Genius...by Captain Picard (no login)1) It allows users to still use the QB IDE.
2) It helps determine if the problem is in QB code or QB64 code and will be a huge debugger time saver on new additions to QB64. 3) It makes it easier to locate all QB64 code. 4) I cannot think of 3 bad reasons to cancel out the above. Make it so #1 ![[linked image]](http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/draft_lens2209648module19537082photo_1236458539captain_picard.jpg)
Pete > I'm not actually a starship captain, I just play one in my Barcalounger.
|
| Response Title | Author and Date |
| Applying that patch now Captain... | on Aug 24 |
| *I understand it, I just don't like the idea of comment coding. | on Aug 26 |
| * Then don't use INCLUDE or DYNAMIC either! | on Aug 27 |
| There's a big difference | on Aug 28 |
| It's only a way to use one program file instead of 2 really | on Aug 28 |
| * Then use an existing macro system such as m4 | Anon on Aug 28 |
| Re: There's a big difference | Cyperium on Oct 4 |