbus, Ohio, if the string of Republican losses suggested a problem with the Republican label and if he was worried it would spill over to him in November, Mr. McCain said, “Sure, all of the above.”

Mr. McCain added that he was confident that he would win, but said, “I have no illusions about this; this campaign will be a very difficult challenge.”

At a tense, private post-mortem Wednesday morning, worried House Republicans demanded that their leadership come up with a plan to stave off potentially devastating losses in November. Republican officials said no leaders or top campaign strategists appeared to be in immediate danger of losing their positions, though in interviews, there was evidence of vast dissatisfaction, frustration and discouragement with the party’s position.

“The Republican brand is down, and it is going to be hard to get it back,” said Representative Devin Nunes, Republican of California.

Representative Peter T. King, Republican of New York, said it appeared that lawmakers might have to fend for themselves. “You are going to have to run on who you are and establish some independence, and that is going to be tougher for some than others,” Mr. King said.

Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma, the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, did not go as far as his predecessor, Mr. Davis, in advising members to step away from Mr. Bush. But Mr. Cole, facing growing restiveness among Republicans about the party leadership, acknowledged the tumult in his party’s ranks and suggested that his committee would look for a change in strategy.

“When you lose three of these in a row you have to get beyond campaign tactics and take a hard look and ask if there is something wrong with your product,” he said.

Advisers to Mr. McCain said they thought the problems Congressional Republicans were having would not translate into significant problems for Mr. McCain. But they said it steeled their resolve to run a campaign that distinguished Mr. McCain from both Mr. Bush and a Congress where he has served, in the House and the Senate, since January 1983. They said Mr. McCain would seek — sometimes explicitly, sometimes not — to distance himself by speaking critically of what he has described as excessive spending in Washington, as well on issues like the environment.

“There’s no question that the results in these special elections portend ominously for House Republicans, but they will have little impact on the presidential election campaign,” said Steve Schmidt, a senior adviser to Mr. McCain.
The special election results left Democrats and Republicans in rare agreement about one thing: President Bush looms as a drag on Republicans. Democratic leaders said a combination of anxiety among voters about the state of the country and the prospect of an unusually heavy turnout of African-Americans meant that many new Senate and House seats could be in play, including those in states like North Carolina that just two years ago seemed out of reach for Democrats.

Woody Jenkins, a Louisiana Republican who lost in a special House election this month, said in an interview that the high African-American turnout in his district was “probably the decisive factor” in his loss.

The election results also raised questions about what had been a main Republican strategy for the fall, if Mr. Obama wins the nomination: to link Democrats in conservative districts to Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama, campaigning in Sterling Heights, Mich., said the outcome in the Mississippi contest, to fill a “hard-core Republican seat,” proved that the strategy would not work.

“They lost it by eight points, and they did everything they could,” Mr. Obama said. “They ran ads with my face on it, and they said, ‘Oh, you look at this, a former liberal, and his former pastor’s said offensive things. They were trying to do everything in the book to try to scare folks in Mississippi, and it didn’t work.”

But Mr. Duncan, the Republican national chairman, said he thought the strategy would be effective as voters became aware of Mr. Obama’s liberal record in the months ahead.

The latest defeat prompted concern among Republican contributors as Mr. Obama has lapped Mr. McCain in raising money (though the Republican National Committee has outraised the Democratic National Committee).

Scott Reed, a former chief of staff to the Republican National Committee, said the defeat would dampen fund-raising. “Republican leadership needs to really take a good look in the mirror,” Mr. Reed said. “They’re taking the party off the cliff.”

Republican House members said the political terrain was tilted against them, and some expressed despair about the months ahead at the private meeting on Wednesday. One House Republican rated the panic expressed at the meeting as a 7 on a scale of 10.

Another Republican who spoke at the meeting, Representative Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, said, “We need to, No. 1, prove that we are listening to the American people, and, No. 2, show that we have a plan of action to respond to what they are telling us.”

because spare change is all we'll have left after Pelosi, Reid and Obama are done gutting our economy by raising capital gains and income taxes, taxing the oil companies, throwing idiotic subsidies at biofuel producers, investing taxpayer money on wind farms, renegging on NAFTA, providing "free" nationalized healthcare, raising farm subsidies (again), and bailing out their friends in real estate speculation

and we'll be lucky if we aren't facing major terrorist activity here at home, sponsored by Nancy and Obama's friends in Iran and Syria...

who is unwilling to admit that the problems facing our country today, the worst in our lifetime, are directly attributable to the incompetent one and his cronies in the White House. Face it, there will never be another Doofus like W.

because if you think the Dem "leadership"'s plans and policies are going to produce a stronger economy, or greater security from our enemies you are more ignorant of socio-economics and foreign affairs than my dog. Thes clowns are all about obtaining political power but don't have a clue how to manage it in the best interests of the country. I am no fan of W, but Congressional Democrats have done nothing to show me that they are any smarter, and have certainly demonstrated that they put defeating and demonizing Bush and Republicans ahead of what's best for this country.

And what's already been communicated as policy intentions (taxes, energy, climate control, health care, NAFTA, Middle East..)will be a disaster on many fronts if put into action.

Bush has nothing to do with what happens next, except that as Dems chart a different course and really foul things up they will use him as the scapegoat.

"who is unwilling to admit that the problems facing our country today, the worst in our lifetime"

The worst in our lifetime? How old are you?

Obviously missed a few items in history as well. Maybe she will get it before taking the GED again.

WW1, WW2, Revolutionary War, Civil War, Great Depression, Dust Bowl Years, Jimmy Carter Years.....




but thanks, Michelle.....

I would expect a troll wannabe liberal would offer new material. Your troll anti Bush posts are old. Your inability to to post troll reponses for the left wing party lack. I would expect more from a person who believes they are clever and witty with their responses. Please try harder with your posts if you are looking to stir up a post.

"The economy is in the tank, thanks to Doofus and company."

Why don't you tell us something Bush did that contributed to the current economic state?

And why don't you tell us what you think about Obama's plan to stimulate the economy by raising taxes, including the capital gains tax which every President, both Republican and Democrat, for the past 40 years has either lowered or left alone?

unemployment is still low, the market hasn't come close to a crash, housing forclosures are less than .3% (hardly a crisis), inflation is low, productivity is still good, interest rates are low

Food prices and gas prices high, partly because of our own stupid biofuel subsidies

don't be so stupid as to parrot everything you read on DailyKos and MoveOn. It makes you seem especially ignorant of the world as it really is.

do you guys ever wonder why you are losing?

- losing support among Americans
- losing your core base
- losing your majority status in congress
- losing the white house
- losing defections to the left
- losing the respect of the world and our allies

I could go on and on. This administration has, hands down, done more to harm our nation that any other.

According to you, "the economy is in the tank". Please explain how higher taxes, more government regulation, and more restrictive trade policies will fix that. Try to stay on topic.

Not sure what school you went to, if any, but that ain't a good thing Gomer.

No surprise there. If we are in a recession -- and there isn't a consensus view on that -- explain how the Dem's platform (Obama or HRC) of higher taxes, more regulation, and more restrictive trade policies will do anything but exacerbate the situation.

I won't hold my breath waiting for a reply.

Why don't you state what your real FEAR about Senator Obama is? You sound just as stupid as that pipsqueak Sean Hannity who incredulously devote his time to attempting to connect the philosophy of the whacko preacher IRREVERENT Wright with that of Obama, while completely ignoring the REAL issues of a flagging economy; our young soldiers getting killed in an ill-conceived war in Iraq, gas prices skyrocketing, etc. And just remember this, if Bush can be president, then ANYBODY can, as he must go down in history as the biggest DUNCE to have ever had the privilege of leading this great country!

is that he's ridiculously naive and would get taken to the cleaners by both our enemies and allies, is allied with a bunch of crazy leftists who reject our values and principles out of hand and attempt to politicise every aspect of our society, has an almost fascist view of how much control the government should have over citizens, and has no idea how our economy works or what the impact of his promises would be

for starters..

As to what I "fear" about Obama:

1. that higher taxes, more government regulation and unilateral re-negotiation of NAFTA and other trade agreements will make a weak economy much weaker and will make us less competitive globally;

2. that universal health care will be the mother of all entitlement programs, a bureaucratic nightmare;

3. that the significant progress, both militarily and politically, achieved in Irag will be reversed by a premature withdrawal;

4. that he'll appoint liberal, activist judges to the Supreme Court.

There's plenty more, but that's a good start.

So, now that I've answered your question, I expect the courtesy of a reply from you. LOL.

"Why don't you state what your real FEAR about Senator Obama is?"

-Lack of any real experience
-Extreme liberal voting record
-May feel beholden to extreme left organizations that help him get elected
-Taxation issues, not understanding cause and effect relationships with taxation changes which could be detrimental to the economy
-Not a speck of international experience
-Soft on illegal immigration (actually they all are)

but still no response as to how Democratic policies will help our "tank(ing)" economy. Go figure.

I wrote a paper about the Cut and Paste lib in College. CnP lady was the focus and example of brain rot. Brain rot is the very first symptom of not accepting truth and reality. CnP lady also assisted in my final term paper linking liberalism to a mental sickness. I was very surprised to receiv an A from liberal academia. Thanks CnP lady. We will miss you during the summer months while your public schools system cafeteria is closed.