CyberForum

 


PGMA was outsted by mob rule?

by Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second (no login)

I think you meant "De Venecia Ousted by Gloria Style Mob Rule." Which, of course, is false.

ESL Alert! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAWR! TOEFL Alert!



Posted on Feb 4, 2008, 11:52 AM
from IP address 141.152.26.147


Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. OK, I STAND CORRECTED ON THAT ONE.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 12:26 PM
  2. DE VENECIA OUSTED BY GLORIA STYLE MOB RULE.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 12:39 PM
    1. MAJORITY VOTE = MOB RULE?. What Do You Think, Feb 4, 2008, 12:52 PM
      1. CROSSED WIRES AGAIN, WHO WAS OUSTED?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 1:57 PM
        1. "174 lawmakers voted for ...,35 were against and 16 abstained." MAJORITY VOTE.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 2:00 PM
          1. OH THAT'S RIGHT, THE NUMBERS CHANGED AND THE MOB VOTED. ALL LEGAL OF COURSE.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 2:05 PM
            1. PER NAPANICE,THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FILIPINO PEOPLE ARE A MOB.. Anonymous, Feb 4, 2008, 2:08 PM
              1. Get used to this. If things don't go Dykeweassie's way, it's always out of whack.. Dirty Sick Pig, Feb 4, 2008, 3:13 PM
                1. THANKS. I WAS WARNED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 3:27 PM
                2. THEY COULDN'T EVEN STATE ONE LEGITIMATE CASE AGAINST JDV,. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 3:55 PM
                  1. Who says they need a case? Tanga!. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 1:02 PM
                    1. WHY, WHAT DO YOU KNOW?. napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 1:13 PM
                      1. Congressional proceedings both legislative and administrative. Why do you ask?. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:51 PM
                        1. WHAT'S THE BASIS FOR SUCH PROCEEDINGS?. Napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 6:27 PM
              2. OH YEAH, THEY ALL WON IN THE ELECTIONS, "FAIR AND SQUARE".. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 3:49 PM
                1. AND YOU CAN PROVE OTHERWISE?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 3:56 PM
                  1. HELLO GARCI, HELLO GARCI!! NEED MORE PROOF?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 4:00 PM
                    1. YOU CAN PROVE THAT THEY ALL DID THAT?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 4:01 PM
                      1. YOU GONNA PLAY YOUR PROOF GAME AGAIN? WHERE'S THAT ROLLING BALL?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 4:04 PM
                        1. MY PROOF GAME? IT WAS YOURS REMEMBER? YOU SOUND SO WORRIED ABOUT THAT ROLLING BALL!. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 7:11 PM
                        2. SO IT REALLY TURNS OUT THAT YOU ARE THE ONE WHO'S GOOD AT ACCUSATIONS WITHOUT PROOF!. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:22 PM
                          1. AND WHAT DID I SAY THAT NEEDS PROOF, QUOTE ME.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 8:45 PM
                            1. YOU SEEM TO HAVE TOTALLY LOST YOUR MEMEORY. CAN YOU REALLY READ YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS?. Anonymous, Feb 4, 2008, 8:47 PM
                              1. IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR STUPID REPLY AND GAMES WERE EXPECTED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:48 PM
                                1. WHAT'S "THAT"? CAN YOU PROVE ALL "THAT"? MORE UNCIVILITY?. napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 9:16 AM
                                  1. YES IT WAS CIVIL AND ENTERTAINING UNTIL YOU CAME IN.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 9:17 AM
                    2. SO YOUR PROOF MAKES THEM GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:54 PM
                      1. You can settle for "preponderance of evidence" and it will still be the same.. Dog S. Pig, Feb 4, 2008, 9:48 PM
                        1. THAT DID NOT EVEN REACH THE LEVEL OF "CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE". What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 11:02 PM
                          1. Ahem! Preponderance of evidence is the least stringent.. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:53 PM
                            1. I KNOW. BUT HE JUST CONSIDERS THEM GUILTY WITH JUST THAT.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 3:59 PM

 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG