| Response Title | Author and Date |
| ROFL @ Try it out with FB... |
on Jul 11 |
| QB64 does a linear scan on variable names | qbguy on Jul 11 |
| * Also, you still didn't say what this program does! | qbguy on Jul 11 |
| Here is what my program does... and doesn't do... |
on Jul 11 |
| Tiny C compiler | qbguy on Jul 11 |
| * I agree 100%! We need those error lines or some kind of clue. |
on Jul 11 |
| Well, maybe Galleon will consider that as a request... |
on Jul 11 |
| Galleon needs some help. There are a lot of distractions! |
on Jul 11 |
| I'd made my first graphics program, grass growing... |
on Jul 11 |
| Why would a finished QB64 compiler would make BASIC popular again? | Anonymous on Jul 12 |
| * Well, I'm not gonna tell ya either dummy but FB is a joke! |
on Jul 12 |
| RE: Why would a finished QB64 compiler make BASIC popular again? |
on Jul 13 |
| Well, at least it is 16-bit in QBASIC "mode" | qbguy on Jul 13 |
| Re: RE: Why would a finished QB64 compiler make BASIC popular again? |
on Jul 13 |
| NO compile should take over a FEW minutes! Let alone an hour! |
on Jul 11 |
| Several large software packages require hour long compile times | qbguy on Jul 11 |
| On my computer, compiling the Linux kernel takes 8 minutes and 31.875 seconds | qbguy on Jul 11 |
| What's your longest QB64 compile time? |
on Jul 11 |
| No QB64 compile should ever take that long! An error is occurring... |
on Jul 13 |
| Results not good... |
on Jul 14 |
| I know how you feel. I was once married too. |
on Jul 14 |
| Well, I'm throwing in the towel on this try... |
on Jul 14 |
| See the glass as you will Pete, it makes no difference. |
on Jul 14 |
| Well people, then what can be done to get some enthusiasm back into this project again? |
on Jul 14 |
| I've said it before : Galleon cannot possibly do this project ALONE! |
on Jul 14 |
| * But on Linux, "yes we have no bananas" is a working command | Dean Menezes on Jul 15 |
| Fixed | Anon on Jul 20 |
| * Infinite GOTO loop. Hit Ctrl - Break! Delete program from life! |
on Jul 20 |