Don't forget to throw in my YouTube embeded video player while you're at it.

Yeah, I agree #3 would be a dream but a future one. For the present, 1 or 2 would be nice. I don't think there is any negative pressure against adding a few intelligent, useful, and easy to implement features to QB-LXIV as long as it maintains 100% QB compatibility, doesn't require any ridiculous compiler switches, and doesn't add too much delay to achieving that accomplishment. I do know sometimes it is easier to implement an idea at the right time rather than try to add it in later.

Pete