Re: Well you could say in the license something about maintaining QBASIC compatibility

by (Login MCalkins)
R

>I think that would mean that it would not allow QB64 code to be mixed with GPLed code, though.

right.

as far as releasing the source code, source forge is a website designed for managing open source projects. it has version tracking and things like that.

when the source gets released, I imagine someone will probably use some of the code to make a DOS QBASIC compiler.

regards,
michael



    
This message has been edited by MCalkins from IP address 12.183.134.16 on May 22, 2008 1:48 PM

Posted on May 22, 2008, 1:47 PM
from IP address 12.183.134.16

Respond to this message   

Return to Index


Response TitleAuthor and Date
You don't need no freaking Liscense! on May 23
 Lawsuits are strickly follow the money but open source makes it volnuerable to abuse. on May 23
  Making it open source has the exact advantage that you stated - contributions by othersrpgfan3233 on May 23
   Look at what happened to FB on May 23
  i address that (common) myth in something i posted recentlymennonite on May 23
   What trademark? There is no trademark... on May 23
    at least offer a serious reply so i know what one looks likemennonite on May 23
     My view on IP and open sourceroy on May 24
    Cost of filing a trademarkqbguy on May 24
 * Ah, but you forget - FB borrows things from QB _AND_ VB, and it is open source! ;-)rpgfan3233 on May 23
  RPG is one of my favorite people to discuss topics with... on May 23
   * Hmm... You raise some good points that I can't possibly argue against. Great reasoning!rpgfan3233 on May 23
   you're wrong about who can help galleonmennonite on May 24