Return to Forum

March 14 2012 at 7:56 PM
No score for this post
Guest  (no login)
from IP address

Response to The list


Is your response suggesting the top four players have received an invite but either:

1) rejected?

2) Or have not responded?

If not responded, when would they need to respond by?

Again, it just leads one to question why one of the four best 96 forwards are not on the list? Given the JRs age debate?

I get why NS would opt out...he's good and likely will get to practice at minimum next year. And NS made BC (who is on the list and highly touted) look like minced meat! And watching him, I will be surprised if he makes the DT team.

And why would JE not reply? I know they are looking to put together a 17U team outside of USA hockey, but it's still a gamble. Why not agree to it and decide from there? It's silly.

The other IL JR player who I understand has NA interest, why isn't he on the list? Some are saying he's one of the best. And while I hear the West coast player is being scouted by the W, but still it's not a done deal?

It just doesn't make any sense!!

Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Response TitleAuthorDate
Page 1 2
anonMar 15, 2012, 5:58 AM
Page 1 2
guestMar 15, 2012, 6:03 AM
Page 1 2
GuestMar 15, 2012, 4:58 PM
Page 1 2
anonMar 15, 2012, 5:48 PM
Page 1 2
CryptorMar 15, 2012, 6:07 PM
     You must
Page 1 2
anonMar 15, 2012, 7:07 PM
      The BDAOA
Page 1 2
OMGMar 15, 2012, 8:38 PM
Page 1 2
anonMar 16, 2012, 12:54 PM
        MN kids
Page 1 2
PittMar 16, 2012, 4:24 PM
         Re: MN kids
Page 1 2
georgeMar 23, 2012, 5:10 PM
         Re: MN kids
Page 1 2
MI dadMar 24, 2012, 7:42 AM
Page 1 2
EarlMar 25, 2012, 5:18 PM
Find more forums on Network54Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement