<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

August 5 2008 at 8:52 AM
Score 5.0 (1 person)
HS guest  (no login)
from IP address 66.244.178.42

 
What is the word on this years top 10. Defending state champs, will they be strong again? Is NT Green really all that? Any new comers? Will Barrington and Prairie Ridge continue their climb up the ranks? Please give your thoughts in the most positive manner and leave out the insults! Insider info needed.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous
(no login)
38.98.152.163

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 5 2008, 9:19 AM 

1.La Gold
2.NT Green
3.Gbn
4.St. Rita
5.Barrington
6.Stevenson
7.St. Viator
8.P Ridge
9.Gbs
10.Fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Coach
(no login)
99.141.123.42

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 5 2008, 12:05 PM 

1. LA Gold
2. GBN
3. St. Rita
4. NT Gren
5. Barrington
6. Prairie Ridge
7. Stevenson
8. NPC
9. Fenwick
10. GBS

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snakeskin cowboy
(no login)
68.253.212.10

Prairie Ridge

No score for this post
August 5 2008, 12:55 PM 

Don't see why they are thought to finish this high next season. Lost their 2 players that could scare you and a longtime top goalie. I don't see much help coming up from JV unless a new bunch of guys are coming in. They will struggle to finish top 3 in Metro Central.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
The Wolf
(no login)
206.53.144.170

Prairie Ridge

No score for this post
August 5 2008, 1:23 PM 

Like all teams seniors move on and new guys step in. E years ago they lost a few good players and all went well. This year will be the same. They had 1 goalie play Varsity for 2 years and last year they split time. No long time superstar. They both played very well, but were never truly tested till the end.they are gone, but I'm sure there is a plan. Again, every year brings a new adventure and this team will do just fine. This is good program that takes care of their kids. Coaching is top notch. And I'm sure they have some new stuff to show you.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not
(no login)
66.104.38.18

staying positive

No score for this post
August 5 2008, 1:50 PM 

Without being negative, let's just say I disagree with several of the above comments on Prairie Ridge. We will see when the season starts.

1. Loyola (but what are they losing to CYA and TI MM?)
2. GBN (NB program will continue to keep them at the top)
3. St Rita (two top players can take you a long way, but not all the way)
4. NTG (no longer scary good, just good)
5. Fenwick ( did not lose a ton, and always reloads)
6. Barrington (lost alot, but fill in from a good JV team)

It's all a guess from here...have to wait and see who goes and who shows for tryouts.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS GUEST 23
(no login)
75.4.40.193

Re: staying positive

No score for this post
August 6 2008, 10:01 AM 

1.La Gold
2.NT Green
3.Gbn
4.St. Rita
5.Barrington
6.Stevenson
7.Fenwick
8.Sandburg
9.Gbs
10.P Ridge

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
high school
(no login)
24.7.251.166

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 7 2008, 10:27 PM 

gold lost there 2 best players and green who knows whats up wit them

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest111111
(no login)
98.227.91.22

hahah

No score for this post
September 8 2008, 3:52 PM 

1. NTG
2. Loyola
3. Rita
4. GBN
5. Prairie Ridge
6. Barrington
7. Stevenson
8. GBS
9....who cares

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
player
(no login)
38.98.152.163

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 6 2008, 10:56 AM 

1 gold
2 Green
3 St. rita
4 Barrington
5 Gbn
6 Stevenson
7 P ridge
8 Viator
9 Gbs
10 Npc

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.12.117.10

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 7 2008, 5:59 AM 

Rita
GBN
Bar
Gold
Green
Fen
NPC
PR
South
?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

RANKINGS.

No score for this post
August 7 2008, 11:44 AM 

All right. Most have pretty much the same teams in the mix. Any inside info as to why they may be here, what/who they have and any other information. Again, please keep it positive.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Legend
(no login)
99.141.123.42

Re: RANKINGS.

No score for this post
August 8 2008, 11:59 AM 

LA Gold is clearly #1 if their top 2 returning players are back. Rumour at the end of the year was they were going to tryout at AAA this year. Any word on what they decided to do?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.239.237.220

Crazy Grady

No score for this post
August 8 2008, 1:10 PM 

STEVENSON #6 or 7???????????????

They graduated all their good players and have no JV players that can play Varsity. They will be a below 500 team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.56.51.229

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
October 31 2008, 3:25 PM 

rita might win a lot of games but theyll choke wen it really matters

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
bs42
(no login)
99.144.221.11

switched rankings

No score for this post
August 8 2008, 10:33 PM 

1 NTG-had a some players playin AAA spring, and still fielded a strong HS HIT spring team

2 Barrington-combination of 2 JV state championship teams, with a few viator steals thrown in, will return top netminder

3 Loyola Gold-bringin back their top line from last year that took em to the final 4...doubt the AAA possibles will actually ditch gold

4 Rita-i predict rita, if anybody, to show up everyones rankings and upset NTG, Barrington, Loyola...#16 is lethal

5 GBN-defending state champs on both varsity and JV...but Barrington surely had a better JV team and GBN JV just pulled some "miracle" bullshit in the 3 OT championship...and whats left of the Varsity is garbage


the rest dont even matter...namely stevenson,fenwick, PR, and anyone else people threw in

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
unnanamous
(no login)
67.163.62.67

best team

No score for this post
August 11 2008, 11:28 AM 

the best team for the 08-09 season is definatey sandburg they have returning players from last season and great coaching!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
bud
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: best team

No score for this post
August 11 2008, 2:50 PM 

who the heck is sandburg. new trier loyola, barrington, or gbn will end up state champions

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.167.12.55

lag

No score for this post
August 11 2008, 10:00 PM 

from what i have heard they lost their two top guys to AAA, i think CYA, but i also heard they a lot of kids that got cut from AAA teams are now going to play for LAG because they have nowhere else to play

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
quisical
(no login)
216.145.228.29

Re: lag

No score for this post
August 12 2008, 9:56 AM 

Will any team have players playing BOTH HS and AAA?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
A Lincoln
(no login)
216.145.228.29

Re: lag

No score for this post
August 12 2008, 9:57 AM 

LAG to CYA? Is that a step up?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hockey fan
(no login)
99.147.199.170

LAG

No score for this post
August 12 2008, 11:17 AM 

I say going from LAG to CYA is a pretty good step up considering all the boys CYA sent to juniors last year. I din't see LAG or for that matter any pure HS player going to juniors. I don't know what you've been smoking moron

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
63.118.78.253

Wood work players

No score for this post
August 12 2008, 12:55 PM 

No matter who graduates or who leaves to AAA , NTG and LAG always have excellent players on their roster and just when you think you know their line up ,kids come out of the wood work to play for these 2 schools. That wood work being AAA.In addition, each of these schools have feeder teams to compliment the existing players like blue, white and maroon. That is the reason why they will always be there at the end of the season as they always have been. Nothing will change.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.239.109.239

best teams????

No score for this post
September 4 2008, 8:12 PM 

Who is gbn what have they done lately?
loyola you have got to b kidding
Fenwick???? really thats all i got to say
I heard sandburg got rid of the old coach and got a new coach that could take them to state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HSH1
(no login)
63.118.78.253

Sandberg or burg

No score for this post
August 12 2008, 12:44 PM 

I had the opportunity to see them play 07/08 several times and against some really tuff teams. If they do not loose any players from last year they will be a contender.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hshockey
(no login)
66.99.246.227

What?

No score for this post
August 28 2008, 11:33 AM 

Im pretty sure sandburg didnt win a serious game against any of the top 4 or 5 teams. LA Gold has 14 seniors and nearly an entire returning team. Plus some AAA additions. Sandburg is not going to be competitive this year in HIT or state.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.163.60.120

Re: What?

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 8:39 PM 

Do you know what you are talking about. Sandburg beat New Trier, Glenbrooknorth, lost to Loyola Gold twice by 1 goal each time.Talk about what you know.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
199.189.11.110

Re: switched rankings

No score for this post
November 7 2008, 7:13 AM 

GBNs goalie played amazing in the third and overtime. not a miracle.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.21.169

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 12 2008, 5:58 PM 

its highschool hockey who cares??

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
63.118.78.253

Who cares

No score for this post
August 13 2008, 6:09 AM 

All the high school hockey players and their fans which is a much bigger population than Chicago areas AA or AAA players and fans.That's who cares.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.73.93.206

Re: Who cares

No score for this post
August 13 2008, 10:08 PM 

One word GLENBROOKNORTH

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

who cares

No score for this post
August 19 2008, 10:20 AM 

Playing for any of these top 10 HS programs is worth it. Good coaching, good competition, great fun. If you have a good coaching staff and you have talent you can continue to play after HS. Let your coach know what you want and they should help you get some looks. But the most important thing is always "play hard". By the way, there is alot of good Junior hockey out there. One does not need to make the USHL or NAHL to succeed. Go play, go to school and have a fun life! I care!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.148.200

if u dont care dont post

No score for this post
September 1 2008, 3:01 PM 

who ever keeps posting "its highschool hockey who cares?" shut it cause half these teams will beat ur sorry AA team anyday

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.193.32.130

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 14 2008, 7:50 PM 

Its pretty open at the top. Gold and GBN will be a lock for the final 4. GBN returns 4 or 5 seniors I believe but may struggle offensively if Lowell doesn't come back. Green lost basically its whole team they may struggle if their freshie goalie left as well. Rita will struggle unless Cimoch carries them. Barrington should be there as well. NPC appears to possibly have a good team. We will see what happens at the Great Eight tourney early in the year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
jimmy
(no login)
68.20.18.79

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 14 2008, 9:03 PM 

Gold is by far #1 with many AAA cuts going there and also very few graduations. GBN lost the most important piece THE GOALIE but will still be top 4. Green lost everyone except 4 skaters and goalies. Goalies should keep them around. Rita, has most explosive offense in C'Moch but no goalies. Barrington will be competetive but won't crack top 4. Lake Forest, Fenwick, NPC, should also win some games.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
63.118.78.253

LAG ?

No score for this post
August 21 2008, 9:05 AM 

Why Does LAG have a shot at the final 4? They always are competitive but will they be competitive and agressive enough as well, will they have the scorers to get the job done?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
OLD LAGOLD GUY
(no login)
63.118.78.253

Re: LAG ?

No score for this post
August 28 2008, 12:33 PM 

I need a qiuck fix on lag. What are they bringing to the State Table this year? Are they going to be as good as all these blogs say they are? I've been away for some time and if any one can answer these questions, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you to who ever responds.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Mr.Knowitall
(no login)
69.47.243.104

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
August 15 2008, 7:58 AM 

I think most of you need to take spelling lessons and forget about hockey.Man I feel like I'm reading on a H.S. Basketball website

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
71.201.93.98

who is in?

No score for this post
August 22 2008, 5:43 AM 

what is the HIT looking like this year?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
X man
(no login)
68.20.18.79

Re: who is in?

No score for this post
August 22 2008, 6:00 AM 

Mt. Carmel out

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: who is in?

No score for this post
August 25 2008, 8:40 AM 

i think barrington beat npc yesterday in a pre season game

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
sup
(no login)
24.1.107.205

info

No score for this post
August 25 2008, 9:42 PM 

GBN will not be as strong as they werer last year as top forwards graduated and its doubtful that lowell, possibly the best player in the state, will return. Loyolas top 2 returners both left to go play AAA but wills till be strong as other players who were cut went to LA. Green may have graduated a lot of players but 2 of their top goal scorers come back and the top half of a solid blue team should be able to fill in nicely, and the sophomore goalie is one of the best in the state. Regardless these will be the 3 top teams in state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.150.110.71

Re: info

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 5:10 AM 

GBN will not be in the top 3 and Lowell is not even close to being in the top 10 players.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
205.188.117.10

Re: info

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 5:36 AM 

NPC will be one of the top 5 in state. GBN will be number 6.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
rich white kid
(no login)
24.1.222.36

yea...

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 11:35 AM 

fremd is gonna be top 10 in state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 2:00 PM 

hate to say it but a lot of years people write off green and say they wont dominate (last year being one of them) and what always happens? they dominate. Green and LAG will once again rule the hockey world as always

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
green pea
(no login)
99.141.123.42

Re: green

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 2:22 PM 

You clearly have no idea about Green this year. Only return 4 skaters and both goalies.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

uh

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 5:36 PM 

right, and you cleary have no idea about green this year because you obviously havent looked at the talent that will take the place of those kids. first of all, 2 of the returners were both top scorers on the team last year and one was a top defensemen. Green draws from the blue team, whcih last time i checked was a VARSITY team last year that won about 45 games. I think most of us would agree that blue would beat any jv team by about 10 goals, which is weird because those are the teams that high schools besides green have to draw from, jv. so your right, im the one whose actually seen the kids that will be on green play, but youre the one who knows how good they will me...my bad

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hs hockey
(no login)
70.232.166.126

Re: uh

No score for this post
August 26 2008, 9:08 PM 

idc what any of u say sandburg will make a run depending on how they do in the bartlett tourney
a coach who has people skills and can connect to the kids
6 returning varsity skaters
2 players from state championship teams (huskies Major and vikings Minor?
a solid goalie from vikings
a some decent jv call ups
this will be the last year sandburg has a chance to make a name for them selfs and they are going to take advantage of it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Green Pea
(no login)
68.20.18.79

Re: uh

No score for this post
August 27 2008, 6:22 AM 

When you lose almost an entire team to graduation and have just 4 skaters returning, to expect that the Blue players will fill the void after they had many many struggles in Metro North is just foolish. This green team went to the UC last year remember? The saving grace for this team is the sophomore goalie. He will hide many mistakes.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
J.R.
(no login)
205.188.117.10

GBN

No score for this post
August 27 2008, 5:24 PM 

Spartans will struggle early this year as new additions find their feet. Rookie goaltending is the biggest question mark. Decent goaltending and they could be top 5. Poor tending will
sink them lower just as it will any team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Metro Man
(no login)
205.188.117.10

Blue

No score for this post
August 27 2008, 5:26 PM 

Last years blue was the weakest in years. NT could get more help this year from last years white players.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Mike Wittaker
(no login)
75.63.58.71

worst?

No score for this post
August 27 2008, 8:31 PM 

I believe that the NT Blue team won 3 out of 4 of their tournaments, one of them being the Stevenson tournament another being a Midget tournament in Colorado with tough competition. Their record in Metro North was decent although a few too many tie games cost them. They were consistent. As a previous poster mentioned, Green is fed by two other varsity teams rather than a mere JV team at every other high school except for Loyola. Lots of talent at NT and now that tryouts are over, it looks to be a solid team. And FYI, Blue went 3-0 against their own white team last year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
spellchecker
(no login)
68.73.123.185

Re: worst?

No score for this post
August 28 2008, 1:14 PM 

Green will be a decent team this year. They lost 5 of 6 D and most of their skill players. Their record could be very good if the rest of the teams aren't that good. Simple as that. They should have won the last three state champs easy if they had a different person running the show. That's not a crticism of the current guy just that he didn't get it done and the talent was there. Knowing what I know as to the results of those last three teams there was probably a better coaching staff out there that would have achieved the desired results.

The last truly great NT Green team was the 05 team that lost to LAG 1-0 in the semis. A lot of speed and heart, 6 big and mobile D man and a good goalie in Ingram. How they didn't get that last game is still a mystery to a lot of people that discuss that team. I think that teams record was 64-5 or something like that. Last year LAG looked terrific yet they couldn't get by Green at the end and the end result was GBN and their unselfish team winning their second champ in a row. My guess is LAG finally gets over the hump and wins State this year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
August 28 2008, 4:29 PM 

green will be decent...by greens standards. meaninig they will be top 3-4 in state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.18

wow

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 6:12 AM 

Blue went 3-0 over White? That is the biggest proof of nothing I have ever heard!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Ramblin
(no login)
99.141.123.42

Re: wow

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 2:41 PM 

Our LAG team will rock this year. With the addition of the CYA guys there is no stopping us.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
mwit
(no login)
99.141.140.3

Re: wow

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 4:06 PM 

To WOW! The comment about Blue vs. White was in response to the idiot that wrote that green would be better off with last year's white players than the blue players. If white can't beat blue, which never happens anyway, how would anyone expect them to make green. Two D and one forward from white were lucky enough to crack the roster this year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.141.123.42

Re: wow

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 4:37 PM 

So were the Blue players....

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
nt
(no login)
76.238.12.239

Envy

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 6:30 PM 

.....gets you nowhere!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
outsider
(no login)
76.214.192.51

hey

No score for this post
August 29 2008, 8:07 PM 

why don't all of you just get a room?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Drew
(no login)
64.12.117.10

Shorthanded

No score for this post
August 30 2008, 3:01 PM 

Who did Loyola get from CYA? I know one D player that will rack up 300 min. in the box.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Metroman
(no login)
64.12.117.10

ToHalfwit

No score for this post
August 30 2008, 3:10 PM 

Two D and one Forward were "Lucky enough" to make Green. I didnt know it was luck that determined who made the cut at New Trier.
Im sure the parents of those 3 Ex White players would agree it was simply by chance they passed by some blue players.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
dwit
(no login)
76.217.106.154

Lucky

No score for this post
August 30 2008, 6:35 PM 

Metroman,
Perhaps the word "lucky" was used in the wrong context. Those 3 players deserve to be on green. The point is that "luck" sometimes plays a part as coaches can overlook players and make mistakes in their picks. Know from first hand experience in that department.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS JOKER
(no login)
67.162.9.89

JOKE

No score for this post
September 3 2008, 4:06 PM 

Lowell now plays for CYA MM... he would easily take anyone on anyteam this year at the high school level. he was just smart enough to get out of joke hockey with that coach over there. Green will be a tough team as always and so will LAG.. rita will have to prove itself with just that one kid. Stevenson is going to be a joke. best player who is now captain is a stupid player. saw a game last year where he went and celebrated at the st. viator bench and forwards losts all good seniors and another kid went AAA i think CYA mm... HP might steal a few more games this year they got a few good players. lake forest is also a sleeper wont be suprised if they upset a few top teams.

Top 10:
1. Green
2. Gold
3. Rita
4. GBN
5. Barrington (strong JV team coming up)
6. Lake Forest
7. Highland Park
8. Blue
9. GBS
10. ? WONT BE STEVENSON, JUST HAVE A WEAK TEAM WITH BAD COACHING, might be Fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Jeff
(no login)
24.14.102.77

Re: JOKE

No score for this post
September 3 2008, 8:04 PM 

^^LOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
ScOUT
(no login)
24.15.16.236

Outlook

No score for this post
September 3 2008, 10:17 PM 

Hinsdale Central is sick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 4 2008, 6:48 AM 

Here is where I see it all falling into place...

1 gold
2 Green
3 Barrington
4 P ridge
5 Gbn
6 St. rita
7 Stevenson
8 Viator
9 Gbs
10 Npc

Other possibles: Fremd, Sanburg

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
what
(no login)
75.57.178.245

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 4 2008, 4:51 PM 

dont start this fremd shit again they will never be good they dont know how to play hockey

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.18

Thanks Scott

No score for this post
September 4 2008, 2:04 PM 

The above public service announcement was bought and paid for.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
75.18.84.14

Neuqua

No score for this post
September 5 2008, 9:51 AM 

Is everyone writing off Neuqua Valley?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
truthteller
(no login)
99.141.231.183

The Valley

No score for this post
September 5 2008, 10:06 AM 

Yes they are because you will spend most of the season in the penalty box with that roster...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.184.44.184

Neuqua

No score for this post
September 8 2008, 8:43 PM 

Neuqua only has 2 good kids returning smythe and a new comer from TI mm. No goaltending and a lot of jv kids. They team will be young with a rumored few other aa/aaa kids that didnt make mm or MM. May contend for first spot in MW.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
70.131.220.111

Re: Neuqua

No score for this post
September 8 2008, 9:02 PM 

Neuqua made coaching changes, and picked up kids from the u16 TI team from last year, such as Ammendola. Did Neuqua loose a lot of there players or did most return.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login Hockeyfan91)
70.131.219.131

Re: Neuqua

No score for this post
September 9 2008, 12:39 PM 

Smythe at NV is the real deal. Other than that, including the TI mm kid, the rest are average at best with a new coach. They have weak goaltending and lost their top scorer for the last two years to the Huskies. The rest of the roster is new. They will be average this year at best.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.239.109.239

42 is god

No score for this post
September 10 2008, 4:29 PM 

Nequa has nothing to bring to the table and they r a bunch of hacks. I dont know if they understand the term BENDER.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: 42 is god

No score for this post
September 11 2008, 3:58 PM 

barington vs. nv this friday. who wins?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: 42 is god

No score for this post
September 11 2008, 3:59 PM 

barington vs. nv this friday. who wins?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hockeyfan91
(Login Passdpuck)
70.131.218.53

Re: 42 is god

No score for this post
September 11 2008, 4:40 PM 

BARRINGTON by 3 minimum!!!!!!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.12.117.10

Re: 42 is god

No score for this post
September 11 2008, 9:51 PM 

Barrington struggles against stevenson. Ties them 1-1. NV by 4.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.184.207

viator

No score for this post
September 12 2008, 8:12 PM 

CL South just beat them 6-1 and you guy say theyre top ten..whats that make south?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
8.12.144.16

same crazed goalie mom from goalie post

No score for this post
September 13 2008, 6:51 AM 

Chill out it was only 1 game.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Huskies
(no login)
70.142.211.62

St. Rita

No score for this post
September 13 2008, 8:10 AM 

St. Rita roster looks very strong. They will be a top 4 team in state. This team would give any Midget Major AA team a run for their money.

(posted this in goalie thread by mistake).

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.64.45

Re: JOKE

No score for this post
October 28 2008, 10:31 PM 

first of all hs hockey is a joke and it absolutely sucks, but of all team u ranked highland park at fuckin 7, the only good players in hp are playing csdhl or AAA (cya and Falcons midget minor csdhl) btw hp lost a tournament with midget minor A teams in it AKA worse than midget minor nihl almost house league

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.78.45.148

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 13 2008, 9:27 PM 

any other day stV wins by 7. much more talent just took a lot of dumb penalties to many goals 5 on 3

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
goalie
(no login)
68.78.45.148

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 13 2008, 9:29 PM 

CLS goalie stood on his head and saw at least 10 more shots. Viator goalie played poor.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 14 2008, 11:02 AM 

St. rita got smoked by barrington last night.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Grapes
(no login)
68.253.178.243

St Viator

No score for this post
September 14 2008, 1:09 PM 

gets smoked by Maine 5-2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.193.16.63

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 15 2008, 5:25 PM 

rita beat barrrington in the final 4-3

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.243.144.191

pre-season predictions

No score for this post
September 17 2008, 6:08 PM 


1. NTG
2. LAG
3. Barrington
4. St. Rita
5. GBN

the rest doesn't matter

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hockey fan
(no login)
63.118.78.253

top 5

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 10:19 AM 

1/LAG
2/St.Rita
3/Barrington
4/Sand burg
5/NTG

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon.
(no login)
63.118.78.253

top 5

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 10:23 AM 

What happened to GBN-NTG? Why is LAG so good. Why is Sanberg so good? I would have to believe NTG is in the top 2 or 3 as well GBN.Is anyone out there close to these teams and wanna give up some info. on this?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
In the know
(no login)
68.20.18.79

Re: top 5

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 11:05 AM 

NTG only returns 4 skaters. Balance is made up of NTB which had a .500 record in MN and White who was awful. NTG will be in top 5 but one of the weakest Green teams of all time.

GBN won back to back Titles for one reason and one reason only. They had the best goalie in the State 2 years in a row (Will Dodge). He graduated so GBN will also be top 5 but won't 3 peat.

LAG is cream of the crop with 5 players coming from CYA.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
In the know even more
(no login)
63.118.78.253

Re: top 5

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 12:16 PM 

Dear in the know,
Lag has 3 players from CYA 07 not 5. 1 is a fwd.[2nd line] and the others are good defensemen. LAG has some very good returners but lost 2 to CYA MMa.The combination of returners who have played varsity since freshman year, the addition of the 3 CYA players and the strongest of the Maroon team make a very solid Gold team. If they play as a team they will be very tuff to beat.They should have 3 very solid lines and a 4th that can play with any team in the state. It seems as though other teams are banking on 1 or 2 players to carry the load. The top 2 players at LAG will carry the load because they are surrounded with highly skilled players that will share in on that load.All LAG games will be tuff because each team comes with their A game,fully amped upand ready to play.

In the know even more.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
68.78.99.55

Re: top 5

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 2:21 PM 

LAG lost the best two kids they had in Obrien and Fallon. Those were the only two kids that stood out to me last year. That was their O last year. They lost their goalie as well.

The CYA kids that made the team are way below what they got and I don't even know the 3 new kids.

I thought LAG was the best team last year but they ended up losing to Green the last three times they played. The State game was dominant on Greens part even though the score was close.

I just don't see them being as good as last year without those two guys and the goalie being gone. The Maroon team was terrible. There is nothing there that stood out as well.

That being said LAG has a better chance than anybody to win State. The play has gone down so much in the last three years that it is almost ridiculous. Most of these kids should be playing another sport.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.78.45.148

Re: top 5

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 8:03 PM 

nt blue last year= average team unless they all got better i juss dont see green being that amazing. they would fit right in with the top half of metro north

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 9:32 PM 

k i could care less about ntg but thats one of the stupider things ive ever seen posted. green would maybe lose one game the entire metro north season, and thats a maybe considering gbn stev and gbs are all down this year. Green definitely wont be the green of old but theyre still top 2-3 in state jsut because they have so much to pull from. and their goaile is one of the bestin state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.73.84.215

Re: green

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 9:38 PM 

What's the new drug of choice over in NT land? Your team is average at best. Good Luck

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Wildcat5
(Login wildcat5)
204.38.195.114

St Rita

No score for this post
September 18 2008, 10:28 PM 

I think Rita is a team that a lot of people are underestimating with Cimoch back and (from i saw) strong goalie play from number 31 i think this team has a legit shot at state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hockeyman
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: St Rita

No score for this post
September 19 2008, 9:29 AM 

agreed, St Rita goalie looked very strong in game vs Fremd.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

it was

No score for this post
September 19 2008, 9:50 AM 

Fremd!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
207.63.190.1

Cmunt says

No score for this post
September 19 2008, 12:15 PM 

its fremd u could put a blind kid in net and he could shut them out

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
gdjksgjk
(no login)
67.162.118.13

true

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 9:50 PM 

Rita has some of the worst goaltending in the state. One big guy but hes slow, rebounds will kill him, and any good shot will be in. rita just does a great job of keeping men out of the middle. all the shots that are on net are from the point or the boards. Rita's goalies will carry them no where.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hockeyfan1
(no login)
207.63.100.165

rita goaltending

No score for this post
September 24 2008, 6:28 AM 

I agree rita hasn't looked great but after seeing them in these first 2 tourneys I don't think the big guy will be there go to guy. The smaller one looked better being able to move and make 2nd and 3rd saves. Last year rita didn't need to rely on their goalie to win most of their games. this year will be a different story

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
64.12.117.10

rita not top 10

No score for this post
September 20 2008, 10:10 PM 

lost to York, beat fremd by only 2 and squeaked past cary grove (with the help of 6, 5 on 3 power plays)- this is not a top ten team

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
predictions
(no login)
24.15.16.236

UC

No score for this post
September 20 2008, 10:33 PM 

could a team from south of of glenview besides fenwick make it to the UC?
Look for Hins Cent(i know pretty random but wait and see) or Rita( very much underestmated)

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

rita?

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 7:58 AM 

underestimated? they were supposed to be top 4 or 5 this year. Cimoch cant do it all, rita and sandburg drop out of the top 10 after this weeekend

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.25.58.43

York

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:54 AM 

York is the real deal, and will only get better. They also could add a great deal of talent next year, if they can pick up those Blues players who chose to stay at the Blues. Next years soph class could be good with some convincing.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
games
(no login)
64.12.117.10

title

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 9:00 AM 

Rita beat a very good Barrington team 4 to 3 in the Great eight championship game last weekend.Will get the forward that was headhunted and put in the hospital by a very cheap Nequa team at same tourny Back today. had six points in 2 games and he will be a top player in the league. York played a very strong team game and looked real good doing it .Cary grove game was the worst game ever witnessed made worse by some moron refs.Bad calls against both teams from the start,game took over 2 hours.All in all its a long season ,teams will have there ups and downs as it goes along. The better teams will learn from the experience of winning and losing and improve upon that .

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.148.200

barrington will be top 3

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 9:46 AM 

their big and fast and in hockey thats hard to beat

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.202.159

Re: barrington will be top 3

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 11:59 AM 

they will win state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: barrington will be top 3

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:04 PM 

after beating geen, and rita, barrington has showed that they are one of the best in state.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

top 3

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:28 PM 

Barrington green was an excellent game. Green outplayed them in my opinion as they outshot them about 2-1 but barrington burried the pucks when they needed to and their goalie is outstanding. top 3 teams in state are lag ntg and barrington and well have to see the order. after watching rita and sandburg play i honestly think those are by far the top 3 teams

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
192.195.66.44

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:30 PM 

do not forget about the Glenbrooks. They have not played in these tournaments but should be top ten teams.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:34 PM 

True. I have not seen them play yet and they will definitely be top 10 teams but i dont think they can play at the level of these 3 other teams

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.73.84.215

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:40 PM 

Watched Game and Barrington was in penalty box all game. Green should have easily out shot them. Bottom line is Green choked again just like last year in the state finals. Maybe the goalie isn't what they paid for? The Top teams are as follows.

LAG
Barrington
NTG
GBN
Stevenson
Fenwick
Rita
GBS
MtCarmel
York

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
yoo
(no login)
24.1.107.205

teams

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 8:50 PM 

completely agree taht green choked, had countless opppurtunities to put barrington away and the green goalie did let in two weak goals at the end that he probably should have stopped. also id slide york out of the top 10 and move rita down a bit. also i was unimpressed with stevenson. They only lost by 2 to green but were completely outplayed and could barely get the puck out. shots must have been around 40-15

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
north
(no login)
67.167.12.55

north

No score for this post
September 21 2008, 9:13 PM 

north has a tourny this weekend.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
rankings
(no login)
24.15.16.236

HC

No score for this post
September 22 2008, 1:44 PM 

Swap York for Hinsdale Central if you are going to include a Metro West team

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: HC

No score for this post
September 22 2008, 2:03 PM 

hinsdale central has not played anybody good yet this season. sure york got their a***Es kicked by NTG but they did make more of a statement than hinsdale central did in their b3nder tourney. Should be 2 good teams competing for MW

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
RR AC MANUAL
(no login)
64.105.238.167

Re: HC

No score for this post
September 22 2008, 3:14 PM 

In spring league York had their full varsity team, while Hinsdale Central was missing 5 of their best 7 players, and only lost in overtime. York is overhyping themselves, and no Metro West team is top 10.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: HC

No score for this post
September 22 2008, 3:53 PM 

agreed. some good hockey teams but the top 10 are all up on the shore. hinsdale central, you guys are still b3nders tho

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.12.151.139

Re: HC

No score for this post
September 22 2008, 4:27 PM 

I had the chance to watch some of the games this weekend and I must say, HS hockey has fallen but it may be for the better. NTG this year is comparable to a NTW of last year. Which in a way makes sense bc i assume most of greens players were on white last year. But anyway, if green has mangaed to get this bad, I can only assume the other teams that I havnt seen, GBN and LAG. will also be worse. In a way I'm glad to see this because it will make games more interesting and people won't be able to predict outcomes as well as they would have been able to last year. Good Luck to all teams this year!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
boy
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: HC

No score for this post
September 22 2008, 9:42 PM 

dude are you kidding me. i dont even live on the north shore and still tip my hat to NTG. they play so fast, you can say how they will be down and this and that but it's bs. they have an awesome coach, and what are you talking about. all the kids from Green this year played on Blue, not White.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
kids are gone
(no login)
216.112.146.184

Top Ten

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 8:17 AM 

There is no way to compare teams from five years ago to teams of today. There are just too many variables like speed and passing, stickhandling and goaltending. Overall, hockey is better today than it was years ago and anyone who ever played thinks it peaked when they played, or when their kid played!

This year there will be a pretty competitive top ten and you'd be crazy not to include LAG, NTG, GBN, Rita and Barrington in that mix. I am sure there will be a few others so I left room for all of you to put your favorites in.

There is enough parity that no team will "coast" to the United Center. It will come down to team play, work ethic, discipline and coaching. None of these teams can win shorthanded!

And for the record, there will always be a few teams that surprise (PR last two years, who knows this year?), a few that are full of themselves (Fremd, York, etc.)and are all talk, and a few that need some time to re-build (NPC last year and Providence this year).

Should be a good year. Man is it a lot easier to watch once your kid is off to college!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
68.20.18.79

Re: Top Ten

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 8:53 AM 

I have to disagree with you. I saw games at Great 8 and now Bartlett. There is a top and then a HUGE Middle. The Middle is where you will find the Parity. We all know that anything can happen on any given day (Bartlett Ship) but most of the time the best teams win. I see the the top ten like this

1. LAG
2. Barrington (until they meet NTG again)
3. NTG





10. GBN
11. St. Rita
12. Prairie Ridge
13 Sandburg
14 Rest don't matter

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
GUEST
(no login)
66.244.178.42

rankings "Final Eight"

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 9:03 AM 

LAG
NTG
BARRINGTON
ST RITA
PR
GBN
NPC
SANBURG

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
76.224.122.198

Re: rankings "Final Eight"

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 10:14 AM 

Nice Job. Take NPC out though, they are really bad.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.2

apples and oranges

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 12:58 PM 

If what I hear each year were true, then high school hockey ten years ago was like today's NHL and today's high schoolers play like mites did ten years ago. Everyone thinks hockey is getting worse every year, but the problem is the eyes and brains of those making that statement. And more the brains.

You can't compare what you remember from yesteryear to now, because all you remember is how those teams played at the end of the season. It's not fair to compare a finished product to September hockey. Let them have a little time to come together and relax.

