CyberForum
--
I KNOW. BUT HE JUST CONSIDERS THEM GUILTY WITH JUST THAT.
by What Do You Think? (
no login
)
.PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE - > CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE - > BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT .
LIKE YOU SAID FOR HIM IT STOPS AT PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE. IT DOESN'T EVEN REACH CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AND HE ALREADY JUDGES THEM GUILTY.
I WONDER HOW HE'D REACT TO BEING CONSIDERED GUILTY JUST AT PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM?
Posted on Feb 5, 2008, 3:59 PM
from IP address 68.229.136.204
Respond to this message
Goto Forum Home
Copyright © 1999-2008
Network54
. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
WWW.NEWSFLASH.ORG
