i do want to add this to what i said

by mennonite (no login)


i like the idea of _roundnum() a lot, and it's being offered to you as a favor, but i don't think you need to include it.

if int() works as you say it will (qb compatible) i will be happy. i mention _roundnum() because you're trying to figure out an improved statement. i'm trying to help you do it. the statements you add should be for now at least, up to you i think. _roundnum() is your option, and if you "mess it up" i can call it something else if i want it in another basic language, no worries.

Posted on Jan 9, 2008, 4:13 PM

Respond to this message   

Return to Index

 Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement