Does anyone else out there get annoyed at the high profiled “persons” that think the public are intellectually challenged? I’ve been utterly & completely fascinated with Marilyn since the age of 12 & over a period of 14 years collected every article, book, “biography”, album, article I could find of her – even from friends abroad. Always looking for something to do in my spare time, again & again I would find myself hauling everything out of the cupboard & re-reading all articles. When I was 18 I sat down with all the articles I had & began making a list of the dates mentioned. Example: photographs published in the albums or biographies would be entered as “2 March ’62 – M arrived late at Fox Studios. Left in tears at 17:00pm” or “18 June ’60 – M attended a dinner party given at XYZ’s house”. Note these dates are just an example. From every date I came across, even if just the month was mentioned as she signed an autograph for a fan in NYC, was noted. At the end of my project, I was amazed at the string of dates I had from 1943 up until the time of her death. I continued to do this shortly before I moved to a different city at the age of 26 (I am now 35) where “never before seen footage (example) found of Marilyn taken on this date in this town” would be slotted in. You end up with your own “personalized diary” belonging to Marilyn & can even swap dates with other fans. In so doing, it’s those that keep her alive that will eventually get justice for her. Now when it comes to people “trying to pull the wool over one’s eyes”, I say get a life. By my early twenties I already felt I knew how she had died & who was responsible – simply by reading statements made by numerous people & noting them, even when their stories changed. Does Thomas Noguchi realize he altered his statement three times & when the whole “no needle marks were found on the deceased’s body” came up, I wondered to myself, but surely the blood tests she went for two days prior to her death would have left a telltale marking? Small things like the bruising on her upper arm & lower back – could she have been “held down?” Needle marks are not evident in the armpit, between the toes & anus. The bruising on her lower back I initially thought could’ve also been as a result of pressure applied while being held down & injected in the anus but then thought of the damage done to the colon if a lethal overdose of drugs was administered by enema. The adrenalin shot administered through her breastbone, did this needle mark also not show? Just wondering. I read the articles & findings by Tass and Speriglio who also reported on her death & compared them to other articles & reports. It makes quite a story. Articles in my possession had Peter Lawford assisting Ralph Greenson with an unconscious Marilyn when the paramedics arrived, today, Lawford in the house at the time is never mentioned. A small article grabbed my attention in the 90’s, but while at first glance one wouldn’t think twice about reading it, the name jumped out at me. Peter Lawford, days before his death wanting to be held & comforted as he sobbed “That poor woman! That poor, poor woman! It was unfair what happened to her?” Wonder who he was talking about? To all her fans, take out your memorabilia, the answers are staring you in the face. Authorities involved in the cover up can only talk bull & believe ones self for so long, thereafter, you start forgetting what you said & so a simple word, simple phrase, said in a slightly different way makes all the difference. Does anyone know WHY Eunice Murray took an “extended vacation?” Is she back? Did she find a new employer when she returned? Just curious.
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.