As a coach, every year at the beginning of a new season, I can't believe the drop in talent from what I just had. But by the end of the year, it's a different story. Give it time.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.202.159

Re: apples and oranges

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 1:30 PM 

amen

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

rankings

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 1:55 PM 

great raknkings. i agree those 3 teams are far and away the best. barrington, nice win but im in terms of sheer talent and as soon as green learns to score on even 1 out of every 5 of their chances you wont be able to play with them. the rankings look like this:

1. LAG
2. NTG

3. Barrington





everyone else

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
wins and losses
(no login)
205.188.117.10

huh

No score for this post
September 23 2008, 10:12 PM 

Is this the same Barrington team that lost to Rita in the great eight tourny? Then turned around and beat NTG? Any team can win on any given day.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
BEASTMAN
(no login)
209.7.119.160

FREMD IS BACK

No score for this post
September 24 2008, 7:31 AM 

THE GLORY DAYS OF FREMD HAVE RETURNED< THE SPIRIT OF MEWS GUIDES US IN OUR ULTIMATE GOAL FOR HOCKEY SUPREMECY, ALL WILL BOW ONCE THEY HAVE FACED A TEAM THAT SPORTED SUCH HOCKEY LEGENDS AS BUD BRADLY(RAGS,BLOODY RAGS,SID VICIOUS, SID RAGLY, BUDDY BUDHOLE,) CRAZY STEVE DECARLO, FRANKY CHAMBERS, JOEY F*CK'n MACARTHUR, and not to mention other countless hockey greats

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.2

yup

No score for this post
September 24 2008, 8:20 AM 

Fremd is back alright. Back on this message board making a disgrace of the program, as you do every year. Congratulations. I guess the new coach is no more into discipline than the old.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.79.80

rankings

No score for this post
September 24 2008, 1:31 PM 

I think everyone is underestimating Fenwick. As much as people like to think that their glory days are over, overall they have a stronger team than last year. They lost their number one goaltender and that is their only problem. The rest of the team is much stronger than last year. They lost to barrington 6-4 with some weak goaltending.

Fenwick will definately win Kennedy cup and should make a run at state.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.78.45.148

Re: rankings

No score for this post
September 24 2008, 7:02 PM 

Fenwick is a bit overrated. Yes they have a good chance to win the the Kennedy cup in the cch,. but there not just going to walk into every game and win. They will lose 2 out of 3 to Rita and could even lose 2 of 3 to MC and viator. All 4 of these teams have a shot at the Kennedy cup just a matter of who comes to play.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
ND
(no login)
76.237.180.165

ND

No score for this post
September 25 2008, 3:02 PM 

ND should be a big upset in state with the allstar john blaus

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
205.188.117.10

ND - Lost

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 7:45 AM 

ND Lost to Cary grove 3-2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
205.188.117.10

ND

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 7:46 AM 

ND lost to Cary Grove 3-2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
September 25 2008, 3:41 PM 

everybody thinks that york is full of themselves. they have not even been talking about winning state or MW or any of that. many players on the team know that their program is notorious for being awful or hacks. why is everyone saying they are full of themselves? ps they dont talk sh1t like fremd

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.148.200

readers are leaders

No score for this post
September 25 2008, 9:34 PM 

you obviously cant read if you havent seen anything about north being top in state and winning metro west

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.209.217

that wont matter

No score for this post
September 29 2008, 8:25 PM 

gold is far and away #1. Go look at the roster.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fremdfan
(Login fremdfan)
209.112.65.131

Re: that wont matter

No score for this post
September 30 2008, 6:08 AM 

fremd is obviously the best team in the state. besides for anybody else but rita nobody can compare to the mighty vikings

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
your dumb
(no login)
209.7.121.128

re: that wont matter

No score for this post
September 30 2008, 11:03 AM 

fremd is obviously not even close to being the best team in state. there not even in HIT. good luck showing everybody that fremd is the best team in state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.243.144.191

Re: that wont matter

No score for this post
September 30 2008, 1:14 PM 

Gold #1 im not so sure about that, according to their website they lost 4-1 to rockford.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.111.103

Re: that wont matter

No score for this post
September 30 2008, 3:31 PM 

evryone is forgetting about fenwick??

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fremdfan
(Login fremdfan)
24.7.253.14

Re: that wont matter

No score for this post
September 30 2008, 8:50 PM 

nobody cares about fenwick thats why. its all about the mustangs over at 79th and western

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.205.179.110

hey

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 6:59 AM 

new trier is gonna get skeeted on this years

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
216.141.147.66

Re: hey

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 10:15 AM 

watched 2 periods of the GBN-vikings game at edge. GBN's d is extremely weak except for their two seniors. The team is full of JV kids and it was obvious by their play. May struggle to break top 10 this year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.14.235.181

Re: hey

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 12:03 PM 

They must be weak if they could only tie the Vikings most quality high school programs would beat them by 3 to 4 goals

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
67.167.12.55

gbn

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 3:45 PM 

gbn has 4 senior defensmen which is actually their strong point. goaltending is weak

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.201.152.40

nice try

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 5:10 PM 

that vikings team is good u have no cue what your talking about

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
To legit to Quit
(no login)
64.105.238.167

Sandburg

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 5:45 PM 

Naperville North beat Sandburg 4-2. Still think your winning state?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.199.169

Re: Sandburg

No score for this post
October 1 2008, 10:02 PM 

yes north beat sandburg... happen to notice there top player was in the stands? last year sandburg lost to naperville central 5-1 metro opener and finished top 3 in metro lets just wait til feb. and see were north stands in the metro playoffs

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
68.20.18.79

Re: Sandburg

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 6:23 AM 

NTG 2 Sandburg 0

SOG NTG 36 Sandburg 13

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 1:59 PM 

once again, green dominates a game (don't let the score fool you, sandburg had zero scoring chances and maybe one shot inside the top of the circles) and cant bury the puck. from what ive seen no one can play with greens speed and they have good defense, but if they dont start burying the puck all that talent will go to waste.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: green

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 2:19 PM 

loyola at barrington tonite. who wins?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Ignatius
(no login)
209.183.32.44

Re: green

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 3:52 PM 

Loyola by 3.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
payton34
(no login)
24.15.79.187

Green

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 5:15 PM 


Barrington by 1

Saw Gold play this weekend. It is not impressive.
How many penelties will # 50 get tonight
But then again they were missing 4-5 players

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.57.111.103

Re: Green

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 6:29 PM 

top ten teams in state are

New Trier Green
Loyala Gold
Fenwick
Rita
Barrington
Sandburg
Stevenson
GBN
Glenbard South
and someone else//

Final Four...

Gold
Green
Fenwick
Barrington..\Nuf' said

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.79.80

Re: Green

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 6:59 PM 

I agree, fenwick is top 5

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
man
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Barrington

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 7:44 PM 

they are already 13-1-2 not including the result of tonight's game vs LAG. they are a top team no question.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Metro Scout
(no login)
67.184.160.122

Good game

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:18 PM 

Barrington 5, LAG 4
Barrington was the better team tonight. But they won't even win Metro Central...go Gators!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
god
(no login)
76.203.20.31

top 5

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:19 PM 

Barrington
NTG
Lag
Saint Rita
Fenwick

Barrington beat Lag 5 to 4 tonight

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
scout hockey
(no login)
76.237.203.215

Barrington vs Lag

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:31 PM 

Loyola was missing some of their players and for the most part it was a close game. Remember this is one of first games of the season for both teams.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: Barrington vs Lag

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:36 PM 

for Loyola yes, but not for Barrington. it was their 17th game of the season.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
observer
(no login)
99.144.239.162

Re: Barrington

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:34 PM 

Barrington 5 Loyola Gold 4

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.210.245.171

lag vs barrington

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:55 PM 

and heres the rest of the story...

lag was playing with 14 kids and there returning goalie from last year was out because of injury. Lag dominated the second and third periods but a bad call resulting in a penalty shot ruined the game for lag. Lag also out shot barrington by 10. when lag has a full roster and some games under their belt, they will deffinitely be a team to be reckoned with!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Titan
(no login)
99.144.239.162

Re: lag vs barrington

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 8:58 PM 

Thanks Loyala Daddy for setting things straight. Blaming the refs for Jr's loss. Weak Brother!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Fan
(no login)
99.144.239.162

October

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 9:12 PM 

Who cares? It's the beginning of October. The fact of the matter is that it's early and no matter how you want to rank the top 5 teams I think it's safe to say that based on pre-season action that in alphabetical order the top teams are:

Barrington
GBN (Current State Champions)
Loyola Gold
New Trier Green
St. Rita

Should be an entertaining season which will come down to whichever team can peak in March and get the goaltending and bounces.

In the meantime, who gives a hoot how many players Loyola was missing tonight? Barrington won, Loyola lost, it's one game and it's October 2nd.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.203.18.125

Re: October

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 9:27 PM 

Easy Barrington! You have a lot to show to everyone. I agree that you are solid. Your goalies are the question? You out shot them bad in the 1st and 2nd they outshot you. 3rd period goes to you on a lucky break. Whatever beat us in HIT and then talk smack. BTW our coaches where not at the game.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

rita

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 9:28 PM 

i know rita beat barrington but that game appears more and more as a fluke. the other time they played barrington smoked them 6-1 and rita looked very average in the bartlett tourny. no top team should lose to york by 5 goals. they are not the dominating team we thought and not in the top 5 until they start beating good teams consistently and beating all the bad ones

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

gold

No score for this post
October 2 2008, 9:30 PM 

please stop making excuses. that lat post just admitted he was a part of the team by saying "us". no one is doubting that you are a solid team, you lost the game, chill out

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Upper North Shore
(no login)
99.144.239.162

GBN and GBS

No score for this post
October 7 2008, 8:52 AM 

Does anyone know what the two Glenbrook schools look like this year? GBN has had quite a run the last couple of years but did graduation hit them hard? They seem to know how to play and beat the NTG and LAG's of the world in big games. GBS was pretty weak last year, do they even have a shot? Need some feedback people...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Skokie
(no login)
67.167.12.55

Green vs Skokie MM

No score for this post
October 7 2008, 9:33 PM 

Skokie MM beats NTG 5-3. Skokie lost to GBN last sunday 5-0.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.2

classic

No score for this post
October 8 2008, 7:30 AM 

Green lost to Skokie? Wow. How?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Snakeskin Cowboy
(no login)
68.253.215.139

How?

No score for this post
October 8 2008, 7:42 AM 

Skokie was more physical than NTG, very small and not physical. Goaltending for NTG was weak at best. Each team was missing 3-4 players it seemed, but unless some of those missing for NTG are lights out studs, they are a very average team and will go nowhere.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
herecomesthespellchecker
(no login)
68.73.126.2

Re: How?

No score for this post
October 8 2008, 12:21 PM 

Well there was a time when Green wouldn't play Skokie because the disparity was too great. I saw one of their games about three years ago and green beat them 11-1. The salad days appear over for NT. Probably time for a change in coaches at the top as well.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
fitantitan
(no login)
99.144.239.162

Re: How?

No score for this post
October 10 2008, 11:16 PM 

Is skokie a hs team? Why do we care about NTG and some jackass MM team? The only team anyone needs to worry about this year is the mighty fresh Titans of GBS. The rest of you DB's got nothing. North sucks this year. Their run is over.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.18

fitanfan?

No score for this post
October 13 2008, 6:17 AM 

North is not as good so far. But we'll beat South.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
34 walterpayton
(no login)
24.15.79.187

GBN and GBS

No score for this post
October 16 2008, 4:37 PM 

GBS
Watched last night as GBS shorthanded ( 5 players )
Lost to DF 5 - 3
GBS led 3-2 after 2 but gave a goal up in first 10 sec of the period and downhill from there.
Even with the 5 additional they are a mid level team.
Defense suspect,goaltending poor and no " STARS " upfront.

GBN
It will take the So & Jr to carry this team
The Flying V's will make their presence felt.
Have not been dazzled by 2 x State Champion yet.




 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
76.238.5.210

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
October 13 2008, 5:49 PM 

The teams are well distributed with their talent this year, though not seeing much with NTG, Barrington, and Rita. I havent seen GBN and LAG yet this year, but I hear that they are have a down year also. GBNs third line from last year, who sucked, is now their first line. NTG is probably the most talented team, with no goal scorers. Green has out shot every team by a large amount, especially the Barrington game which i heard was a fluke. SOG NTG-45, Barrington-15? Come on. Barrington is good only because of their goalie, and Rita has literally one good player, Simmach. NTG is sucking terribly losing to skokie? Thats awful, but after watching NTG they are by far the best i have seen, though they cant score which they really need to work on.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Grapes
(no login)
68.253.185.132

Work on scoring??

No score for this post
October 13 2008, 6:34 PM 

Scorers are developed a long time ago, one does not become a scorer at 17 or 18 years old. If NTG is by far the best team you've seen, there are going to a lot of shocked people before this season is over.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.165.136.27

Re: Work on scoring??

No score for this post
October 15 2008, 3:46 PM 

hockey stop polls
1. Loyola
2. Barrington
dont know the rest. But the first two should be switched.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
October 15 2008, 8:56 PM 

cant argue with the fact that green is talented and can dominate any game but it doesnt matter if they cant score. true they can get a million shots on you but if they dont score they wont win. theyll have a good year as always but no title for green unless some people step up

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
98.213.225.108

Top Ten...

No score for this post
October 16 2008, 2:40 PM 

Why is nobody putting Rockford Icemen in the mix?
Beat Loyola Gold 4-1 and beat vikings 2-0.
Plus have won combined state for the past 12 YEARS!
You can say that its a weak league but to stay on top for that long says something.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.217.110.219

Re: Top Ten...

No score for this post
October 16 2008, 2:45 PM 

NOT A PURE SCHOOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.47.33.91

The truth about Rockford

No score for this post
October 16 2008, 2:47 PM 

What Rockford does in Illinois H.S. hockey should be embarrassing to them at the least. How can you expect any other school to give you any respect, when you pick your team from all elidgeable players in your City!!!!, not your school, not your district, Your entire City!!. Then you take that team and play a high tiered club program along side it. I would like to see the Catholic league pick its finest 18 players and give you the but-kicking your ego needs!!!!!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.209.217

what it says

No score for this post
October 16 2008, 5:35 PM 

It says you are afraid to compete under the same rules as red division teams. Enjoy your run of paper trophies.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
jimmy
(no login)
12.208.135.228

top 10

No score for this post
October 17 2008, 10:47 PM 

Bartlett
York
ELS
St. Charles North
NTG
OPRF
Linclon way East
Hinsdale Central
GBN
Marist

all the $hit show teams are going to be in it for state...
hs hockey is so good.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.148.200

york

No score for this post
October 18 2008, 10:07 AM 

after seeing them in their metro debut their number 1

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.161.13

Re: york

No score for this post
October 18 2008, 11:11 AM 

yet they lose to a crap sandburg team and there now 0-2-1

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.79.80

Re: york

No score for this post
October 18 2008, 12:14 PM 

fenwick number 1.

2-0 regular season, beat barrington.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hs hockey
(no login)
24.15.16.236

HC

No score for this post
October 18 2008, 10:28 PM 

Hinsdale Central is not going anywhere until 1)there two team players are actually available on a consistant basis and 2)find goaltenders who can stop more than a beach ball, their save percentage is around 60%

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hs
(no login)
24.15.16.236

rankings

No score for this post
October 18 2008, 10:33 PM 

add chicago math and science academy in there too while your at it

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.175.89

metro north update

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 12:50 AM 

Loyola Maroon 2
GBN 2


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.139.102

Re: metro north update

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 7:49 AM 

If that score is true, Foreman's top 10 in Hockey stop is crap. I'm sure GBN will drop 1 spot with a tie to Maroon since Foremans nose is ducktaped to Brunners arse!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.234.45

Re: metro north update

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 10:32 AM 

o yea for sure those rankings are shit. he has Providence ranked ahead of Stevenson. As we all know Providence is one of the worst Varsity teams around!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.161.13

Re: metro north update

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 11:43 AM 

thats not far we all know that if your north side you will get love god forbid a south side team every has a chance

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

foreman

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 5:42 PM 

so did he watch any games before he made those rankings? theyre brutal

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.105.238.167

Re: foreman

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 8:34 PM 

Those rankings are so on, he has Marist twice!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.60.248.90

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
October 19 2008, 9:51 PM 

Hey Jimmy, Lake Park just handed it to Saint Charles North tonight 6-3, with a sophomore goalie sporting a 102 temperature. I guess they move up to #4 on the list.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.145.138.45

new rankings

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 8:57 AM 

1. Barrington
2. LAG
3. Rita

and then everyone else because it doesn't matter. no one else sports the skill this year to hang with these three teams. also, according to the metro north website, it is true gbn did tie maroon, and stevenson and gbs lost to deerfield.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
payton34
(no login)
208.251.246.210

new ranking

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 9:25 AM 


Yes the MN Site is correct.

GBN Tied Maroon - It was the goalie who saved the day for Maroon
One line for GBN at the moment & suspect Defense & Goalie

Deerfield did beat GBS & Stevenson but lost easily to NT Blue

MN is going to be fun. Look out for LF........


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
68.73.85.35

Re: new ranking

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 10:54 AM 

Everyone knows that the talent level throughout the state is way down. Forget about the Maroon goalie. He has to stink because the two guys on Gold stink. The eventual state champ will probably come out of no where because the talent is so thin and parity exists. Some of the coaches at some of the previous "top" teams may have to actually be forced to teach their players how to win a faceoff or learn how to hold a lead in the last minute 10 different times in one freakin season.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Notasnippyfan
(no login)
216.112.146.184

HS peaked when?

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 3:27 PM 

It's interesting to see these posts where everyone talks about how great it was when they played. I played 20 years ago and am not afraid to admit that with very little variation, it has gotten better every year. The kids today are better than I was and better than any of the rest of us men's league benders want to believe. At the end of the day it is one of the dumbest serial posts in that it is impossible to resolve. Be here now Snippy. Last time I checked, your team from a few years ago is not competing for the state this year. And whoever wins will be a worthy champion just as others before them. It is true that there is much more parity now so it should be fun to watch and enjoy. And if you want to focus on things that don't or won't matter, focus on your fantasy football team. That is the only place that things that don't matter, do matter. Peace.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
76.16.71.171

Re: HS peaked when?

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 4:40 PM 

Not talking about twenty years ago. Talking three years ago. 2006 season. You had more than a handful of terrific teams. Necqy, NPC, LAG, GBN GBS Green. Even Blue won 50 games that year. The Blue team from three years ago would run everyone off the ice today. Including Green.

And I don't play the game. Other than those points your post was right on the money.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

top 3?

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 3:47 PM 

and you dont include green? green has played some bad games against some MM teams but against high school teams they have dominated every game except for barrington, who they still outplayed if you were at the game. Also, green just beat pheonix aaa twice, 2-1 and 4-2, a team that loyla beat by 1 and tied. not sure ive forgiven rita for the blowout they recieved by fremd

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.58.60.7

ntg no way!

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 5:11 PM 

no way ntg is top 3, they're not even top 5!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

hmm

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 5:27 PM 

based off what? they completely outplayed barrington and outshot them at least 2-1 at bartlett and only lost due to great goaltending and 2 weak goals let in late in the third. and they beat a team twice that loyola beat by one and tied...but youre right there's no wayy they are top 3?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

sorry

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 6:08 PM 

great goaltending by barrington and two weak goals let in by nts goalie in the third

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
rita
(no login)
71.201.204.31

Re: sorry

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 6:55 PM 

fenwick beat barrington, barrington should not be top three and if they are, so should fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.175.94.172

Re: sorry

No score for this post
October 20 2008, 11:07 PM 

wow.
let's not forget fenwick's loss to MOUNT CARMEL?

who is MT. CARMEL this year? psh.

you is in for a surprise if you think fenwick should be in the top..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

game

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 5:53 AM 

does anyone know if the barringtons first or second goalie was playing?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Ballstrap
(no login)
72.254.107.163

Barrington Goalies

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 6:50 AM 

Against Fenwick, they played both goalies and they both sucked. Goaltending is the achilles heal.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
209.7.121.128

Re: Barrington Goalies

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 10:57 AM 

yea i was at the barrington feenwick game. barrington goalies played awful and was the reason they lost. otherwise barrington would have beat fenwick 5-0

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.145.138.45

stop making excuses

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 11:54 AM 

ntg!!! you lost to barrington, you lost to skokie's MM nihl team, and it doesn't matter what you did against some team lag played. the only thing that matters is head to head. face it, you're not that good!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.204.31

Re: stop making excuses

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 1:17 PM 

the fenwick mt carmel game was the very first tourny of pre season but theyll win kennedy cup carmel blows they lost to notre dame

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 1:57 PM 

you say green just isnt that good...i could care less about what htey did against skokie and beating pheonix for the first time in a while is great but i could care less about that either. the bottom line is that against illinois high school teams green is 6-1, the one loss coming to barrington. And if you claim NTG is bad then why did barrington only beat them 2-1, why were the shots 35-14 or whatever they were. Green is fine. They are not as good as past green teams but they still green, still top 3, and still will be there at the end, and thats all there is to it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.168.76

Re: green

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 2:01 PM 

your cool

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.75.188

Re: green

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 7:25 PM 

barrington beat nt, supposedly the top team, and fenwick beat barrington. So I would say that fenwick is the top team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.202.251.152

Re: green

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 9:04 PM 

Fenwick has lost to Barrington 2 times so not. They are good but please... Fenwick may be good in 2 years.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

wow

No score for this post
October 21 2008, 9:17 PM 

just because you beat a team once doesnt mean youre better. build a body of work, beat them a few teams, beat other good teams, and then talk. no one really can claim the top spot right now. i will agree, however, that fenwick, green, barrington, rita, and loyola are easily the top 5 teams in the state.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anotherguest
(no login)
216.112.146.184

The last guy got it right.

No score for this post
October 22 2008, 1:31 PM 

The top five are NTG, Barrington, LAG, St. Rita and Fenwick. Barrington is the only one that has beaten the other four. But they are clearly not dominant. NTG is the best "team" from a fundamental point of view but they give up more goals than they have in the past, and they miss more chances so they are beatable. It looks like there will be at least five and possibly ten viable contenders for State depending on how the brackets come out and who shows up on what day. Should be fun to watch!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.58.50.62

Re: The last guy got it right.

No score for this post
October 22 2008, 2:34 PM 

Loyola did look anything special last night when they played sandburg the score was 4-1 but 2 controversial goals for Loyola, yes sandburg lost to another good team but showed more promise then they have earlier this year

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.168.76

Re: The last guy got it right.

No score for this post
October 22 2008, 3:18 PM 

Yes Sandburg is going to be a top team in the end. They will be able to play with any team when they have a full bench. Whoever thinks Fenwick is top 5 look to find a new team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
October 22 2008, 5:33 PM 


sandburg a top team this year? ntg beat em and i'm sure many other schools can also

i'd give any team a chance right now becuase there is clearly no 'top' team. based on from what ive heard and seen gbn is not even in the mix with a tie to loyola maroon. ntg has rebounded from early losses, beating that phoenix team twice. loyola is always a contender so don't count them out. but if i were to pick a state champ in october, i'd go with ntg

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

sandburg

No score for this post
October 22 2008, 6:00 PM 

Sandburg will play with teams because they have a very good goalie that will keep the scores tight, but its hard to win with no offense

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.58.40.221

Re: sandburg

No score for this post
October 22 2008, 9:27 PM 

sandburgs offense has been in the stands for a month it will come

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.163.76.46

Re: sandburg

No score for this post
October 23 2008, 6:18 PM 

Just keep dreaming boy's.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
are you kidding
(no login)
99.144.239.162

dumpster

No score for this post
October 24 2008, 7:49 PM 

garbage. that is what sandburg is

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.168.76

Re: dumpster

No score for this post
October 25 2008, 8:11 AM 

whatever you say bud

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.223.23.31

top ten

No score for this post
October 29 2008, 3:39 PM 

1. Barrington
2. Loyola gold
3. New trier Green
4. GBN
5. St Rita
6. Stevenson
7. Maine
8.Prarie Ridge
9. Mt Carmel
10. Fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Not at all
(no login)
141.218.216.214

Rankings

No score for this post
October 29 2008, 3:50 PM 

Stevenson is absolutely horrible this year, they lost their whole team in Croft and Wood to graduation. Also Maine is wayyyyy overrated as well, they always start their year strong and then fade dramatically as the season goes on. PR isn't as good as everybody thinks they are with their best returning player, DK, quitting before the season even started. I'm not sold on Rita being a strong team this year as Cimoch will wear down trying to carry the team. Barrington, Gold, and Green are the three powers this year as long as injuries or locker room problems don't derail them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Top Ten
(no login)
98.227.49.144

Revised

No score for this post
November 1 2008, 8:48 AM 

1 Barrington
2 Gold
3 Green

4 Rita
5 PR
6 GBN
7 Fenwick


8 Sandburg
9 NTB
10 CLS

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.168.76

Re: Revised

No score for this post
November 1 2008, 11:19 AM 

1. Barrington
2. NTG
3. LAG
4. GBN
5. Rita
6. Sandburg
7. PR
8. Fenwick
9. NTB
10. CLS

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
67.167.12.55

rankings

No score for this post
November 1 2008, 11:48 AM 

sandburg is over rated. GBN put the beat down on them 5-0 and it was running clock the entire thrird

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
76.16.160.210

top ten

No score for this post
November 1 2008, 6:01 PM 





1. Barrington
2. LAG
3. NTG
4. Rockford
5. GBN
6. Rita
7. Sandburg
8. Maine
9. NTB
10. Notre Dame

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.207.110

Score

No score for this post
November 1 2008, 8:36 PM 

GBS 5 NTB 2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

green

No score for this post
November 1 2008, 9:24 PM 

saw green play against blues MM today and was very impressed. Beat them 5-3 and were winning 5-1 with 4 mins left. Great game for green

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login rockfordfan08)
98.193.50.129

Fact: I love Rockford

Score 5.0 (1 person)
November 1 2008, 10:34 PM 

Question: Will Rockford be in the top ten teams at the end of the season?
Answer: You're an idiot.

Fact: 1. NTG
2. LAG
3. GBN
4. Barrington
5. Who cares...


I'm going to write you up for not working.



Icemen Rule

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login acwhnib)
24.7.250.227

Re: Fact: I love Rockford

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 9:06 AM 

NTG: 5 Blues midget major: 3

green played excellent despite the dirty plays by the blues. heard about the game, and understand that the blues are one dirty team. anyways green beat them and no other team could.

1.NTG
2.LAG
3 to.. who cares...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

top 10

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 11:10 AM 

if green plays the way they did against the blues for the rest of the year, they wont lose to another illinois high school team. Well have to see if they can keep that up

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.209.217

wow

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 11:57 AM 

Skokie must be better than the blues!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

hm no

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 12:00 PM 

the blues are the top MM team in illinois. green is a defferent team now than they were 3 weeks ago. got some players back form injury and look like the green team we expected

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: hm no

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 5:16 PM 

green is a different team than 3 weeks ago, if skokie played green again my guess is that green would win. the only downside to green now is i heard that green lost a top defenseman in the state due to a dirty blues team? is that true? will that stop green's domination so far?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: hm no

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 6:35 PM 

saw the game and yes greens top defenseman was injured on what was a blatant check from behind. Not sure on the extent of the injury but he left the game immedeately after and was taken to the hospital

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: hm no

No score for this post
November 2 2008, 6:41 PM 

best defenseman gone...can green handle the pressure?? that will be the question

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.138.29.75

Re: hm no

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 7:56 AM 

greens top defenseman is gone, so why does everyone think they are so good? Until this kid, forget his name, number 62 gets back green will be back to like the way they were in the beginning of the year

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Diagnosis
(no login)
66.158.125.162

Green

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 1:20 PM 

The word is that the Green defenseman has a slightly separated shoulder. Good player and will be missed but plenty of good D to cover. To the post that said they won't be the same without him......you must not have watched any of their games. Defense is solid up and down and one other player that is still out...will soon return.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.86.95

Green

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 3:50 PM 

You are correct that the green defenseman has a separated shoulder. However, as you mentioned, green has a wide array of solid defensemen who will certainly be able to cover until his return. Loyola Plays the blues on Thursday so we'll see if they live up to their number one prediction.

P.S. For anyone who didn't see the game the second goal against NTG never went in the net. The puck bounced off the crossbar and straight out. NTG's senior goalie Parsons was so upset that he received a ten minute unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for swearing profusely at the refs. Also The refs had just reffed a girls U-10 hockey game beforehand begging the question of who let them ref a real hockey game?


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.213.112.11

Re: Fact: I love Rockford

No score for this post
November 9 2009, 8:34 PM 

hahaha rockford is top 3 in the state already!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.101.68

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 1:52 PM 

I don't know why everyone keeps listing Sandburg in the top 10 in state. They are 3-3-2 in MW with losses and ties to some schools that a true top 10 would have run over. I also saw Hinsdale Central beat them 3-1 with about half their team missing and JV players on the ice. Speaking of Hinsdale Central, I saw them beat Naperville North easily 4-0 last night. It appeared they had most of their team there and it is a totally different team although it looked like they still had some guys out. Having seen most teams play so far, when HC has their full roster with AAA and AA guys out there they are for sure able to be mentioned in the top 10 discussion. That being said, who knows how many games they will get out of their full roster.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.140.180.131

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 3:58 PM 

where and what time is gold playing the blues?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

relax

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 6:46 PM 

Green is fine. Their D will be back next week and will only miss about 2 games

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: relax

No score for this post
November 3 2008, 8:00 PM 

agreed. NTG is an all around good team with two leading forwards in the returners, harris and vail

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
162.34.231.16

LAG

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 6:56 AM 

Last night Gold cancelled their Thursday evening game with the Blues for unspecified reasons.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
RESCHEDULED
(no login)
75.22.192.48

LAG GAME

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 9:58 AM 

GAME IS BEING RESCHEDULED BETWEEN LAG AND BLUE

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: LAG GAME

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 1:38 PM 

Gold and NTB play each other?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
LAG
(no login)
75.22.192.48

LAG GAME

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 2:51 PM 

GAME IS BEING RESCHEDULED BETWEEN LAG AND BLUES

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
68.253.219.76

Re: LAG GAME

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 3:36 PM 

Can't believe those Ass Ramlers canceled their game against the blues. What a bunch of fuckin pussys

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: LAG GAME

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 5:39 PM 

agreed with the statement above

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.145.138.45

it's funny

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 5:47 PM 

it's hilarious that they canceled because the more they piss everyone off, the more you jokes post.

top 6 in no particular order:
NTG
LAG
Fenwick
Rita
Barrington
GBN (defending champs)

We're dealing with high school kids, on any day any of these teams can beat each other.

Also, it could be an interesting week for LAG, they have Fenwick and Rita back to back.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(Login winger10)
98.226.240.129

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 5:48 PM 

1.NTG
2Loyola Gold
3.Barrington
4.St.Rita
5.GBS
6.Fenwick
7.NTB
8.?
9?
10?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.1.107.205

top 5

No score for this post
November 4 2008, 9:21 PM 

Who cares about the top 10, there are only 5 relevant teams this year.

NTG LAG and Barrington are the 3 top teams, with NTG being the most talented team I've seen thus far.
Fenwick and St. Rita also seem like they can play at the top when they play their best but aren't as consistent. These are really the only 5 teams i see having any shot at playing at the UC

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
209.7.3.194

Re: top 5

No score for this post
November 5 2008, 12:13 PM 

totally agree about only 5 teams being able to compete,

in no order,

fenwick
ntg
lag
rita
barrington

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.78.126

Re: top 5

No score for this post
November 5 2008, 3:38 PM 

Lag No.1 without a doubt. With Cleary's Blazing Speed and Dirty Dangles he will lead the ramblers to the UC.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.138.248.134

Re: top 5

No score for this post
November 5 2008, 4:24 PM 

sean cleary is god awful

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
70.131.58.61

Sean Clearly

No score for this post
November 5 2008, 6:25 PM 

Stop posting about yourself sean we all know you suck at hockey

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.205.106

Re: Sean Clearly

No score for this post
November 5 2008, 9:11 PM 

cleary is horrible we played that kid and he blew

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: Sean Clearly

No score for this post
November 5 2008, 10:12 PM 

ya haha post about yourself again you little pussy grow a pair you cathlic fag

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.67.242

WTF

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 7:10 AM 

Ahhhh blazing speed?? Thats a good joke. The only reason why loyola did half way decent last year was because of fallon and obrien so stop thinking that your team is good.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Dick the Bruiser
(no login)
68.253.178.236

Barrington

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 9:10 AM 

Anyone see Barrington-Maine last night?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

score

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 10:43 AM 

Barington 4 Maine 1

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Dick the Bruiser
(no login)
68.253.178.236

Barrington

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 11:20 AM 

Barington 4 Maine 1

No comment on the officiating?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

peaked my curiousity

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 11:32 AM 

Let's hear it!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Dick the Bruiser
(no login)
68.253.178.236

Barrington

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 11:56 AM 

Let's say got a little help to pull this one out. 2 periods, minimal penalties. Score 1-0 Maine.

3rd period starts the parade to the penalty box for Maine. Several 5 on 3 for Barrington, results in 4 PP goals. Oh yeah, Barrington also got a penalty,with less than a minute to go. Mighty convenient, along with all the chit-chat by the bearded ref with the Barrington players.

If they're 1 or 2 in state, Maine has to be Top 5.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
63.95.36.13

Re: Barrington

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 12:04 PM 

when was the last time maine lost and didnt complain about refS?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
129.59.43.42

Re: Barrington

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 12:09 PM 

First off, you're Maine! This means that you are combination of schools, so stop trying to rank with schools that actually can field their own teams. 2nd off, You're Maine! You guys used to lose to Barrington by 15 and now just because the clock isn't running everytime you think that makes it any better. In a 2-1 game maybe you could claim the ref assisted. But 4 unanswered goals, simply means you are terrible under pressure and that Barrington is better than you. Maine in the Top 5? Really?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Dick the Bruiser
(no login)
68.253.178.236

Pressure

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 12:16 PM 

There was no pressure except from being shorthanded the whole period. Last year's games were 2-2 and Barrington win 5-2 or 5-3. You got help last night that's all. Deal with it, even the parents and Hutson looked kinda sheepish in the lobby after.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
sowhat
(no login)
67.184.160.122

you play twice

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 4:09 PM 

Maine is a decent team that ran out gas in the third and got caught chasing and got a lot of penalties. Barrington converted. That's what good teams do. Maine deserves credit for a well played game through two periods. Get 'em next time if you're that good.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Dick the Bruiser
(no login)
68.253.178.236

Barrington

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 4:33 PM 

Perhaps you can explain how Maine ran out of gas in the first 5 minutes of the 3rd after an intermission?

Oh, maybe it was 4 penalties called in the first 5 minutes. Ya think?

Good teams convert two 5 on 3's? I would sure hope so, of course we didn't get to see Barrington defend one.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
sowhat
(no login)
67.184.160.122

to Dick the Bruiser

No score for this post
November 8 2008, 7:49 AM 

The Maine kids had their hands full because while you weren't watching, Barrington slanted the ice toward the Maine goal too. And they used a magic puck. And the Maine kids forgot to take their skategaurds off. Seriously. Maine couldn't keep up. Their goalie kept them in it. And then once Barrington got on the power play, Maine was overwhelmed. It's not like the penalties weren't obvious. And its hard to get penalties when you have the puck the whole time. Get over it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
170.146.91.6

Peaked?

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 12:37 PM 

Think you mean "piqued".

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Bruiser the Dick
(no login)
204.27.169.2

piqued?

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 2:53 PM 

huh?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

spelling

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 3:11 PM 

Dear Mr. Webster,

Sorry about the spelling error.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
199.189.11.110

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 7 2008, 7:10 AM 

gbs 5? they lost to deerfield and they have no goaltending.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hopkins
(no login)
205.188.117.10

facts

No score for this post
November 7 2008, 11:19 AM 

GBN didn't lose to Deerfield...............

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.193.29

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 10:21 PM 

whoever puts stevenson in a top ten is a dumb fuck.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.67.242

NTG vs. Naperville

No score for this post
November 6 2008, 11:01 PM 

NTG 6. Naperville 0

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: NTG vs. Naperville

No score for this post
November 7 2008, 8:58 AM 

NTG 6 NPC 0

SOG
NTG 40 NPC 5

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Fan
(no login)
99.142.84.255

Maine

No score for this post
November 7 2008, 11:56 PM 

Maine is a nice little team. The MM Express kids do make them quite competitive, those are good hockey players. Barrington is a well coached, solid team and they took advantage of what the refs called. We'll see what Barrington is about when they play in the LAG tourney in a couple of weeks. They have a good chance to take it. Depends on their goaltending.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
joke
(no login)
24.15.16.236

?

No score for this post
November 8 2008, 10:32 AM 

why do i have a hard time believing shots were 40-5?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.160.141

update

No score for this post
November 9 2008, 9:46 AM 

LAG 4
Fenwick 1

SOG 25-18 in favor of LAG...game was played at Fenwick.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
joker
(no login)
24.1.107.205

hm

No score for this post
November 9 2008, 1:28 PM 

if you saw the game you wouldn't think it was a joke

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.38.233

Re: hm

No score for this post
November 9 2008, 1:31 PM 


Results from NTG visiting Culver

NTG 3 Culver 0

NTG 5 HSE 4


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.57.163.119

score update

No score for this post
November 9 2008, 8:56 PM 

LAG 1
St. Rita 1

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: score update

No score for this post
November 9 2008, 9:59 PM 

any comments from anyone who saw the game? shots? who dominated play?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.145.138.45

it doesn't matter...

No score for this post
November 10 2008, 11:42 AM 

according to Barrington, and most of the people who post on this site, it doesn't really matter who dominated play they tied in the end. Only the end result matters.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: it doesn't matter...

No score for this post
November 10 2008, 4:24 PM 

well i happen to disagree and want to hear how the game went

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.140.187.52

Re: it doesn't matter...

No score for this post
November 10 2008, 7:30 PM 

S.R. outplayed,outshot and controled alot of the game vs lag.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
12.73.240.176

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 10 2008, 9:28 PM 

theres no reason viator should be in anyones top ten
they are scrapin the bottom of the catholic league
look for ND to be the suprise team this year
fenwick and PR are highly overrated
rita has one line.. which can actually carry them pretty far
not a chance barrington will choke

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Hs
(no login)
24.15.16.236

Metro West Rep

No score for this post
November 10 2008, 9:41 PM 

Hinsdale Central should be added to the bottom of the top 10, they are the best team in Metro West which aint great, however is not brutal

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Metro West Rep

No score for this post
November 10 2008, 10:16 PM 

whoever said barrington will choke? and in order to choke you have to be the best team...whcih remains to be seen. and also, jsut because youre winning your garbage league doesnt mean youre in the top 10. and who cares, there is only a top 5 this year that matters

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.184.37.53

Re: Metro West Rep

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 9:22 AM 

HC isn't that good. In Metro West, they are over rated. They aren't even the top team in West.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.58.43.138

???

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 10:09 AM 

didn't ND lose to SR 7-3? do you really think they belong in the top 10? i'd give them top 20, but not top 10.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.138.172.172

Re: ???

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 12:22 PM 

That was their only loss you J**off give them some credit they are going to be right in the mix this year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.205.106

Re: ???

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 1:30 PM 

they only lost 6-4 not 7-3

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login chikachikayeah)
67.184.170.179

Are you talking about Notre Dame?

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 2:37 PM 

They lost to a mediocre Cary Grove team.
And haven't beat anyone good.
And St. Rita beat 'em 7-4

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.205.106

Re: Are you talking about Notre Dame?

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 2:54 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.5.91.34

Score

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 4:16 PM 

Last night.

Rita 5 GBS 2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login chikachikayeah)
67.184.170.179

Oh

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 8:21 PM 

Nice link. I guess it was 6-4
St. Rita's site says 7-4
But I guess that uhh makes sense
They still lost though.
And haven't beat anyone good

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
207.63.100.166

Re: Are you talking about Notre Dame?

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 6:17 AM 

There must be an error on the score sheet. the final score was rita 7 ND 3. After being tied at 1 Rita scored next 2 goals the game never got closer than a 2 goal game. If you follow the scoresheet it shows the score being 4-3 in the third and that is wrong

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.2

pshaw

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 4:23 PM 

right in the mix? The only mix is the garbage after the top 5. You can have that mix.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.138.172.172

Re: pshaw

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 8:59 PM 

Oh ok pussy don't know shit assclown.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.18

well said

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 6:27 AM 

You make an intelligent and relevant point.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
metro
(no login)
24.15.16.236

HC

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 10:02 PM 

Have you seen Hc play with a full team? if you have you will not doubt that they are top 10

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
12.73.241.28

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 6:26 PM 

well ND at least should be take the spots of viator or fenwick on everyones top 10 after beating both teams

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.13.86.95

NTG vs Fenwick

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 9:12 PM 

NTG 6

Fenwick 0




SOG

NTG 34

Fenwick 23

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.38.233

Re: NTG vs Fenwick

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 9:15 PM 

Saw the game. Green dominated both defensively and offensively. Great game by the goalie, he made some great saves and really took control of the game. Seems to me that green is the team to beat right now.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.67.242

Re: NTG vs Fenwick

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 10:02 PM 

agreed. Fenwicks so called "super star" did absolutely nothing against a real team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.141.129.64

nd = awful!

No score for this post
November 11 2008, 11:20 PM 

ND has Barrington and Prairie Ridge coming up on their schedule, lets see what they do with those two teams. sorry icedons but beating grayslake doesn't put you in the top 10.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.107.156.234

Re: nd = awful!

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 6:25 AM 

ND sucks a nut

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.138.172.172

Re: nd = awful!

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 11:12 AM 

Oh ok thats why they are 23-2 your wife sucks both of my nuts real goooooooood!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.107.156.234

Re: NTG vs Fenwick

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 6:28 AM 

Agreed. Fenwick couldn't do anything against a real good green team. Green and loyola definitely the top two in state. #'s 3-5 could go any way.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Chicago Sun Times
(no login)
65.43.108.70

Top Ten Rankings

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 11:25 AM 

Today's Sun TImes has HS rankings with GBN as #1.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Adam Jahn
(no login)
66.244.178.42

I don't know what I'm talking about!

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 11:45 AM 

Adam Jahns' top boys hockey teams

1. Glenbrook North: Won last two Blackhawk Cups

2. New Trier Green: Watch for Will Harris and Michael Vail

3. Barrington: Deep and talented

4. St. Rita: Chris Cimoch is one of the area's best

5. Loyola Gold: Ramblers dominating in HIT play

6. Glenbrook South: Cody Stevens and Dan Kerr can play

7. Fenwick: Cam Verbeke is back on defense

8. Neuqua Valley: Jeff Smythe is a force on blue line

9. Notre Dame: Kevin Orchard, Johnny Blaus pace the Dons

10. Stevenson: Matt Levey and Greg Rachke can score

Others: Prairie Ridge, Naperville Central, Cary-Grove, Naperville North, Mount Carmel, Providence, Sandburg, Highland Park



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

a little adjustment in who is in and who is out

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 12:37 PM 

Stevenson: OUT
Notre Dame: OUT
Fenwick: OUT

P Ridge: IN
Cary Grove: IN
Sanburg: IN

Where all 10 sit, we'll see after next week.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
walterpayton34
(no login)
208.251.246.210

A little adjustment

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 1:09 PM 


Agree with the above except :

GBS - Have not beaten anyone yet ( like ND )

Order should be

New Trier Green
Barrington
Loyola Gold
St Rita
GBN
Fenwick
Neuqua Valley
Prairie Ridge
Cary-Grove
Lake Forest

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
67.184.37.53

How?

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 2:08 PM 

How do you put NV in front of PR when PR beat them 3-0?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login chikachikayeah)
67.184.170.179

Cary Grove?

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 2:23 PM 

Is a joke
Get 'em out of your rankings
The only game that looks good for them this year is their 3-3 tie against Barrington, but that was obviously a total fluke; revealed by their 7-0 ass-whoopin

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
64.12.116.70

no joke

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 5:17 AM 

maybe barringtons win over CG was the fluke - not the 3-3 tie?

