<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

U19 2009-2010

April 21 2009 at 6:24 PM
No score for this post
Anonymous  (no login)
from IP address 75.56.48.115

 
Who is on top?

TI
MISSION
CYA
FURY

???????

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.48.115

Re: U19 2009-2010

No score for this post
April 21 2009, 6:26 PM 

Well, where is everyone going? Coaches? Recruits? Levels? Age appropriate?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.220.139

Re: U19 2009-2010

No score for this post
April 21 2009, 8:31 PM 

TI may have the edge.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
67.184.88.133

Re: U19 2009-2010

No score for this post
April 21 2009, 8:37 PM 

Yes, TI has the edge and Mission has 7 bridges.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.220.139

Re: U19 2009-2010

No score for this post
April 21 2009, 9:31 PM 

yup, a bridge per skater

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.139.120.184

jwhl

No score for this post
May 1 2009, 5:53 PM 

colorado selects leave midwest elite

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.139.120.184

jwhl

No score for this post
May 1 2009, 5:57 PM 

look on colorados web site they will tell you why?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
West side Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Hot

No score for this post
May 2 2009, 3:55 PM 

Now there's a team with some hot moms. They will be sorely missed.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AC
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: Hot

No score for this post
May 3 2009, 6:52 AM 

No more Nationals either. TI 19 now favored to win it all?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
URA
(no login)
67.162.9.196

Dreamer

No score for this post
May 3 2009, 8:25 PM 

No core of 19's returning, No goaltending, No scoring, No CanAm exposure and a coach with No 19U experience let alone communication skills to represent these players to colleges. Below 500 this season at BEST !!!!!! What will happen next season for the returning Juniors with such a weak 16 program ????

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login Dad2435)
98.193.70.120

URA little nervous

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 9:50 AM 

the State Championship won't be a walkthrough in 2010?

By my count at least the first two offensive lines from U16 will return, plus three defensemen, plus some from CYA. Competition for the few remaining spots will be tight.

There are plenty of good goalies at this level. Will mission roster four goalies?

This group got to the finals at Nationals with balanced scoring, and no "pre-olympians". I believe this speaks to the strength of AC as a coach.

AC has plenty of college coaches in his contact list, since believe it or not, scouting is very active at U16. As for his communication skills I believe he speaks "hockey coach" and not "telemarketer".

Most of this group, whether 92 or 93, are currently sophomores. They are staying together to get the better of the two coaches for two more years. TI is a very tempting choice for any sophomore.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
unsure
(no login)
198.232.63.58

Re: URA little nervous

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 12:43 PM 

Who coached the mission 16s last year and how did they fare?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.193.70.120

Re: URA little nervous

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 2:40 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login Dad2435)
98.193.70.120

Re: URA little nervous

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 2:42 PM 

This is a U19 thread. TI u16 moves up to 19.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.53.183.45

exposed?

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 2:58 PM 

....some of them do move up as do some of the Mission 16's. As far as scouting at the 16's, last time I checked, some of the better TI 16 players had heard from few if any scouts. AC may have collegiate coaches on HIS list but more importantly, how many TI 16's are on collegiate scouts lists? It takes communication, effort, follow through and not "tele-marketing" but the knowledge of what these scouts want to see and hear. Didn't see any of that at TI in the past couple of years. TI 16's may have gotten to the National championship game "without 4 pre-olympians" but remember, you were playing 16's, not 19's......a whole new ball game. You do what's best for your daughter so if TI and AC is what's best for you, great...but don't question why some players would want to play for the Mission at the 19 level, especially 92's and 93's that are still Juniors. Playing there will get them noticed. Being in the right place at the right time (scouted venues)is key!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: exposed?

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 3:23 PM 

TI 16 got to the national championship game because they had a much easier path than most teams. As with the Polar bear, when they finally played a good team, they GOT beat.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.28.44.66

Re: exposed?

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 4:03 PM 

The 92s and 93s in question are not allowed to be contacted by colleges coaches yet. They are only sophmores in high school.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.53.183.45

in the know!

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 7:42 PM 

Yes, you are right that coaches cannot initiate phone contacts to players until July 1st after Junior year but as of September 1st of Junior year, any player can contact a coach by email or a phone call, make unofficial visits and even get offers once on campus. Waiting until coaches can call you is WAAAAAAAY too late!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.206.75.61

Re: exposed?

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 12:44 PM 

Mission got beat by polar bears.
Ti beat polar bears later in the season.
TI choked at the polar bear tournament in that game.
plus, the team they played was 17u. they had girls two years older than some (most) of the girls at TI.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login Dad2435)
98.193.70.120

Re: exposed?

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 4:52 PM 

I don't think I questioned why some players would want to play for the Mission 19's. If you read this bs, it sounds like it is the only choice. I simply responded to the post which is spreading mis-information about the momentum at TI and questions the ability of the individual who I believe is the better hockey coach.

The mope's comments at 3:23pm do not deserve a response.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
mope
(no login)
24.13.78.217

yes, the truth hurts

No score for this post
May 5 2009, 8:11 PM 

and it's undisputable. Plus AC apparently does not understand (duh!) nor respect the good female, student athlete. Who has he helped place in a D-1 program? Nobody! If RM had not run the CYA 14's into the ground a few years ago, AC would not even have a team. CYA defections at'92 and '93 two years ago saved AC's ass, especially since only three 92's now remain from the EP coached national championship team of only two short years ago. Why? Most of the hard working players went to the Mission where they finally felt part of a progressive girl's organization. They found respect. Who has TI recruited? Nobody! Anyone with any concern for their personal development on and off the ice has left TI. One year to go and then turn out the lights. A very sad story indeed.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login Dad2435)
98.193.70.120

What a relief

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 6:44 AM 

I thought this board was here to undermine the TI effort. It's nice to see the mission parents are just as willing to slander their own. BTW I'm sorry things didn't work out for you the way you wanted at CYA, and then TI. I'm sure it will be much different at Mission.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
West side Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Disgruntled

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 8:08 AM 

Nice to see the parents who feel they were underappreciated voice their displeasure. Just be careful of that grass across the fense. It isn't always as green as it seems. While you are bending over in order to smell that green stuff just make sure you stop and kiss Old Lady C's ring. She is the one who runs that whole show. By the way the moms at TI are much better looking than the hags at the Mission.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.86.78.198

TI Mom's

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 10:29 AM 

used to give the Mission Mom's a run for their money until last year...losing all those games did not help the facial lines and the losing induced binge drinking has given them all a beer belly...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Hockey Parent
(no login)
71.143.231.209

My Daughters Played for AC

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 3:31 PM 


Why give AC a bad rap. He is a good Hockey Coach.
Every Girls team he has coached has improved. So,
He does not cuddle parents like some coaches.
Any team that AC coaches will be respectable at any level.
If a College Coach likes a player, he will contact a coach or
e-mail a player. Do you think these College coaches don't know
that all these club coaches play up about any of there players.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
99.141.132.102

Re: My Daughters Played for AC

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 3:57 PM 

Agreed. AC is a fine, proven, hard-working coach who is dedicated to developing his players and seeing his teams succeed. Not sure if these posters are concerned about not having enough quality players for next year (lots of talent is graduating from the U19 mission team) or maybe they don't like the prospect of good competition in the neighborhood.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.53.183.45

talent

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 4:46 PM 

....and lots of talent returns!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
wishing
(no login)
67.162.9.196

No Call

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 8:53 AM 

6 out of 18 players looking for a better place from TI 16's (1/3) of the team. TI 16 who played Mission 19 last year as a senior had a hard time since no colleges had any information on her ( TI 16 college communication "A Joke") TC / Mission 19's helped bring a great Div 1 opportunity. Comunication / exposure that's what's important at 19's. Most of these posts are from parents who would jump at the chance to play Mission but realize their is probably not a spot for little Amy .... Drink the cool - aid and dream some more !!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Info
(no login)
76.8.80.162

Recruiting

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 9:00 AM 

U16 is the level most watched by college scouts

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
College Scout
(no login)
71.143.231.209

Most watched levels ??

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 12:58 PM 



1) U16 is not the most watched by college coaches.

2) They watch the High School grade and Birth year second.

They look for there needs in certain players !

How Smart-good grades, Age- High School, needs to be filled. Talent ??

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
99.141.132.102

dose of reality

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 5:59 PM 

What's important at u19 (or at any other level for that matter) is to get on a team with compatible teammates and a good coach who all work together toward a common goal -- succeeding to the best of their ability as a team. If, instead, the goal of the players, coach and parents is to get scouted, that just about guarantees that the season will be an unpleasant affair, marked by selfish play, backbiting and recrimination.

Most of the girls we're talking about have already had numerous opportunities to be scouted and will continue to be scouted this coming year, whether they play on Mission or TI. Both teams promise to have solid players and respected coaches who will attract scouts. The scouts have been and will be influenced by what they see in a particular player on the ice -- that's what they are paid to do. Communication, no matter how glib, simply will not change that fact.

So, in the end, it comes down to who your daughter feels most comfortable playing with. Mine has made her choice.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.136.27.231

D1 Colleges

No score for this post
May 10 2009, 6:30 AM 

There is a saying:
"If you want something done right, do it yourself"

Why are you relying on your Club Coach to PLACE your daughter and communicate on her and your behalf?

1. Scouts and College Coaches start taking NOTE of
the players at the U14 level, if they attend particular
venues, then they also get RATED.

2. It is up to your daughter to communicate to those
College Coaches, her showcase and tournament schedule
at the U16 and U19 level.

3. The College Coaches will continue to simply take NOTE
at the U16 level.

4. It is at the U19 level that their interest level
increases. It is at the U19 level that communication
between your daughter and College Coaches is the most
important (Junior and Senior Year). FYI, keep that
communication short, simple, informative, with one or
two sentences just socializing - and most important -
no more than once a month!

5. If your daughter is not attending Development Camps
or other venues (Prospects Tourney, Chowder Cup, Magog
Tournament, HNIB, etc) that have college coaches in
attendance, then it is your responsibility to tape her.

6. Realize that the College Coaches are more interested
in watching her PLAY in a showcase or a tournament than
watch her at a 1 or 2 week camp (excluding USA Hockey
National Development Camps). Obviously, if there is a
camp that has a College Coach (coaching at that camp),
your daughter is very intersted in playing for - then
she should consider attending that camp; but it wouldn't
be mandatory.

7. Attend College Night, I don't think anyone associated
with College Night or your State Hockey Association has
implied that it is up to your Club Coach to PLACE the
player. You do need a recommendation from your Club
Coach, when you submit your college application.

8. A College Coach is going to assume that a prosective
player isn't interested in playing for him/her because
she hasn't communicated with him/her - the Coach is not
going ask the question "Why hasn't the Club Coach told
me about this player".

9. Every college has a online or paper athlete
questionnaire/survey that the player can complete, which
is the first step toward communicating interest to a
College Coach.


As for the Senior from TI (07-08) that played for the Mission (08-09), the responsibility was with her and her family to get her PLACED, not her Club Coach.






