One has to wonder. When they condemn a Democratic President for not doing enough to combat H1N1, and then fail to realize that they voted against a bill to create more resources to combat it. WTF? ...
They are shrill and without societal value.
Jim...
Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) says President Obama has endangered American lives by not doing more to alleviate the nation's short supply of H1N1 vaccine. [...]
"The current administration is solely responsible. They can't blame this on any prior administration," said Wilson. "This is the responsibility of the current administration. They've put the lives of Americans at risk."
Last week, some Democrats predicted that H1N1 could become a line of new line attack of attack on Obama from Republicans. In a release issued on Thursday, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee claimed that any criticism of H1N1 policy by the GOP would amount to hypocrisy.
The DCCC pointed to a June vote on a supplementary appropriations bill as evidence. Wilson joined 95% of Republicans and voted against the bill, which contained special funding to combat H1N1 both domestically and internationally.
I haven't read that particular bill...and I would bet my left leg YOU haven't either. I would bet my OTHER leg the democrats played politics with the bill (thus putting us all at risk) and added a bunch of BS to the bill so they could whine about it later. I guarantee that is what happened, because that is how Pelosi's Pack-o-dogs run.....talk about having no shame....pffft.
~~life isn't about how to survive the storm but how to dance in the rain~~
This message has been edited by susanklmr on Nov 2, 2009 9:39 PM
I haven't read that particular bill...and I would bet my left leg YOU haven't either. I would bet my OTHER leg the democrats played politics with the bill (thus putting us all at risk) and added a bunch of BS to the bill so they could whine about it later. I guarantee that is what happened, because that is how Pelosi's Pack-o-dogs run.....talk about having no shame....pffft.
******************
Speaking up for the Shrill and without Societal Value contingent.
LOL... The World According to Jim. If he says it, it is so...
***************************
Not a whole lot different than the "World According to Gus".
The difference is, I've thought about it; you just are an emotional reactionary to shit you don't like.
LOL! We have so much proof that you have "thought about it"! Har! Yeah buddy, we'll just take your word on that, because you *are* who you *are*! Don't bother sharing, or God forbid, writing any of it down.
LOL! We have so much proof that you have "thought about it"! Har! Yeah buddy, we'll just take your word on that, because you *are* who you *are*! Don't bother sharing, or God forbid, writing any of it down.
************************
Over the past 15 years, I have written it down. It is not my fault that you do not pay attention.
LOL! We have so much proof that you have "thought about it"! Har! Yeah buddy, we'll just take your word on that, because you *are* who you *are*! Don't bother sharing, or God forbid, writing any of it down.
************************
Over the past 15 years, I have written it down. It is not my fault that you do not pay attention.
Bullshit. Reference a single post of yours on this board that contains at least a single 3 inch paragraph of your own thoughts in the last two years!
haven't read that particular bill...and I would bet my left leg YOU haven't either. I would bet my OTHER leg the democrats played politics with the bill (thus putting us all at risk) and added a bunch of BS to the bill so they could whine about it later. I guarantee that is what happened, because that is how Pelosi's Pack-o-dogs run.....talk about having no shame....pffft.
You haven't read the bill but can guarantee what happened in it.
You really think that "inches of pages" is the way to measure good thoughts?
It's rather difficult on a written forum to find out in any other fashion, dont you think? A single line is, after all, a measureable fraction of an inch. One thing is certain, *zero* inches doesn't prove much.
I abhor lengthy rants, they are a waste of time and effort. Brevity has always been my strongest asset. I got high grades for thesis papers that I have had to write that were many pages less than what my instructors expected because in my brevity I conveyed all the necessary components and thoughtfulness. Just because you can write a 3" paragraph doesn't mean that you should.
I(f one has not read the bill, he/she cannot sway that it is either good or bad.
Therefore, Jim's supposition is that it must be good because there would be more resources to create the vaccine. Should we conclude that the assumption is that the Republicans are evil because they voted against the bill. Of course because Jim and you liberals trust the administration without a doubt. Hey, what does that say about liberalism? Blind faith is a religious belief.
Well apply the evidence if you will.
=================================
Glenn Beck hates 9/11 survivors. Shocking as Glenn Beck claimed that he hates 9/11 survivors. The Fox news personality and media clown has always been an outrageous demagogue, a pied piper to the illiterate, unwashed masses that make up the Fox news audience. Michael Stone,Examiner.com
This message has been edited by Poetse12 on Nov 3, 2009 11:29 AM
I abhor lengthy rants, they are a waste of time and effort. Brevity has always been my strongest asset. I got high grades for thesis papers that I have had to write that were many pages less than what my instructors expected because in my brevity I conveyed all the necessary components and thoughtfulness. Just because you can write a 3" paragraph doesn't mean that you should.
The maximum length of a post of anyone's thoughts should be no more than it takes for them to express them. But then the act of posting one's thoughts *does* require some minimum of "printed" word. As usual, Jim is skewing the meaning of my post. I never equated quality with quantity, which he assumed like a dog with a new bone. My point was the above, that it *requires* some *minimum* of words strung together to covey one's thoughts, and he hasn't met even that minimum in a number of years now. Unless, of course, that sarcastic insults and questions he answers himself are the sum total of his thoughts.
