CyberForum

 


THAT DID NOT EVEN REACH THE LEVEL OF "CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE"

by What Do You Think? (no login)

 

UNLIKE THE EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM THAT WILL BE PRESENTED. THESE WILL BE BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.

UPDATE, COLLATED MATERIALS. THEY HAVE NOW GATHERED AT LEAST 3 YEARS WORTH OF COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS AND COUNTING.

A COUPLE OF THE "SEXYRETARIES" NOTICED THAT THERE IS EVEN ENOUGH THERE TO PUT HIM IN TROUBLE WITH U.S. DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY WITH REGARDS TO THE WAR ON TERROR.

NOW THAT IS ANOTHER AVENUE THAT JUST OPENED UP! THEY WERE ASKING IF THEY SHOULD START INCLUDING THOSE EVIDENCE AS WELL.

HEHEHEHEHE...THE CLOT THICKENS!

ATTENTION NSA! YEAH! GO FOR IT GUYS. THE NAME IS NAPANICE...




Posted on Feb 4, 2008, 11:02 PM
from IP address 68.229.136.204


Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. Ahem! Preponderance of evidence is the least stringent.. Virgie Pig Valenzuela The Second, Feb 5, 2008, 3:53 PM
    1. I KNOW. BUT HE JUST CONSIDERS THEM GUILTY WITH JUST THAT.. What Do You Think?, Feb 5, 2008, 3:59 PM

Find more forums on PhillipinoCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG