CyberForum

 

"174 lawmakers voted for ...,35 were against and 16 abstained." MAJORITY VOTE.

by What Do You Think? (no login)

.

Posted on Feb 4, 2008, 2:00 PM
from IP address 68.229.136.204

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

1. OH THAT'S RIGHT, THE NUMBERS CHANGED AND THE MOB VOTED. ALL LEGAL OF COURSE.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 2:05 PM
1. PER NAPANICE,THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FILIPINO PEOPLE ARE A MOB.. Anonymous, Feb 4, 2008, 2:08 PM
1. Get used to this. If things don't go Dykeweassie's way, it's always out of whack.. Dirty Sick Pig, Feb 4, 2008, 3:13 PM
1. THANKS. I WAS WARNED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 3:27 PM
2. THEY COULDN'T EVEN STATE ONE LEGITIMATE CASE AGAINST JDV,. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 3:55 PM
1. Who says they need a case? Tanga!. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 1:02 PM
1. WHY, WHAT DO YOU KNOW?. napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 1:13 PM
1. Congressional proceedings both legislative and administrative. Why do you ask?. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:51 PM
1. WHAT'S THE BASIS FOR SUCH PROCEEDINGS?. Napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 6:27 PM
2. OH YEAH, THEY ALL WON IN THE ELECTIONS, "FAIR AND SQUARE".. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 3:49 PM
1. AND YOU CAN PROVE OTHERWISE?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 3:56 PM
1. HELLO GARCI, HELLO GARCI!! NEED MORE PROOF?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 4:00 PM
1. YOU CAN PROVE THAT THEY ALL DID THAT?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 4:01 PM
1. YOU GONNA PLAY YOUR PROOF GAME AGAIN? WHERE'S THAT ROLLING BALL?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 4:04 PM
1. MY PROOF GAME? IT WAS YOURS REMEMBER? YOU SOUND SO WORRIED ABOUT THAT ROLLING BALL!. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 7:11 PM
2. SO IT REALLY TURNS OUT THAT YOU ARE THE ONE WHO'S GOOD AT ACCUSATIONS WITHOUT PROOF!. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:22 PM
1. AND WHAT DID I SAY THAT NEEDS PROOF, QUOTE ME.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 8:45 PM
1. YOU SEEM TO HAVE TOTALLY LOST YOUR MEMEORY. CAN YOU REALLY READ YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS?. Anonymous, Feb 4, 2008, 8:47 PM
1. IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR STUPID REPLY AND GAMES WERE EXPECTED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:48 PM
1. WHAT'S "THAT"? CAN YOU PROVE ALL "THAT"? MORE UNCIVILITY?. napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 9:16 AM
1. YES IT WAS CIVIL AND ENTERTAINING UNTIL YOU CAME IN.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 9:17 AM
2. SO YOUR PROOF MAKES THEM GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:54 PM
1. You can settle for "preponderance of evidence" and it will still be the same.. Dog S. Pig, Feb 4, 2008, 9:48 PM
1. THAT DID NOT EVEN REACH THE LEVEL OF "CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE". What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 11:02 PM
1. Ahem! Preponderance of evidence is the least stringent.. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:53 PM
1. I KNOW. BUT HE JUST CONSIDERS THEM GUILTY WITH JUST THAT.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 3:59 PM

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG