Of course, QB has some inconsistencies, but dwelling on them at this point is not really necessary.
I would make the stuff to work using the rules of the help index. Although some may not be very clear, I don't understand going to extremes to test them at this point.
As long as they work using common sense coding practices, why worry about someone who is a lamebrain to begin with? Once again, no applause is necessary!
Return to Index
|Response Title||Author and Date|
|Because BASIC is BASIC ;-).||on Jan 8|
|I meant in the context of expected coding practices||on Jan 9|
|Yeah there's a fine line between...||Anonymous on Jan 9|
|That was me above...||on Jan 9|
|that's what they said at fb.net||mennonite on Jan 8|
|The way I see it||Iain on Jan 16|
|Some QB "quirks" are a very important part of QBASIC||on Jan 8|
|* Looks good||qbguy on Jan 8|