CyberForum

 


PER NAPANICE,THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FILIPINO PEOPLE ARE A MOB.

by Anonymous (no login)

.



Posted on Feb 4, 2008, 2:08 PM
from IP address 68.229.136.204


Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. Get used to this. If things don't go Dykeweassie's way, it's always out of whack.. Dirty Sick Pig, Feb 4, 2008, 3:13 PM
    1. THANKS. I WAS WARNED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 3:27 PM
    2. THEY COULDN'T EVEN STATE ONE LEGITIMATE CASE AGAINST JDV,. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 3:55 PM
      1. Who says they need a case? Tanga!. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 1:02 PM
        1. WHY, WHAT DO YOU KNOW?. napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 1:13 PM
          1. Congressional proceedings both legislative and administrative. Why do you ask?. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:51 PM
            1. WHAT'S THE BASIS FOR SUCH PROCEEDINGS?. Napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 6:27 PM
  2. OH YEAH, THEY ALL WON IN THE ELECTIONS, "FAIR AND SQUARE".. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 3:49 PM
    1. AND YOU CAN PROVE OTHERWISE?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 3:56 PM
      1. HELLO GARCI, HELLO GARCI!! NEED MORE PROOF?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 4:00 PM
        1. YOU CAN PROVE THAT THEY ALL DID THAT?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 4:01 PM
          1. YOU GONNA PLAY YOUR PROOF GAME AGAIN? WHERE'S THAT ROLLING BALL?. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 4:04 PM
            1. MY PROOF GAME? IT WAS YOURS REMEMBER? YOU SOUND SO WORRIED ABOUT THAT ROLLING BALL!. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 7:11 PM
            2. SO IT REALLY TURNS OUT THAT YOU ARE THE ONE WHO'S GOOD AT ACCUSATIONS WITHOUT PROOF!. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:22 PM
              1. AND WHAT DID I SAY THAT NEEDS PROOF, QUOTE ME.. Napanice, Feb 4, 2008, 8:45 PM
                1. YOU SEEM TO HAVE TOTALLY LOST YOUR MEMEORY. CAN YOU REALLY READ YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS?. Anonymous, Feb 4, 2008, 8:47 PM
                  1. IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR STUPID REPLY AND GAMES WERE EXPECTED.. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:48 PM
                    1. WHAT'S "THAT"? CAN YOU PROVE ALL "THAT"? MORE UNCIVILITY?. napanice, Feb 5, 2008, 9:16 AM
                      1. YES IT WAS CIVIL AND ENTERTAINING UNTIL YOU CAME IN.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 9:17 AM
        2. SO YOUR PROOF MAKES THEM GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT?. What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 8:54 PM
          1. You can settle for "preponderance of evidence" and it will still be the same.. Dog S. Pig, Feb 4, 2008, 9:48 PM
            1. THAT DID NOT EVEN REACH THE LEVEL OF "CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE". What Do You Think?, Feb 4, 2008, 11:02 PM
              1. Ahem! Preponderance of evidence is the least stringent.. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:53 PM
                1. I KNOW. BUT HE JUST CONSIDERS THEM GUILTY WITH JUST THAT.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 3:59 PM

Find more forums on PhillipinoCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG