|
95 WaxersNovember 22 2009 at 2:40 PM | Anonymous |
| Stick a fork in them, they are done |
|
| Author | Reply |
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 22 2009, 4:53 PM |
what a ridiculous comment. They are a hard working team that has beaten YSE and Barrie. They will be just fine. What, is Clarington the new beast of the east? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 22 2009, 5:27 PM |
Coming out of Clarington with a tie?
Cant compete with those teams,be lucky to win the toilet bowl |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 22 2009, 10:59 PM |
on the outside lookin in right now.Clarington could be the TSN turning point |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2009, 12:48 PM |
we'll see what happens tonight against COW...I say BIG WIN !! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2009, 4:05 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2009, 10:58 PM |
Why arent you bragging ?what happened? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 8:37 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 9:31 AM |
aaaaa...tie game ? COW coach got tossed near end of game. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 12:15 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 2:17 PM |
How 'bout them COWS. Poor Markham. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 3:58 PM |
it was a 2-2 tie, not 4-2 win for COW
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 4:21 PM |
Only 3 wins in there last ten. Uh Oh! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2009, 7:04 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 26 2009, 9:55 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 27 2009, 9:00 AM |
Go Ajax !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 28 2009, 12:53 PM |
ajax has improved alot this year |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 28 2009, 8:47 PM |
yep - Ajax rules !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 29 2009, 11:07 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 29 2009, 11:42 AM |
What was the score in the Markham game? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 29 2009, 9:19 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 3:05 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 3:13 PM |
YS
Barrie
AP
SC
Markham
Kingston |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 4:15 PM |
Kingston is in the east. North Central is bringing up the rear. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 10:10 PM |
Waxers beat SCC. SCC sloppy Waxers strong. Good win boys |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 10:20 PM |
Wow
Markham won a game! Start the parade! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 10:39 PM |
That's right, lets start the parade and ride it all the way to the OMHA's!! They deserved the win and it just shows that if they work hard they will come out winners. Score should have been 10-0 the way Waxers played the only thing that stopped them was the SCC goalie. Waxer boys worked hard and played smart and proved that even a strong goalie is not going to stop them |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2009, 10:40 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 6:07 AM |
3-1 empty netter. Come on folks you can not really think that because Markham wins against an team of equal talent that this shows their strength? Both teams have 1 or 2 players that carry the team and both teams have decent tenders. One game, one close one at that, means very little. SCC did look sloppy but if you watched the game Markham was not strong, 2 of their players were and the rest just rode their coat tails. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 7:13 AM |
10:39 10-0 ???? SCC hardly got out of their end how about 20-0 ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 7:28 AM |
Who cares! Why all this talk about 2 teams that are not going anywhere-again. They both will be next years 'Clarington'. Waxers is losing their star, SCC is losing their star and one of the goalies all to YSE. SAC will welcome three new students. That's right folks, YSE will be da bomb! You read it here first and we all know that what is written here is the truth |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 7:55 AM |
10:39 and 7:13 You are both a few cards short of a deck if you think that Waxers could score 10 or more goals in a game. I am a Waxer parent but not a AAA, I have seen them play a few times and they are nothing special
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 8:44 AM |
7:28 AM - let them go the the promised land - wondering which goalie YSE will take - both perhaps ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 10:37 AM |
November 30 2009, 3:05 PM - funny how you guys always look at things negatively. I just looked and saw Markham was 3 losses in their last 10. Two to YSE and one to Quinte. Two of those were 1-goal games. Yeah, that's pretty bad. They must make you nervous. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 10:38 AM |
10:39 >>> Puuuulleeease. Markham played decent, but couldn't score 10 goals on an open net. First goal on the SCC goalie was weak, after that he played decent, nothing that difficult. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 12:35 PM |
funny how its awfull quiet on here and then they finally win one and the chirpin starts.
Enjoy the toilet bowl again this year. lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 1:27 PM |
One win and they think they are going to the OMHA? Folks are not really that clouded in their judgements are they?
Look at the scores and standings it shows that any team can win on any given day with of course the exception of North Central. Markham and SCC have beaten YSE, Markham won to Barrie, SCC beat A/P and Kingston. SCC was slaughtered by Clarington and Quinte. Quinte slaughtered Pete's but Pete's tied YSE, etc etc. There is still half a season left which means it is way to early to say who will be top and who will be toilet bowl. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 1:33 PM |
Please! Please! Pay attention to this team. With the best coach in the OMHA, a top forward in the league and probably the most talented goalie around they will only show there true colours as time progresses. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 1:50 PM |
"With the best coach in the OMHA, a top forward in the league and probably the most talented goalie"
I hope you are referring to SCC and not Markham |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 2:17 PM |
What 1:50pm said!! And I am not even an SCC parent/coach/player/grandparent/aunt/uncle or cousin 5x removed |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 4:22 PM |
someones just having fun,theres no way that could be serious about either team |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 4:28 PM |
Post is hard to follow, if he is talking about Gage yes he is a top player |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 4:39 PM |
gage? you mean the kid who tries to skate end to end with no thought of ever setting it up or making a pass? that never works anymore. someone should tell him. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 4:49 PM |
don't see him that much (from the East) but he was slick the game I watched. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 4:51 PM |
Very obvious 1:33 is just trying to stir the pot. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 7:27 PM |
No names please no names ... |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 9:24 PM |
All this yappin from a team that has 3 wins in there last 11 games.
But ,hey,they must be good they beat Barrie! lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2009, 10:07 PM |
The shots were fairly even in the game between Waxers and SCC - a bounce here and a bounce there could have been a different outcome. Who cares though, really? Just relax and enjoy the development of the teams (and all). Both SCC and Waxers teams have showed upside. Waxers getting the nod for consistency & discipline, with some seperation between YSE (#1) and Barrie (#2) as far as skill level. Non parent coaches in Barrie make them dangerous in the regular season as they roll #14, #17, #10 every second shift. Come playoffs, anything can happen when intensity and physical play throughout 15 skaters matters. Barrie will be a one line team to have any success which will be easier to shut focus on and shut down. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 8:42 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 8:50 AM |
I think you mean 14, 17 an 2, not 10 and they are doing that due to injuries, once 9 comes back they will have two really strong lines putting 9 with either of the three above, so Barrie will not be so easy to shutdown like you think... |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 8:57 AM |
Shots were even? You must have been watching another game. SCC could barely make a pass to their own teammate let alone take a shot on net, SCC hardly got out of their own end.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 9:54 AM |
For safety SCC decided that shooting can be dangerous to their opponents and passing in traffic is bad too. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 11:06 AM |
How's the air quality in Barrie and surrounding area? Appears that your brains are being starved for oxygen. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 11:31 AM |
Air quality is good. Barometric pressure is good. Humidex is good as well. Thanks for asking. Do you have any other insightful comments besides that gem? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 12:38 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 1:03 PM |
When the Troll from Barrie comes out, it means six more weeks of winter, which in turn means six more weeks of listening to the big mouth parents and kids. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 1:38 PM |
listening right into April at the OMHA's as per usual |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 2:06 PM |
memories of last's year OMHA finals ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 2:11 PM |
yea the one where Barrie beat YSE |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 3:27 PM |
I think Bruce sings a song about Glory Days. Last year, last year, last year. What have ya done this year? Lots of excuses, how about that big Chicago tourney, will we be reading about that on here next year? Shut your lips and play hockey!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 3:54 PM |
You keep bringing it up.
3 wins in 11
Just shut up and try to win some games will ya! lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2009, 4:45 PM |
spoken like a true Markham parent
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 2:28 PM |
So who wants to predicate the outcome of Markham vs. Barrie on Sunday and Markham vs. SCC on Monday? I'll go first:
Barrie will win 6-1. 0-0 after 1st, Markham will score 1st goal of game in 2nd, answered immediately by Barrie who will then finish the second period with 2 and hammer in 4 more in the third.
SCC and Markham will tie 3-3. Markham will think they have won-and be dumbfounded that they may add another 2 points thus causing them to slack off-with seconds remaining and SCC will remember that it is OK, in fact a requirement in hockey, that they take more then 5 shots on the net thus tying the game. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 2:42 PM |
Actually last game against Markham SCC had more then 5 shots, most of the shots were missed attempts to ice the puck. So markham and barrie can worry about their series and forget SCC. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 2:42 PM |
The outcome of the SCC game will all depend on whether 77 ever passes the puck and who they put have in net
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 2:48 PM |
Outcome of any SCC game will be dependant on the entire team remembering that there is no 'I' in TEAM. But hey, what do I know? That could happen, as I look at the scores and see that they have beaten YSE not once but twice, beaten AP and Kingston-I guess anything is possible.
As for what tender SCC uses, it won't make a difference if the team forgets to help out. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 2:55 PM |
2:42 PM according to my spies SCC tenders are both very and equally good. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 3:01 PM |
well good luck with them then |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 3:03 PM |
Thx !!!!! and good luck to you too !!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 3:04 PM |
'Both tenders are very and equally good'? Pay closer attention pal, one is definately better then the other. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 3:11 PM |
r u with this team by any chance to know this for sure ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 3:27 PM |
Nope, i have seen this team a few times in tournaments and in 2-3 league games. Besides if what we read here is true and YSE is aquiring on of them then there must be one better then the other.
You will most likely see the stronger one playing in Barrie tonight. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 3:30 PM |
Don't bet on YSE "know how to pick a goalie"  too bad they cannot develop from within - and yes they are looking for more then a goalie from SCC (this is a great compliment) - how loyal to their own players. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 4:05 PM |
YSE takes one of those goalies and they will be in worse shape than they are now! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 4:10 PM |
Neither SCC goalie is going to YSE. The former Waxer goalie will be going back to Markham. Brother Andre coach, who will be next years 95 AAA coach, was seen talking with the parents after the high school game earlier this week. Former Red Wings goalie will stay with SCC as a starter |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 4:39 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 5:43 PM |
You are correct it is always better to have two outstanding goalies - we will see. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 6:00 PM |
I guess SCC will be on the hunt for a decent goalie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 6:19 PM |
What ridiculous dribble - all this noise around SCC on a Waxers thread that is totally unfounded. Get some sleep you bunch of idiots (probably one or two dolts posting repeatedly). Karma might find a puck leaving the rink and wiring your jaw shut................now go to bed right now. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 6:35 PM |
All this noise around SCC on a Waxers thread is as meaningless as the Waxer thread itself. It sounds like it is a couple of scorned parents, most likely former GTHL members becasue the ETA members are good clean people that would never put down teams of young developing athletes  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 3 2009, 8:29 PM |
Please! It is full of meaning! Where else can you get cheap entertainment from?
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 4 2009, 11:37 AM |
6:19pm......It can not be that meaningless to you since you are following it  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 4 2009, 6:44 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 6 2009, 10:04 PM |
What was the score vs Barrie? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 6 2009, 10:10 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 7 2009, 12:07 AM |
Only Markham would be celebrating a tie. Kinda sad. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 7 2009, 10:30 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 7 2009, 10:14 PM |
boys lost a tough one to an outstanding goaltending effort from x waxer |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 9 2009, 1:24 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 9 2009, 4:12 PM |
You guys cant score on any goalie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 9 2009, 8:10 PM |
waxers are a far better team than their record shows, hard working & well coached |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 10 2009, 9:01 AM |
Absolutely, they are the hardest working team I have seen - give them some time and they will score. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 10 2009, 2:20 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 13 2009, 10:44 AM |
Waxers win ! Waxers win ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 13 2009, 3:56 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 13 2009, 9:52 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 14 2009, 8:39 PM |
Prediction waxers 3-2 over Barrie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 14 2009, 9:41 PM |
Barrie beats Markham 3-1 tonight. It was a good game. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 9:13 AM |
Now I think we can say "Stick a fork in them, they are done" |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 10:52 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 12:22 PM |
3 - 0 in 3 games that remain head to head versus AP Raiders (and this will happen my friends) and the Waxers won't be on the outside lookin' in anymore! Waxers will then upset YSE in round one and sweep in the OMHA's. Oh ya baby! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 12:29 PM |
And then the alarm went off and it was time for you to go to work. Today you're working the drive-thru. Remember to ask if they would like an apple pie with that. lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 12:35 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 2:25 PM |
I still think Markham is good enough to make the playoffs. Still not sold on AP. Especially after Barrie waxed them the other night. That's more like the AP that will most likely show up the last half of the season. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 15 2009, 3:17 PM |
what like Barrie WAXED the waxers last night ?? Barrie is a good club from what I saw. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 12:16 AM |
Barrie scored the winning goal with around five mins left in the game on a bounce turnover off the referee that sent PB in on a breakaway. Empty netter finished it at 3-1. Was a pretty even game. Well played by both teams. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 4:19 PM |
It was the Refs fault not Barrie's talent. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 4:24 PM |
The Barrie Troll jinxed you. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 4:38 PM |
He works in mysterious ways.But it seems to be working |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 4:59 PM |
Too bad he couldn't get across the border. You could have used him in Chicago. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 5:06 PM |
Wow someone has good memory - Chicago seems like distant past, but hey if this makes you tick ... - now playoffs are important are they ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 5:32 PM |
You Barrie people dwell on the past. Just giving you a little taste. Gets sickening doesn't it ball washer. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 6:00 PM |
not when your a winner! lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 16 2009, 6:09 PM |
Why can't we all love each other - Christmas is coming - let's be nice ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 17 2009, 6:45 AM |
So, how did you make out last night against Whitby???
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 17 2009, 8:03 AM |
Is that what rips your head off the pillow at 6:45? Holy smokes. Roll over and give your wife a hug. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 17 2009, 9:20 AM |
What if there is no wife to hug ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 17 2009, 12:12 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 22 2009, 8:37 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 22 2009, 10:00 AM |
3-2 AP. Waxers have only won 2 of last 12. Gotta be dissapointing for the coaching staff. Maybe the team would be in a better place if they developed and recruited from their own AA program instead of taking players from other AA centres. Is the HC the new guy who's always chomping on his gum? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 22 2009, 10:50 AM |
"Re: 95 Waxers December 15 2009, 12:22 PM
3 - 0 in 3 games that remain head to head versus AP Raiders (and this will happen my friends) and the Waxers won't be on the outside lookin' in anymore! Waxers will then upset YSE in round one and sweep in the OMHA's. Oh ya baby!"
Guess your crystal ball was a little foggy, you had better win the next 2 games vs. A/P if you want a shot to make the playoffs let alone beat YSE!
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 14 2010, 12:34 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 14 2010, 12:35 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 14 2010, 4:43 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 15 2010, 8:45 PM |
Why is everyone on this team trying leave. We don't want you unless you're #19. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 16 2010, 8:59 AM |
We will take your best players - no problem - please leave a note here. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 16 2010, 11:40 AM |
Ok #19 dad, we will take the kid. First explain to me why he is on a team that is not fairing to well despite his talent? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 17 2010, 9:57 AM |
We will take him of your hands ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 18 2010, 11:30 AM |
Hey #19 parent! Here is a tip for you-when you are pimping your kid at least try and make the posts original. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 18 2010, 2:19 PM |
There is no player on this team that will make a difference, even if they do secure a playoff spot they will be out in 3-4 games. Everyone knows that there is no competition in this devision. Bottom line will be YSE and Barrie. A/P, SCC and Waxers will be dust in the wind, they battled well though but they all would be best to accept that they will have to settle for less then the best (again)! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 18 2010, 9:58 PM |
Don't count this team out just yet! My prediction is that they take 3rd spot and knock Barrie out in 4 games |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 19 2010, 8:10 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 19 2010, 11:40 AM |
and my prediction is you should lay off the crack |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 19 2010, 11:53 AM |
I second that opinion. Crack is not good for the mind!
This is what you will hear from the dressing room of the Waxers - Dust in the wind, all we are is dust in the wind...
The new coach - you know, the guy everyone saw taking notes - was there last night. Any opinions on next years Waxers? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 19 2010, 12:14 PM |
I pretty much guarantee some imports coming in...from the south this time. Think further than Toronto to people. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 19 2010, 8:02 PM |
New coach wont change a thingh |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 8:59 AM |
He will - already asked my son to come over - this is a big change ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 9:12 AM |
.....you mean "come up" not "come over" don't you? It's about time the AAA Waxers brought up some A and AA talent of their own. Good for the organization! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 9:14 AM |
"Big" hmmmm. A curious choice of words. SCC "big" D from feeder area to AAA Waxer zone - pretty obvious. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 10:50 AM |
good luck with the "big" D from SCC, slow & non-discipline - good addition |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 11:30 AM |
It not the D man - my son scored 56 goals in HL this year baby - this is Big ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 12:03 PM |
To bad the Waxers couldn't get a reputable coach for once. Lots of talent on that team but no one to coach them. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 12:27 PM |
Don't be thinking South and west only. This guy's doing his homework. Been talking to a couple of good players from east of you who are on losing teams. He says he's allowed 5 import and he plans to fill all 5 spots. I'm considering taking my son over. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 1:03 PM |
What specifically do you think he is looking for? Defence, forwards or goalies. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 1:26 PM |
If he is smart, he will be looking for all of the above. With #19 leaving, he will be starting from scratch.
Anyone know any of his coaching history? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 1:44 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 20 2010, 7:41 PM |
All you guys don't know squat. They haven't decided on anything yet.
I think they are going to post all the new AAA coaches early next week.
As far as I know, PK is the only one that has put in for the team.
"the guy everyone saw in the stands taking notes" is a friend of his.
I saw them talking to eachother after the game. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 21 2010, 9:02 AM |
As far as you know? what makes you an authority on what the Waxers have decided, who has applied and who PK is friends with? You don't think PK already knows the "Note Guy" IS the coach next year? PK is only making nice with him in the hopes of securing his kid a spot on the team next season.
My guess is that you know as much "squat" as we all do! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 21 2010, 10:27 AM |
7:41 - Usually I do not agree with anyone on here because it just does not add to the entertainment value. In this case though-I have to agree with 9:02.
PK is not the only one that put in for the team and the 'note guy' will be the new coach. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 21 2010, 1:24 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 21 2010, 2:48 PM |
Introduce yourself at Don Beer on Friday night. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 21 2010, 6:49 PM |
Cannot - we are playing as well - any other place/time/date ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 21 2010, 6:57 PM |
Leave number and name i will call you after i see you play |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 22 2010, 8:41 AM |
Should I include team name as well ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 22 2010, 3:29 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 23 2010, 5:00 PM |
On our way to lay a beating on Peterborough. Watch out Barrie we are hot on your heels. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 24 2010, 2:56 PM |
I hope Waxers enjoyed their short and sweet victories, as of tomorrow it is over! YSE will put you back in your place! oh ya baby! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 24 2010, 3:07 PM |
To those who wanted #19, they will probably give him to you without a fight. He has not nearly been the superstar he is supposed to be. In the last 4 or 5 games the Waxers have scored 20 goals, I don't think one of them has been from #19 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 24 2010, 5:17 PM |
Goal scoring isn't everything. He's still a big part of the team and a great kid. On and off the ice.
This year we have a much more balanced lineup and getting scoring from all three lines.
I bet you there is 4 or 5 players that could be in the race for points leader on this team.
19 was one of the early bloomers and hit puberty first. He dominated for a couple years because of it.
Now others are catching up. You can't expect him to score every night. He makes things happen
and is still a treat to watch. No, I'm not his mom, dad, uncle, aunt, cousin or grandparent.
Now, quit talking about the kid on here. You'd think we were in the GTHL or something! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 24 2010, 6:14 PM |
Ok coach! Let's face it, the kid IS good but he has lost his drive. Rumour is he STILL wants to leave and he will be an asset anywhere he goes. Now the big question is; will the Waxers let him this time? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 24 2010, 9:33 PM |
OK - we will take any players - takers leave a message. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 8:53 AM |
don't be surprised if you see #19 wearing a blue and white jeresey again next season |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 8:59 AM |
Gosh, I hope for the kids sake he isn't, unless of course it is with the Marlies. The worst thing for #19 would be to stay were he is, the 2nd worst thing? having to have played there this year. He is a without question the best on the team but imagine how much better he would be if he had been on a team that could have developed him. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 10:56 AM |
8:59 - You're an idiot. He's been on the Waxers since day one. If he's that good, obviously he's being developed. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 11:25 AM |
Idiot? Are these posts hitting a nerve, mom? dad? coach? The kid IS that good and should be on our team in the G, there is still a jersey calling his name.
Don't delude yourself though by thinking that his talent has to do with coaching, look at the coaching history of this team-sure you have had yourselfs some nice dads as coaches, but his development is all him and as stated above IF he had moved he would have had the proper guidance to compliment his natural talent and I guarentee you that all the 'top' lists that are made on this and other sites would have seen his name consistenly in the top 3.
The Waxers are a medicore team but look at the attention this thread draws but if you read through them there is many refernces to #19. Not one of them really bash the kid-he is that good! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 11:28 AM |
The kid is a decent player on an average team. He would not be a difference maker on any of the top teams in either the ETA or the SCTA never mind the GTHL. Markham has never won anything so let's all get a grip and stop pimping the kid. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 11:37 AM |
You suck as coach G boy. We all know who you are - an overpaid slouch who's is so challenged to have a real life and a real profession that you chose hockey to drive your $30-50k income.. cash no doubt - like "Oliver Jeweler". Go back from the rock that you crawled out from. The boy will be staying in the G you putz! The current Waxer coach has done a great job with the team and talent at hand. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 11:48 AM |
staying the G? he's never been in the G you putz
if the coach has done such a great job why has the team only ever been mediocre and why has he never been able to attract top players but instead forces players to stay |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 11:55 AM |
Some coaches coach a team so that they can be sure that their kid has 3 A's on their sleeves, they have no interest in developing a team anymore then it is.
No point really, just a random thought  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 25 2010, 12:34 PM |
team has never done anything and will never do anything.Mediocre at best. Get out if you can. RUN |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 26 2010, 2:28 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 26 2010, 2:28 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 26 2010, 4:42 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 26 2010, 9:17 PM |
Waxers had a good run there for a bit, unfortunately it came to late in the season.
Big changes are in store for this team next year, I'll admit: with the new coach my kid is not a sure bet for the team but that is ok I predict they will remain where they have for the last few years, 3 or 4th at best. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 27 2010, 2:45 PM |
I hope we get a new coach. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 27 2010, 3:43 PM |
Someone from some team has no exams to study for? It's obvious because he went on 5 or more sites and typed the same thing. Crack the books, you'll need it as only a precious few ever make it in hockey! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 27 2010, 3:54 PM |
Your stupid response is more annoying than his stupid posts. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 29 2010, 12:00 PM |
Looks like you got your wish son, a new coach is confirmed. Sounds like it will be a graduated process though. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 29 2010, 2:55 PM |
"a graduated process". What the heck is that? He starts as the stick boy, then promotes to trainer............ac...........c |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 29 2010, 8:53 PM |
You are close! It is more like the new coach will be head on paper and the current coach will be assist on paper but who are you kidding? Everyone knows that there will be no change. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 31 2010, 11:56 AM |
Waxers will win 2 of 3, AP will lose 2 of 3 and SC should win 2 o2 2 against NCP. Bye Bye AP. Have fun in the toilet bowl! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 31 2010, 12:41 PM |
Waxers gotta beat Kingston (1st place) Barrie (2nd place) and AP. .The will be lucky to win 1.
Place your bets folks |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 31 2010, 1:46 PM |
10 - 1 odds the previous post is right on the mark! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | January 31 2010, 3:01 PM |
LOL, LMAO, ROFL and so on! Waxers will NOT win 2 of their 3 final games - they will win ALL of them! Just kidding! But boy do I have a good poker face!
I was just told who their new coach will be.........unfortunately for the Waxers, this is means there will be no changes. Check out the coaching background on the new guy, I think the Waxers switched a nice guy for another nice guy and not much more. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 2:36 PM |
"Waxers gotta beat Kingston (1st place) Barrie (2nd place) and AP. .The will be lucky to win 1.
Place your bets folks"
If you go by the winning percentage Markham has to play Kingston (3rd overall) and Barrie (2nd overall) and AP (7th overall).
I bet they win 1.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 2:58 PM |
1st round playoff preview tonight |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 3:09 PM |
2:58 - is that wishfull thinking? You are down your top F and top D and you really think there is a chance that you will win a round against Barrie, if you even get that far? Lots can still happen between Waxers, SCC and A/P |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 3:29 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 3:42 PM |
Waxers 34 pts with 3 games left
A/P 33 pts with 3games left
SCC 32 pts with 1 game left
SCC is only done if Waxers win at least one game - the way they have played all season there is no guarauntee that they will. If Waxers lose all 3, A/P wins at least one and SCC wins their last the final standing will be
YSE
Barrie
A/P
SCC
If Waxers win at least 1 and SCC win 1 and A/P lose all, the final standings will be
YSE
Barrie
Markham
SCC
If Waxers and A/P each win a game then yes, SCC is done.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 4:05 PM |
anyway you slice it YSE and Barrie will be moving on to the crossover games. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 4:07 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 8:12 PM |
Barrie is not going anywhere if they do not step it up NOW. 1-1 tie going into third with Markham. Both teams are playing very well, it go either way. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 1 2010, 8:39 PM |
Barrie won 2-1 and didn't play well but that's what good teams do. Find a way to win even though they aren't playing well. Meanwhile Markham is in desperation mode and still couldn't pull it out. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 2 2010, 8:39 AM |
Ajax is by far the better team and has a chance vs. YSE. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 2 2010, 9:09 AM |
Wake up sonny, the bell has rung, you've been dreaming |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 2 2010, 9:21 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 10:49 AM |
Here's a little insight (from a 94 DMF thread) about your new coach, kids. Doesn't sound like things will be any better then they already are.
*
Coach came in bragging things will change, they are probably the worst AAA team in Ontario. Two wins this team is at best a mediocre AA team. Hallet brouhgt zero in and team was much better with BW. Goalie from states only decent recruit, and the rest work hard, with coach BS them about his great OHL contacts. This year was a disgrace and the coach thinks AA and hopefully this clown will be let go at year end. This team should never have wasted their time and everyone elses playing in the AAA loop.
Did you not know Hallet fired from Kingston as OHL scout and US kid shopped around to all teams, but only Halet made offer.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 12:52 PM |
If that is all true, then i think I have to retract my previous opinion stating that they will be third-AGAIN. I am thinking that they are now SOL |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 1:59 PM |
EVERYTHING on this site is true |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 2:05 PM |
If it's true that PK has been replaced, it's really a shame. His efforts with this team, and the way he has handled himself have always been top notch. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 2:54 PM |
"EVERYTHING on this site is true"
Great now I have confirmation from trusted source, I was not sure how to handle this site before ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 4:11 PM |
"If it's true that PK has been replaced, it's really a shame. His efforts with this team, and the way he has handled himself have always been top notch."
It is anything but a shame and definately not top notch in terms of coaching and developing. If his efforts had been top notch we would have seen much more from this team over the last few years. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 4:36 PM |
MH knew going into the Flyers that they were weak, shouldn't he have been able to make a difference? He is the HC afterall? Did he? NO! Do the boys like him? Sure, he is a likeable guy but I bet if you asking anyone of the boys and the parents, he did little for them as players or as a team.
I hope for the 95's he is able to figure it out because so far it looks like a repeat of last for him: take a weak team and ............. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 6:22 PM |
It is official. According to the Waxers website, MH is the new Waxer coach. PK will remain on the bench as 'trainer' |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 7:01 PM |
I am sure that the AC, trainer, etc will not be announced until after try outs IF those roles are to be filled with parents of players on the team. For example, what if 2 Marty Brodeur-like keepers try out? Then what? I'm sure the new coach knows better than that. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 10:23 PM |
2 years and out for the coaches. This is a good thing and Waxers have made a good decision. PK should not be allowed to be on the bench as an AC or trainer. That would be crazy! Let the new guy have a chance. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 11:32 PM |
Sorry folks, PK is on the bench as trainer. I repeat he IS going to be the trainer next year |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 3 2010, 11:37 PM |
This is what will happen for the Waxers next year. PK will be on the bench, BM will be on the team and there will be a reunion of tenders. And the biggest thing for next year-they will STILL place 3rd or 4th.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 8:27 AM |
11:37 In the words of Candian comedic actor Leslie Neilson "I picked a bad week to kick the glue habit" eh there buddy. BM, reunion of tenders - 0.1% chance of either happening (never say never, enter the .1%). |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 10:19 AM |
PK will be on the bench - DEFINATELY, IT WAS PART OF THE DEAL WHEN BRINGING IN A NON-PARENT COACH
BM will be on the team - 99.9% YOU WILL SEE HIM IN A WAXER JERSEY.
Reunion of tenders - ASSUMING YOU ARE INDICATING THAT THE SCC GOALIE WILL BE RETURNING, AS PK's KID IS THE CURRENT TENDER, I AM ON THE FENCE WITH THIS ONE. CAN'T SEE IT HAPPENING BUT NEW COACH HAS SPENT QUITE SOME TIME TALKING TO PARENTS |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 10:30 AM |
Angus glen on Monday nights, is already one of the most scouted weekly venues during the season.
Mark my words, next years Waxers will challenge for top spot and it'll be the home team
with the most ETA players selected in the 2011 draft. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 11:20 AM |
Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 11:45 AM |
I was there on Monday. NO scouts. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 12:50 PM |
IF, and that is a big 'if', there were any scouts there on Mondays be assured that they were not there to see the Waxers |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 1:38 PM |
You could be right. Maybe those guys with the Clarkson jackets, Otters jackets, and knights jackets, jotting down things in a binder were probably just writing a book while checking out the game. Couple of tier II (buzzers & fury) guys walking around too.
Obviously you wouldn't know a scout if he gave you his business card or tried to sell you cookies.
No "IF's". There WAS at least 4 or 5 that I saw on Monday and I wasn't looking that hard.
Its a well known fact that most of the ETA scouting is done from Angus.
If a scout is asked to check out a kid that plays for North Central, Do you think he'll drive up to Rama?
No, they'll wait until they play at Angus Glen on a monday night, because its a great venue and most of all, its convenient.
So what if they are there only to see the kid from North Central. If your kid stands out, don't you think he'll be noticed?
This is your first kid going through the system huh? Don't worry, still lots to learn. The fun is just beginning.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 2:17 PM |
No, it is not my first kid going through the system. I should have worded it in a way that it would be clear to you-Waxer parent?. So here goes, hopefully this makes a little more sense to you:
If and when the scouts appear, they are not there because of the Waxers  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 2:27 PM |
"Its a well known fact that most of the ETA scouting is done from Angus" - this has got to be the most stupid, ridiculous comment I have ever heard. Do you have an "edit" switch or "fast forward" switch in your brain? Or is your brain frozen in the Titanic/Stamkos/Del Zotto time warp? The only thing that will be scouted at Angus next year will be for Pokemon champions from the immediate surrounding area haging in that wonderful library |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 2:28 PM |
PK is on the bench next year. I wonder if he will stay when his kid gets cut?
BM shouldn't return but he most likely will. The pull will be using his linemate/best buddy to bribe him. Hopefully the kid will realize that he is to good to stay with the Waxers given the history of the team and all the 'unkowns' of the new coach
Goalie reunion will not be happening given the reason stated above. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 3:12 PM |
GTHL AAA Teams vs. OMHA AAA teams this year:
48-25-8
Top 5 GTHL AAA teams vs. OMHA AAA teams this year:
28-2-1
The scouts will be at Chesswood, folks, so stop yer squabbling. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 3:48 PM |
"The pull will be using his linemate/best buddy to bribe him."
If that kid took bribes he would've been at SAC/YSE 2 years ago |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 4:16 PM |
Oh please! Bribed or not, he would not have been at YSE 2 years ago. The difference with this 'years' bribe is that there is a personal connection to the ante. Sad thing is, the 'ante' is not even that good.
Besides, reality is, this kid ain't leavin'! He just doesn't have it in him. And before you folks think I am being negative to the kid RELAX, I just mean that if he can be swayed by who his teammates will be then he just does not see his true potential. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 6:36 PM |
2:28 - "stay with the Waxers given the history of the team and all the 'unkowns' of the new coach"
You are talking about the Waxer history as if its bad??? Give your head a shake.
The association has much to be proud of and this particular team, has for the past few years, been very competitive.
What exactly are the "unkowns" of the new coach? I'd be happy to call him and clarify any "unkowns".
He's a non-parent volunteer coach, that has coached Minor Midget AAA many times.
He's been there, done that and probably could write the book.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 6:36 PM |
3:12 yep, the hotspot for GTHL scouts is for sure Chesswood. OMHA is Angus Glen. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 4 2010, 7:50 PM |
There are lots of unknowns with this team. The coach is unknown in the Waxer community. It is unknown if the team can amount to any more then 3r. But the biggest unknown is if your kid will remain on the team next year. That my friends is what is causing all these pot stirring posts! You are scared $hitle$$ that you may not be able to brag about the number of A's little billy plays for |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 5 2010, 8:37 AM |
I am sure my kid is not making Waxers. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 5 2010, 8:41 AM |
You must be on the AA team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 5 2010, 8:43 AM |
Hey maybe with the new coach, the '95 AA's might actually get called up instead of the '96 AAA's! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 5 2010, 10:33 AM |
Not likely. There is a reason they are in AA. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 6 2010, 2:53 PM |
We are going to kick some AP ASS!! I figure 6-1 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 6 2010, 4:08 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 6 2010, 8:03 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 8:48 PM |
any score from waxers/kingston game?
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:02 PM |
Waxers lost 4-2. AP beat Barrie 2-1. SCC is O.U.T. Not to worry though, SCC will meet Waxers and AP in the ETA's |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:39 PM |
I think the very first poster should retract 'stick a fork in them...' comment. If Barrie can lose to AP and Waxers beat AP 3-1, Barrie is the team needing the fork.
WAXERS = OMHA CHAMPS!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:40 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:44 PM |
It's ok Barrie player/parent, there is always next year for you. Waxers are taking you down! Oh ya! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:48 PM |
A win against NC last weekend and SCC finishes 3rd.
Big swing with that loss, tumbling out of playoffs altogether.
Fine lines drawn. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:53 PM |
Barrie will send you home early again,you know ,the way they do year after year,you guys must be getting tired of it. lol
But dont give up hope.You can never give up hope. Maybe Barrie will take the night off again like they did tonite.Game meant nothing, you could tell by watching them play. I am sure they wont get up for playoffs. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 7 2010, 9:53 PM |
coulda, shoulda, woulda. SCC should never have assumed that NC would be content without a win. They will crush them in the ETA's, no doubt about that. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 8 2010, 11:23 AM |
What an utter complete shock------Waxers finished 3rd! AGAIN.....never saw that coming  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 8 2010, 11:44 AM |
9:48 PM - not a win, tie would have done it for SCC - NC scored with 20 seconds to go - shorthanded. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 8 2010, 7:26 PM |
Hypothetically speaking; what does it mean when you and your kid meet with next years coach and the coach makes a few negative comments about other players on the team? Nothing really malicious and not really mean but enough to make you say hmmmmm? Would that send out some red flags? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 8 2010, 9:40 PM |
Like what? Truths? Like "little Billy is soft? or Little Johnny has not shot? or Freddie needs to learn how to skate better?"
I don't know, if its something like that, I don't see harm in that. Many people talk about players on a team.
Strengths and weaknesses.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 9 2010, 11:06 AM |
Coach should not be discussing any players with any other players/family. Period. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 9 2010, 3:39 PM |
If the coach is being critical of players while pointing out what he'd like to improve about the team then I don't see any real issues. If he's being rude and completely bashing players then that's a different story.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 9 2010, 4:08 PM |
I don't know, I think I would have to agree with 11:06...there should be no discussing other players.
I understand how it can be considered harmless if he is using players of examples of what he needs to improve but it depends on how it is done. If he says 'I am concerned about Joe's size and the increased risk of injury' or 'John's style would work well being on the same line as Tom', I guess those type of comments are ok but what I would question is the use of names and why he feels the need to discuss/critisize (even if it is done with good intentions) players with other players. I am sure that plans for next season and an improvement plan can be laid out loud and clear without any names being mentioned.
If he is making comments such as 'Bill, is strong in the corners but skates like crap' or 'Tim couldn"t skate end to end if his life depended on it'....Not acceptable at all.
So, are you going to share the comments that have got you thinking? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 9 2010, 4:12 PM |
I'm also curious to know if the coach made any critical or negative comments to you and your son about where he thinks your son can improve |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 9 2010, 5:58 PM |
If he is making any of the above comments to you, you can guarantee that other players/families are hearing about your kid.
Negative comments or not, I do not agree with a coach critisizing one kid to another. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 10 2010, 8:30 AM |
I was told that my kid will make this team better, any advise ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 10 2010, 10:11 AM |
That's funny - I was told that your kid wouldn't |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 10 2010, 3:00 PM |
There are so bad that even my kid will not help ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 10 2010, 9:44 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 11 2010, 9:22 AM |
and the only goal we scored was on a 5 on 3 pp.... |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 11 2010, 11:50 AM |
So what, more games to follow - Markham Wins ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 11 2010, 12:06 PM |
Markham will win - nothing. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 15 2010, 6:32 PM |
ok all you Markham haters it is time to get on board the right train now. Markham just has to, and will, win one more game.
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WAXERS |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 15 2010, 7:39 PM |
Way to go.Now you jinxed it. Do you believe in miracles? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 15 2010, 7:59 PM |
There is no miracle involved here. Markham has proven to be the better team, their hard work, dedication and great coaching are really paying off.
Don't hate, appreciate! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 18 2010, 8:48 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 18 2010, 11:32 AM |
Funny how they are now 'the best'. Should have thought that way at the beginning of the season and maybe you would have given YSE a run for #1 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 18 2010, 12:02 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 18 2010, 12:17 PM |
Not a chance! They may have come in third but they were many, many points behind the #1 spot |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 18 2010, 12:29 PM |
what exactly is it that you win for finishing first in the regular season? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 18 2010, 1:30 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 19 2010, 6:02 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 19 2010, 7:01 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 19 2010, 1:20 PM |
DO YOU BELIEVE IN MIRACLES ?? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 19 2010, 2:27 PM |
Slow down pal. Barrie isn`t that good, miracle please. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 19 2010, 5:56 PM |
Miracle on ice coming up! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 19 2010, 6:16 PM |
I hope Waxers win, especially after all the smart-a$$ remarks. You'll look just as bad as the Colts if you don't |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 8:53 AM |
Ah-hem......la la la la la la laaaaaa, mi mi mi mi mi mi miiii
Thanks, I was just warming up  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 10:08 AM |
Good Morning Waxers. Today's the big day. We're all counting on you to win tonight. Best of Luck. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 12:25 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 1:05 PM |
Gonna look really stupid when you lose waxers. Bring it down a notch. Haven't won **** yet. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 4:32 PM |
Barrie is done like binner. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 5:11 PM |
barrie will win next two games in a landslide |
|
anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 5:15 PM |
HOPE MARKHAM TAKES THIS SERIES...........AP IS WAITING FOR BARRIE...ON ANOTHER NOTE SOME FEED BACK FROM PARENTS OF THE OTHER TEAMS IN THE DIVISION. WHO DO YOU THINK IS THE BEST PLAYER ON AP 95'S??
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 9:51 PM |
And the fat lady has sung! Way to go Waxers. They will take it all the way to the top. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 10:09 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 10:14 PM |
3-2 Waxers. Barrie fluked on a penalty shot with seconds left |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 10:17 PM |
are you serious. Unbelievable. KABOOM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 10:53 PM |
good for you Markham looks good on the clowns from barrie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 11:27 PM |
congradulations markham. you earned it with your work ethic |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 11:36 PM |
Hard work, team play, dedication and outstanding coaching is what gave the Waxers the series. Great game boys, well earned. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 20 2010, 11:42 PM |
Yo buddy i am happy and all that we won. but it was all the players the coach had nothin to do with our win |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 2:05 PM |
Waxers will crush the rest of the ETA.
OMHA champs, then off to Ottawa for the OHFs ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 3:45 PM |
Come on Waxers! You just witnessed where a cocky attitude will get you. Everyone loves you right now, don't become Barrie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 4:54 PM |
There's nobody from the Waxers that would actually post those comments like 2:05. Just some goof trying to stir things up, like usual.
Waxers had a great series against Barrie. Which a couple of those games could have gone either way.
For the record, Barrie is a classy bunch. The kids are very talented and play with a lot of emotion.
Nothing wrong with that. At the end of the series, there were no hooligans, they stood up like men
shook hands and wished all the Waxers luck for the remainder of playoffs.
Chins up Barrie. The puck bounced our way this time. Was a very exciting, pretty equally matched series.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 6:03 PM |
barrie not classy all year. they just got humbled! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 7:44 PM |
you must be from the east |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 8:55 PM |
Give your head a shake, only a limited few from barrie are classy, suprized there wasnt very many fights. Barrie wont even try in the eta's they will just be looking for fight...look out!
Barrie is no where near classy, just a cocky bunch, puck didnt bounce waxers way they worked damn hard to get there, and barrie has noone but them selves to blame. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 21 2010, 9:03 PM |
Somebody is bitter. Barrie must have beat them earlier in the year.
Maybe noone. LMFAO |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 3:06 PM |
Somebody from Markham has a real hate on for Barrie.
Get over it allready its just kids hockey! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 3:57 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 4:00 PM |
Two good goalies on the team. Why all the Bitchin? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 4:08 PM |
Two good goalies, is that what won them the series? I hardly think so. The goalies are not bad, the one that played Barrie, is much better then the coach's kid, but they certainly did not win the series without the scoring ability of their teammates. A good goalie would have won the series if the scores were not as close as they were.
I think it is great that the Waxers beat Barrie, someone had to put them in their place. But the story remains the same....Waxers will not finish any higher then 3rd at best for next season. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 4:18 PM |
If (???) Barrie will finish 2nd next year - 3rd is all Waxers need. 3 - 4 games warm-up before 2nd round of OMHA's . |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 4:22 PM |
I think all you Waxer people need to tone it down a notch. Yes, you made the play-offs, yes you beat Barrie, but you still have a long way to go before you can walk the talk |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 4:48 PM |
They already did - Go Waxers ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 5:00 PM |
No they haven't. They only made it through the first round. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 5:29 PM |
What happens to Barrie now? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 6:03 PM |
It appears that Waxers are going to take over Barrie's attitude. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 6:44 PM |
I doubt that is a Markham parent. This is the first year they have made it past the 1st round. I think they are hopeful for a Clarington win and they may have a good chance. Kingston will be another matter. The Waxers will play to win, but know that they will be up against a tough team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 22 2010, 10:34 PM |
Toros are coming to whoop your ass. They were in a bad mood tonight after Kingston beat em 9-1. I don't think they want to be embarrassed anymore. Even the drunk Kingston parents were silenced and shocked. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 8:07 AM |
Don't get so exited buddy, Toros get YSE, Waxers versus Whitby. Go ahead and change your tune now.
Express wins 3 straight. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 9:06 AM |
Good luck to Express and the Waxers. Good bye to both Whitby and Clarington. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 9:11 AM |
Waxers had a shot against Clarington but Whitby is a whole other story |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 9:33 AM |
No, Waxers play Toros. Good luck to all. They wouldn't have had YSE playing Kingston second round. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 12:24 PM |
As I understand it, Whitby the remaining highest seed left from the east therefore crossover versus lower remaining seed from west which is Markham. Therefore, YSE versus toros. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 12:28 PM |
300+ posts about this team? Red Flags are waving----STAY AWAY. Is that accurate? Current coach has had 'people' talk to 'people' on a few of the AA teams in the G trying to recruit, my family being one of them. Is this team really as bad as portrayed on here? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 12:31 PM |
On second thought....I am not going to get a straight/honest answer on here now am I. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 12:39 PM |
Whitby VS. YSE schedule allready posted.
Waxers against Toros |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 12:53 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 2:32 PM |
Whitby has there schedule but it isnt on the omha site yet.
At YSE Sat. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 23 2010, 4:51 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 8:40 AM |
@ 12:28 PM
This is a wonderful team with a great group of parents, coaches and kids. There is no tension amongst the parents or the kids, everyone gets along. We are a true team!
I find it hard to believe that any one of the parents from our team would come on this site to trash other teams and make the cocky, arrogant remarks that are being posted. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 8:54 AM |
Thanks coach, but I think they were looking for an honest answer.
By the way, I watched your so called 'star player' play with the 94's last night. For the first time this season that kid played like he can, he led the team to a victory, series win. There he was a star. Why do you think that is? Let me tell you, first off the team is far better then the 95's and I am not referring to the age difference. Second of all, for once, the kid was challenged and had people he could play with. All the more reason that #19 will and should leave Waxers (or at least the 95 age group)
If you people have watched the 95's and then watched #19 play for the 94's, you would have seen an outstanding player. Don't tell me there is no issues or tension with the 95's, if not, we all would have seen a stellar performance all season from this kid. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 9:15 AM |
He and other star players are more then welcome to our team - we like good players a lot ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 11:18 AM |
8:54 If you're trying to trash the team, (which no doubt you're probably responsible for 90% of the comments on here), you aren't doing a very good job.
So, let me get this straight, as you say, this 19 kid from the 95 team "led the 94 team to a victory, series win".
To me, that tells me that the 95 team has done a pretty good job at developing this kid.
He's played great all year. Might be the reason he got called up to the 94's in the first place?
Oh, yeah, of course, it has nothing to do with the team. Don't be stupid.
The team has done well because of a great parent group and chemistry of the kids.
We know who you are. Doesn't matter how much crap you try to stir up on here, sorry,
your kid won't make this team next year. Get over it. Time to move on. Good luck to you!
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 11:33 AM |
Hello????? His ability has NOTHING to do with the development that has apparently gone on with this team. He is good now just imagine how good he could have been if he was on the JrC or YSE, where the teams are made up of talent and not friends.
Of course my kid won't make the team genious-he is not a 95. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 11:41 AM |
8:40 I'm with you there. I can't see anyone from the team making those remarks either.
No doubt, just someone from a rival team trying to make us look bad.
Looking forward to this weekend. Toros and Waxers have always had good games.
Should be a good series. Good luck to the boys!
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 11:54 AM |
11:33 - Oh really, "His ability has NOTHING to do with the development"?? Are you ok?
You seem to have a heck of a lot of knowledge and interest in this boy and team.
Either this is 19's parent (which I doubt very much), or you have a 95 kid (which would at least explain why you're on here),
or you're some kind of creepy pedifile. I think its the latter. Very creepy.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 12:04 PM |
Doesn't really matter who the pothead/stirrer is, the truth is that any one who has had any interest in this kid knows a lot about why he is still with the Waxers this year.
The kid is good and no one is saying otherwise. I think that the 'poster' is bitter because of where #19 almost ended up last year-I think that team still has a jersey with his name and number on it.
Waxer people don't get all defensive about $hit on here it is obviously someone just rying to get your goat and it unfortutately looks like it is having an affect. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 24 2010, 5:04 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 25 2010, 11:49 AM |
True or not? I just heard from someone who I consider to be a good source that your #19 is definately going to the JRC's for next season along with the former Waxer goalie (his cousin?). As a 'G' family looking at crossing over to the OMHA, somebody please talk some sense into the kid and family! The G is not the place to be. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 25 2010, 12:10 PM |
Not true. I don't know about the cousin but #19 is staying with the Waxers |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 25 2010, 1:21 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 25 2010, 9:30 PM |
JRC have two very good goalies. No way would they take the cousin just to get the other. Where do you guys come up with this stuff? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 26 2010, 11:03 AM |
Go get them Waxers !
From Barrie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 26 2010, 11:31 AM |
Waxers are a great team and they are only getting better! GO WAXERS--all the way! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 26 2010, 12:50 PM |
The only way the Toros have any shot is to sit the plugs. I don't think they can win with 9 players. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 26 2010, 1:09 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | February 26 2010, 7:19 PM |
9 that listen to the coaches, 6 that listen to Daddy. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 2:24 PM |
3 points to 1 for the Waxers, the Toros look lost in their own end. Markham is a disciplined team, that's probably why they spanked Barrie. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 3:22 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 3:53 PM |
Held Barrie ( and the best line in Ontario) to 4 goals in the last 3 games, I'd say more like a whup'n. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 3:59 PM |
I'd say more like Lucky Charms. More posts hit than by a drunk on main street. The Markham timekeeper doing his best to cheat by running the clock 3 times no less, was cute. Careful how much you fluff your feathers - you'll get blown away. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 4:01 PM |
Wow, 3 lucky games in a row?? Did SCC have a lucky game the other night as well?? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 4:31 PM |
Nope, they played well. Like anyone gives a hoot about the toilet bowl anyway. No timekeepers cheating which was a change. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 4:33 PM |
I look forward to the toilet bowl every morning, it's funny, then I think of Barrie. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 4:42 PM |
Get your goalie to knock the net off even more in this playoff round, it is ingenius. Your idea? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 5:18 PM |
No, my idea was spanking you guys. It worked, enjoy the bowl, we're off to St Catherine's baby. Here's what you can do next year, mouth off on even more threads, then not even make the playoffs. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 6:22 PM |
Seriously people! get over it! Both teams had a great series. Markham came out on top for a few reasons-1 they kept their cool and 2 they had a bit more luck on their side. If you watched any of the games you would have seen that it really could have gone either way.
Barrie lost Markham won............. MOVE ON |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 7:18 PM |
Oh, move on, when Barrie wins we don't hear the end of it. Take your lumps you inbred Barrie freaks. You guys suck and that is the bottom line, your kids are all a bunch of mouthy pukes and nobody likes Barrie, so we will rub it in any chance we get. LOOOOOOSSSEEERRRSSSS!!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 1 2010, 8:43 PM |
".....so we will rub it in any chance we get."
And sound just like Barrie |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 8:01 AM |
Markham can't get over it - they have never won anything, ever. And never will. What a bunch of pukes. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 10:42 AM |
Are you SCC folks that insecure that you have to keep posting things about Barrie and Markham?
I know for sure, one of your parents has been a "busy bee" on here.
Quit trying to deflect attention from your own inept team.
Markham and Barrie had a great series that could have gone either way.
No issues with any of the parents. Many of them know eachother.
Both class teams. Someone just trying to slam both of them. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 1:39 PM |
Probably just as insecure as all you other people are.
The only way you would be in the know as to who is posting what is if you are the Forum owner/moderator and you secretly (or so you think)switch the IP address display on. Even then it is not fool-proof. If I know YOUR IP address as a very computer savy person I can post making it appear that it is YOU |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 2:29 PM |
Huh? Who the **** cares, Barrie deserves everything thrown at them. I'm not from Markham, and not from SCC, I just hate Barrie. No, I'm not jealous, I just think you guys are an overrated bunch of pretenders. Have fun in the bowl. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 2:49 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 2:52 PM |
What you really are trying to say is you hate that your team sucks like a hoover on day 1. You also bemoan that Barrie and others easily beat you whenever you play and especially when it counts. You will win nothing, again. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 4:45 PM |
Still mouthing for a team thats been spanked 4 in a row. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 2 2010, 9:38 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 3 2010, 5:27 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 7 2010, 10:31 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 7 2010, 6:14 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 7 2010, 6:43 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 7 2010, 6:58 PM |
3-1 Waxers. Great game. Good series and both teams were class acts. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 7 2010, 10:53 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 12:22 PM |
Any goals in the Bronze Medal Game ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 12:31 PM |
There surely must be an award for getting to the OMHA's with a horseshoe, playing 4 round robin games without a win, sorry but a win by default does not count, getting to the Bronze medal game, losing in OT x2, I'll admit it was a decent effort, but still not good enough because they ended up losing, and scoring only 2 'recognized' goals all weekend.
Markham is a fair team but still no better then the rest and certainly no comparison to YSE or Barrie (I don't really mean Barrie but if I didn't throw that in someone else would have) |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 12:48 PM |
Dumb penalty or bad call in OT ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 1:01 PM |
What team is Barrie playing in ETA finals ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 3:35 PM |
who cares. Markham got waxed is all that matters. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 3:36 PM |
Sorry. "spanked" is the proper term. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 4:06 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 6:19 PM |
Obviously you guys weren't there. oh yeah, that's right, you were at home cleaning up your golf clubs.
Since you weren't there, I'll tell you St.Catharines put on a great OMHA tournament. Very well organized and well run.
YSE looked like the ones to beat through the round robin, but any of the other four teams could have been in the gold game with
a couple of bounces. Every game was very close. The bronze and gold games were no different, both going to OT.
Yes, Markham only scored 2 'recognized' goals (as the game vs Wellend got reverted to a DQ 1-0 win).
Since you mentioned the above, why not also mention that Markham had the least amount of goals scored against them throughout the tournament.
Also, according to the tournament shot counts, Markham out-shot every team, except for YSE who out-shot them 16-13
(shots were announced after every period and game).
Was too bad what happened to Welland, but didn't matter as Markham was going through anyways.
So "spanked"? I think not. Lucky? not a chance. Give credit where credit is due.
The Waxer boys played great this weekend and had a fantastic season! Great job boys!
Congrats to Halton and thanks to St.Catharines for hosting a memorable OMHA finals weekend.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 6:21 PM |
Did you have a good drive home coach? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 6:26 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 6:54 PM |
Now if you can just get them to change it to the team with the most shot wins you guys could kick ass.
Hope you enjoyed your one and only kick at the OMHA can coach. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 6:59 PM |
Markham got spanked, hahaaha.
So you out shot a few teams, big friggin deal. Barrie outshot you every game and you sure "spanked" them. You are the luckiest team in history, your time came and went - now go away. You whinning is painful. Another record - congrats. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 7:03 PM |
I was there and trust me for the most part it was not good hockey. The gold game was by far the best.
Markham may have outshot teams but shot counts by all teams were very low which is why no one mentioned their GAA |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 14 2010, 7:12 PM |
Markham post. Thanks. Spoken like a true rookie. So you were mezmerized by your first and no doubt last appearance. You can't even recognize that St. Kits is almost as rotten as Welland. You were lucky to beat Barrie, and you know it. You were lucky beyond your wildest dreams to even play today afer a dismal round robin. Quit beating your chest and go home to look at what yu acomplisehed. Nothing. Shots mean nothing. You got spanked big time. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 15 2010, 12:36 PM |
Wax on, wax off. Wax on, wax off |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 15 2010, 1:26 PM |
Poor poor people from Barrie, sour grapes, too bad you guys weren't there, Markham would have 2 wins!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 15 2010, 1:34 PM |
Sour grapes? No. But thanks for the laughs at the OMHA's. It actually made it all worthwhile. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 17 2010, 7:33 PM |
Markham lost to YSE, the silver medalists, 3-0. This was the lowest number of goals that YSE scored against anyone at the tournament. Markham lost to Halton who won the gold 1-0. Markham lost the bronze with 2 minutes to go in double overtime. They had the lowest goals against in the whole tournament. The difference between going home with a gold, silver, bronze or nothing was only a couple of goals. Markham held their own and had nothing to do with luck. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 17 2010, 7:43 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 17 2010, 7:43 PM |
Markham got there on luck, got to play Sunday on luck, and ran out of luck. Goals against mean f/a.
Outta luck. Chuck. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 17 2010, 8:18 PM |
It has only to do with luck! You talk about them having the lwest goals for-quite an accomplishment when you are only faced with 13-15 shots/game-NAWT
Waxers are a mediocre team who came across some good luck |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 17 2010, 8:44 PM |
Right. Double over time was luck. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 17 2010, 11:32 PM |
8:44-Finally you are starting to catch on. It is all luck, were you there? If you were you would have clearly seen that the game wasn't won or lost by talent it was luck by both teams. 1 OT or 5 OT's does not mean a team is something to write home about |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 18 2010, 4:55 PM |
8:44 don't worry about it. some people on here are just disgruntle. this guy obviously can't stand the fact that the waxers were playing in the OMHA's, while he was at home hitting the refresh button on his computer, trying to get updated scores..
I'm sure he was sticking pins in his blue & white voodoo dolls all weekend too.
I guess keeping goals out of your net isn't important. and, keeping the amount of shots down isn't a good way to go about it.
They're right. Waxers are a mediocre team. They aren't the best, I'll admit that.
But, the question I've got to ask Mr.Disgruntle, is if the Waxers are mediocre and played in St.Catharines last weekend;
what does that make the team of this disgruntle poster? I guess just "unlucky"? "NAWT" |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 18 2010, 6:10 PM |
Fact is, one of any of the top 6 teams from the GTHL would likely have won the OMHA's this year. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 21 2010, 9:12 AM |
pass the crack pipe...idiot |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 21 2010, 2:40 PM |
they would beat the waxers fo sho |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 22 2010, 9:16 AM |
flyers would make waxers melt |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 23 2010, 9:30 AM |
With the new additions to the Waxers, not only will they make it to the OMHA's next year, they will be bringing home the title. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 23 2010, 11:06 AM |
Ok sunshine, you keep telling yourself that. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 24 2010, 9:25 AM |
Waxers are going to be the top this season, especially with the new coach coming in. He has many years of experience and not having a kid on the team is something that the Waxers are long overdue for.
GO WAXERS GO! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 24 2010, 9:38 AM |
Ya,he has lost of experience coaching last place teams. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 24 2010, 9:40 AM |
Then I guess it is a good thing that Waxers are not a last place team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 24 2010, 9:43 AM |
Then I guess it is a good thing that Waxers are not a last place team.
Not yet! That is why they brought this guy in. It is a conspiracy between Barrie and North Central. North Central does not want to be last again and Barrie wants to make it to the OMHA's. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 24 2010, 10:01 AM |
Good one 9:43! What's the matter, new coach turn you away already? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 1:02 AM |
New coach has a terrible reputation amongst current ohl gm's for several reasons. Underachiever. Had one stacked team - the Markham Majors team and they lost way too much with several players asking to be traded during the year; many high end players being drafted way later than expected, and ultimately failing at the ohl level from lack of development. All you have to do, is do your homework and you'll find the answers.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 11:46 AM |
Better than parent coach in AAA that can't happen. Why are the waxers bringing the new coach on if he's so bad. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 1:16 PM |
Better than parent coach in AAA that can't happen. Why are the waxers bringing the new coach on if he's so bad.
Because no one else wanted the team except for the current coach, PK. To many complaints about him so there had to be changes. PK is still part of the coaching, this was done as a 'condition' on the non parent getting the team.
I agree, do your homework and the answers are very clear. Wrong choice for a coachiing change at this age and level |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 2:36 PM |
Who is going to the "skate" tonight? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 4:11 PM |
it is a birthday my friend not skate. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 7:21 PM |
Consider your self lucky if you chose not to go. It was the biggest waste of time for my son and I. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 27 2010, 7:25 PM |
Just another money grab ala GTHL for a hockey school the coach works at. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 1:35 PM |
Somebody must be really scared, to be spending so much time trying to put down this team and cut up the new coach.
I was at the skate. It was a normal "skate". Nothing exciting, just some drills for evaluation.
Thanks for the advise. I've already done my homework. To everyone I've talked to, MH is very respected.
I'm only aware of a couple minor midget teams that MH has coached. For the fun of it, I went
into the past OHL drafts and found 14 kids that were drafted from those two teams.
Of those 14, I guess players like Jesse Blacker, Christ Terry & PK Subban, were all "underachievers"?
There's several others that are still playing OHL or on NCAA/CIS scholarships.
I think that's good enough for my kid. But maybe not.
I'd like for my kid to play in the OMHA this upcoming year. Where do you think I should take my kid?
What has your coach done?
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 2:57 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 3:14 PM |
1:35-or coach  ............You can not seriously be implying that MH had anything to do with PK?? Or the other two for that matter.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 4:28 PM |
I'm just going by the OHL drafts. Public information.
I did a search and found this site to look up all the past OHL draft years:
http://members.shaw.ca/caldwela/drafts/
I'm thinking you should take your own advice and do your homework!
You've got a big mouth, but you still didn't answer my question. Its not a hard one.
Where should I take my kid? What has your coach done?? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 5:21 PM |
Our coach gets us to the OMHA's almost every year |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 6:29 PM |
That's fantastic! You must have a great coach. I'm sure he's not a parent coach then, right?
I'm sure he'll be able to give your little Johnny lots of advice about next year and will be
able to promote your guy to the next level with how well he's connected.
What teams did you say he coached through the minor-midget year? Which players did you say he got drafted?
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 6:42 PM |
With his green connections he can take my kid all the way baby, all the way.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 7:07 PM |
Past 5 Years OHL first rounders.
05 06 07 08 09 Total
Alliance 5 2 4 2 6 19
ETA 3 6 5 3 6 23
SCTA 0 0 3 1 0 4
GTHL 7 8 6 10 7 38
US 1 2 2 2 1 7
Other 4 2 0 2 0 8
YSE consistently strong, but the other organizations suck with maybe the one strong team every ten years.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 7:50 PM |
You really should give MH a fair shot. He is a decent guy with a lot of knowledge. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 28 2010, 9:09 PM |
Waxers will be just fine. The hoopla aroound this team is that for once in the 95 age group of the Waxers, not one parent knows if there kid has a spot on the team. This new coach has no obligations nor friendships to protect. This has many of the Waxer parents up in arms. I am a Waxer parent and I have spoken with the new coach, I think my kid has the ability to play on the team but if he is cut I believe it will be because MH has found someone better-hard to hear but if you think rationally it is very acceptable. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 29 2010, 1:47 AM |
ok coach, time to take a break from the forum. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 29 2010, 9:26 AM |
hopefully he whacks the idiot parent who is always on here posting |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 29 2010, 3:23 PM |
Stop ta-ta-talking that blah blah blah |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 29 2010, 11:07 PM |
Waxers are THE team to beat next year. Current Waxers #19, #15, #81 and both goalies, SCC #77, #12, Barrie Latour, Shwartz, COW Carnavale. They have all been confirmed to be wearing the blue and white next year.
GO WAXERS GO |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 29 2010, 11:20 PM |
What center in their right mind would let these "top" players go to play for competition team won't happen or are they all moving residences! they might get out of their center but they have to get out of all the other centers around them dont they? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 7:42 AM |
The above is correct, all those players plus a couple from TRW and DMF will be Waxers. They will be realeased by their center and they do not need releases from any other center |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 10:05 AM |
Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't a Barrie player need a release from YSE before he could go anywhere else? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 11:54 AM |
That used to be the case but not so anymore |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 12:28 PM |
lol, you guys are all fools......there is no way that any player from Barrie is going to Markham, period. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 12:46 PM |
Why would any player want to go to Markham (except if they are from NC). Is it because the 'made it' to the OMHA's? I mean don't get me wrong they are not a bad team but I fail to see what the draw is. I don't know the new coach, is there something about him that is attracting players? They have the #19 kid which isn't bad but is he that good that he is attracting players? Is it because Stamkos, Hodgson and Guance-soon to be 2 of them, were Waxers?
Like I said I don't think Markham is a bad team. I have only seen them play when we face each other and maybe a couple of games in tournaments and I can't figure out why a team like this warrants 400+ posts. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 1:42 PM |
Crackpot parent group and coach |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 2:09 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 2:23 PM |
The parent group and coach are just fine. The popularity of this team based on the amount of posts just indicates that there is a lot of jealousy from those who wish they were on a team even half as respectable as the Waxers |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 30 2010, 7:11 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | March 31 2010, 1:55 PM |
I'm glade to become apart of this organization! Especially with the two AA and one A upgrades coming.... (my son is one of the AA coming). OHL cup, here we come. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 1 2010, 8:39 AM |
I'm glade to become apart of this organization! Especially with the two AA and one A upgrades coming.... (my son is one of the AA coming). OHL cup, here we come.
If the above is true then it looks like the new coach is already putting his plan 'of bringing a team lower in the standings' into action. At least he is consistant |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 1 2010, 8:57 AM |
are the 2 AA (AAA wannabe's) coming from the SYB 'S ??? if you want 1 you have to take both??? hehehe |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 1 2010, 9:08 AM |
1 is for sure. Current coach has been 'scouting' this team for MM year. He has asked 4 kids to go to their B skate. Funny though, I know 3 of the 4 families have not met with the new coach, they are just going with what the current coach is telling them. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 1 2010, 10:14 AM |
yea and the other kid was on a bottom AA city team - more fool you!
"coach let me tell you about my kid - he's had bad coaching for the last 8 years - he really is AAA."
Gotta love those kids that look good in a try-out and at the 3rd game or so the coach has that moment where he knows he screwed up!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 2 2010, 8:01 PM |
This team needs 2 new goalies and the new coach knows it.
At least he is trying to get the best team together. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 2 2010, 8:28 PM |
He needs 2 but will only be taking 1. He can't cut the former coaches kid aka one of the goalies.
Interesting to see who shows up to the Bday skate tomorrow |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 3 2010, 4:55 PM |
Another poor bday skate for the Waxers. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 3 2010, 6:36 PM |
What you see is what you get! If you thought the new coach could do better at attracting good talent, I feel sorry for you. Everyone says he is a nice guy but as a coach? History doesn't support him and his failed attempt at scouting isn't any better. But he's a nice guy. My son has been on his team before and well all I can say is he's a nice guy. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 4 2010, 12:39 AM |
Tell the coach to put more gas in his car.And drive north. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 4 2010, 10:16 AM |
what he have out - a few AA city guys - hahaha who will now go to other AAA teams and say they got a spot on the waxers = was a kid from the AA toronto penguins there - a couple of SYB's = sad - all very sad!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 4 2010, 3:02 PM |
Waxers are fading already and the season hasn't even started. Congrats to the new coach, he sure is consistent but this has to be a record-bringing a team down in the standings before they even start |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 4 2010, 5:10 PM |
you people are clowns your team had a good season and you just cant be happy |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 4 2010, 7:04 PM |
you are a clown for thinking that a Waxer parent would trash the team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 5 2010, 3:34 PM |
Which SYB kids coming in? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 5 2010, 3:37 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 9:58 AM |
Returning Waxers confirmed = 4F, 2D and 1 goalie. One of the F is the so called 'star player' as mentioned in a few posts above-this is not surprising, the 2D will surprise most and the goalie is not the current coach's kid.
New to the team = 2F, 1D and 1 goalie. They have confirmed and they are all from GTHL AA.
Should be an interesting year for the Waxers |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 1:12 PM |
How many of them are from SYB? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 1:18 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 1:27 PM |
Which numbers were they, have a hard time believing that |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 1:43 PM |
This is all BS the team is not confirmed as yet. Changes will be made after tryouts. It's not over till it's over. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 2:00 PM |
Goalies are definately confirmed. They will keep one and the other one is coming from the Waxers AA team. PK will be coaching the AA |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 2:56 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 8:11 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 8 2010, 8:39 PM |
Where is the AA coach going? Why is he leaving? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 9 2010, 7:40 AM |
AA Waxer coach? His kid is the one moving up to AAA |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 9 2010, 4:13 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 2:16 PM |
Is 77 from SCC headed back to the wax? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 2:46 PM |
He is heading there so that he can ride the coat tails of #19-may backfire though if 19 plays like he did this season he didn't live up to the star player, neither of them did so who knows-maybe together they can share the title. Good players both of them but you will not see them on any 'lists' now or next year.
Probably won't be that big of a loss for SCC but debatable if it he will make any difference to the doomed Waxers |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 3:40 PM |
77 would not go to Waxed for an inch of $100's!
Get a life.
Enjoy the summer. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 5:15 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 8:04 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 9:36 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 11 2010, 10:27 PM |
YSE is not interested in SCC 77 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 10:44 AM |
Hey guess what? I recently met with the new coach of the Waxers and he promised me that my kid would go top 40 for sure. He said he had no doubt. It was at that moment I decided to NOT take my kid to the Waxers. My kid would have definately been a good addition to the team but having been through the OMHA and GTHL with my older boys I can tell you that no one can make those kinds of promises. I wish the Waxers luck but do really consider any other offers that you and your son may have. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 11:47 AM |
With our without your kid they will still suck |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 12:49 PM |
77 has been skating with them |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 12:54 PM |
Once or twice. So have a lot of kids. Especially all the AA ones |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 1:54 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 3:49 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 4:30 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 4:36 PM |
Russian, French, Spanish, Cantonese or English; the STILL suck |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 4:49 PM |
Please oh please don't waste your time with the crap that is going to develope over the next few weeks. Dismanteling half the team and dumping PK's kid will create a devision in the team that won't be mended by MH and his sales pitches.
I guess if your a AA kid dreaming of AAA then getting 4 shifts a game is good. If your on the first line and getting every power play, penetaly kill and 90% of the third period your happy.
For the rest of you good luck #19 will suck up every favour and prime event that MH can dig up from his dusty bag of tricks. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 5:09 PM |
4:49 that has to be one of the most sensible posts I have read on here in a long time. The team really needs PK to help with the big changes. The more people are hearing about MH the more they see that this team is falling before it even gets started.
To add to the post; if 19 was really that good he wouldnt stay with the Waxers. I am sure MH stroked his ego enough and that is why he is staying. Afterall that is what MH is really good at;him and his sales pitch sucked us in a few years ago. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 12 2010, 7:44 PM |
???? where do you people make this stuff up. Dumping half the team? AA kids?? Dumping PK's kid. All untrue. Seriously good reading, but total BS clearly axes getting grinded. Not going to have long to wait to see what's true. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 13 2010, 9:21 AM |
By early next week you will see that there is no BS in what has been said about half the team, including PK, gone |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 13 2010, 9:34 PM |
Disappointing show at the first tryout |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 14 2010, 12:06 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 15 2010, 12:09 PM |
How many signed on Tuesday? Any different skaters showing up tonight? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 15 2010, 4:44 PM |
All the AA kids were signed |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 17 2010, 8:41 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 18 2010, 1:33 PM |
and now it can be said with deepest sincerity...................
'Stick a fork in them, they are done'
KABOOM! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 18 2010, 2:59 PM |
Is 19 really gone? Where is he going? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 18 2010, 6:20 PM |
By the looks of it tonight-he is going to SCC |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 7:40 AM |
Why do Waxers keep losing players to SCC |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 11:39 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 2:12 PM |
Waxers are losing players due to poor coaching |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 2:26 PM |
Poor coaching of the past and the unknown of the future. Crappy organization starting from the president down!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 3:40 PM |
Unknown of the future? Nobody thinks so. this coach is a loser who has only coached losing team. He is not well respected in the hockey world. Nobody has anything good to say about him. Don't know what they were thinking when they hired him. he can't attract anyone good and has already started off badly with the team and players. if the team does well it will be because of the players not the coach. SCC is geographically close so they get the spillover. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 3:49 PM |
Ya if they are leaving a team that made it to the OMHA championships to go to a team that made it to the toilet bowl, there has to be something going on with the new coach. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 4:22 PM |
Wow-the coach isn't even being given a fair shot. He is a really good guy and it is unfortunate that he is being judged so prematurely. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 5:05 PM |
Looks like he is being judged on his past record and his present effect on the team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 19 2010, 8:23 PM |
Every year you guys say "stick a fork in them, they are done", yet they keep getting better every year.
Obviously, you guys have no idea.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 10:16 AM |
'You really should give MH a fair shot. He is a decent guy with a lot of knowledge.'
Decent? If you think this guy is decent then you need to take a closer look. The only thing he is decent at is screwing people over.
A lot of knowledge? Ya, on how to upset a kid and screw people over.
The Waxers organization is corrupt and vindictive. They don't give a hairy ball about kids and developing. They can't hold on to players so they force them to either play where they dont want to be, play on a lower level or quit puck altogether. It kindof backfires on ya though don't it? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 10:57 AM |
Learn the rules before you start to blame the organization.Quit hockey lol.Only reason they quit is because of parents like you that **** it up for them. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 11:22 AM |
There is only one rule-Any organizations of any Minor Hockey can at any time make decisions for a child without any regards to the feelings of the child. Even though parents fork out the dough they have no say in what is best for their child when it comes to sports namely hockey. If a parent dares to go against or question the desires of a coach/organization as to what is best for the child then they better be prepared to wave the white flag.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 12:49 PM |
Why does this team always have some much drama? They made it to the OMHA's!!!!! Why is the team turning upside down?
A few times I have met with MH and I got the impression that he isn't the type to hold on to players-or 'force' them to play. I took him for the type that would happily let a player go if he didn't want to be there. What decent coach would want a kid that doesn't want to be there, the kid isn't going to play at the top of their game if they are made to stay |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 1:13 PM |
I bet if this guy had any idea that you were all a bunch of cry babies he would have run the other way. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 1:23 PM |
This coach would never keep a kid that didn't want to stay. Remember you who you signed with when you signed. He also needs to put together the best team he can. If your kid doesnt make the cut then get over it. It's MM hockey now. The reality has hit for alot of parents that their kid doesnt have the skill the size, the hockey sense,or whatever it is that a team needs. Move on and stop blamming the coaches. True that if a kid doesnt want to play for a team he wont play with full heart. Arrangements should be made to let the kid go. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 2:02 PM |
'This coach would never keep a kid that didn't want to stay.'
Then you don't know this coach. He has held players back before and it sounds like he is doing it again. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 4:39 PM |
yeah, yeah, yeah because everything else on this thread has been dead on.
He signed all those AA's cut PK's kid, promised someone he'd get them drafted, now has a long history of holding kids up. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 23 2010, 4:43 PM |
gO BACK TO HOUSELEAGUE LOSERS |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 25 2010, 4:18 PM |
Becareful folks! Not only does this guy have a poor history has a productive coach he also has a history of walking out on teams half way through the season. What I hear about what is happening already sounds very similar to what happened a few years ago to another 95 team.
I will agree, he is a nice guy......until you want to do what your kid wants to do and it doesn't follow his plan....then the true colours come out. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 25 2010, 7:05 PM |
hope he's not skating a signed kid - knowingly or unknowningly -- u still have any imports in the picture there ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 26 2010, 7:08 AM |
No he is not,that would be SCC skating kids without paperwork. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 26 2010, 11:14 AM |
so SCC really did that? hard to believe that they knowingly do that.
i guess that is why Waxers are going to punish a couple of the kids eh? Hold them back just to get revenge? Nice |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 26 2010, 12:30 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 26 2010, 12:38 PM |
Question for ya coach-why can't you just let the kid/s be happy and support them in giving them their release? What do you have to gain by holding players back? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 12:56 PM |
How is the team looking ? Last tryout Wednesday ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 1:07 PM |
team is full so last try out is a waste of time. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 1:08 PM |
No way - are you telling me that my kid has no hope on Wednesday ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 1:10 PM |
They filled it way baack when they had their Bday skates-all try-outs have been a waste of time |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 2:07 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 2:37 PM |
Didn't you see all the AA kids there?? Those are the new players |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 2:51 PM |
Thats ok there will be 30-40 kids at the last tryout on Wed. Even if there are no spots available they need to collect the money. Need to fund the little boys club. Because minor hockey isnt screwed up enough they need to make it even worse.
Keep it going Waxer executives, youve messed up before why stop now. This organization is so freaking behind the times and there approach its no wonder that 99% of tall the talent leaves.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 2:59 PM |
did I miss something or did'nt the org. not own the first round of the draft just a few short years ago? kid by the name of SS - hey i'm not from Markham - but chill out. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 3:00 PM |
2:37 pm - nothing wrong with AA players. Let's say you have 4 AAA players already, this gives you 12 As. Since maximum number of As you can have is 51 (unless you have AAAA players) - all you need is 51-12=39 As. So you need is 19-20 AA players and you are set ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 3:12 PM |
2:59. As a matter of fact they did. (4 years ago). Look at how many of there minor midget teams actually do well. One team in 30 years good job!! This years team actually made it to the OHL cup, congratz and maybe one kid will actually make it to the "O". |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 27 2010, 3:22 PM |
Aside from his obvious natural talent the success of SS was not due to the organization but instead to outstanding coaching that happened to be in the organization at the time.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 29 2010, 8:39 AM |
How was yesterday ? Any updates please ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 29 2010, 8:45 AM |
Saw some new kids out there but dont know which ones got picked. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 29 2010, 9:17 AM |
8:45am.....don't get all excited about the new kids out there. Anyone that is attending a AAA try-out now has already been cut from at least one other team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 29 2010, 10:57 AM |
I understand that team is going to be very strong. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 30 2010, 9:34 AM |
I could see why he isn't done. The only kids who could put the puck in the net couldn't skate. This is a great skating team with no offence. He has to be looking for goal scoring if he is still looking for anything. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | April 30 2010, 9:50 AM |
Who left and who was cut? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 2 2010, 10:38 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 3 2010, 8:25 AM |
Waxers 3-0. Solid performance |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 3 2010, 9:28 AM |
Nice try. Waxers lost 2-0 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 3 2010, 12:08 PM |
They lost to COW ? Wow - COW must have very strong team this year ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 3 2010, 1:35 PM |
so seriously, who won?
how many new kids on both teams |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 3 2010, 6:54 PM |
12:08 - you are obviously a COW parent or LT !! keep pumping your team up. HAHAHAHA We will see how you are without your key players when real season begins. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 4 2010, 8:43 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 4 2010, 10:34 AM |
COW parent or not if I am not mistaken Waxers beat COW everytime in last season. If there is truth in that COW lost their key players and if COW did win then Waxers are in trouble. BIG TROUBLE! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 9:37 AM |
Rumour has it this club has a lot of class. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 11:30 AM |
Everything bad about minor hockey in full display |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 1:58 PM |
any truth to the rumour that they are holding 3 kids back? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 2:37 PM |
Not sure about 3, but 2 for sure |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 2:49 PM |
Oh well, looks like one will play in Newmarket and onother one in Aurora. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 3:20 PM |
Why are they holding 2 or 3 back? This is the minor midget year, if a kid doesn't want to play why not let them go? Why do the kids want to go? What is the reason for screwing over a kid? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 3:31 PM |
The question is - do they have a full roster ? If not - no wonder they hold players they like back. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 3:45 PM |
No full roster issue, team is picked. The buck stops with the AAA convenor on this one, certainly not with a first year coach. Shame on the Waxers executive for not doing right by the families involved here. Really, with all of the ill in the world, why not just throw this goofy little hockey mess up in the air and say "I'm going to take the high road on this one" and let the kids go play where they want. It looks petty and vindictive on the Waxer organization. Park the ego boys ........and the self-righteousness that goes along with it and do what's right..... ya bunch of narcissistic old boy club pilfering wankers. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 4:05 PM |
I don't get this - team is picked and still holding 2-3 players ? This does not add up. Surely they want them to play for Waxers. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 4:07 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 4:37 PM |
"No full roster issue, team is picked. The buck stops with the AAA convenor on this one, certainly not with a first year coach. Shame on the Waxers executive for not doing right by the families involved here. Really, with all of the ill in the world, why not just throw this goofy little hockey mess up in the air and say "I'm going to take the high road on this one" and let the kids go play where they want. It looks petty and vindictive on the Waxer organization. Park the ego boys ........and the self-righteousness that goes along with it and do what's right..... ya bunch of narcissistic old boy club pilfering wankers."
