Personally, I don't think it'd be worth it.

by (Login PhyloGenesis)
R

It sounds kinda like (though perhaps a better way of doing it) the idea of a command line switch to support QBasic code. (No offense meant.)

PhyloGenesis

Posted on Aug 15, 2009, 7:50 PM

Respond to this message   

Return to Index


Response TitleAuthor and Date
WHAT? It sounds like a switch to use the NEW QB64 functions to me! on Aug 15
 *The differences are the same as the differences between FB and QB. on Aug 15
  * It is not the same as FB! You NEED a switch to even USE QB code in FB! on Aug 16
The metacommand would allow hybrid programming... on Aug 16
 * Why not set the environmental variable QB64_VERSIONAnon on Aug 16
  * Because that would only be skipped at runtime, not at compile timeymous on Aug 16
  * The main point is that the QB IDE will ignore the 'QB64 code as a comment! on Aug 17