going at each other again.

McCain pretty much is done as a national candidate so she isn't a threat I would think.

going at each other again.

McCain pretty much is done as a national candidate so she isn't a threat I would think.

Because as I have said before, McCain is a Democrat and Palin is a conservative. they do not belobng in the same party. S

So why did she agree to run on the same ticket with him?

Because she brought the true conservatives to the polls. If shge had not run with McCain, Obama would have won by a landslide because MOST conser5vatives would have stayed home.

McCai9n is a Democrat.

So she was trying to help a Democrat win?

McCain was running as a Republican. But he thinks so much like a Democrat that conservatives would not vote for him unless he had a true conservative on the ticket. Palin was that true conservative.

You can r5tell that by the tripe that th4e MSM published about her.

LOL. Pots is always good for a laugh..

***********************************

I've learned that the people you care most about in life are taken from you too soon and
all the less important ones just never go away.
And the real pains in the ass are permanent.

LOL. Pots is always good for a laugh..

OMG....  What is the problem with you?  Do you have nothing better to do than to attack him? 

~~life isn't about how to survive the storm but how to dance in the rain~~

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends.
Japanese Proverb

Susan

What is wrong with YOU?

You just attacked a poster for attacking a poster.

I guess it is ok when you do it?

So do any other posters agree that McCain is a Democrat and doesn't belong in the Republican party?

"...So do any other posters agree that McCain is a Democrat and doesn't belong in the Republican party...?

No, there are a few major points where he differs from other Republicans but, by and large, he is in the right party and, by and large, the party stands for many of his ideas about government.

 

*****
You learn to know a pilot in a storm.
-Seneca

Gee Susan, I didn't think you had a monopoly on attacks. Besides laughing at someone isn't attacking them. But attacking me was, so you are the attacker, not me. And Pots is a big boy, he can answer for himself.

Sandee saw that too.

***********************************

I've learned that the people you care most about in life are taken from you too soon and
all the less important ones just never go away.
And the real pains in the ass are permanent.

Gee Susan, I didn't think you had a monopoly on attacks. Besides laughing at someone isn't attacking them. But attacking me was, so you are the attacker, not me. And Pots is a big boy, he can answer for himself.

You.re absolutely right, Maw. You illustrate the profile of a real liberal according to ?Ann Coulter. You can't debate the issue so you attack the person. You fit the mold.


And since Ann coulter has done such a good job of describing you, you sttack her as a person not to be believed. Gee, Maw, if you were really intelligent, we would know it by now.

And since Ann coulter has done such a good job of describing you, you sttack her as a person not to be believed. Gee, Maw, if you were really intelligent, we would know it by now.

Ann Coulter? You have the audacity to questions someone elses intelligence while quoting Coulter?

You REALLY are good for a laugh Pots.

***********************************

I've learned that the people you care most about in life are taken from you too soon and
all the less important ones just never go away.
And the real pains in the ass are permanent.

Ann Coulter? You have the audacity to questions someone elses intelligence while quoting Coulter?

You REALLY are good for a laugh Pots.

She is intelligent enough to peg you exactly right. Therefore, she must be smarter than you are. You do not offer any proof that is is not ineelligent. You simply indicate it. You present no proof.

But she presents proof about you. She declares that when you argue with a liberal, and the liberal starts losing, the liberal just calls names./ You avoid the subject--Just as Ann says. Ann may be dumb, but you prove yourself to be dumber.

Just as Ann says. Ann may be dumb, but you prove yourself to be dumber.

I consider myself smarter, since I don't listen to dumb Coulter. You said yourself she may be dumb...We both removed all doubt with that agreement. LOL

***********************************

I've learned that the people you care most about in life are taken from you too soon and
all the less important ones just never go away.
And the real pains in the ass are permanent.

I consider myself smarter, since I don't listen to dumb Coulter. You said yourself she may be dumb...We both removed all doubt with that agreement. LOL

Yes, I did say she MAY be dumb, but we were talking abourt a specific issue. Liberals avoid the subject and call names. She is righ on that one even if she is dumb.

Now the point is that the Dumbest person on earth can be right about some things and the smartest person on earth can be wrong about some things. so the issue is all that matters.

Now the point is that the Dumbest person on earth can be right about some things and the smartest person on earth can be wrong about some things. so the issue is all that matters.

***************************************

Well, on this issue at least, you are right.

Jim..