Agree with it being done for vidictive reasons. Disagree that the AAA convenor is bares all the blame. It wouldn't be happening if MH and PK weren't pushing for it. It was my understanding that there are 3 that want out but they are P.O.'ed because they feel they were stabbed in the back by another player so now they want someone to pay and of course the only logical way to do so is to make sure they really upset a kid. First class alllllllll the way |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 4:51 PM |
So let me get this ... They have a roster they like and still will not let the kids go ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 5:10 PM |
I am assuming that MH and PK are the coaches? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 5:52 PM |
What a joke of a coaching staff. Laughing stock of the ETA |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 8:53 PM |
just so you idiots are aware, #77, #3 from scc are already on yse, and #19, #81 from markham are on scc. so stop talking and shut up. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 9:37 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 5 2010, 9:46 PM |
I hear they can sign anywhere but the Waxers who don't want them or with SCC who they skated illegally with so by rule are not allowed to sign with them. How long is MG's suspension?? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 8:44 AM |
I understand that OMHA's advise on tryout paper work was incorrect. There is no need to skate a kid illegally when you have seen him play all season. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 11:27 AM |
MG suspended? On what grounds? Was the error not made by the OMHA?
Does the Waxer organization not realize what a joke they are? It seems like this has gotten pretty out of hand all because the Waxers want revenge. This is something that the media needs to see, Minor hockey at its worse. I have no doubt that all you nay-sayers would feel a lot differently if it was your kid that was involved. The Waxers are a picture of all that is wrong with MINOR hockey. Pulling this crap in a minor midget year?
Do your research folks, look at all the facts and you will see that the Waxers are pushing this for one reason and one reason only and it has NOTHING to do with thoughts, feelings, hopes and dreams of kids. It is all about this organization being on a power trip. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 11:32 AM |
Well said.
A little empathy from the Waxer Org is in order ! Spite and revenge should not motivate decisions. |
|
Anonymous
| re:95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 12:50 PM |
I agree why have them skate when you seen them play all year,, but on the same token why have a birthday skate and invite kids from scc and the gthl with our own kids? is that not tampering too? who is call the kettle black? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 1:11 PM |
That's not the issue....the issue is that 3 kids are being held back from playing their Minor Midget year by an organization that is acting purely out of malice.
Speaks volumes about the organization and will have an impact on future decisions of players and parents as they consider the Markham org. The organization needs to look how this decision positions them as an option for players going forward. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 4:24 PM |
Stop your crying already. You guys are the ones looking like idiots.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 5:21 PM |
Over 20 posts in less than two days.
Suddenly, it becomes really obvious who frequents this site.
Only one team this drivel could be coming from.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 5:23 PM |
I think GS should work the phones a bit harder...lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 5:49 PM |
GS? Isn't it SG??
I think there are lots of posts on this thread because it seems to be a sore topic right now. There are probably people posting here that have no interest other then to stir the pot. Fun though isn't it |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 6 2010, 6:41 PM |
There is a universal law that governs the world, "As you sow, so shall you reap", or some say "What goes around comes around" others simply call it Karma.
SG, be careful how much pain you inflict on others it just may come back to you in the form of painful disappointment. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 9:58 AM |
What are the odds of a 4'11" goalie getting a hard look at Oshawa Under 16? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 10:01 AM |
No full roster issue, team is picked. The buck stops with the AAA convenor on this one, certainly not with a first year coach. Shame on the Waxers executive for not doing right by the families involved here. Really, with all of the ill in the world, why not just throw this goofy little hockey mess up in the air and say "I'm going to take the high road on this one" and let the kids go play where they want. It looks petty and vindictive on the Waxer organization. Park the ego boys ........and the self-righteousness that goes along with it and do what's right..... ya bunch of narcissistic old boy club pilfering wankers.
......................bang on! The Toronto Star/Sun/G&M should sink their teeth into this one and expose these "little man syndrome" goof balls. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 4:34 PM |
Waxer organixation has every right to keep their players. SCC is trying to buy a team and that is what the media should get a hold of. 95 Waxer team built a srong team that should stay together because they definitely turned a lot of heads last year. SCC were not as successfull last year and are trying to steal a winner for their MM year. SCC is in the wrong here what is so hard to see about that. They will win this battle in the end because of stature and money. Leaving the remaining Waxers feeling ripped off. Although the Waxers have been underdogs every year and have surprised. So fingers are crossed that they can do it one more time and shove it right up SCC's you know what. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 4:57 PM |
4:34.....dude, get your facts straight
"Waxer organixation has every right to keep their players. SCC is trying to buy a team and that is what the media should get a hold of. 95 Waxer team built a srong team that should stay together because they definitely turned a lot of heads last year. SCC were not as successfull last year and are trying to steal a winner for their MM year. SCC is in the wrong here what is so hard to see about that. They will win this battle in the end because of stature and money. Leaving the remaining Waxers feeling ripped off. Although the Waxers have been underdogs every year and have surprised. So fingers are crossed that they can do it one more time and shove it right up SCC's you know what."
No one is trying to buy players (except YSE). There is no money coming from either team
Waxers built a strong team that turned heads? You obviouly are a Waxer parent or player. The only time heads turned is from side to side from embarassment for the team. Strength had nothing to do
with your little debut in the OMHA's
SCC is not in the wrong. If you ask the right people, you will find that the OMHA is in fact in the wrong.
There is no battle between SCC and Waxers. It is between a player and an organization. If the player is let go then there will be a winner--the KID!
Waxers feeling ripped off? If they are going to surprise people then why would they feel ripped off?
Guess what folks? I am a Waxer parent. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 9:07 PM |
Waxers lost a key player who wanted to leave last year. Organization dug in against others players in a vindictive, chilish, pathetic display of cry baby syndrome. Looks really good on the new coach, the old coach, and most significantly the AAA convenor. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 9:11 PM |
Look, I'm a kid facing the waxers this year, and I know they will be a good team. They always are. They will be competing for third place with A/P and SC, so who cares who they lost, who they got, let the kids play and you'll see a good hockey team. Good luck in the season. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 7 2010, 9:21 PM |
wow, full of perspective son. good to see. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 8 2010, 9:38 PM |
Cmon ,they wont even make the playoffs. Battle for the basement with a much improved NC.
YSE and Barrie is a coin toss and SC third. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 9 2010, 11:14 AM |
Markham is hard to play against because of the team style they play. The kids that left are hardly superstars infact they are hardly noticeable. Waxers will be absolutely fine. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 1:51 PM |
Good for Waxers ! They did let the kids go ! Well done ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 2:05 PM |
And you would know this how? Was there any conditions of either kid? Why did they agree to let them go? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 2:12 PM |
If this is true and I hope that it is, Good on Markham for allowing 15 year old boys to pursue their passion.
Had things continued down the path they were, there could be no winners. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 2:19 PM |
oh ya good on Markham alright.....'ok boys, we don't want you so we'll let ya go but you can only go to any team but the one that you want to'
I would say good for Markham, but the conditions that were placed on the releases do nothing for the kids. Both of them have to play AA now |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 2:28 PM |
Never hold up in a court of law. They are either released or they are not. We still live in a free country. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 2:56 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 9:57 PM |
It's that kid again, you people just don't know how to shut up eh? Well figure it out, your comments won't make a difference, if you want pleasure go work on your hands in the bathroom, don't chirp the organization. That's probably the only way your kid works on his hands anyways. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 10:02 PM |
Any organization who would hold onto to any kid are pigs and couldn't care less about the kid. It's alot about the ego, the money and whatever else these teams have up their asses. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 11 2010, 10:06 PM |
Oh shut up you plug, get off the site and get a job. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 12 2010, 4:18 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 12 2010, 4:45 PM |
Leave Waxers alone - they will be just fine ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 13 2010, 7:52 AM |
Does the release BS above mean Waxers kid can't go to SCC? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 13 2010, 8:42 AM |
Who would like to go to SCC anyway ? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 13 2010, 8:44 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 13 2010, 10:01 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 21 2010, 4:28 PM |
Markham will surprise a lot of people once again this year. Losses were not that big. Those players are definitely not all star players
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | May 21 2010, 9:46 PM |
Really? Are you feeling that insecure that you need to bring Waxers to the top again. Sorry but Waxers will struggle-no surprises |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 9 2010, 4:49 PM |
Waxers are totally the best, they are the team to beat. They beat Red Wings so you know for sure that makes them tops |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 11 2010, 3:28 PM |
Sorry to burst your bubble. Red wings are not the same red wings this year.You're both pretty bad. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 11 2010, 9:41 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 12 2010, 10:12 AM |
Coach is a serious head case |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 12 2010, 10:42 AM |
they also picked up Whittaker...he can carry the team to the OMHA title! he helped DMF! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 12 2010, 11:08 AM |
Thanks Dad! That has got to be one of the funniest things I have read. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 12 2010, 11:11 AM |
Ya he helped DMF so much so that they cut him |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 13 2010, 4:10 PM |
I hear the kid left since they wanted to stop paying his ride. Whatever.
Welland will be standing at the head of the line once they settle down. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 13 2010, 4:42 PM |
imports, no one likes them but you need them for the bottom line which is to win. the gthl runs on that, and too many omha teams are following suit. sure you end up higher in the standings but local players lose out. welland has to be the worse don't think there is 1 local player there any longer & seems every team is going that way.
i will vote for the teams without the imports. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 13 2010, 5:45 PM |
Waxers are still doomed. Down grade in players, no attempt to promote team play, a coach that drops the F-bomb every other word. It is a recipe for disaster. To bad because they did have potential to be decent |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 13 2010, 6:05 PM |
Downgrade in players, wishing it to be true does not make it true. Being cut hurts but you need to look beyond that to getting a new opportunity and lease on life. Your son will either take that chance and run with it, wish his friends well as they remain his friends throughout life, or go the other route. My thoughts are take the positive road.
Like most teams this team has a lot to improve upon and has to work hard every night but have shown a modicum of success to date to be built upon. win over Halton, tie versus Halton, win over red wings, tie versus Canadiens, win over Hamilton, win over COW. Nothing awe inspiring but certainly enough to agree headed in a positive direction. Sure team has had some poor games to date as well but if teams did not have things to work on it would not be much fun.
Cheers.
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 13 2010, 7:23 PM |
Well said 6:05
5:45 Coach has been great and we've already got more goals out of the new kids, than we got from the last four months total production of the players that left. Down grade? So be it then, bring on the recipe for disaster!
F-bombs? We'll be playing hockey more Sundays, while you'll be in church I guess. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 11:12 AM |
It's ridiculous to suggest and infer that the outbound pair of players that went to SCC are not missed. Are you suggesting that they would have been cut....................you idiot? I will give you congrats though - on making out ok given a bad situation. Re coach: Waxer organization has been a little "questionable" (to say the least) at the top throughout the past several years. This F bomb swewing lackie will fit like a glove. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 12:01 PM |
only 1 was getting cut not BM. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 12:51 PM |
Either way you cut it, this team did not pick up anyone that could replace BM. Having said that the Waxers are still a decent squad..................right now. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 1:58 PM |
Neither were being cut, anyways who cares now. Lets move on. Waxers will very likely finish 5th this season which is good for golf. The coach will end up with a bar of Ivory soap in his yap.
Final predictions - 1. YSE, 2. AP, 3. Barrie, 4. SCC, 5. Waxers, DNF. NCP |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 3:04 PM |
Time will tell where all teams finish. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 4:28 PM |
Coaching history can also tell where teams will end up. Sorry Waxers |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 14 2010, 6:36 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 15 2010, 8:43 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 15 2010, 9:43 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 15 2010, 1:59 PM |
Worst waxer 95 team in years .What a shame! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 15 2010, 3:00 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 18 2010, 10:22 AM |
Waxers are the best - watch out ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 6:09 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 6:10 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 9:10 AM |
It was a great start. We weren't really ready and we wanted Quinte to start off on a high cause they aren't going to know what hit them when we meet again |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 3:58 PM |
Kids who left are good players but didn't get on the board much.Coach will find out that to swear and bench kids will not work long.Didn't work with his other teams and won't work with this one. Check out his history of coaching last place teams. Has started the season off going in that direction and blames everyone but himself. AP is hurting and will have a tough time against all but the weakest of team. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 4:34 PM |
yeah all his last place teams. What place were they in the year before he took them, and the year before that, and the year before that, and the year before that?
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 5:13 PM |
No clue.What's your point? That he can only get a job on perpetually last place teams?Or that he can't improve a last place team? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 5:28 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 19 2010, 6:03 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 20 2010, 11:30 AM |
Wow, great comback. As creative as the coaching. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 20 2010, 11:56 AM |
prediction for tonight = waxers 7 nc 0 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 7:57 AM |
Waxers won. Way to go boys |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 9:07 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 11:11 AM |
Waxers beat NC 4-0 with NC dressing 11 players. Impressive. Will finish below NCP. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 11:19 AM |
NC is much improved. They held the score at 1-0 (for Waxers) until the 3rd. Unfortunately they fell apart in the third but a 4-0 loss is not indicative of the game played by both teams. NC probably had 8 shots on net but they did a good job at keeping the score to a minimum |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 11:28 AM |
wow, thx for the spellbinding mucg sought after commentary. Proves that people do actually live in the own little vortex's - not being able to distinguish what really matters in life and what doesn't. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 12:27 PM |
Is it true they got beat by the AA team? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 3:17 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 21 2010, 4:25 PM |
it was close  |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 24 2010, 10:51 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 27 2010, 1:52 PM |
Barrie is coming to town ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 28 2010, 7:08 AM |
What was final score versus Barrie? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 28 2010, 9:11 AM |
|
anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 28 2010, 10:24 AM |
How did the new kid from Central look in the Barrie lineup?? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 28 2010, 10:59 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | September 28 2010, 11:25 AM |
1-0 is the correct score. Waxer goalie stood on his head last night. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 2 2010, 7:49 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 3 2010, 10:35 AM |
how's the new players look .. keeping up to AAA standards |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 3 2010, 9:47 PM |
nice, try a diffrent approach |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 4 2010, 11:01 PM |
howd the big bad waxers do tonight? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 4 2010, 11:47 PM |
They beat big bad York Simcoe |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 4 2010, 11:56 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 6 2010, 12:52 AM |
score is they are a much stronger team than yse |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 6 2010, 8:46 AM |
Much stronger then YSE? Thanks for the morning chuckle |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 7 2010, 4:11 AM |
Best Defense in the league. Average forwards. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 8 2010, 12:39 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 8 2010, 11:14 AM |
4:11am
Go to bed and stay off da pipe |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 9 2010, 10:06 PM |
So......how is the powerhouse of a team with the best defence doing in the tournament?
Uh huh, yep, that's right.....definately a powerhouse LMAO |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 20 2010, 8:03 AM |
It looks as though now all the Waxers have a shot at being drafted to the O. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 23 2010, 12:24 AM |
Yup ..highest ranked talent in 95 hockey |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 23 2010, 10:19 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 23 2010, 10:52 PM |
Funny thing is that the whole team can drafted as high as they want but that mean crap all!! Show up to camp and see how you fit in then we'll see what happens. And your so highly touted scout ends up having no players picked. oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | October 24 2010, 12:22 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 12:42 AM |
Will finish in second as best D in the league |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 7:45 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 8:33 AM |
Waxers crushed the Pete's |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 9:38 AM |
Waxers new coach has really taken the team to the next level. Should've left well enough alone by the look (and sound) of it. The real problem lies in executive and executive decision making. What would Donald Trump do? That's right! See ya later........ bon voyage to the coach. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 11:20 AM |
The only thing this coach is guilty of is trying to stop the hand-holding of the players-parents-previous coaches. He has high expectations and so he should. Time for Little Billy to grow up.
I say Keep up the great work coach |
|
anonymous
| 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 12:39 PM |
Sorry Petes won (read petes beat waxers) 2-1 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 2:26 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 2:28 PM |
11:20 Coach, there's no Little Billy on the team
|
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 3:09 PM |
Waxers will turn a corner and once again surprise many |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 2 2010, 9:43 PM |
11:20 - yes sir; 3 wins in 13 starts - two of which came against "0 Wins & too many losses to count versus the lowly North Central Pred's. Ya he's money in the bank. Bye bye. Bring back last years coach |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 8:40 AM |
The coach is the real thing. He coaches young men NOT little boys. Grow up and grow a pair, you can't hold Little Billy's/Johnny's/Sammy's/Joey's hand forever |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 10:17 AM |
whats with the "little billy" angle, are you alright? it's about wins/losses along with development. quantum leap backward is all i am observing. losing to the petes of late, come on now! pk rules! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 10:18 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 10:34 AM |
'Little Billy" is just a general term....I am not surprised that you find it a little complex |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 1:39 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 1:47 PM |
mmmmmmmm...........................cake...........................yummy |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 2:07 PM |
I guarantee this nonsense isn't the current or former coach. GUARANTEE.
Just folks with too much time on their hands. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 3 2010, 2:44 PM |
I agree with 2:07....coach is not interested in this nonsense, he wants to develop the team. Leave him be and let him do his job. Once you step back you will see that it is indeed a great job that he is doing |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 4 2010, 1:11 AM |
I am the best Coach in the business period. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 5 2010, 12:01 PM |
These losses are a planned stage of the overall development plan. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 6 2010, 1:48 AM |
What can I say. Best hope is a shot at the toilet bowl, an thats along shot! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 7 2010, 2:26 PM |
Best Coaching and defence in 95 haockey |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 8 2010, 12:13 AM |
Thanks coach
Tonight, Ajax 2 Markham 0. Team is small, work hard but no sustained offence. If defense is so good why do they have a forward playing point on power play? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 8 2010, 12:40 AM |
So defence can rest for 5 on 5 stupid. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 8 2010, 7:03 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 9 2010, 8:48 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 9 2010, 11:34 AM |
I would not worry about the score 2 - 0 AP - wait for playoffs ... |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 9 2010, 11:39 AM |
so you're saying your defense is not skilled enough to be on power play |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 9 2010, 1:20 PM |
You wont even have a sniff at the playoffs |
|
Anonymous
| Waxers whup Whitby | November 9 2010, 9:34 PM |
Waxers 2 Whitby 1
good game..a little bit crazy at the end but still..... |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 9 2010, 10:16 PM |
Since when is 2 - 1 a whup.Dont get carried away cause you finally won a game. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 9 2010, 11:53 PM |
4 wins playoffs here we come lol |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 11 2010, 9:23 AM |
Developing well ..not interested in wins yet. They will come. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 14 2010, 12:32 PM |
Why are the Waxers the slowest team to report scores to the OMHA website?
What was the score last night? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 14 2010, 3:56 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 14 2010, 4:00 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 14 2010, 8:32 PM |
did they beat barrie tongiht? |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 14 2010, 8:45 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 15 2010, 9:05 AM |
See waxers are now movin up the standings. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 15 2010, 10:26 AM |
They were able to pull off a tie because of the call-ups. Once they play with their own full roster they will move down again |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 15 2010, 2:56 PM |
You past a weak SC team dummy |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 16 2010, 9:48 AM |
Waxers are on the rise - solid in 4th and going up ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 16 2010, 11:08 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 17 2010, 7:00 AM |
on the rise if you count backwards 6 5 4 3 2 1 |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 17 2010, 10:52 PM |
Remember, if your rise lasts more than 4 hours consult your physician |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 9:43 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 10:28 AM |
Good one 9:43! That really made me LOL |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 12:48 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 12:50 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 1:56 PM |
We got spanked all over the ice....was embarrassing, could have been worst if not for our tender. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 3:06 PM |
their goalie always keeps them in the game. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 3:07 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 3:22 PM |
If we could all encourage NC to win a few so that Markham sits at the bottom that way the coach has lived up to his reputation in bringing a mediocre team to the bottom. Good thing he is consistent |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 3:35 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 23 2010, 3:51 PM |
Want the scoop? Here it is. The coach is just plain mean. This has nothing to do with not holding the kids hands. He swears at the kids, calls them names like retard and cocksucker and the worst players are the ones he hand picked. Some scout he is. He should be fired plain and simple. He should not be allowed to coach period and especially not kids. Say what you like about how or why the Waxers made it to the OMHA championships last year, but they did. Now they can barely beat NC. Coach has the kids so scared they don't know what to do. Told a kid who got an MVP award in front of the whole team that it was a travisty to hockey he won the award. Shouts at them when they screw up, shouts at them when they win awards. Uses the excuse that he is tough like OHL coaches. Nobody believes that.OHL coaches are professional and are dealing with adults not kids. Coach shouldn't do anything that can't be told in public so whoever doesn't like this post, talk to the coach or whoever hired and has not fired him. His last two teams were in last place and that is where the waxers are heading. I feel sorry for the boys who want to play hockey and have some fun. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 9:19 AM |
Plus he sends them out to goon the other teams when losing and laughs....piece of work!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 9:50 AM |
You put up a fuss when PK was coaching claiming he wasn't tough enough and now you are putting up a fuss because MH is TOO tough. The grass is always greener isn't? You guys are a joke |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 9:54 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 12:06 PM |
3:51 ...If is true what he calls them as stated why would Parents not get together and deal with this " RISK MANAGEMENT" ..just call the OHF and they will tell you what has to be done and send a representative to interview the boys. Trust me if this is true what you have stated HE WILL BE GONE !! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 12:08 PM |
" SPEAK OUT " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go to OHF website and READ !! IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO SPEAK OUT IF YOU KNOW ABUSE IS TAKING PLACE !!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 12:12 PM |
THIS IS NOT WHAT GOES ON IN THE OHL !! THIS IS AN ABUSIVE PERSON TRYING TO JUSTIFY HIS SICKNESS !! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 12:43 PM |
loud mouth loser egomaniac. see ya! waxers will play .700 hockey after bozo gets the boot - just watch |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 12:59 PM |
You'd have to go back to Minor Atom to see a team this weak. 7 pts that year, -97 (GF over GA). Next two years Avg 30 points, -18 (GF over GA); Next three years Avg 38 points, + 15 (GF over GA). Projected 2010/11: 22 points, -22 (GF over GA).................. now that's progress! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 2:08 PM |
A few things. One = the parents will not go to the OHF because none of the crap about the coach is true and Two = the Waxer organization would never have the balls to boot him |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 5:21 PM |
12:59 you have way to much time on your hands |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 6:47 PM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 24 2010, 11:03 PM |
If this coach really is as bad as rumours are suggesting, something needs to be done. Concerned parents should not be accepting the way their KIDS are being treated |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 25 2010, 6:40 AM |
That's part of coaching, if you don't like it pull your kids from team sports.It happens in all sports at all levels |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 25 2010, 7:02 AM |
6:40.You're brilliant..Call the OHF and give them your opinion and name. Tell them ..that ABUSE is acceptable and part of the game. Tell them that every Coach is abusive. Tell them how stupid the RISK MANAGEMENT program is in hockey. I hope your kid is safe and okay ? I doubt it ! Hope you have heating in your cave in this cold weather. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 25 2010, 2:32 PM |
6:40 you are an idiot! Someone call childrens aid.
7:02 well said! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 26 2010, 1:41 PM |
So, has this coach been reported yet? From what I have heard about PK it is unlikely that he would stand for the rumoured treatment of the boys. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 28 2010, 12:25 AM |
Parents are afraid of the Coach here and he rules no matter what ! He can abuse if he wishes. They do not have the guts to challenge him. |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 28 2010, 12:30 AM |
total BS! If your kid is being "abused" and you say nothing - shame on you, try parenting, none of the boys are playing hockey for a living - let them have fun! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 29 2010, 9:49 AM |
I smell grilled Chicken ! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2010, 11:23 AM |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2010, 12:36 PM |
What you smell is the scent of victory. You just don't know it cause you've never experienced it. Waxers have begun the climb with a strong solid win over Clarington |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | November 30 2010, 12:40 PM |
You really want to make yourself look better eh? Didn't you just play COW and not Clarington? No way you would have beaten Clarington. Suprising but not impossible for you to have beat COW |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 1 2010, 1:09 AM |
Gaurdians..??...........NO BACKBONE !!!!!!!!!!! Pathetic !! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2010, 1:09 AM |
Pathetic !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Anonymous
| Re: 95 Waxers | December 2 2010, 8:01 AM |
Do share? You are obviously very bothered by something you find "pathetic", What is it? |
|
Anonymous
| |