and they say that fb'ers aren't elitistby mennonite (no login)
another very constructive commentary from the never-happy lachie.
isn't this what chaos calls "crapping all over an act of benevolence?" not that i'm against criticism of qb64, i just find the double standards amusing. i'm sure galleon does too. anyway, i'm happy with qb64, but that means i'm "insane." what else is new? do i have to say i realize lachie doesn't speak for all fb'ers?
only that i've heard all this before about people that use qb.
why should qb64 be any different?
Return to Index
|Response Title||Author and Date|
|Re: and they say that fb'ers aren't elitist||Lachie Dazdarian on Jan 27|
|Seriously Lachie||roy on Jan 27|
|Re: Seriously Lachie||Lachie Dazdarian on Jan 27|
|Name me five people here that hate FB.||roy on Jan 27|
|Re: Name me five people here that hate FB.||Lachie Dazdarian on Jan 27|
|*I now know where you stand . Period.||roy on Jan 27|
|As a semi-neutral outside observer||Iain on Feb 21|
|I completely agree...||Pete on Feb 21|
|* Pete, Pete, Pete, Pete, and Pete||Pete on Jan 27|
|Thinking outside the compiler for a second...maybe a minute....||on Jan 27|
|thanks for demonstrating the other reason i hate deleted threads||mennonite on Jan 27|
|I never knew I was an extreme programmer!!||Author of Recent U.A. Game (Lachie knows) on Jan 28|
|Oh sorry, you need an IDE to go with that?||on Jan 28|
|...||OLPC on Jan 28|
|*it uses () now?||mennonite on Jan 28|
|Optionally. of course...||OLPC on Jan 28|
|*oh, cool. nice to know.||mennonite on Jan 28|
|Re: Oh sorry, you need an IDE to go with that?||notthecheatr on Jan 29|
|* AFLAC! You quack me up||Daffy Duck on Jan 28|
|This I agree with||notthecheatr on Jan 29|