Since Sep. 11, 2001 the Bush administration had all the chances to kill Osama Bid Laden.
by Philippine Reader (
But five years later all we have are thousands of dead American soldiers and not one sign of weapons of mass destruction nor the body of the terrorist responsible for the WTC attack.
And because of the upcoming elections and the rock bottom ratings against Bush, there is now an attempt to divert the issue by blaming the previous Clinton administration for not doing enough?
Bush had five long years and the coalition in which to kill Osama while Clinton had eight short months and no allies, now who has had a lot more chances and accountability for non-performance?
Posted on Sep 26, 2006, 3:18 PM
from IP address 126.96.36.199
Respond to this message
Goto Forum Home
OUT OF TOPIC FOR THIS CYBERFORUM!
DSP, Sep 27, 2006, 11:34 AM
intimata, Sep 27, 2006, 12:39 PM
So what's in topic?
Philippine Reader, Sep 28, 2006, 11:04 AM
Feigning ignorance? You don't have to...
DSP, Oct 1, 2006, 8:24 PM
And what's in the Philippine current news and events?
Philippine Reader, Oct 1, 2006, 10:04 PM
"...you have yet to prove..."
DSP, Oct 6, 2006, 10:33 AM
Copyright © 1999-2013
. All rights reserved.