CyberForum

 


MORE ACCUSATIONS THAT NEED PROOF.

by Napanice (no login)





Posted on Feb 1, 2008, 2:28 PM
from IP address 68.164.171.137


Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. THE PROOF IS THE EVIDENCE ITSELF. THAT THE ARTICLES WERE WHOLLY COPIED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 2:32 PM
    1. THERE'S THE FATAL FALLACY IN ALL YOUR ARGUMENTS. YOU'RE A GUARANTEED LOSER.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 2:41 PM
      1. RED ANGEL WAS RIGHT. YOU ALWAYS LIKE TO IMPOSE YOUR CHARACTER ON OTHER POSTERS.. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 3:00 PM
        1. THAT WOULD BE A TOTAL WASTE OF TIME. ANOTHER PERSONAL ATTACK INSTEAD OF A CIVIL RESPONSE.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 6:36 PM
          1. OH AND CALLING SOMEONE A LOSER WAS NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 8:08 PM
            1. WHEN I CAN SEE YOU LOSING YOUR CASE, THAT MAKES YOU A LOSER.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 9:01 PM
              1. SO ARE YOU USING YOUR CRACKED CRYSTAL BALL AGAIN?. What Do You Think?, Feb 1, 2008, 9:52 PM
                1. FILED OR NOT, THE BASELESS ACCUSATIONS TELL ME WHERE YOUR CASE IS GOING.. Napanice, Feb 1, 2008, 10:11 PM

Find more forums on PhillipinoCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG