**********

Gunny G:

Poly-Ticks
Many years ago, politics was something that was not first and foremost on the average citizen's mind. At that time I considered myself apolitical. As politics permeated more and more of our daily lives, things changed.
Now, things have gone far beyond politics as we knew it, and "politics" is much an outdated word, I think. Have you noticed how, more and more, words like coup d'etat, conspiracy, deception, fraud, etc. are associated with what used to be politics and government?

*****

"When we assumed the soldier we did not lay aside the citizen," from then-Gen. George Washington's June 26, 1775, letter to the Provincial Congress is inscribed inside the apse.
Ref
http://www.arlingtoncemetery.org/visitor_information/amphitheater.html
Note: The above quote was a favorite of Col David (Perfumed Princes) Hackworth USA (Ret.) (now deceased)

*****
"There ain't no ticks like poly-ticks. Bloodsuckers all."
-Davy Crockett (unsourced)
Ref
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett

**********

**********
Gunny G: Speaking of Coups...

Conspiracy In Philadelphia, 1787 By: Dr. Gary North
Origins of The U. S. Constitution By: Dr. Gary North
***THE CONSTITUTION THAT NEVER WAS***
Connect The DOTS! ~Dr Ed Rivera
THE HIDDEN 14TH AMENDMENT AGENDA ~ By Michael LeMieux
We Did Not Keep The Republic! We Blew it...
America�s Coup D��tat in the Making: Deception and Self-Deception by Claes G. Ryn
Electoral College Designed To Preclude Political Parties
The Founding Fathers Great Mistake By: Garrett Epps
Why an Income Tax is Not Necessary to Fund the U.S. Government
THE BATTLE OF ATHENS, 1946
What is it that Barack Obama knows that the rest of us don�t? By: Judi McLeod
(^Is November 4, 2008 more a coup d�etat than it is a general election?
Is Election �08 a mere formality?^)

A Coup d'Tat? By: Joan Swirsky
Beware of The Red Dot! By: Alan Stang
AMERICA REDUCED TO THIRD WORLD STATUS By Joan Veon
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: ONE GIANT FRAUD By: Devvy
Climategate: Barack Obama’s rule by EPA decree is a coup d’etat against Congress...
ANY DOUBTS? THIS SHOULD CHANGE YOUR MIND!
**********
ATTENTION:
THIS SITE POSITIVELY TABOO
TO GUBMINT FINKS!

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts


HEY!
NO STINKIN' SPIES ALLOWED HERE!

Sign by Danasoft - Get Your Free Sign







Gunny G: WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?



**********
SHARE THIS/LINK TO THIS PAGE/ADD, ETC.
CLICK BELOW!
**********
Share
**********



 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Ron Paul: "A Supposed Lesser of Two Evils"

September 10 2008 at 12:24 PM
No score for this post

  (Login Dick Gaines)
Forum Owner
from IP address 67.232.196.18

Paul Statement to the National Press Club(Endorse 3rd Party Nader, McKinney, & Baldwin- Barr noshow)
Ron Paul's Campaign for Libtardy ^

Posted on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:47:54 AM by mnehrling
Edited on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:05:48 AM by Admin Moderator. [history]

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

Carroll Quigley Author of Tragedy & Hope

The coverage of the presidential election is designed to be a grand distraction. This is not new, but this year, it's more so than ever.

Pretending that a true difference exists between the two major candidates is a charade of great proportion. Many who help to perpetuate this myth are frequently unaware of what they are doing and believe that significant differences actually do exist. Indeed, on small points there is the appearance of a difference. The real issues, however, are buried in a barrage of miscellaneous nonsense and endless pontifications by robotic pundits hired to perpetuate the myth of a campaign of substance.

The truth is that our two-party system offers no real choice. The real goal of the campaign is to distract people from considering the real issues.

Influential forces, the media, the government, the privileged corporations and moneyed interests see to it that both party's candidates are acceptable, regardless of the outcome, since they will still be in charge. It's been that way for a long time. George Wallace was not the first to recognize that there's "not a dime's worth of difference" between the two parties. There is, though, a difference between the two major candidates and the candidates on third-party tickets and those running as independents.

The two parties and their candidates have no real disagreements on foreign policy, monetary policy, privacy issues, or the welfare state. They both are willing to abuse the Rule of Law and ignore constitutional restraint on Executive Powers. Neither major party champions free markets and private-property ownership.

Those candidates who represent actual change or disagreement with the status quo are held in check by the two major parties in power, making it very difficult to compete in the pretend democratic process. This is done by making it difficult for third-party candidates to get on the ballots, enter into the debates, raise money, avoid being marginalized, or get fair or actual coverage. A rare celebrity or a wealthy individual can, to a degree, overcome these difficulties.

The system we have today allows a President to be elected by as little as 32% of the American people, with half of those merely voting for the "lesser of two evils". Therefore, as little as 16% actually vote for a president. No wonder when things go wrong, anger explodes. A recent poll shows that 60% of the American people are not happy with the two major candidates this year.

This system is driven by the conviction that only a major party candidate can win. Voters become convinced that any other vote is a "wasted" vote. It's time for that conclusion to be challenged and to recognize that the only way not to waste one's vote is to reject the two establishment candidates and join the majority, once called silent, and allow the voices of the people to be heard.

We cannot expect withdrawal of troops from Iraq or the Middle East with either of the two major candidates. Expect continued involvement in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Georgia. Neither hints of a non-interventionist foreign policy. Do not expect to hear the rejection of the policy of supporting the American world empire. There will be no emphasis in protecting privacy and civil liberties and the constant surveillance of the American people. Do not expect any serious attempt to curtail the rapidly expanding national debt. And certainly, there will be no hint of addressing the Federal Reserve System and its cozy relationship with big banks and international corporations and the politicians.

There is only one way that these issues can get the attention they deserve: the silent majority must become the vocal majority.

This message can be sent to our leaders by not participating in the Great Distractionthe quadrennial campaign and election of an American President without a choice. Just think of how much of an edge a Vice President has in this process, and he or she is picked by a single personthe party's nominee. This was never intended by the Constitution.

Since a principled non-voter sends a message, we must count them and recognize the message they are sending as well. The non-voters need to hold their own "election" by starting a "League of Non-voters" and explain their principled reasons for opting out of this charade of the presidential elective process. They just might get a bigger membership than anyone would guess.

Write-in votes should not be discouraged, but the electoral officials must be held accountable and make sure the votes are counted. But one must not be nave and believe that under today's circumstances one has a chance of accomplishing much by a write-in campaign.

The strongest message can be sent by rejecting the two-party system, which in reality is a one-party system with no possible chance for the changes to occur which are necessary to solve our economic and foreign policy problems. This can be accomplished by voting for one of the non-establishment principled candidatesBaldwin, Barr, McKinney, Nader, and possibly others. (listed alphabetically)

Yes, these individuals do have strong philosophic disagreements on various issues, but they all stand for challenging the status quothose special interest who control our federal government. And because of this, on the big issues of war, civil liberties, deficits, and the Federal Reserve they have much in common. People will waste their vote in voting for the lesser of two evils. That can't be stopped overnight, but for us to have an impact we must maximize the total votes of those rejecting the two major candidates.

For me, though, my advicefor what it's worthis to vote! Reject the two candidates who demand perpetuation of the status quo and pick one of the alternatives that you have the greatest affinity to, based on the other issues.

A huge vote for those running on principle will be a lot more valuable by sending a message that we've had enough and want real change than wasting one's vote on a supposed lesser of two evils.
Ref
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2079017/posts
See Comments, etc.
--

**********
R. W. "Dick" Gaines
THE "G" BLOG. @WordPress.com
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/
(AKA: Gunny G's Globe and Anchor Online....)
**********
THE "G" BLOG @N54
http://www.network54.com/Forum/578302/
**********
The Gunny G FURL Archive
http://www.furl.net/member/gunnyg
**********
FOR MY "G" BLOGS UPDATES...
SEND: "ADD-ME"
GunnyG@gmail.com
RANTS-n-RAVES: OUR LATE GREAT REPUBLIC!
*********
GyG's BEER HOMEBREW Site/Forum
http://www.network54.com/Forum/605099/
**********
The Original and ONLY Gunny G!
RESTORE THE REPUBLIC!
TAKE AMERICA BACK!
**********

**********
News-n-Views, Military, History, Politics,
Controversial, Unusual, Non-PC
Eye-opening, Thought-provoking,
Articles Just Not Seen....Elsewhere
**********
NO LESSER OF EVILS--
JUST THE GENUINE ARTICLE!

**********

 

Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Ron Paul: "A Supposed Lesser of Two Evils"
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on Constitutional IssuesCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  



**********
SHARE THIS/LINK TO THIS PAGE/ADD, ETC.
CLICK BELOW!
**********
Share
**********


GyG COMPANION "G" BLOG: The "G" BLOG @WordPress.com!!!

PLEASE CHECK HERE FOR ADDITIONAL ARTICLES!

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/




GREAT SITE!
GREAT ARTICLES!

http://www.strike-the-root.com/


Click Button Above, Please
*****

MUST READ!
FOR THE THINKING MAN!


Please Click Button Above
*****

COPS OUT OF CONTROL!
PLEASE CLICK IMAGE ABOVE
*****


eXTReMe Tracker