Creator & director : email rick_potvin@yahoo.com Cryonics-for-Connectomes or Connectome-Cryonics are equivalent terms for CryoConnectomics or cryoconnectomics. It's now the only cryonics that matters and it has not yet been proven viable-- but it's urgent to do so. It can also potentially falsify the entire cryonics thesis. It is to be distinguished from plastination, uploading and A.I. which is NOT cryonics and is of no interest to cryonicists qua cryonicists. Many cryonicists are also uploaders or transhumanists but cryonics itself is not interested in uploading by definition but rather reversible suspended animation which does require proof of survival of connectomes through vitrification.
 

 Return to Main forum page.  

Actually, it won't prove that.

March 15 2004 at 10:15 PM
Anonymous  (no login)


Response to Re: Even if they turn out to be wrong in the intrepretation...

 

A DOG can be made without the actual signature of the deceased.

In fact, since there exist no "DOG refusal signature" one could quite easily (and accurately) stipulate that Bobby-Jo's claims that Ted geniunely didn't want to be cryoperserved are entirely false, as if that was his wish, his fervent desire, he could have obtained a lawyer and written such refusal. Case closed.

The primary reason the DOG isn't being realised, is most likely because it would validate that Ted is even there and Alcor wishes to keep that information private (even though we all know he's there, Alcor hasn't actually come out and said it, as far as I know at least).

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

[Cryonics Observer][CryoTalk][Chronopause]