Actually, it won't prove that.March 15 2004 at 10:15 PM
|Anonymous (no login)|
Response to Re: Even if they turn out to be wrong in the intrepretation...
A DOG can be made without the actual signature of the deceased.
In fact, since there exist no "DOG refusal signature" one could quite easily (and accurately) stipulate that Bobby-Jo's claims that Ted geniunely didn't want to be cryoperserved are entirely false, as if that was his wish, his fervent desire, he could have obtained a lawyer and written such refusal. Case closed.
The primary reason the DOG isn't being realised, is most likely because it would validate that Ted is even there and Alcor wishes to keep that information private (even though we all know he's there, Alcor hasn't actually come out and said it, as far as I know at least).