 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Disgruntled

No score for this post
May 6 2009, 4:12 PM 

Hey there Willie, watch what you are saying, I am keeping my eye on you and I have seen the TI MOMS left and its not pretty, we Mission moms rock. I don't have to take all the credit just because of my name, hot spirited and just plain hot. I agree TI is almost washed up. Maybe this year some 16's and even any 14 that played up may move up and have a solid team but with the talent moving into the Mission 16 year and then up the next year or so watch out. These girls have played together and the new ones coming on will most certainly deserve to be there. I wouldn't want my daughter by to at TI ever, CYA YEAH, but still MISSION BEATS THEM ALL, GO MISSION!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.120.84

Re: Disgruntled

No score for this post
May 8 2009, 7:59 PM 

hi. can you go away. you're so annoying.

much obliged

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.120.84

Re: Disgruntled

No score for this post
May 8 2009, 8:00 PM 

hi. can you go away. you're so annoying.

much obliged

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
99.140.209.101

Re: Disgruntled

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 12:56 PM 

Sorry you are such a stick in the mud with no sense of humor, why don't you go away.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
99.141.65.38

We all want you to go away

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 5:13 PM 

This is about hockey ... not about you. I know who you are and you are not even close to being a hot hockey mom. You wish ... along with wishing that your player had talent. Yes she plays with the Mission, but only by default. YOU know what I'm talking about. I'm sick of reading the garbage you're putting on this board. We're all sick of it. If the readers only knew what you really looked like ... you belong in a trailer park. Now that I've exposed to everyone what you really look like, can we please get back to hockey?!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.115.32.182

Re: We all want you to go away

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 5:17 PM 

Buehler? Buehler?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: We all want you to go away

No score for this post
May 10 2009, 1:31 PM 

hey there since when has this post always been about hockey, from the looks of it much of the time is spent bashing one team or another so if you can rationalize that its about hockey then delude yourself. Also you sound like a real jerk, yes lets let everyone get back to your version of hockey so you can bring on the negative comments. Please do us all a favor and let us know how your daughter fares this weekend at tryouts, one thing is for certain if her attitude is as bad as yours she won't be making any top team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anon
(no login)
99.141.65.38

Hit a nerve?

No score for this post
May 10 2009, 4:25 PM 

My daughter will fare just fine at tryouts ... you should worry about your own kid. She can be replaced easily ... and you know it. This board is always about hockey related subjects and I've never knocked any player, club, or otherwise here. You're just annoying and obnoxious and the crap you write on this board has absolutely nothing to do with hockey AND you are not hot! Just because you wear shirts with little holes in them to show your cleavage doesn't make you hot. It amazes me that you set that example for your daughter. I'm sure you'll be so proud when she turns out just like you.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.51.74

Re: Disgruntled

No score for this post
May 9 2009, 11:14 PM 

haven't done a thing, why would i?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.136.27.231

College

No score for this post
May 10 2009, 6:33 AM 

There is a saying:
"If you want something done right, do it yourself"

Why are you relying on your Club Coach to PLACE your daughter and communicate on her and your behalf?

1. Scouts and College Coaches start taking NOTE of
the players at the U14 level, if they attend particular
venues, then they also get RATED.

2. It is up to your daughter to communicate to those
College Coaches, her showcase and tournament schedule
at the U16 and U19 level.

3. The College Coaches will continue to simply take NOTE
at the U16 level.

4. It is at the U19 level that their interest level
increases. It is at the U19 level that communication
between your daughter and College Coaches is the most
important (Junior and Senior Year). FYI, keep that
communication short, simple, informative, with one or
two sentences just socializing - and most important -
no more than once a month!

5. If your daughter is not attending Development Camps
or other venues (Prospects Tourney, Chowder Cup, Magog
Tournament, HNIB, etc) that have college coaches in
attendance, then it is your responsibility to tape her.

6. Realize that the College Coaches are more interested
in watching her PLAY in a showcase or a tournament than
watch her at a 1 or 2 week camp (excluding USA Hockey
National Development Camps). Obviously, if there is a
camp that has a College Coach (coaching at that camp),
your daughter is very intersted in playing for - then
she should consider attending that camp; but it wouldn't
be mandatory.

7. Attend College Night, I don't think anyone associated
with College Night or your State Hockey Association has
implied that it is up to your Club Coach to PLACE the
player. You do need a recommendation from your Club
Coach, when you submit your college application.

8. A College Coach is going to assume that a prosective
player isn't interested in playing for him/her because
she hasn't communicated with him/her - the Coach is not
going ask the question "Why hasn't the Club Coach told
me about this player".

9. Every college has a online or paper athlete
questionnaire/survey that the player can complete, which
is the first step toward communicating interest to a
College Coach.


As for the Senior from TI (07-08) that played for the Mission (08-09), the responsibility was with her and her family to get her PLACED, not her Club Coach

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
98.206.75.61

What??

No score for this post
May 11 2009, 7:25 PM 

"the responsibility was with her and her family to get her PLACED, not her Club Coach"

I thought playing for TC was supposed to be the key to getting anywhere.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.158.125.162

committed

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 7:15 AM 

To all the misinformed...this particular player has "been placed" as you call it at a very fine institution which happens to be Colgate. The point to be made is that last year as a Junior playing 16's at TI, there was little to no guidance in regard to the entire recruiting process that the juniors at the Mission have already been very informed about and are being actively recruited, thanks to a director who is the one informing both the players/parents on how to go about the process, informing the coaches about individuals' skills, and getting back to the player/parents regarding specific things certain coaches are looking for, where they fall on thier lists, etc. None of this went on last year at TI. Yes, it is the responsiblity of the player to make the contacts and follow through but it is extremely helpful when you have an advocate in the hockey world who can help guide the players, the parents, and communicate between the player and the collegiate coach. Simple as that!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: committed

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 8:22 AM 

So many teams, so many places of higher learning to play the game. Everyone will find a place to play if they so desire. But the real game is $how me the money. Very few getting full rides based solely on hockey skill and/or coaches connections(sorry TI). Skill plus academics are really the keys for most players who desire to play a non-revenue producing women's sport at D-1/D-3.
Best of luck to all at tryouts.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
207.63.100.162

Re: Committed

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 8:44 AM 

Very happy to hear the player will be playing her chosen sport at a good college. Good for her, and thanks to the coaching at Mission who helped her. Too often people get all tangled up in silly organization loyalty, and fail to see that its the PEOPLE that make these things happen, and right now they just so happen to be employed by the Mission. They could have still been employed by TI, but that org. dropped the ball, now there at the Mission. Good for the Mission, better for the girls that make those teams that get the best (all around) coaching, on and off the ice. Good luck to your daughter!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Not Mission Yet
(no login)
63.242.253.155

Better Yet

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 9:33 AM 

It will be better for all the girls to the extent the other girls organization are forced to step up their coaching, development and college placement efforts.

Check out the Mission u19/u16 schedule just posted on their website. That is a pretty intense season.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Off the fence
(no login)
99.141.132.102

Re: Better Yet

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 1:00 PM 

Intense? I'd call it over the top. These girls had better get into the schools of their choice based on their hockey skills or their coach's salesmanship, because they'll have little time for academics or any other interests. It won't be cheap either.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.139.120.184

guest

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 1:13 PM 

sounds more expensive than a prep school.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 1:30 PM 

Prep school is cheap if you have the academic and time managmement skills.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.53.183.45

schedule

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 4:28 PM 

Perhaps that schedule is for both the 16's and 19's some of which they will be attending together, other tournaments may be either for just the 16's or the 19's.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
West Side Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

What

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 4:48 PM 

The TI moms are way better looking than the hags at Mission. TI moms are even dumber than the mooses at Mission. Go TI!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.107.2

Re:What

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 5:01 PM 

Its really hard to tell the TI cows from the TI hillbilly dad's! They all need to start shaving (their back)!
Go Mission....Go Mission!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.206.75.61

Re: Re:What

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 12:49 PM 

clearly people forget that this is supposed to be about hockey.
at least the parents at TI know what they are talking about and don't all think their kid is the best when really she sits on the bench as third line player.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
truth seeker
(no login)
99.141.132.102

Re: schedule

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 5:01 PM 

Well then, let's be clear about what's being advertised.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.245.197.174

what about school?

No score for this post
May 12 2009, 7:04 PM 

If you look at the proposed schedule and then figure in at least 4-5 MWEHL weekends, you're looking at at least 10 (or more) missed days of school. Figure in a possible trip to nationals and there's 4-5 more. God forbid you get sick and have to miss school due to illness. If you ask me, this is WAY too many days to have girls missing school. Too hard to catch up when you miss this much.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: Better Yet

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 6:56 AM 

" the Mission U19 and U16 teams will be traveling together to several events during the course of the season . " Several events, not all events. Our experience with Mission and TI is that the majority of the players are excellent students. They utilize their time well, they have to. If you don't think your daughter will, then travel hockey is not for her. They do miss out on a lot of the social aspect of school, so that is a sacrifice.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
207.63.100.162

Re: what about school?

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 7:17 AM 

Most athletes driven to play the highest possible level in sports at their age level are generally driven people in all aspects of their life. If you think the seniors that have college commitments from the Mission, TI, etc., got them without very good grades as well, then you are mistaken. Average girls do not play AAA hockey past the U12 level. A straight A student could easily miss 10 days of school in one year and be just fine. Do some real homework and you will find that most of the girls playing AAA are very good students as well, because they have to be.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Concerned parent
(no login)
99.141.132.102

Re: what about school?

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 8:14 AM 

We don't need to hear generalities about AAA players. We have years of experience with our daughters and can judge for ourselves whether grades are likely to suffer with this kind of schedule. Based on my experience, the schedule is a concern. Others will have to make their own judgments as to what's best for their kids.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.107.5

Re: Concerned Parent

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 8:36 AM 

You may not want to hear the generalizing, but it can be backed up with fact. If you are so concerned, quit and go play house league! The general statements made by the poster were not at all untrue, and in fact make perfect sense. If the schedule is more than your kid can handle, then so be it, but dont talk smack about the program or the schedule because of your personal concerns. These kids have been handling that schedule just fine for years. Keep your concerns to yourself.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
207.63.100.162

Re: concerned parent

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 9:50 AM 

"Based on my experience, the schedule is a concern."

If your daughter is old enough to play at the U16/U19 level, then she knows what she wants, and it's her experience, not yours. She is the one playing hockey and doing the school work.
Get over yourself, you sound like a typical overbearing whack-job hockey parent with way too much free time!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
198.232.63.58

Re: concerned parent

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 10:44 AM 

Settle down. Obviously, there's a point at which the hockey/school equilibrium can be thrown out of balance, even for highly motivated teenagers. If it's not an issue for you or your daughter, more power to you. If it's an issue for others, they should be free to discuss it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
West Side Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Moms

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 11:52 AM 

TI moms are way hotter. I don't think any of them ever got above a "C".

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Girls Hockey
(no login)
71.143.226.128

The Mission U19 Schedule

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 12:44 PM 


The Stoney Creek is the Best women's Hockey tourney (level of play)
The Schedule is fine, if no Midwest elite games(they do not teir?)
Some of the new players might not handle that much Hockey ? Injurys
will play a part in playing 80 games ? Look at last years team at
Nationals, they were beat up and squeaked to the finals. Goaltending
will be the key for any IL teams to advance in all of the Tourneys ?

All in All, ILLINOIS does a Nice job with Girls Hockey !!

Good luck to all the Girls trying out for all teams..

Stay Healthy and enjoy it if you can, it comes to a end quicker then
you think..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Girls Hockey
(no login)
71.143.226.128

The Mission U19 Schedule

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 12:49 PM 


Stoney Creek is the Best women's Hockey tourney (level of play)
U19 Schedule is fine, if no Midwest elite games(they do not teir?)
Some of the new players might not handle that much Hockey ? Injurys
will play a part in playing 80 games ? Look at last years team at
Nationals, they were beat up and squeaked to the finals. Goaltending
will be the key for any IL teams to advance in all of the Tourneys ?

All in All, ILLINOIS does a Nice job with Girls Hockey !!

Good luck to all the Girls trying out for all teams..

Stay Healthy and enjoy it if you can, it comes to a end quicker then
you think..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
207.63.207.4

details

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 1:05 PM 

Since you brought it up, what is the goaltending situation looking like?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Truth
(no login)
193.200.150.152

Set the record straight

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 1:25 PM 

Here is the hard truth. I'll start by saying I know AC, and like him. I think he is a VERY good hockey coach. I also know, as someone said, he doesn't "cuddle" people. Thats true, just who he is. He would rather coach and leave. Dealing with parents and scouts is not something he enjoys or excels at. If he's being 100% honest with you, he'd tell you that himself. He does what he has to in those areas. TC on the other hand excels at 'selling' these kids to colleges. And if you really think that doesn't matter, you're being very naive. The proof that you're wrong is simply, history. If colleges just 'found' these kids, it would reason that all the coaches in this area have put many kids in school. But the facts don't bear that out. NO ONE is close to TC. Not just 1st liners, but 2nd, and 3rd. That's an undisputable fact. I don't blame anyone for choosing to play with AC. But don't blame those who choose to play for TC. Don't distort the truth. Scouts and college coaches care a great deal about the opinions of those they respect. And they respect TC.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.139.120.184

guest

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 3:04 PM 

you said it tony

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 3:52 PM 

OK, THIS MESSAGE IS TO WILLY AND EVERYONE ELSE, you tell me how annoying I am and then you all stir up things about the hags at Mission, I told you come and look for me at tryouts. Also you have the wrong girl whoever mentioned the tasteless wearing of shirts by the suspected hot hockey mom, wrong, wrong, wrong . I am class all the way!!!! I bet you will be at tryouts, for all of your bashing of the Mission. One intelligent comment about the upcoming schedule and players missing school. I agree that girls at the higher levels get there by being motivated kids, that drive translates to all areas of life. My daughter plans on pursuing a career which will require post-graduate education and has learned time management skills combining hockey with school, that's what defines success. being able to focus on your hockey goals and carrying that over to education and life. By the way, she gets this from her mom, take that Willy!!!!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
I havent seen
(no login)
207.63.100.162

anyone considered hot

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 5:54 AM 

Hey hottie,
Ive been at most of the spring skates at the Mission, (I am assuming you are there with your daughter too) and sadly, haven't seen one mom that is remotely Hot! That is not to say that the Mission/TI/Fury/CYA moms that are there are ugly, but to label yourself as Hot, sets a pretty high standard that quite frankly, I just haven't seen. I'm really nothing to look at either, old, overweight, and plain looking, but I haven't given anyone the impression that I am anything else. I would love to see a "Hot Mom" at the rink! Where are you, give us a hint, U12, U14, U16, U19, daughter is a forward, defense, goalie? Come on now, put up or shut up!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
99.141.132.102

differing opinion

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 6:25 PM 

If playing for TC was all that it takes, every girl who has played for him and who he talks up would be playing D1 at the school of her choice. Don't think that's the case. The girls who made it to college did so on their talent, hard work, grades and test scores. That's the way it is and should be. A coach has nothing to do with grades and scores (except maybe in a negative way when the program over-commits to too much hockey). As to hockey, both TC and AC clearly understand how to put their players in a position to showcase their talent and work ethic.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
the real difference
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: differing opinion

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 6:48 PM 

TC will have his pick of some quality TI players at tryout #1, while AC has to wait for the Mission cuts.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.53.183.45

All it Takes?

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 6:56 PM 

Playing for TC is not all that it takes and I don't think that is what posters are trying to get across. The bottom line is that an advocate and someone who knows this entire process and has been doing it for sometime, (even with his own daughter) is a benefit during this exciting yet challenging process. It is a numbers game and unless you know how to play it, a player can easily lose out. Of course it takes talent and good grades on the part of the player but what people continually misunderstand is that it isn't known to the player where they fall on a coaches list or how interested or uninterested they really are in a player, sometimes until it is too late. Letters and emails are distributed to dozens and dozens of girls but the reality is 6,7,8 recruits per year is all they take. Knowing just how interested a school is in a player because of their skills and their academic achievements is a necessity and someone like TC who communicates with coaches and both share a mutual respect is someone who can help a player understand just how "wanted" they really are. OR......the other option is to hire a middle man at someplace like NCSA and pay thousands of dollars. There are several of the top 92's from across the country who have already committed to schools as Juniors....some of which are from right here in Chicago and have played for the Mission.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Hot Hockey Mom

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 7:16 PM 

Listen Hot......What's with all the college stuff. You'd be much hotter if you couldn't speak English. Lay off the academic stuff, it's very unappealing.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.138.0

Re: All it Takes?

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 8:02 PM 

Alright, so what goalies are where and who is committed already?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.197.239.199

eleven goalies

No score for this post
May 13 2009, 8:35 PM 

at mission

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.158.125.162

Committed!

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 6:30 AM 

that's for me to know and you to find out! It is a personal decision for each individual to "announce" if and where they are committed, not information to advertise on a message board, especially this one.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.107.11

Re: Hottie

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 6:59 AM 

I agree with the poster at (May 14 2009, 5:54 AM), and have to admit that calling yourself a "Hot Hockey Mom" is really setting yourself up for some bashing here. If you are in fact proud of your looks, then why not tell us who you are, or at least dis spell any rumors and post a picture? Having a hot mom at the rink would be a welcome sight for us average looking guys, and might even help us decide where to try out!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Hottie

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 8:41 AM 

Half the fun is finding me, anyway I believe that my commentaries regarding hockey are noteworthy and the rest is just icing on the cake. Counting down to tryouts, I think Mission will of course be the first choice for the majority of girls and additionally TC is a professional and along with his coaches will do the best he can in selecting the girls. The ultimate goal of course is to have your daughter at the U19 level be coached by him. I have alot of respect for him and the other coaches at the Misiion. He cares about the kids, he really does. Good luck to all of the girls!!!! See you boys at tryouts!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
I See
(no login)
99.141.65.38

A Hottie?

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 1:03 PM 

I'm quite sure once your found the party will be over........or should i say the fat lady will be singing?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: A Hottie?

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 7:56 PM 

blah, blah, blah, by the way the correct use of " your" should be "you're" GO MISSION

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.141.65.38

Re: Blah Blah

No score for this post
May 15 2009, 7:59 AM 

Okay, I get it. I hit a nerve about your looks, and more importantly that you will never be able to identify yourself because of your "Un Hotness". Go ahead, plenty of grammatical errors to point out!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: Hottie

No score for this post
May 15 2009, 5:03 AM 

Hottie......she/he ? who lives in glass house, shouldn't throw stones. I let it go but since you are so particular......alot is supposed to be a lot. You're welcome.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
RPMcMurphy
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Whose tryout is it anyway?

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 7:08 AM 

You should be "commited". Too bad the state hospital at Tinley Park is closed.
Just let the kids play a great game!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
noone
(no login)
99.139.120.184

Re: All it Takes?

No score for this post
May 14 2009, 7:16 AM 

this s a general statement that can be made in any state with any program. Ultimately it is the player that gets themselves to the next level. Good Luck to all.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Randy

No score for this post
May 15 2009, 12:23 PM 

Hey Randy

Ease up Big Guy! This isn't about hockey. It's about the recent augmentation the moms have undergone since the state playoffs. It's time for the ladies to "Bust Out" at tryouts. Come on out Hottie.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
166.203.37.200

Re: Randy

No score for this post
May 15 2009, 1:28 PM 

First of all thank you for the grammatical correction, I am probably not as old as you are so I do tend to use some slang. A nerve was not hit about my looks, I can dress down or up so maybe I might be overlooked when I CHOOSE TO BE. Tomorrow is the big day, let's all look our bests because remember this is all about us, not our girls, yuck, yuck, can I say that? GO MIISSION

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
166.203.37.200

Re: Randy

No score for this post
May 15 2009, 1:28 PM 

First of all thank you for the grammatical correction, I am probably not as old as you are so I do tend to use some slang. A nerve was not hit about my looks, I can dress down or up so maybe I might be overlooked when I CHOOSE TO BE. Tomorrow is the big day, let's all look our bests because remember this is all about us, not our girls, yuck, yuck, can I say that? GO MIISSION

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
WTF
(no login)
74.63.107.11

Are you serious?

No score for this post
May 15 2009, 5:34 PM 

Choose not to be noticed? Your definition of "Hot" is seriously flawed! Check me out at the rink, I will be the "Hot" dad disguised in the old pot bellied body in the ill fitting clothes.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: Randy

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 5:39 AM 

I guess us old folks didn't know slang was another word for stupid.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Blanch
(no login)
68.255.223.162

Rosters

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 7:12 AM 

Its been said that the mission teams top to bottom are going with 20 player rosters. To all the third liners and forth liners enjoy creating and expanding your splinter collection. Oh yea and thanks for bank rolling the team. Or maybe this way you make it easier to cruise to nationals by rostering other orgs. talent.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.162.22.65

Re: Rosters

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 7:21 AM 

Expanded rosters to pay for all the freebies.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Rosters

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 10:24 AM 

First of all, its smart to go with 18 players, 2 goalies. Last year our injuries made a dent in our ability to compete and with added girls this will guard against this happening again. Also, just because a girl is on the 3rd or 4th line doesn't mean they stink. Last year lines were pretty evenly divided wtih the stronger girls playing with those who were not necessrily at their level, ie first year. All lines were good, some just had different contributions such as speed or scoring. I know someone will make a snotty remark about my daughter being a last line player and no that wasn't the case, I still stand by my observation of how lines functioned. Why don't all of you quit your complaining and focus on your daughters game and leave the organization out of it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.107.4

Hey Blanch

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 4:06 PM 

Take a deep breath an settle down. First, 20 players on the Mission U12 roster will be difficult when 16-17 players (including goalies) are all that is showing up to try-outs! Second, why not wait until the teams are rostered before you start cackling like you just got the 6th seat on "The View". If the talent is there, I cant see any reason not to have 20. I, for one would have no problem with my daughter being a 3rd or 4th liner on the best team as opposed to......? If one girls organization can keep the rest from a trip to Nationals simply by taking 2 extra players on 3 teams, then what does that say about the other organizations!
Signed,
proud 4th liner

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.30.221

Re: Hey Blanch

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 5:00 PM 

Could not make first tryout. How many goalies showed?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.227.196.166

Re: Hey Blanch

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 6:06 PM 

Where exactly is the Blanch reference coming from, I don't think I look a DAY OVER 70. Good try getting me reveal myself by sharing info on how many goalies showed, thought I missed that one huh, I am much smarter than I look!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anon
(no login)
99.141.65.38

Not too good looking then

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 7:24 PM 

If you're much smarter than you look, you're pretty dumb.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Not too good looking then

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 3:05 PM 

Why the hostility, you must be a woman who feels very threatened. Give it up and get a life or make a contribution that doesn't resort to name calling. When the majority of girls don't make the Mission, where do you think they will be going, beginning from U19, I know this is 19 thread but don't get so rigid. This question was not directed to you MISS ***.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.63.64

Re: Not too good looking then

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 4:34 PM 

miss ***.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anon
(no login)
99.141.65.38

Goalies

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 7:24 PM 

There were two U12 goalies and three U16 goalies.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.197.174

goalies

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 8:33 PM 

how about 19U -- how many showed?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: goalies

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 8:40 PM 

Nice tryout times for the 19's TI----another example of indifference towards girl's hockey.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.55.5

Re: Goalies

No score for this post
May 16 2009, 11:21 PM 

this is a u19 thread... no one cares about lower ages..

okay thanks.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Goalies?

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 9:24 AM 

Don't have the slightest idea. Spent time at both tryouts checking out the recent augmentations. Very nice. Keep it up girls.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
99.141.65.38

Know your facts

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 5:09 PM 

If the Mission rosters more than 17 players, the fees go down for all players. They rostered 18 on a few teams last year and players' fees dropped. Please try to post accurate information.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.245.197.174

tryouts

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 6:21 PM 

so no one is talking about tryouts -- what's going on?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.139.120.184

guest

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 6:40 PM 

rumor has it the mission is going to roster 35 players per team it will only cost 5000 in fees go mission go mission

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
avis
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 8:04 PM 

they still won't win nationals.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.62.173

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 17 2009, 9:54 PM 

and 35 players means lots of benchwarmers! How great!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
207.63.100.162

Re; Mission Try Outs

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 4:17 AM 

Question: If the Mission is such a terrible org. with people here saying they will have huge rosters, big fee's, never win Nationals, etc., etc., then why are all the best girls there at try outs trying to make a team? Are they all crazy? Or can we assume by the negative post's that you have already been cut from the Mission?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.255.54

Re: Re; Mission Try Outs

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 7:29 AM 

Not sure how you're evaluating the "best", at least at the u19 level. A more objective evaluator probably would conclude that the talent is spread around pretty evenly among the competing teams. Haven't followed what's going on at the other levels.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
65.79.36.66

Re: Re; Mission Try Outs

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 12:48 PM 

This is very true. I believe that ti and mission will be very close tanelt wise..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.255.54

Re: Re; Mission Try Outs

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 1:16 PM 

Which means that team chemistry and work ethic may be the decisive factor. Could be interesting.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
207.63.207.4

another factor

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 1:17 PM 

what about goalies? any ideas about what's going on?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.62.224

Re: another factor

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:06 PM 

talent..



and a goalie signed at ti.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
NOT in the know
(no login)
207.63.100.162

Re: Re; Mission Try Outs

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 1:23 PM 

what is TANELT?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 4:27 PM 

I don't know who you but that's quite a joke and a compliment at the same time for the Mission, that they would have that many girls to take. Of course they won't, the teams will have 18-20 players, that's it and from my past experience all girls were pretty evenly played which absolutely can't be said for what was done at TI.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.141.65.38

Re: Evaluation

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:33 PM 

My evaluation of the "Best" org. is as follows:
Girls get equal ice time with the boy's side.
Girls get ice slots that make sense with their age group, not whatever is left over.
Girls get independent off ice training by pro's, not coaches.
Girls get equal size locker rooms as the boy's.
Girls are treated as equal participants in the org.
Of course my comment may have been taken to mean the 4 best teams, No, just the best all around org. for any female to play at (at the moment).
I am by no means a "Mission Lover", but a supporter, yes, for the above stated reasons.
Also, Ive had a daughter in hockey for many years with experience at 3 of the 4 organizations, so I'm really just saying that right now, the Mission get's it while the other 3 are playing catch-up.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.62.224

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:42 PM 

i'm sorry, but you're really dumb.

you can only have a total of 20 players, but thanks for letting us know they won't take 35. you're really helpful.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.107.12

Re: Hot Hockey Mom

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:45 PM 

I certainly hope for your sake you ARE hot, because the really dumb post's are on my last nerve....Blondie.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:48 PM 

apparently you're too obtuse to read the response and decipher what was being said, everyone knows you can't take 35 dumbo, the point being made was that the Mission could attract any number of girls they want, you must really be threatened to act like such a jerk

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.107.12

Ease up

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:53 PM 

on the peroxide Blondie, it's leaked through to that cavernous cranium of yours wiping out what little neurons you were born with.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.62.224

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:54 PM 

Honestly, the alleged "hot mom" said, and I quote "...that they would have that many girls to take. Of course they won't, the teams will have 18-20 players, that's it..."

I'm sorry, but if you read this, she's completely oblivious.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.62.224

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 5:57 PM 

and why wouldn't she throw all her stripper money to the mission's fees...




awaiting my comeback...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hot hockey mom
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: guest

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 6:31 PM 

Here's your comeback, what's with you people, you must not be able to read between the lines. Let me re-phrase my original comment for those who are so "concrete", The point is that the Mission can call the shots, they are in front of the pack. We all have kids in hockey, not just girls and the poster stating 35 was trying to stir the pot. I can tell the bunch of you are not going to be on the Mission and thank God for that, we won't have to deal with such pettiness. You still have the wrong girl, no bleached blonde here and no stripper pole although I hear it's a great workout.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.48.121

HOW ABOUT TRYOUTS

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 7:52 PM 

Let's talk about tryouts and not about moms and how everyone who's played or is playing on mission thinks it's super great.

Shall we?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.255.54

Re: HOW ABOUT TRYOUTS

No score for this post
May 18 2009, 8:26 PM 

despite the feuding organizations and bickering parents, the system appears to be working in the best interest of illinois girls hockey. no team at the u19 level will be a lock. there'll be good, intense competition within illinois, and illinois teams should be competitive nationally.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Re: HOW ABOUT TRYOUTS

No score for this post
May 19 2009, 9:01 AM 

Nice augmentations last night.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
65.79.36.66

Re: HOW ABOUT TRYOUTS

No score for this post
May 19 2009, 12:19 PM 

eh?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

player's leaving?

No score for this post
May 20 2009, 7:47 AM 

How many players will TI lose to Mission?
How many players will Mission lose to TI?
Thanks.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.202.255.54

Re: player's leaving?

No score for this post
May 20 2009, 7:52 AM 

define "lose"

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
65.79.36.66

Re: player's leaving?

No score for this post
May 20 2009, 12:09 PM 

it's not a loss if you don't want the mission players..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Willy
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Pickups

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 9:10 AM 

The Mission picked up the three best players from the TI program. How could TI be so stupid to let these three superstars go? By the end of the year, maybe even holiday time, the two skaters Mission picked up will be first line with KC. The most important thing to remember is there likely will be more shared ice time with these two superstar skaters. Go Mission.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
207.63.207.4

wow

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 9:15 AM 

thanks for the kind words, dad

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.86.78.202

From what theam?

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 10:48 AM 

are these 16's that are moving up?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
172.190.134.154

Re: From what theam?

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 10:52 AM 

Loyalty at TI is a one way, dead end street.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
207.63.207.4

From what theam?

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 1:11 PM 

Just curious, dad...who are the three best players/skating superstars you speak of?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: From what theam?

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 4:11 PM 

All the superstars left TI years ago.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.62.159

Re: From what theam?

No score for this post
May 21 2009, 8:08 PM 

and went to college.

does anyone have pre-rosters with people who signed where?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: From what theam?

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 5:19 AM 

Nope....they went to the mission and out East. TI has lost so many players because of the coaching---or lack thereof.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Willly
(no login)
67.175.159.229

TI's loss

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 7:40 AM 

I would have to agree with the Mission father in the previous quote. There aren't any players left at TI. Not even one single good player let alone great player. The best TI has to offer left this spring to play at Mission. Mission is a true top notch team while TI is nothing more than an average club team. Go Mission.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Lola
(no login)
67.175.159.229

TI's loss

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 7:55 AM 

The only players from TI who could make Mission's team did. Enough said.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: TI's loss

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 9:00 AM 

There are great players on both teams. Why is that a negative?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
207.63.207.4

TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 9:08 AM 

I agree with the above post. There are some very good 92s still left at TI.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.158.125.162

TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 9:34 AM 

...None of which have ever played U19. That will be the difference.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 10:21 AM 

Yes, that is true, but that is the way things work. You start as a U10, then U12, U14, U16 and finally U19. Many fine Mission players haven't played U19 either because they were U16's. I've often felt my daughter was not ready to jump up to the next age group but somehow she always was. Just because somebody is on Mission or TI doesn't make them more or less ready to jump to the next level. Time will tell but won't it be more fun if they're good competition for each other ? We'll have to see how the team dynamics play out. Good luck to both teams.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.93.171

Re: TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 10:42 AM 

"Time will tell but won't it be more fun if they're good competition for each other ?"

House League, Single "A", and maybe High School, Yes. NOT at AAA. That may be the way the people at TI think, and probably that is why they made sure the Mission could not field more than one team at any level this year, but make no mistake, TI only prolonged the inevitable and probably fueled the Mission, and the girls that would have played on a second team to make sure it happens soon! The amount of time and commitment it takes to play at the AAA level, AND be successful, repeat: AND BE SUCCESSFUL, is staggering for any young athlete. The girls and parents at the Mission want Illinois to be respected as a premier place to play AAA hockey where our teams can travel anywhere in the United States and Canada and compete on their level, and win! That wont happen with one good organization, and 3 other watered down ones! Ever wonder why Assabet Valley girls organization wins so many National titles every year? Why they have the most teams in the finals every year? They field 2 and sometimes 3 teams at every level which gives the girls on the bubble incentive AND competition to make it to the top team the next year.
I for one, would like to see Illinois viewed as more than a "One hit wonder" by the other top organizations around the world. The Mission has made a great start, but it will be a long road with many bumps. Go Mission!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.38.47.165

Willy's Trash

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 11:09 AM 

Willy, is a TI parent trying to fan the flames by talking trash. Simply read his previous posts and you'll see where his loyalties lie. He is definitely not a Mission parent. TI can come on here and make all the claims they want. But the better team will be determined on the ice, not on this message board. TI has set itself up for tons of smack, should the teams not be "equal". lol I'm looking forward to the action, pretty confident in how it'll all work out. Good Luck all. And Willy, shut your mouth.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 11:16 AM 

We are talking about two different things. You are talking about the organizations and I am talking about the players. I agree that Mission is really putting a lot of effort in building and nurturing the girls program. TI has done nothing. TI, as we knew it, It will come to an end soon but for now they still have quality players on the U 19 team. I don't know anything about any of the other TI teams but assume people would go as a last resort.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Globe Trotter
(no login)
76.202.255.54

Re: TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 11:32 AM 

Today Illinois, tomorrow the World. GO MISSION

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: TI

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 12:49 PM 

I remember when I used to think that TI WAS THE PLACE TO GO, when my daughter played there they were considered tops. Now it is a last resort team and that's too bad. While there are some good players left at the U19 level, for the most part it's not anything special to play there. The Mission is headed in the right direction and I am proud my daughter will represent them. All the girls that came to tryouts looked great and unfortunatley you can't pick them all. Rosters are decided for I believe U14, 16, 19, maybe a couple of spots left at U12, not sure. The coaches made a real effort to pick the kids they thought would be best for this season and I have to say they really have heart when it comes to how hard that process is. It was done in a professional manner and with understanding of how the girls that weren't picked feel. GO MISSION!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
75.57.114.195

Re: TI

No score for this post
June 10 2009, 3:57 PM 

What does it matter if the players on TI haven't played U19, but half of the Mission U19's haven't played U19 either. TI has a real coach, that knows hockey, and players that can and will succeed at the level. The Mission also has players that can and will succeed at the U19 level also. The teams will be close talent wise, just have to see who wants it more.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
65.79.36.66

Re: TI's loss

No score for this post
May 22 2009, 12:44 PM 

Mission and TI are pretty equal, besides price.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.135.32

Re: TI's loss

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 2:31 PM 

A whole 4people left ti to play mission.
1 is a brat.
1 is lazy with horrid grades
1 is lesbian
and 1 is 15.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
208.158.7.138

Re: TI's loss

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 3:29 PM 

I think I may have to report your post as "inappropriate". Either you are a player with a bad attitude and that would make sense considering the content of your message, you sound like a spoiled child. Then again, you could be the parent of an incredibly poorly mannered child and then it would make sense since this would be an inherited trait. Sounds like you need to get to the gym and concentrate on yourself and that belly before resorting to name calling. Have a super day!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

let's get to the heart of the matter

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 6:00 PM 

At least a dozen good to great hockey players (also good kids/students) have left TI in two short years----since the national championship season. WHY?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.205.219.60

Re: U19 2009-2010

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 7:15 PM 

wow your post was incredibly rude. I think I can maybe place one of the 4 TI girls in one of those categories, and that is the 15 year old

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Leaf
(no login)
67.162.9.196

What Now

No score for this post
June 7 2009, 8:00 PM 

A team takes on a coaches personality !!! T.I = Big Trouble

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Transparent
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Grammer

No score for this post
June 8 2009, 10:24 AM 

To the parent who is HHM and the one who is critizing Willy. Please go back to the fourth grade and bone up on your english. You embarass yourself constantly with your mindless jabbering. Not only are you a functional moron, you are wrong about Willy.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.255.54

Re: Grammer

No score for this post
June 8 2009, 1:04 PM 

who or what is grammer?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.136.27.231

Response to Transparnt

No score for this post
June 8 2009, 3:37 PM 

Grammer - as in Kelsey Grammer!

OR

Grammar - as in the branch of linguistics that deals with syntax and morphology (and sometimes also deals with semantics)
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn - Definition in context

What's Worse THE GRAMMAR OR THE SPELLING??


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hhm
(no login)
208.158.7.138

Re: Grammer

No score for this post
June 8 2009, 5:59 PM 

Oh please, just because I had some typos you get all worked up. The point is the post WAS INCREDIBLY RUDE, when you criticize individual players and say the things you said, especially the gay comment then that is totally uncalled for and if the only thing you find is to make a comment on my endless prattling then I guess I made my point didn't I? Stick to comments about the teams in general but stay away from personal attacks. As a mother I would never say anything like that about someone's daughter and hopefully the mother's out there agree regardless of the team their daughter is on. PUT A CORK IN IT FOR GOD'S SAKE.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.86.78.202

Everything that is wrong...

No score for this post
June 9 2009, 8:05 AM 

I've heard about complete-hockey from other parents and had to see it for myself.

Based on the posts here and in the other "threads", most of you represent EVERYTHING that is wrong with youth sports today and should be ashamed of yourself. Anon posts give you all the courage to make complete idiots out of yourselves and to read a post that is full of hate and accuses specific girls of being this or that serves as a reminder that there are a bunch of parents that are WAY TOO INVOLVED in their kids hockey experience.

I can't for the life of me understand why Larry continues to support this board.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
208.158.7.138

Re: Everything that is wrong...

No score for this post
June 9 2009, 9:34 AM 

Thanks for the post but in truth I don't think this is your visit but it doesn't matter. This board should be for sharing information, not personal attacks on the kids. Willy or whomever you are that was totally unacceptable behavior and I hope that none of the girls has read your garbage. Is there any way that it can be deleted, help me out with this one, Thanks


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.22.98.157

Re: Everything that is wrong...

No score for this post
June 9 2009, 9:55 PM 

Hot Mom, you are correct in saying that this a posting board created to exchange information. IF PEOPLE CANT TAKe HEAT, GET OUT THE KITCHEN.
I mean c'mon, everyone, lightn up. This is still Amerikka so we can take advantage of free speech. Dont like free speech? then you are a bunch of fascist nazis.
As long as there is no slander going on, take it with a grain of salt. Unless you are so insecure that you cannot take any form of criticism; pop another zantax or mothers little helper to help you cope.
This board is entertainment.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
WWW
(no login)
67.175.159.229

Voice of reason

No score for this post
June 10 2009, 6:24 AM 

Finally someone who understands what this board is for. Entertainment. I do agree some of the things can be over the top, such as the one post critisizing the four kids who went to the Mission, but most of this stuff is for fun. Enjoy.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.114.195

Re: Voice of reason

No score for this post
June 10 2009, 11:08 AM 

Exactly, if we all just let that disgraceful post go, and others that will come, the poster will not get the satisfaction they want.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
208.0.229.146

Re: Voice of reason

No score for this post
June 11 2009, 3:28 PM 

OK I thought I had you guys fooled but your are much smarter than I give you credit for to see that my initials stand for yes you guessed it HOT HOCKEY MOM. I agree this post is entertaining, I go on it when I'm bored at work. But don't ever post anything like that about the girls or HOT HOCKEY MOM will take her stiletto's to your flabby rear end.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.22.98.157

Re: Voice of reason

No score for this post
June 13 2009, 7:52 AM 

HHM, you make it tempting.......

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
goooberggguy
(no login)
76.16.131.73

dawg

No score for this post
June 19 2009, 3:41 AM 

I agree, but have two questions..

What is the going rate this fall for a hockey mom hummer?
and....

How many times can I post this before i get banned from this "site"? (again)

lets count...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
96.60.80.88

TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 22 2009, 4:40 PM 

TI posted their rosters today.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 23 2009, 10:01 AM 

three goalies to replace the two excellent ones they lost?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
U14
(no login)
99.144.229.147

rough

No score for this post
June 23 2009, 11:29 AM 

They are going to have a rough time fielding a U14 next year with just 5 1996s on the roster.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.58.219

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 23 2009, 12:08 PM 

Typo... A.S. is a Forward.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.58.219

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 23 2009, 12:12 PM 

They only lost one goalie...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
uno-dos
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 23 2009, 1:45 PM 

The two rostered goalies from last season's 16 team are obviously gone. Spin it anyway you want. This team will struggle without them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.58.219

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 23 2009, 9:14 PM 

...or succeed.

Great groups at ti & mission!
Good luck this season ladies!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
134.129.203.26

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 25 2009, 7:22 PM 

...and CYA

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
what team concept?
(no login)
24.13.78.217

Re: TI Rosters Are Up

No score for this post
June 26 2009, 7:24 AM 

It's really all about the parents, the size of the roster, and individual playing time. First liners at TI, third liners at the Mission. The result will be second at State and watching Nationals via the webcast. Good luck.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(no login)
76.197.233.221

morons

No score for this post
June 26 2009, 8:07 PM 

you people are flippin morons. let the girls play the games.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Coach 1
(no login)
66.72.126.156

Fury Rosters

No score for this post
June 29 2009, 9:05 AM 

Anyone want to post the Fury U-19 roster since they have failed to do so?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.127.1

Re: Fury Rosters

No score for this post
June 29 2009, 11:31 AM 

they have a team?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Coach 1
(no login)
66.72.126.156

Re: Fury Rosters

No score for this post
June 30 2009, 8:29 AM 

As far as I know they were putting one together from tier 2 players, and handfull of AAA girls. They have not listed a roster. All the other teams have so why are they special. Looking for fury U-19 roster.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
70.131.104.180

Re: Fury Rosters

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 1:18 PM 

Fury 19U is still seeking players. Last I heard, they had the minimum required to have a team. That's probably why the roster isn't up yet.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: Fury Rosters

No score for this post
July 8 2009, 6:27 AM 

but isn't the rink owners daughter playing U19 mission?
isn't everyone?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
RIP
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: Fury Rosters

No score for this post
July 21 2009, 8:17 PM 

AC reportedly also coaching the Charger MM's. Looks like it's all over but the memories for the TI girl's program.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Tryouts
(no login)
63.241.207.195

Re: Fury Rosters

No score for this post
August 13 2009, 1:27 PM 

Bruins tryouts start Saturday, August 15th, check the website for details.

U12
U14
U19

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Mission

No score for this post
August 30 2009, 7:43 PM 

Where are all the IL D? Is it true 5 of the 6 Mission 19 D are from out-of-state?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
espo
(no login)
75.3.129.185

Re: Mission

No score for this post
August 31 2009, 9:49 AM 

No that is not true. I know at least three of them are local.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Girls Hockey
(no login)
67.173.67.49

Stoney Creek Tourney

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 5:28 AM 


The Mission dream team is on it's way home
after two losses out of 4 games. Team IL
3 wins and a Tie. Knocking out the host Stoney Creek.
TI Playing in the Semis Sunday morning ?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.198.164

mission

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 11:07 AM 

what happened in that last game? Is the scoresheet right -- 4 goals on 15 shots?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.53.160.26

Re: mission

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 6:18 PM 

Sounds like a rough game for the defensive end of the "Mission dream team?"

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
TB
(no login)
98.226.246.87

Results

No score for this post
September 20 2009, 1:54 PM 

It was a quarter final that TI played vs. Toronto, not a semi and it looks like another solid win for the Canadian team with 4 Canadian National U18 players on it. Not an easy team to beat but don't go dissing the Mission for thier loss as it looks as though they kept the Aeros shots to 15.

Results show that Mission probobly had the toughter bracket. London and Toronto made it to semi's. None of TI's first round opponents made it past the first round going 1-2, 0-3 and 1-2. Lucked out getting to play Stoney Creek to get to the quarters, who isn't the team it was last year by a long shot.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
99.141.173.61

Re: Results

No score for this post
September 21 2009, 7:45 AM 

No need to diss either team. They both played well against tough teams (at least until they faced a clearly superior Toronto team) and were able to showcase their players for the many scouts who attended. All the girls should be congratulated.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
The Masi
(no login)
98.253.33.36

Good sports

No score for this post
September 22 2009, 9:57 AM 

Maybe the parent who wrote the first Results post was one of the Mission parents rooting against the TI kids this past weekend. Nice.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.239.186.84

Re: Good sports

No score for this post
September 23 2009, 7:42 AM 

I never write on this board but do check in once a week for entertainment. However, I couldn't let what you wrote go. As far as rooting for the other team I saw several Mission parents and kids clapping when T.I. scored against Stoney Creek and not one cheered when they got scored against. On the other hand when Toronto scored their first goal against the Mission, I saw several girls along the glass clapping and cheering. If that wasn't bad enough, the parents upstairs were doing the same. Totally classless. Cachey would never have allowed it. I am sure Andy would encourage it. Again, classless.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.203.0.38

Re: Good sports

No score for this post
September 23 2009, 8:40 AM 

Fact of the matter is that there are parents and players on both teams who root against the other team. That's to be expected when teams are rivals. While I personally didn't observe any of that behavior, TI's reaction probably was in response to the hope expressed by some Mission backers that TI would not do well at Stoney Creek.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Good sports

No score for this post
September 25 2009, 4:12 PM 

I used to be a more frequent poster but modeling takes up much of my time now BUT I COULDN'T AGREE MORE with the behavior of the Mission girls, very classy just what I would hope all girls would emulate. I am proud of those girls and hope the younger girls on all teams, and especially our mission see this and do the same. GO MISSION

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.39.147

Re: Good sports

No score for this post
September 25 2009, 8:53 PM 

Great for the Mission girls, they are a great representation of their organization and their families, but not of TC. He has fooled too many players and families for too many years. He is not what he makes himself out to be, he's a true salesman. His drive for scholarships and victories is for his own ego, not for the girls involved. My daughter played for TC, what he says and does are complete opposites, its quite clear he doesnt know his hockey and talks a big game with scouts. But regardless, Mission vs. TI will be a great day, about time the State has true competition, best of luck to all, and represent IL well regardless which side we are on, its best for our kids and the sport.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Wild Thing
(no login)
98.253.33.36

TC vs AC

No score for this post
September 25 2009, 10:42 PM 

Who are you kidding? TC over AC any day. Mission by seven. TI sucks.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
166.203.146.126

Re: Good sports

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 7:22 AM 

Let's see if I understand what you are saying. I own a business and the way I qualify success is increased revenue and excellence in my employees. So we know we have the revenue thing covered as evidenced by the number of girls who came out at all levels to pre-tryout and at tryouts. Next, among these girls the 'most' qualified were selected, that would cover the excellence part. As far as TC is concerned I think I am pretty good at identifying attributes someone possesses in order to get the job done. Yes, maybe he has an ego, who cares, most CEO'S or anyone at the top of their game has one, myself included. That's part of the personality of someone who chooses to be in a position of leadership. I respect TC and I think he sets the bar high for the girls. If they, including my daughter, don't meet the bar or exceed it then they don't deserve to get a scholarship or be on the team and get the play time, etc. He is a straight shooter and even if my daughter had not made the team she has skated for him and respects him and I do too. If TC wasn't leading at the Mission then the program would not be what it is. Furthermore, look at the stats, he accomplished in a very short time an incredible amount. He assembled the talent, skaters and coaches and is very hands on at all levels, That's how I run my business and his formula is very similar. SOUNDS LIKE you have a gripe with him on a personal level, maybe your daughter really wanted to be part of the Mission and wasn't accepted. That's life but making such negative statements about someone like you did usually means it's personal. I do agree, good luck to all girls in Illinois hockey.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.160.10

guest

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 7:59 AM 

without kendall hes nothing

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.178.92.134

Re: guest

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 8:07 AM 

Right, we all know and love KC but I bet she would be the first one to say that no team is or should ever be dependent on one or two players. BTW I wrote the previous post and I stand by it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
71.194.184.100

good sports

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 9:05 AM 

saying tc is like a ceo is very funny hes more like a shift manager at mcdonalds who looted workers from wendys and burger king iknow my kids would rather go to gibsons =t.i. or cya where the food doesnt have an ego

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.178.206.45

shift change?

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 2:41 PM 

Give those workers some credit, no one can "loot" anyone unless they want to be "looted" and the loot they are receiving is great coaching and the know how it takes to run an organization. If you think ego is a limited commodity then you'd better open your eyes. Ego isn't a bad thing to have, as I said I have one and it doesn't mean I look down on anyone, I just recognize what I've been able to accomplish with drive, some natural talent and perseverance. So your daughter didn't make Mission, big deal, support her where she is without tearing down the competition.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Regarding
(no login)
12.149.123.130

Shift Change, and TC

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 3:26 PM 

All of you knocking TC have obviously spent time thinking about this, however I don't see any other girl's H.D. getting the flack TC is, which speaks volumes in of itself! My daughter is at the Mission because of, and ONLY because of TC. If he quits, or gets replaced, we will take a hard look at the org. before staying, and of course follow him if he goes elsewhere. Say what you will about that, but the bottom line for me is he has, is and continues to produce better than anyone else.......not even a close race now. I haven't seen the "Ego" your talking about, not that it does not exist, but I have not seen it. As far as what he has done for his players, put up the numbers for all 4 girls AAA H.D.'s and then we can judge! I suspect nobody has done that yet because we all know what it will show. I only wonder why all you people aren't steering your anger towards the idiots at T.I. that ran the girl's program into the ground?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.160.10

guest

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 7:15 PM 

who won

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
166.203.202.149

Re: Shift Change, and TC

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 8:19 PM 

I agree, and as to the who won question you know the answer TI, WHAT IS THAT SUPPOSED TO PROVE. The point is many of us left TI BECAUSE OF THE COACHING and the lack of support. My daughter is happier at the Mission, maybe yours is happier at TI or CYA, WHATEVER, the point is why are you so anti TC, WHAT HAS HE DONE TO YOU, get a grip please, it's a game and everyone is entitled to where they want to play and who they think will lead them best. That's it ok. Move on......time for another subject

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.198.164

score please

No score for this post
September 26 2009, 9:15 PM 

I'm not with either team but am curious as to the outcome of the mission/ti 19u game tonite. Can someone please give me info WITHOUT attitude? Thank you.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Girls Hockey fan
(no login)
67.173.67.49

U19 Mission vs. Team IL

No score for this post
September 27 2009, 5:32 AM 


Saturdays score was 2-0 Team IL

The game was a good game, the score after 2 1/2 periods
was 0-0. with about 9 min in the 3rd TI scores to
make it 1-0 , TI had 3 penalties in a row in the last
10 min. Yes, Mission (Kendall) had plenty of chances
to put the puck in. TI scores 2nd goal with about 5 min to
go in game. TI goalie played very well, the team did as
well. The Mission changed goalies at the half way mark
( 0-0 ) score, that hurt them and maybe should have left
the starting goalie In ? Mission must have had 6 power
plays and could not lite the lamp ? This years Mission
team with all the returners did not look that impressive?
Kendall was on the Ice as much as a player could ever be,
Even playing the point on Power plays ? These teams will
meet plenty before the season is over. It is good for IL
Hockey when you have multiple good teams at any age
level.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.160.10

guest

No score for this post
September 27 2009, 12:21 PM 

What happened to the dream team?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.216.69

Re: guest

No score for this post
September 27 2009, 6:21 PM 

left for the coaching...don't mistaken TC past results for coaching. He picked skill and hope they would do the rest for him because he can't coach!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: guest

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 2:59 PM 

Yes, I can see your point, hmmm I own a business and I think I will just look for and hire people WITH NO SKILL, sure that makes sense, do you not see the point I am making. When you are a leader its about attracting the right people ad as far as coaching you have got be kidding. I've watched my daughter when he is running practice and its the best I've seen.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.216.69

Re: guest

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 10:27 AM 

then you haven't seen much

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
172.191.53.183

Re: guest

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 12:19 PM 

so which team really won?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.160.10

guest

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 12:42 PM 

dream team got spanked

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
209.175.22.13

what???

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 9:04 AM 

I'm sorry but I don't call getting 11 shots on goal vs. 24 shots against 'getting spanked' -- I call it fortunate.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
198.232.63.58

Re: what???

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 10:30 AM 

It was a close game that either team could have won. My guess is they will all be that way, which is good for Illinois girls hockey, the players and the fans.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: what???

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 3:14 PM 

and the two that went in were somewhat weak shots at best.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Creed
(no login)
98.253.33.36

What

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 4:32 PM 

Another post from a Moron TI parent. Keep stirring it up. It will catch up with you. The Mission will pass you by like a bolt of lightning. You and your coach can go scratch yourselves.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Been There
(no login)
75.150.254.141

AC and TC

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 7:03 AM 

My D does not play for either of these coaches, but knows them both well. Once she went off to college her coach spoke with her and I on a number of occasions about potential recruits from Illinois. I asked him what the reputation of Illinois girls hockey was in the college coaching community. He said that the college coaches have an easy time evaluating girls who play for TC because he coaches them to play the way college coaches will expect them to play. He said that AC was highly regarded at the U14 and U16 level for skill development and teaching discipline, which are about the only things that colleges look at when watching the younger girls play.

For years people on this board have complained about the lack of good coaches in girls hockey, how the best players have to go east to get good coaching and get "noticed", etc. It would seem that in Illinois these two guys are both doing a great job, and I commend both of them.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.160.10

guest

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 10:49 AM 

what ever you say coach cachey

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: AC and TC

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 2:16 PM 

Well said, I've seen TC put my daughter through the paces and am always impressed. Let's try to keep things positive here!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.24.133

Re: what???

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 5:43 PM 

on an even weaker goalie.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
209.175.22.13

re: what???

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 9:59 AM 

yet the weaker goalie was TCs top choice before tryouts even began. go figure

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
netminder
(no login)
66.158.125.162

It happens

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 1:48 PM 

Every goalie has a bad day here or there. Perhaps nerves played a part or the fact that her former "mess with my goalie head" coach was standing on the opposing bench.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
enforcer
(no login)
99.141.165.25

Re: It happens

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 3:08 PM 

I suggest we back off making negative comments about individual players. It's not called for and, in any event, teams and coaches win and lose games.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: It happens

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 5:32 PM 

Couldn't agree more. All fun and games on this board because of stupid comments but not when talking about a specific player. She is a great player, you've never had a bad day? It's not where you start but where you end. It's a very long season and not an individual sport. Both Mission and TI are great teams.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
209.175.22.13

whatever

No score for this post
October 2 2009, 11:25 AM 

so when's the rematch? got to see if lightening strikes twice.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.175.239.212

Re: what???

No score for this post
October 2 2009, 5:30 PM 

Great kid and a great goalie. Move on AC!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.24.133

Re: what???

No score for this post
October 3 2009, 12:06 PM 

nahhh i'd call it mission just sucks.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Page Turner
(no login)
99.139.120.255

Modeling? HHM?

No score for this post
October 8 2009, 8:07 AM 

What issue of Hustler will you be in?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
67.163.86.139

Re: Modeling? HHM?

No score for this post
October 8 2009, 6:23 PM 

Now thats more like it, girls in hockey

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HHM
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Modeling? HHM?

No score for this post
October 9 2009, 2:49 PM 

Actually I am a model for exotic CAR magazines andI often travel and work the car trade circuit so sorry to disappoint, you won't see me in that dreadful magazine. My daughter's hockey does cut in to my travel but hey aren't our daughters worth it. GO MISSION!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.198.164

gold medal classic

No score for this post
October 11 2009, 6:48 PM 

so what happened in Madison this weekend? who won tourney?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
76.203.17.134

Re: gold medal classic

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 7:14 AM 

Not much at the u-19 level. Most of the games were mismatches. Mission/TI game was competitive -- Mission won 3-2 with a goal late in the third. Series tied 1-1.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
couldn't stay
(no login)
68.255.223.162

What happened

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 7:35 AM 

Anyone know the score from the U16 SSM vs. Mission game?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.198.164

mission/ti game

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 7:39 AM 

was the game as lopsided (shot wise) as it was the last time?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.28.44.66

Re: mission/ti game

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 8:32 AM 

the mission outshot ti 38 to 5. very lopsided game again

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anyone
(no login)
76.8.80.162

Know a Guy

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 9:08 AM 

Where I can find scores from this weekends action in Mad Town? 19's and 16's if possible.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
19
(no login)
99.144.237.135

19

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 10:38 AM 

19 scores

Mission over TI 3-2
TI over Caps 6-1
TI over Sharks 5-0
Mission over Sharks 5-1
Mission over Caps 8-2 and 5-2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Charles Mcbride
(no login)
65.26.246.246

Why don't the caps 19 show their game results onlin

No score for this post
October 21 2009, 5:59 PM 

Are they really that bad that they can't show their game results online. With a combo of all WI players they should be fairly good. Maybe too many egos over their at the Wild

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.198.164

are you sure?

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 11:50 AM 

only 5 shots and 2 goals? that doesn't sound right.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: are you sure?

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 12:46 PM 

Really? Only five shots by TI?? My grannies wheelchair dike hockey team would have had more shots.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.245.198.164

are you sure?

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 6:39 PM 

are the ti goalies THAT good or aren't the mission getting any quality shots? just wondering how a score is THAT close with a 38-5 shot difference.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.175.239.212

Re: are you sure?

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 7:25 PM 

No quality shots!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.228.153.100

Re: are you sure?

No score for this post
October 14 2009, 1:32 PM 

The quality of shots were very weak in the SECOND ti/mission game, on both sides.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.175.239.212

Re: are you sure?

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 7:30 PM 

It is harder for goalies to play in games with little or no shots

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Annonymous
(no login)
64.53.244.93

RE: Are you sure?

No score for this post
October 14 2009, 1:31 PM 

Don't believe everything that comes across this board. Team Illinois and the Mission played a very competitive game this past weekend in Madison. Shots were probably close to being even with maybe one team having one or two shots more than the other.

The game was hard fought with the Mission scoring the winning goal in the third. From appearance, this should be a hard fought series this season; both teams are capable of victories.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
U16 game
(no login)
76.209.55.73

Late score

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 11:09 AM 

5 -1 SSM were up late dont know final

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: Late score

No score for this post
October 12 2009, 4:59 PM 

SSM WON against U16 but the girls played a great game considering the level of this team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Im not sayin'
(no login)
76.223.64.222

I'm just sayin'

No score for this post
October 14 2009, 3:52 PM 

SSM U16 beat CYA U16 7-1, and considering the level of talent on that team....

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Blank
(no login)
76.8.80.162

Blank

No score for this post
October 15 2009, 10:50 AM 


Mission lost 6-1 to SSM

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
wrong thread
(no login)
66.158.125.162

U19

No score for this post
October 16 2009, 9:44 AM 

this is a U19 thread! I assume the scores vs. Shattuck are 16 scores since the Mission 19 team has not yet played them. Start your own thread so as not to confuse the facts.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: U19

No score for this post
October 16 2009, 11:59 AM 

Doesn't matter. Both SSM teams are undefeated. The conversation is interchangeable.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.228.153.100

Re: U19

No score for this post
October 16 2009, 1:42 PM 

except ti or mission havent even played them at the u19 level, so that's why they're still undefeated! GO ILLINOIS!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hhm
(no login)
76.16.144.248

Re: U19

No score for this post
October 16 2009, 5:22 PM 

Don't be elitist, since when on this board has anyone ever followed the rules! It's more fun mixing everything up anyway. That way we are all one big happy hockey family.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.28.44.66

Re: U19

No score for this post
October 19 2009, 11:58 AM 

How did the Mission 19s do over the weekend?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
scores
(no login)
66.158.125.162

Mission U19

No score for this post
October 20 2009, 6:43 AM 

Went 3-1-1 Lost to Stoney Creek (2-1), tied Bluewater(4-4) and defeated Durham (5-1) and Waterloo, twice (4-0, both times). Good hockey!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Team Illinois U19

No score for this post
October 24 2009, 7:27 AM 

Lost to Assabet U16 2-1.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.228.153.100

Re: Team Illinois U19

No score for this post
October 25 2009, 9:41 PM 

but beat NAHA U19 White, 4 to 3.

Assabet U16 is an excellent,fast team and would dominate ALL U19 and U16 teams in the Chicagoland area.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.223.175.221

Re: Team Illinois U19

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 7:17 AM 

Lost to Assabet U16 4 to 3 in OT for the Championship

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
209.175.22.13

assabet

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 7:33 AM 

assabet tourney not what it used to be -- only 8 teams in this time -- 2 being from assabet.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.150.254.141

Assabet

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 7:55 AM 

The two teams from Assabet are typically two of the best in competition anywhere. NAHA White is also as good as it gets. Kudos to TI for beating NAHA White and for playing so well against Assabet U16. Beating them in their building with Carl's refs is tougher to accomplish than playing a round of golf with the Pope.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
76.202.250.27

Re: Assabet

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 8:23 AM 

How did Mission do this weekend?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
annonymous
(no login)
66.158.125.162

update

No score for this post
October 28 2009, 10:24 AM 

Mission 19's did very well this past weekend beating Shattuck 4-2. Also defeated Balmoral and MN Elite (white) while losing to MN Elite (red) in the championship.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Sour Grapes

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 4:27 PM 

As always from a TI parent whose team won't even make it out of Illinois in March. Please stay home next year when the TI 19's won't be able to beat a good 14U team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
76.202.250.27

Re: Sour Grapes

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 5:02 PM 

Thinking about next year this early in the season? Something wrong with year?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
A note
(no login)
76.223.64.222

Of ...

No score for this post
October 26 2009, 9:49 PM 

Elevators, parent, coach?!?!?!?!?!?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.224.19.56

o codeof silence????

No score for this post
October 27 2009, 2:02 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.224.19.56

Re: Of ...

No score for this post
November 3 2009, 7:20 AM 

what

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
96.60.81.36

Open Net Goal in 2nd OT vs NAHA

No score for this post
October 27 2009, 5:28 PM 

How far will TI get with their goalie playing the puck in the 2nd OT and missing it leaving the net wide open. I cannot believe that NAHA missed the open net...I guess it was better to be lucky than good that day.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.228.153.100

Re: Open Net Goal in 2nd OT vs NAHA

No score for this post
October 28 2009, 2:13 PM 

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Goalie guy
(no login)
67.173.67.49

TI Goalie

No score for this post
October 30 2009, 4:56 AM 


That goalie played in and was the winner in a double
over time against a very good Naha team. Then 3 hours
later she is in a overtime again with a very good Assabett 16 team. I would cut her some slack?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Goalie guy
(no login)
67.173.67.49

TI Goalie

No score for this post
October 30 2009, 4:58 AM 


That goalie played in and was the winner in a double
over time against a very good Naha team. Then 3 hours
later she is in a overtime again with a very good Assabett 16 team. I would cut her some slack?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.175.239.212

Re: TI Goalie

No score for this post
October 31 2009, 9:47 PM 

nahhh i'd call it TI just sucks.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
?nnnnn
(no login)
70.8.227.255

n???????

No score for this post
October 28 2009, 5:04 PM 

?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.75.130

Assabet Tourney

No score for this post
October 29 2009, 10:07 AM 

Ya i saw that too. pretty brutal.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

D-I or D-3 ?

No score for this post
November 2 2009, 5:35 PM 

Have any of the TI 19U girls received any scholarship offers?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
James Bond
(no login)
98.253.33.36

D-1 Ha

No score for this post
November 2 2009, 8:09 PM 

The only D-1 conversation is at the Mission. TI can barely skate with a good 16 team. Almost all the Mission players will be getting money to play at D-1 schools. Mission is easily the class of the Chi teams. Too bad TI

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: D-1 Ha

No score for this post
November 3 2009, 5:22 PM 

You would think that after almost all their hockey players have left, the former third liners---who are now first liners, would get a well deserved fair shot?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
JB
(no login)
98.253.33.36

Re: D-1 Ha

No score for this post
November 3 2009, 5:30 PM 

Third liners? Please. There isn't one single player left who could make the real team. They were all fourth liners with either CYA or TI. Not one is good enough to play in college.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
99.145.226.173

Re: D-1 Ha

No score for this post
November 3 2009, 6:45 PM 

The Mission girls who have announced are all great players who worked hard for their offers. They should be congratulated. Good luck in college.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.216.83.131

Re: D-1 Ha

No score for this post
November 5 2009, 10:46 AM 

Doesn't the TI coach have any college connections? Apparently not if some players have to spend half of their summer out EAST being seen!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: D-1 Ha

No score for this post
November 5 2009, 11:11 AM 

I'm not associated in any way to the TI team but you sound like a total idiot when you say they are all "4th liners". There are excellent players on that team. Did they not beat Mission? Dumb luck? I don't think so.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Coaches
(no login)
67.173.67.49

TI Coach

No score for this post
November 11 2009, 4:54 AM 


I Think that the Current TI U19 coach has 9 players who
whent D1 Hockey programs, just from one season.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
71.229.40.199

Re: TI Coach

No score for this post
November 11 2009, 7:49 AM 

Please list the names as they have NOT shown up on the college lists.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
SICKof BULLshit
(no login)
98.228.153.100

GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 6 2009, 10:05 AM 

I don't understand why people are such assholes. Parents are all talk on this stupid site. You dumbasses are actually pinpointing 17 and 18 year old girls who are just trying to play the game they love. Leave your ego out of it and let the girls play it out on the ice.
It's extremely ridiculous and lame that parents find the need to down talk girls from Mission and Team Illinois.


Seriously, GROW THE FUCK UP.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
99.145.226.173

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 6 2009, 11:41 AM 

amen!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hhm
(no login)
99.140.211.124

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 9 2009, 4:47 PM 

I totally agree and I have to add my 2 cents as well about the comments about third or fourth liners. Line placement changes and it doesn't mean that first line is the strongest. Our TEAM spreads out the talent across all lines, no one is stronger than another although there are some lines which have better players in terms of scoring and those that are better defensive even as forward. So enough about the lines, once you reach a top team like the Mission at the 16 and 19 level then those girls are all great and no one is necessarily better than another, they just have different strengths which the coach uses to win the game. It's great being with a top organization but TC should get a lot of the credit for development and attracting the competitive talent. As far as the other girls on the other teams knocking them down just makes those of you doing it look lame. Let your girls do what they do best and play hockey, its a fact of life, some are better at the things they do than others but it shouldn't prohibit you from playing in a sport that you have fun. Make too much of an emphasis on competition and you will break apart the ties these girls have with those on their team as well as others. Competition is healthy and being the best is something to strive forward but it shouldn't define who you are and when it does you will not be as good as you think you are.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.54.23

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 11 2009, 10:42 AM 

TC has NOT developed a single kid on the Mission U19 team. He has merely inherited them. He developed girl's hockey in Illinois but, has done nothing to add to the girls he has now. The only thing has has developed to perfection is his EGO !

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.216.83.131

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 11 2009, 1:50 PM 

Please kindly name the D-1 players from A "avis" C's program since he has been at TI? Thank you.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Please
(no login)
66.158.125.162

name them

No score for this post
November 12 2009, 10:33 AM 

and I believe the players, who do not have DI commits have been with AC for quite some time now. Talk about lack of development. Perhaps that'w why players left..........lack of it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.150.254.141

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 13 2009, 12:50 PM 

Your post is clearly based upon lack of knowledge. To begin with, I agree that TC has played a major role in the success of girls hockey in Illinois, but he did not "develop girls hockey in Illinois". Whoever wrote this has a daughter who is too young to know the coaches that developed girls hockey in Illinois. You've probably never heard of the Shooting Stars, and don't realize that the CYA teams 6-7 years ago were the first from Illinois to make it out of regionals at U15 and U16.

Secondly, TC himself will tell you that his role is not to develop players, but to promote players who have college bound talent. If you want to talk about developing players, go talk to Sylvain Turcotte and Wally Kormylo. The list of girls who went on to play in college after learning to play from these two guys will knock your socks off.

I think it is a fact that in the last three or four years, TC has had the benefit of attracting the strongest players at whichever age level he has coached at. Because of this, I think it is obvious that more of his players will get D-1 spots than do AC's players. But, again, you should know that using D-1 as your criteria is also flawed. A significant number of D-1 rostered players that came from TC's teams are seeing little if any ice time. There are plenty of girls who are better off playing D-III, and in many cases it has nothing to do with talent, but everything to do with academics, social preferences, etc. In my mind if TC gets a girl into a D-1 situation and she would have been better off D-III, I don't think he's done her any favors.

The opinions expressed in this post are strictly mine, and I do not have any connection to TC or AC.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(no login)
76.197.228.27

d1

No score for this post
November 13 2009, 4:18 PM 

far more telling is the number of girls who have gone on to play college hockey that have opted out of the local scene....how many home growns have gone east for those high school years? How many Ill girls can be counted that have played for the powerhouse east coast club teams?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
12.111.239.2

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 13 2009, 7:40 PM 

"Secondly, TC himself will tell you that his role is not to develop players, but to promote players who have college bound talent". Holly crap are you kidding me. College coaches continue to develope players. For TC to tell you he is not developing player because they are already developed is so messed up. It is every coaches job to continue to develop players. Be it U12 or DI. He should not be on the bench if he is not developing. I don't care what age or what level. It is unfortunate that girls hockey does not have someone like Sylvain Turcotte. He would make someone like TC look silly. I wish Sylvain would switch to girls. I agree with you, he is great. And like you said very sad that Sylvain , a boy coach, has sent more girls to college than both AC or TC.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: GET A LIFE

No score for this post
November 15 2009, 1:20 PM 

Hey dinosaur, so name 'em?? Certainly not his own daughter.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
209.175.22.13

Update?

No score for this post
November 17 2009, 12:49 PM 

how did the ti and mission teams do this past weekend in michigan?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Update
(no login)
66.158.125.162

Detroit

No score for this post
November 17 2009, 1:20 PM 

TI met some local competition, finally, losing to Belle Tire 4-0 and Little Caesars 4-1 to get knocked out in the quarter finals.

Mission beat Ohio Flames in the quarters, spanked Little Caesars in the semi's and lost to LA Selects in the championship in a shoot out.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
your momma
(no login)
173.123.189.167

odd question

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 3:05 AM 

shame

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Congrats
(no login)
71.57.19.3

signings

No score for this post
November 17 2009, 1:26 PM 

4 Illinois girls committed to D-1 programs. At least one more unsigned. And hopefully more to follow.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
DI
(no login)
98.226.246.87

signed

No score for this post
November 17 2009, 7:23 PM 

All four DI commits from the Mission. At least two more from there yet to sign.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: signed

No score for this post
November 18 2009, 4:28 AM 

Not totally true.....one NAHA.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Real
(no login)
98.253.33.36

D1

No score for this post
November 18 2009, 6:23 AM 

Obvious who is the class of Il hockey. TI gets smoked while Mission goes all the way. At least six from Mission will play D1 while no one at TI even has a chance. Mission is so much better it's a joke.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
red
(no login)
66.28.44.66

Re: D1

No score for this post
November 18 2009, 7:12 AM 

The core of the TI team are juniors in high school. I think they have another year before they sign anything.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.216

Re: D1

No score for this post
November 18 2009, 7:44 AM 

Please, please, please, don't be a parent. If you are a parent it is time for you to get a hobby.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fan
(no login)
99.145.231.186

Re: D1

No score for this post
November 18 2009, 8:02 AM 

or better yet, a life.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Correction
(no login)
66.158.125.162

DI's

No score for this post
November 18 2009, 12:37 PM 

...then that makes 5 commits. Four from Mission and 1 from NAHA (former Mission)

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
74.63.75.131

Re: DI's

No score for this post
November 19 2009, 7:14 PM 

Holy Cow, taking credit for one at NAHA...pretty soon you are going to take credit for any player that had a hockey game in Illinois, wow!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
OMG
(no login)
98.226.246.87

unreal

No score for this post
November 19 2009, 8:44 PM 

.....just making a correction regarding the fact that it was initially stated that all 4 DI commits were from the Mission, when actually there were 5 Illinois girls. The fifth Illinois girl is at NAHA but played for Mission last year.....not taking credit, just simply stating a fact you moron!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
add
(no login)
99.142.35.168

one more

No score for this post
November 20 2009, 5:19 AM 

played at TI as an 8th grader then SSM the last 4 years

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.224.19.56

Re: one more

No score for this post
November 20 2009, 6:08 AM 

CammiGranato 1979, Huskies, from IL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Re: one more

No score for this post
November 20 2009, 8:00 AM 

Let's talk IL girls, not out of state/country ringers!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anom
(no login)
66.166.171.210

DI

No score for this post
November 20 2009, 8:26 AM 

I think this thread should serve two purposes to congratulate the Illinois players regardless of where they play (SSM, NAHA or elsewhere) and to note the in state programs that helped out-of-state girls get into DI (and later DIII) programs.

Illinois Girls announcing publicly so far appear to be:
F Missy Denk - Poplar Grove - Chicago Mission - Maine
F Nicole Germaine - Clarendon Hills (SSM) - Minnesota State
D Maggie Hunt - Naperville - NAHA - New Hampshire
F Claire Santestefano - Wilmette - Chicago Mission - Northeastern
F Jocelyn Simpson - Joliet - Chicago Mission - Colgate

Others:
D Caroline Campbell - USA 18s/Chicago Mission - Fordland, MO

COngratulations girls keep them coming

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
76.224.19.56

guest

No score for this post
November 24 2009, 8:24 PM 

congratulations nicole another canadian

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.19.3

Big game Sunday?

No score for this post
December 4 2009, 10:48 AM 

Will Mission 19's continue to play possum?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.10.53.194

Re: Big game Sunday?

No score for this post
December 5 2009, 10:18 AM 

Traveling with the Stars: Susan Lucci




By Kelly Carter, Special for USA TODAY
Emmy-award winning actress Susan Lucci served as Grand Marshal of The Hollywood Christmas Parade on Nov. 29. The event airs on MyNetworkTV on Dec. 10 and 24. The All My Children star will soon spend more time on the West Coast when production on the soap opera shifts from New York to Los Angeles in January. But first she travels to Tampa, to launch Susan Lucci by Fila, her new sportswear line, on the Home Shopping Network, Dec. 9-10. She shares her travel tips and highlights with Kelly Carter for USA TODAY.

MORE CELEBRITY TRAVEL: Wayne Newton
ARCHIVE: Previous Traveling with the Stars columns
Q: Where have you been recently and what did you like about it?

A: We were in Rome recently for the first time. Rome has been on my wish list for a long time. There was so much to love about it. It surprised me how accessible its beauty is. It's everywhere and all around you. The Colosseum is right there. Michelangelo's Moses is right in a church that you walk in and there's nobody else and you get to see the sculpture close up. The Borghese Gardens were the biggest surprise. If I lived in Rome I would be there all the time. I hadn't seen Bernini before and I fell in love with the Bernini sculptures in the Borghese Villa. On top of it, they were having a Caravaggio exhibit so the beauty of those gardens, the beauty of the home, the Bernini sculptures everywhere and the Caravaggio paintings, oh I could just stay there for a very long time.

Q: What's the best place you've ever visited?

A: I used to tell my husband if I'm ever missing check La Rèserve de Beaulieu in the south of France and you might find me there. It's beautiful, on the Mediterranean and the croissants in the morning are fantastic.

But ultimately I remember so clearly standing on the balcony of our room at Pebble Beach (in California) and seeing the Pacific Ocean for the first time. My husband looked out at the Pacific Ocean and Pebble Beach and said, "God surely made this place on a Monday when he was well rested." They have a magnificent spa. You can have a massage and a manicure and pedicure in a room in front of a fireplace. It is spectacular, not to mention some of the best golf on the planet. I don't play but my husband and my son do. Pebble Beach is surrounded by that natural beauty and Carmel is so gorgeous.

And we spent several wonderful and memorable days and nights at the Amanpuri resort in Phuket, Thailand. Everything there was meant for your senses. Every time we would leave they would put on fresh linens and put orchids on the pillows and towels. Everything was done with a beautiful artistic hand.

Q: What's the most surprising/unexpected place you're ever visited?

A: In July we were in Kenya working (with Feed the Children) in the slums of Nairobi. We feel that we gained so much. To have the presence of those beautiful children in our memories and in our hearts, it was more than we ever could have imagined. You try to raise some awareness and help these beautiful children any way you can. But the other side of that experience was that we went to Finch Hattons safari park (in Tsavo West National Park). Finch Hattons is the man Robert Redford played in Out of Africaand he started this camp in the southern part of Kenya. It was built in the '20s and has been beautifully maintained. There was a lot of wood and candlelight and animals everywhere. There was a hippopotamus family living in the lake right outside of our tent. To sit down in that kind of environment with a tablecloth, silver and candlelight and have a spectacular dinner with beautiful wine was amazing. It was opposite of the austere experience of Nairobi, but both were equally beautiful and impressive.

Q: What's your favorite vacation spot?

A: For a vacation, for being pampered, wonderful restaurants and free as a breeze, I really like Palm Beach. We stay at The Breakers and I think some of the finest hotels in Europe could take a refresher course from the staff there. It is so well maintained and so beautiful. They spa offers Guerlain products and there's some of the most wonderful golf courses around. You're right on the ocean so it's warm usually and beautiful. To sit outside at lunch is absolutely gorgeous and there are sailboats early in the morning. You can take a Pilates class or have a massage outside overlooking the ocean. Even in globally economic hard times, it lifts your spirits because it's very sparkling. My mother lives there so I go for a long weekend or part of the holidays. Plus some of the best shopping in the world is on Worth Avenue. It's like Madison Avenue with palm trees.

Q: Can you offer an insider tip or recommendation for your favorite vacation place?

A: Some of our favorite restaurants in the country are in Palm Beach. Café L'Europe, especially sitting in the bar, is such a beautiful place. There's a fabulous jazz combo. Chez Jean-Pierre is a wonderful French restaurant. They have Dover sole to write home about and Café L'Europe does as well. None of these places are stuffy.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.10.53.194

Re: Big game Sunday?

No score for this post
December 5 2009, 9:13 PM 

Candy Spelling: Happily back in touch with Tori




LOS ANGELES (AP) — Candy Spelling says she's back in touch with daughter Tori and putting reports of their estrangement behind her.
Spelling said Wednesday that she and Tori have been communicating and have finally taken their relationship to a place she's happy with and which is private. She has spent time with Tori's two children, including a first-time visit with toddler Stella.

Candy Spelling, a panelist on the E! reality series Bank of Hollywood debuting Dec. 14, said she's not trying to compete with Tori's reality resume. The former Beverly Hills 90210 star appeared in So noTORIous and a series with husband Dean McDermott.

Candy Spelling called her daughter an "incredible all-around actress" who shines in both comedy and drama.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - U19 2009-2010
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement