Slow down there big boy. What happened to Qbasic here?by (Login burger2227)I don't care for a lot of the NEW BS being proposed, when the premise was to create a version compatable with Qbasic to begin with! Some time LATER would be best. Perhaps binary, but Octal is rarely needed already without one byte values. QB never had them so we got into string values. Keep it simple for now........you have to eat your dinner to get dessert. Ted PS: For those few argumentative people here, I know that QB already has Octal so what is the big deal? Keep going in this direction and we won't have to do any function coding.
from IP address 71.60.226.47 |
| Response Title | Author and Date |
| qbasic already has octal | mennonite on Jun 25 |
| i'm glad you're trying to keep the "fun" in function coding | mennonite on Jun 25 |
| Philosophy..............right up your alley Mr. ASCII | on Jun 25 |
| okay... | mennonite on Jun 25 |
| Those features came with the C programming | on Jun 25 |
| i try to be super human in replying... actually i don't | mennonite on Jun 25 |
| *It's a bird. It's a plane! Naw it's just Mennonite......... | on Jun 25 |
| oh i like that | mennonite on Jun 25 |