CyberForum

 


ABOVE POST IS A COPYRIGHT VIOLATION

by What Do You Think (no login)

 

ABOVE POST VIOLATES COPYRIGHT AS PER FAIR USE RULES OF THE COPYRIGHT LAW.

IT VIOLATES SECTION 107-1 AND 107-3

1. SAID CONTENT IS A NEWS ARTICLE AND THE NEWS MEDIA HAS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

2. BY POSTING THE ENTIRE ARTICLE WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER, IT MINIMIZES AND IMPACTS BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL VALUE OF THE NEWS MEDIA BY TAKING AWAY POTENTIAL VISITORS OR READERS FROM THEIR SITE(S)






Posted on Feb 1, 2008, 9:42 AM
from IP address 68.229.136.204


Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. THE ACCUSATION IS BASED ON FALSEHOOD.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:44 AM
    1. YOU CAN'T SUPPORT THAT STATEMENT YOU JUST MADE.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:45 AM
      1. YES I CAN.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:46 AM
        1. 1. THE ENTIRE ARTICLE WAS COPIED. THAT IS A COPYRIGHT VIOLATION PER STATUTE YOU CITED(107). What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:49 AM
          1. NOT SO, BASED ON LIMITATIONS ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:50 AM
            1. YES SO, AS IT LIMITS THE AMOUNT OF THE WORK YOU CAN COPY. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:52 AM
              1. THE PROOF YOU CITED IS NOT THE LAW, IT IS AN APPLICATION OF THE LAW.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:54 AM
                1. GOOD, THEN YOU KNOW IT WAS APPLIED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:55 AM
                  1. NOW YOU KNOW THAT I KNOW, BUT DO YOU REALLY KNOW WHY?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:59 AM
                    1. ARE YOU READY FOR IT TO BE APPLIED AGAIN?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:01 AM
                      1. ARE YOU?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:08 AM
                        1. OBVIOUSLY, YOU CAN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION, AGAIN. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:17 AM
                          1. VERY WELL THEN, DISCUSSION ENDED AS YOUR EFFORTS ARE AN ATTEMPT TO DELETE THIS THREAD.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:20 AM
                          2. JUST AS YOU CAN'T ANSWER MINE. YOU DARE TO ACCUSE BUT CANNOT PRODUCE.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:38 AM
                            1. WE'LL SEE...HEHEHEHE...WE'LL SEE.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:52 AM
                              1. DON'T TAKE TOO LONG, YOU MAY START SEEING THINGS.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 11:43 AM
                                1. I KNOW YOU WILL...IN THE MEANTIME, GO WATER YOUR ORCHIDS. HEHEHEHE.... What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 11:57 AM
                                  1. I LOOK FORWARD TO IT.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 12:04 PM
      2. 1. THE ENTIRE ARTICLE WAS COPIED. TRUE.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:46 AM
        1. WHAT SAYS I CAN'T?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:48 AM
          1. United States District Court for the Central District of California. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:51 AM
            1. THAT JUDGEMENT DOES NOT APPLY HERE. WRONG EVIDENCE.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:53 AM
              1. SITUATION IS SIMILAR. EVIDENCE - THE COPIED ARTICLE, STANDS BY ITSELF.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:55 AM
                1. THAT'S YOUR OWN BIASED OPINION, I DON'T AGREE TO THE SIMILARITY.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:58 AM
                  1. ARE YOU AWARE OF THE NITTYGRITTY OF THAT CASE?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:00 AM
                    1. WHAT DID I ALREADY STATE?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:09 AM
                      1. WITH ALL THE FACTS PROVING YOUR CULPABILITY, NOTHING TO SUPPORT YOUR CASE. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:16 AM
                        1. VERY WELL THEN, DISCUSSION ENDED AS YOUR EFFORTS ARE AN ATTEMPT TO DELETE THIS THREAD.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:20 AM
                        2. WHAT CASE, CITE THE NUMBER, THE COURT AND THE HEARING DATE?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:39 AM
                          1. WHAT'S YOUR HURRY? YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF TIME TO THINK IN THE FUTURE. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:55 AM
                            1. YOU TOOK THE TIME THE LIST EVERYTHING BUT THAT WHICH MATTERS. I WONDER WHY?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 11:46 AM
                              1. THE ANSWER WILL COME TO YOU.... What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 11:58 AM
                                1. IN THE FORM OF WHAT, A DISCUSSION MESSAGE?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 12:05 PM
      3. 2. THE COPIED PIECE WAS A COPYRIGHTED NEWS ARTICLE. TRUE. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:47 AM
        1. THAT'S NOT A VIOLATION.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:48 AM
          1. AFTER ALL YOUR YADAYADA FOR JOURNALISTS, YOU STEAL THE WORK THEY MADE?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:52 AM
            1. 107 DOES NOT EVEN MENTION STEALING, IT'S YOUR UNQUALIFIED ACCUSATION AND NOTHING MORE.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:55 AM
              1. THE EVIDENCE-THE COPIED ARTICLE IS ENOUGH TO PROVE IT WAS STOLEN.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:56 AM
                1. SAYS WHO? CITE THE EXACT WORDS IN 107 THAT SAYS IT WAS "STOLEN". Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:04 AM
                  1. ALL ONE HAS TO DO IS SEE YOUR POST AND FIND THE SOURCE TO SAY IT IS STOLEN.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:06 AM
                    1. THE LAW DOES NOT DEAL WITH YOUR PERSONAL FEELINGS AND EMOTIONS SO STOP CRYING.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:10 AM
                      1. WHO SAID IT DOES?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:15 AM
                        1. VERY WELL THEN, DISCUSSION ENDED AS YOUR EFFORTS ARE AN ATTEMPT TO DELETE THIS THREAD.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:21 AM
                        2. THEN DON'T COME UP WITH A RESPONSE THAT'S IRRELEVANT.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:40 AM
                          1. SO, FOR THE RECORD, NAPANICE THINKS VICTIM'S RIGHTS ARE IRRELEVANT. What Do You Think, Feb 1, 2008, 11:56 AM
                            1. ARE YOU A VICTIM? YOU'RE THE ONE MAKING THE ACCUSATIONS HERE.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 12:00 PM

Find more forums on PhillipinoCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG