Return to Forum

March 14 2012 at 7:56 PM
No score for this post
Guest  (no login)
from IP address

Response to The list


Is your response suggesting the top four players have received an invite but either:

1) rejected?

2) Or have not responded?

If not responded, when would they need to respond by?

Again, it just leads one to question why one of the four best 96 forwards are not on the list? Given the JRs age debate?

I get why NS would opt out...he's good and likely will get to practice at minimum next year. And NS made BC (who is on the list and highly touted) look like minced meat! And watching him, I will be surprised if he makes the DT team.

And why would JE not reply? I know they are looking to put together a 17U team outside of USA hockey, but it's still a gamble. Why not agree to it and decide from there? It's silly.

The other IL JR player who I understand has NA interest, why isn't he on the list? Some are saying he's one of the best. And while I hear the West coast player is being scouted by the W, but still it's not a done deal?

It just doesn't make any sense!!

Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Response TitleAuthorDate
 WellanonMar 15, 2012, 5:58 AM
 Re: 15, 2012, 6:03 AM
  Correct...GuestMar 15, 2012, 4:58 PM
   CripticanonMar 15, 2012, 5:48 PM
    YepCryptorMar 15, 2012, 6:07 PM
     You mustanonMar 15, 2012, 7:07 PM
      The BDAOAOMGMar 15, 2012, 8:38 PM
       yesanonMar 16, 2012, 12:54 PM
        MN kidsPittMar 16, 2012, 4:24 PM
         Re: MN kidsgeorgeMar 23, 2012, 5:10 PM
         Re: MN kidsMI dadMar 24, 2012, 7:42 AM
          USHLEarlMar 25, 2012, 5:18 PM
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement