No score for this post January 12 2008, 2:02 PM
http://pitchickexpose.we.bs/
http://ru.youtube.com/watch?v=F2ppj1sEhsM
.
Debra Stockman posted on her own site the emails she had with John Goodwin. We will review these emails for each of you to see the connections between her and John Goodwin. Remember the question before. How many dogmen do you know that act the way Pitchick does? How many dogmen do you know that exchange emails with John Goodwin? How many do you know would reply to an email sent by him? How many do you know would tell personal information about another dogman to John Goodwin? All the dogmen we interviewed and participated in this report said they knew of NO ONE. Yet Pitchick admits to and even shows some of the emails she and John Goodwin had exchanged. These emails date back a few years. This is very important to establish as it shows the start of her relationship with John Goodwin. Notice in the one email how she tells about personal information on Phil and even sends a picture of him to JOHN GOODWIN, the Director of Animal Fighting for the Human Society of the United States. The man who was on the raid at Floyd Boudreaux's yard! Did she use the email exchange to challenge him on why all of Boudreaux's dogs were killed? No, she said nothing about this except to probe on what information he needed. Put this together: the video, the emails and information given up on Phil to John Goodwin, and what do you think. Would any dogman do this? HELL NO. Not one that we know about. Now add this fact. Pitchick even signs her real name in the email to John Goodwin. She hides it from all the dogman on her site but yet tells John Goodwin???????? She admits to John Goodwin that she had been at a dog fight. Now does this sound like any dogman you would know? No it sounds like someone trying to establish an opening to work together. She establishes a knowledge base (been to dog fights and knows information on a guy John Goodwin wants). We feel these emails were the start of Pitchick relationship with him. One can only guess what other emails she sent him. Another key fact! Pitchick likes to hide her name and occupation. Yet she is always willing to post anyone else's personal information and pictures. Yet she sends a picture of Phil to John Goodwin and signs the email with her real name. For someone who hates having her real name, and picture shown; Why in the HELL would she sign it as Debra Lee Stockman and why would she send a picture of a guy John Goodwin wants to bust to HIM. Read for your self on the next page the emails Pitchick has posted on her site. She posted them. I guess she didn�t think any dogmen were smart enough to put this all together. One other noticeable change is her tone. Usually she writes in a buck wild, profanity filled way. Here she is calm and cool. If you are a rant and rave type then John Goodwin is one to rant with unless you take the "n" out of rant. That leaves you with RAT. Here are her emails Before you think 'oh another one defending the dog fighters', you should know I have been vegetarian for more than 20 years and was vegan for about six. I see no reason whatsoever to kill an animal to eat it, so I don't. I am against factory farming and think most of the meat industry is actually cruel and disgusting, often dismembering animals that are still alive. Yet that goes on thousands, if not tens of thousand of times a DAY in this country, but I guess that is more, um, palatable, with almost no one up in arms about that, since it is so pervasive and generally accepted as just the way things are. Having actually witnessed a dog fight once upon a time I do not feel that way at all about the sporting of dogs. I enjoy watching boxing, karate, tough guys contests, as well as many other sports (I was one of the ten people that watched most of the Olympics this year). I think this could also be a valid sport. If not illegal the dogs could be even better cared for and less would die, as then losers would not necessarily need to be killed, they could be placed in pet homes sometimes. As long as it is illegal no one is going to place a dog that could come back to bite them, so to speak, as evidence of illegal activity. As long as dog fighting is illegal it fosters just the sort of scummy, underground, drug dealer, ghetto types I mentioned above. Ok, so as long as I had your ear I thought I would give you some of my thoughts. I had thought about posting something similar to this a while ago on your myspace group but figured you'd just delete it. I will probably crosspost this somewhere though I haven't decided where yet. I thought about not replying at all since I have concerns that this will put me on your 'hit list', but honest, patriotic Americans should not be afraid to speak their own truth. If the APBT could talk, I think they would tell you much of the same that I have.
Anyway, back to Phil. He is a red neck, a woman hater and a puppy peddler. He's no dog fighter though. As far as I know, he's never pitted two dogs even once. I guess he does these hog catching things from what I've seen him and others say, but I couldn't tell you that for sure even if I wanted to since I've never been involved in any of it. I have seen him post many times about catches and I think I saw some catch pictures a long time ago on his site, but isn't that legal in Arkansas?
I hope you'll really think about some of the stuff I've said today and if you have any questions you think I could answer for you that would help your understanding of the people that love these dogs and why they also want to sport them, I'd be happy to try and answer them for you.
Sincerely,
(yes, I signed my real name here)
aka pitchickSubject: RE: Eppinette
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:02:54 -0500
From: "John Goodwin" < JGoodwin@hsus.org >
To: "pitchick" < pitchicksboards@yahoo.com
Female Born 09/12/1967
lNot Married: very odd for someone of this age, this causes her to have a need to establish a �family� outside the norm of a husband and children. A cause becomes the spouse and friends become the children.
lVegetarian: We know of no other dogman that is a vegetarian. This fits the profile of an Animal Extremist.
lIs against farming of animals for food, the slaughter of food animals. Clear attitude of an animal extremist.
lObtained dogs from shelters: Is there any other dog man that takes in rescue dogs and at the same time admits to going to dog fights in the same city?
lHer network of informants and data is massive: She has unique computer skills. She has demonstrated to many how she uses them to get information and makes cases against anyone. Cross her or one of friends (remember friends to her are like her children) and she will use these skills against anyone. More on this later.
lRecords all phone calls: Has admitted to many that she tapes all calls, keeps them organized and will use them if �Crossed� Do you know of any dogman that records their phone calls?
lLoves her own dogs (has them up on her website) but does not show real game dogs on her site. Go back to the conflicts of undercover section. This point may seem small but is really big. Like the undercover agent in the Hells Angels that could not pay respect to the fallen angels, Pitchick can not pay respect to the great gamedogs on her site. Instead it shows respect to her dogs. She talks them up and showcases them and her self. No dogman we know does this? Dogmen always pay respect to the great dogs of the past.
In Summary Pitchick does not look or act like any dogman we have ever seen? She fits the profile of an animal right extremist. We now will dig deeper into her actions and work to see what we find. As we go into this investigation, we will point out certain key facts for each of you to remember. Always compare the methods to the behavior of anyone you suspect. Undercover Agents in the Gamedog World 1. Web. We initially thought postings by dogmen were how the Human Society gathered their intelligence. While this is true, they also use websites with special software to gather intelligence on your real name, email, IP number, your job, kennel and any posts made. While this information is collected individually, they summarize the information to link it back to a person. We will show how her site allows tracking back to your home or JOB. She is sophisticated and has the tools to make this happen. 2. Informants. They are paid $5000 to provide information that leads to the arrest and conviction of anyone for animal fighting. 3. With out the above two methods the ability of the AE�s to make a case against a dogman is very slim. It is important to review our findings with specific facts that show how the informants and their websites are used to make arrests. In Summary Pitchick has the ability on the web to provide HSUS with the information they need. She also is the person referred to in the taped video as "having made a killing" turning in dog fighters. While it is difficult to imagine how much a "killing" would be we think she has received over $25,000 from HSUS in the last year. You owe it to yourself to read the entire Summary and see all the facts
Link to Post - Back to Top Logged
Score 1 2 3 4 5 (5=Excellent)
Current Topic - PURE CROSS Respond to this message
<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >> Return to Index
Create your own forum at Network54
Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement