Respond to this messageReturn to Index
Original Message
  • the SG FET number is quite low -- switch to vitrific during 2009 (child ment)
    • Julie (no login)
      Posted Aug 17, 2011 12:04 PM

      so it should help 2010. I know that I did a fresh cycle at SG in Jan 2010 - BFN but I had a BFP in March of 2010 with an FET. My RE (Chang) said that they were seeing a marked increase in success on FET with vitrification so I am wondering if the 2009 are still skewed from before that. The day I had my first u/s after the FET, I was the 3rd positive pregnancy he had seen just that day. Of course there are 364 other days in the year but I thought that was interesting. I know I had two 6-day blasts that were frozen and put back and I had a singleton in November. I would see if they can give an update on the numbers for 2010 and thus far in 2011 if I were thinking about using them.
    Login Status
  • You are not logged in
    • Login
      Password
       

      Optional
      Provides additional benefits such as notifications, signatures, and user authentication.


      Create Account
    Your Name
    Message Title
    Message Text
    Image Services Photobucket.com
    Options
    Enable formatted text (what's this?)
          


    Find more forums on FertilityCreate your own forum at Network54
     Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement