CyberForum

 

THAT JUDGEMENT DOES NOT APPLY HERE. WRONG EVIDENCE.

by Napanice (no login)

Posted on Feb 1, 2008, 9:53 AM
from IP address 68.164.171.137

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

1. SITUATION IS SIMILAR. EVIDENCE - THE COPIED ARTICLE, STANDS BY ITSELF.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:55 AM
1. THAT'S YOUR OWN BIASED OPINION, I DON'T AGREE TO THE SIMILARITY.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:58 AM
1. ARE YOU AWARE OF THE NITTYGRITTY OF THAT CASE?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:00 AM
1. WHAT DID I ALREADY STATE?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:09 AM
1. WITH ALL THE FACTS PROVING YOUR CULPABILITY, NOTHING TO SUPPORT YOUR CASE. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:16 AM
1. VERY WELL THEN, DISCUSSION ENDED AS YOUR EFFORTS ARE AN ATTEMPT TO DELETE THIS THREAD.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:20 AM
2. WHAT CASE, CITE THE NUMBER, THE COURT AND THE HEARING DATE?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:39 AM
1. WHAT'S YOUR HURRY? YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF TIME TO THINK IN THE FUTURE. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 10:55 AM
1. YOU TOOK THE TIME THE LIST EVERYTHING BUT THAT WHICH MATTERS. I WONDER WHY?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 11:46 AM
1. THE ANSWER WILL COME TO YOU.... What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 11:58 AM
1. IN THE FORM OF WHAT, A DISCUSSION MESSAGE?. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 12:05 PM

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG