Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California
Ann Coulter
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals.
Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad complexions. It's liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know that from watching "The West Wing" and all movies starring Julia Roberts.)
But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy with the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie Prejean.
This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering their famous "flight or flight" response. So liberal masturbators are, once again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc.
First, the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that Prejean had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan's handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news.
Next, a photographer released a single cheesecake photo of Prejean. This prompted liberal reporters who have never met a Christian to proclaim that Christians were outraged by the photo. Liberals believe abortion is a sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are mortal sins. (And if wearing women's underwear is a basis for being disqualified from the pageant, that's the end of Perez Hilton's judging career.)
Then on Monday some genuine "semi-nude" photos were released. These were not what we'd call appropriate for a Christian. In a curiously similar attack, the left's final attempt to destroy Paula Jones was to lure her into appearing naked in Penthouse magazine. Oh well.
Christians aren't people who believe they are without sin; they're people who know they're sinners and are awestruck by God's grace in sending his only Son to take the punishment they deserve.
This is in contradistinction to liberals, all of whom believe they're on a fast track to heaven on the basis of being "basically good" people -- and also believe that anyone who disagrees with that theological view is evil.
Finally (so far, anyway), reporters gleefully released the divorce records of Prejean's parents. Because when you want the truth, what is more reliable than angry accusations traded in the middle of an acrimonious divorce?
Liberals used the divorce papers to argue that Prejean had some deep-seated psychological disturbance causing her to oppose gay marriage. Symptoms of this debilitating illness include a belief in some sort of "god" and a reverence for the Bible.
It's not as if Prejean's special talent in the Miss USA contest was to perform an opposite-sex marriage. (Or, as the president and I call it, "marriage.") She didn't even volunteer her "controversial" views on marriage. Rather, she was asked for her opinion on gay marriage and gave it -- in an answer wrapped in so many layers of sugar it took 10 minutes to get to the point.
"Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that's how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman."
What a vicious hate-monger! Any second there I was expecting her to bust out a "by golly!" or an "oh my gosh!" Angry gay-marriage supporters should be happy they didn't get my version of that answer. It contains some terms you won't find in your Bible.
Liberals wouldn't attack James Dobson with the amount of bile they've directed at a 21-year-old beauty contestant. It's not just Christianity -- it's women liberals hate.
From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated women -- mostly their mistresses -- like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill Clinton in our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share Muslims' opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a women's right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances.
You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal American male.
I'm not sure we needed a psychological profile of Prejean to figure out why she holds the same position on gay marriage as: the president, the vice president, the secretary of state, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards and his mistress, and the vast majority of the American people.
But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political views of Karl Marx.
From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of TV anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal masters. It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and severely restricts the vision.
The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male's bidding, as the bubble-head anchorettes do, or stand on the rock of Christianity.
Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.
ha liberals hate it when she's right ....and she is here
May 14 2009, 8:37 AM
From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated women -- mostly their mistresses -- like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill Clinton in our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share Muslims' opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a women's right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances.
You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal American male.
But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political views of Karl Marx.
From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of TV anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal masters. It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and severely restricts the vision.
It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear
Re: Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California
May 14 2009, 11:13 AM
I read the article, thinking it was accurate, and well-written, and *then* I looked to see who wrote it. I should have known. *chortle* Coulter is the recipient of a few Liberal fatwahs herself, she knows of what she writes.
Liberal "feminism" is no different than Liberal "diversity", or Liberal "patriotism", etc. etc. The very *first* non-negotiable requirement is *Liberal*, regardless of the issue. Fail to meet this litmus test, and whatever issue at hand goes right out the window. And it's not a matter of agreeing to disagree. Har! Nooo! Coulter's described "fatwah" of utter personal and professional destruction is ordered up post haste, and the loyal butt-persons in positions of public influence jump eagerly into action. And as we have seen so often, there is *no* bottom! Because the issues of "taste", "decency", "fairness", "accuracy", "morality", and a few others, go right out the window behind the others.
Re: Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California
May 17 2009, 12:23 AM
Nobody is suggesting that Carrie Prejean should be killed, or should be silenced. Which your use of the word "fatwa" implies.
Give the Left a little time! They aren't the brightest porch lights on the block, after all. They have done both, with both Coulter, and Limbaugh, so please, no implying here that it is somehow beneath them. There *is* no beneath them!
Re: Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California
May 17 2009, 2:13 AM
Give the Left a little time! They aren't the brightest porch lights on the block, after all. They have done both, with both Coulter, and Limbaugh, so please, no implying here that it is somehow beneath them. There *is* no beneath them!
********************************
I am a member of the "Left", and I have never suggested such shit... ergo, your mindless characterization fails.
Re: Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California
May 17 2009, 10:38 AM
Give the Left a little time! They aren't the brightest porch lights on the block, after all. They have done both, with both Coulter, and Limbaugh, so please, no implying here that it is somehow beneath them. There *is* no beneath them!
********************************
I am a member of the "Left", and I have never suggested such shit... ergo, your mindless characterization fails.
Are you bragging or complaining? Did I say anything about *all* the Left? Yet your comment on the fatwah implies *none* of the Left, which is simply untrue. So I guess that makes my mindless characterization more accurate than your mindless characterization. I'm shocked...
gus.
Current Topic - Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California