CG is no joke

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.226.240.129

Re: no joke

No score for this post
November 18 2008, 6:04 PM 

no they just got there ass handed to them by green in the bartlett tourny

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.78.126

Re: Top Ten Rankings

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 1:08 PM 

They may be no1. in the sun times, but everyone knows the top 2 in state are NTG and LAG. Gbn lost too many players and wont contend in state this year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.13.86.95

Sun Times

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 1:10 PM 

The Sun Times, and the other guy who commented on the top 10 teams below you are pussies. Ranking the defending champs number one is a super conservative move especially when they have tied Loyola Maroon. Glenbrook North plays a weak schedule, playing few if any games against MM or out of state teams. Congrats on beating the crap out of the bad teams in state, but good luck beating NTG and LAG, and the Barrington and Rita games should be interesting.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Sun Times

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 2:04 PM 

thats an embarassment of a ranking. GBN tied maroon and yet they rank them 4 places in front of gold. GBN is a mediocre team and this guy clearly hadn't watched anyone play before he made those. Top 4 are rita, loyola, barrington and ntg in no order. fewick falls from being considered after being smoked by both NTG and LAG

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.136.22.246

Rankings

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 8:18 PM 

Though I'm not sure if GBN is the team to beat, they certainly run deep in talent. Though they've lost players, they brought up players from a JV team that won the state championship last year. If those JV players beat the other JV players brought up to Varsity then whose to say they won't do it again? We'll have to wait and see who is the top when NTG, LAG and GBN play each other. As for Barrington, they'll choke as they always do because of their selfish players and dirty style of play.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.243.144.191

Re: Rankings

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 8:25 PM 

"If those JV players beat the other JV players brought up to Varsity then whose to say they won't do it again? We'll have to wait and see who is the top when NTG, LAG and GBN play each other."

that is absolutely the most idiotic thing i have ever heard. Both NTG and Lag pull from another Varsity team not JV. They are both goin to walk all over GBN. and wasnt it GBN that tied loyola maroon

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
67.167.12.55

gbn

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 9:06 PM 

has anyone actually seen gbn play or are all these comments just stemming from one game where they tied maroon? From what i heard the game against maroon they had more than 3-1 shots and tons of scoring chances, but simply couldnt put it away. As for strength of schedule, why would they play practice games against MM and other teams when they already play over 60 games a year? We should see on sunday when they play fenwick.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: gbn

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 9:39 PM 

well thats not really a fair test considering fenwick just got pounded by both lag and ntg. no top team should ever tie maroon...ever. gbn lost all of its skilled player and not to mention the best goalie in the state. putting them at number 1 is a joke. and to the point about winning the jv championsjip....its jv. have you ever seen a jv game? its a joke. ntb or maroon would beat every jv team by about 5 goals. gbns third line who couldnt do anything last year...is now theyre fist line. they just aren relevant this year

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.14.235.181

Re: gbn

No score for this post
November 12 2008, 9:49 PM 

Having GBN as the top team in state is a bit of a joke as they should barely be in the top ten at all but the bigger joke is the honorable mention of Providence. I have nothing against Providence but they are just plain bad this year. Prairie Ridge could be in the top ten but not Cary Grove.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.214.215.247

Re: Rankings

No score for this post
November 16 2008, 5:03 PM 

Actually your're #2 behind St.Rita but that's quite understandable, you always think your're #1 but really #2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
216.112.146.184

Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 8:31 AM 

I agree that Barrington has had its troubles with head cases and selfish players in the past but this team is very different. I have seen them twice and both times they had maybe three penalties. Both times they controlled the puck and they moved the puck better than they ever have. They still have a ways to go but they don't seem to have the head cases they have had in the past. They still don't move the puck as well as NTG or LAG, but don't bet on them folding. They don't look like a team that will beat itself in the penalty box and they are deep enough that the coach can sit kids who don't pass. Look at the stats on Metro...they are the LEAST penalized team in the league!
They are beatable as everyone seems to be. But it sure looks like their best players are setting a much better example. They will be a final eight team...it's anyone's guess after that.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 2:05 PM 

based on recent games, New Trier Green is the number one team in state

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.25.57.86

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 2:38 PM 

http://www.ushsho.com/ilrank.htm

everyone should take a look

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.136.22.246

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 2:50 PM 

Rockford at #1? That's a joke.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.25.57.86

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 3:05 PM 

it is done by computer soooo......

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 4:20 PM 

only some scored are reported so its flawed. also the records are misleading since green and gold both play much tougher schedules than anyone else. clear that ntg lag barrington and rita are the top teams. green seems to be the one leading the way right now

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.14.102.77

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 4:42 PM 

Wow those are the worst rankings i have ever seen.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
walterpayton34
(no login)
24.15.79.187

Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 4:47 PM 

So turn the scores in. Play the games and let the chips fall.
The difference between 1-5 is small past the top ten forget about it.
Name me one team below 10 that will compete in march?


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 4:57 PM 

name one team outside the top 4 that will compete in march

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 5:04 PM 

that website makes absolutely no sense. Green doesn't play in a league, and plays much harder teams that those rockford benders. Gold is the same way. Despite losing to Rockford twice, they are still a good team and are top three. I have yet to see Rockford so I don't know much about them, but I don't think Green plays them. Glenbrook North is a fluke, and you will see that in a month once they start playing solid teams and not New Trier White.

NTG
Rockford (until they meet NTG or LAG)
LAG
RITA
BARRINGTON

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Curious
(no login)
75.22.192.48

Loyola/Rockford

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 6:56 PM 

Why is everyone saying Rockford beat Loyola twice. There was only one game between them. I guess Rockford only beat them once.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.214.194.245

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 13 2008, 8:38 PM 

try this one, make you feel any better? shut up and play hockey

http://midwestyouthhockey.com/view_2008_rank.php?a=1&v=744

p.s. the best team doesn't always win and rankings don't mean sh*t till all the games are done, then blow your your own horn.

p.s.s. remember, it's HS hockey and it's for pride and bragging rights within the HS forum, there are plenty of AA and AAA teams that can and will knock you silly at times.

shut up and play the game

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.79.80

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 14 2008, 9:41 PM 

none of those ranking sites are up to date or accurate

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
205.188.117.10

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 15 2008, 6:26 AM 

agreed, barrington, NTG and LAG way too high

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.67.242

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 15 2008, 8:34 AM 

haha good joke. I think its been pretty much established that those three teams are all top five in state. So how could they be ranked to high?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.7.250.227

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 16 2008, 2:52 PM 

NTG number 1

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.79.80

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 16 2008, 9:57 PM 

New rankings,

1. NTG
2. LAG
3. Fenwick
4. GBN
5. Barrington
6. Rita
7. ND
8. PR
9. NPC

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 16 2008, 10:33 PM 

so youre saying the third team got beat by the number 1 and 2 teams a combine 11-1. kinda hard to believe. also rita deserves to be up higher and gbn got smoked by fenwick.

1.NTG
2.LAG
3.Barrington
4.Rita
5.Fenwick
6.GBN
7.PR
8. ND
dont care after that

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
216.112.146.184

A little shift?

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 9:58 AM 

If you believe that either of the prior two posts is close, there is a real shift to strenth in the the Metro Central. Barrington, PR, ND, and probably Maine, Cary Grove and Crystal Lake South could all argue top twenty status. The rest suck, but I don't recall seeing that depth in Metro Central ever. NT, LAG and the Catholic schools holding strong. If this were the rider cup, the MC might actually have a shot for the first time ever!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Oval Tessier
(no login)
68.253.177.234

A little shift indeed

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 10:31 AM 

1. NTG
2. Barrington
3. Rockford
4. LAG
5. GBN
6. Rita
7. Nequa Valley
8. Prairie Ridge
9. Maine
10.????

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.79.80

Re: A little shift indeed

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 10:43 AM 

Oval Tessier, that is one of the worst lists I have seen.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.14.102.77

Re: A little shift indeed

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 1:05 PM 

I would have to agree. Didn't PR shutout Nequa Valley? how could they be ranked ahead of them then.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Oval Tessier
(no login)
68.253.177.234

move around a bit

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 1:22 PM 

but that is your top teams. Now and at the end of the season.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.29.75.188

Re: move around a bit

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 4:29 PM 

forgot fenwick, prairie ridge and nequa suck, so does gbn.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.145.138.45

reality check

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 5:26 PM 

GBN 2
Fenwick 6

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
PR BLOWSSSS
(no login)
98.227.91.22

HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY TOP 5

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 5:51 PM 

1. NTG
2. LAG
3. Barrington
4. Rita
5. Fenwick

top 5 as of now, NTG is dirty this year once again.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Ranks
(no login)
24.15.16.236

Top 10 shifted

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 7:16 PM 

1. NTGreen
2. LAGold
3. Barrington
4. St. Rita
5. Fenwick
6. GBNorth
7. Neaqua Valley
8. Hinsdale Central
9. Notre Dame
10.Mount Carmel

5-10 interchangable

1-3 set

4-??


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.14.102.77

Re: Top 10 shifted

No score for this post
November 17 2008, 7:47 PM 

^^^ another pure crap ranking, maybe you should watch some teams before you rank them

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS
(no login)
24.15.16.236

Shifted

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 1:33 PM 

what would you change big guy

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.226.240.129

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 18 2008, 6:00 PM 

york that high okay w.e, lets just say if you really look at that its all done off the record and what not but the lower seeded teams have beat some higher seeded teams head to head which would rank them higher some times

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.226.240.129

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 18 2008, 6:03 PM 

if you think GBN is really that good, then there is an issue cuase they lost to maroon. also there third line from last year is there first line this year and the rest is JV players

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 18 2008, 6:07 PM 

gbn isnt that good, theyre bad, but the bottom line is they will beat most of the teams below them because there is huge talent drop off from the first 4-5 teams.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.226.240.129

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 18 2008, 6:07 PM 

the first 5 are pretty interchangeable at times between each other but the bottom five are up in the air basically

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
209.7.3.194

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 11:12 AM 

1. NTG
2. LAG
3. Barrington
4. Fenick or Rita
5. Fenwick or Rita
6. GBN
After that there are no other contenders.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.107.156.234

Re: Metro Central observation

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 12:29 PM 

NTB vs. GBN. Who will win?????

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
199.189.15.25

i wonder

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 12:39 PM 

GBN hands down.
Real question is GBN vs GBS who will win?
I think GBS will prevail 2-0 victory.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.184.37.53

No way

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 12:53 PM 

Gbs lost to NV, no matter what people say. the score is the score and GBN crushed them! GBN all the way

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
64.107.156.234

Re: i wonder

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 12:56 PM 

gbn hands down? not so sure

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
24.15.66.158

Blue

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 2:39 PM 

NTB is going to pound GBN tonight...but not as hard as green is going to when they finally meet. get ready fuckheads.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: Blue

No score for this post
November 19 2008, 2:55 PM 

yes seriously the LAG Tourney has changed the brackets, so if GBN can even make it out of there bracket, NTG will be waiting for them. And oh, they will be ready you fucken benders

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
209.224.196.250

NTG BLOWS

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 9:02 AM 

GBN will walk all over those shobby pigs like they did in state. Shut up NTG u suck. GBN 3 years in a row. Sit down.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.13.86.95

Moron

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 2:02 PM 

You sir are a douchebag and even worse a dumb shit. GBN has twice now stolen the state championship from better teams but they have never walked over them. Good work beating blue, but without anyone good on your team you'd better pray that you get knocked out of the LA tourney before New Trier goes to work. Your goalies are shit, your defense is average thanks to Chero and your offense consists of last years 4th line. You play the easiest schedule in state and couldn't pull off a W against Fenwick. Your time for talking shit was last march. Now you should stop embarrassing yourself. Bragging after beating blue is like NTG bragging about beating Geneva. If your on the team is time to come to reality if your a fan is time to sit down. Thanks happy.gif

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.2

where is your mouth now?

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 7:28 AM 

GBN pounded Blue. No updates from the loudmouths?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
99.152.122.184

Re: where is your mouth now?

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 8:31 AM 

Prairie Ridge 2
Barrington 2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
24.15.66.158

Noonan!

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 9:27 AM 

NNNNNNNNNNNNNOOONAN!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Dangla
(no login)
199.189.15.21

we will see

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 9:41 AM 

we will see at the end of the game on...
nov 26 at 6:30.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: we will see

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 1:57 PM 

we will see keep that shit up GBN. I'm glad you beat new trier's second team. I mean you lost to fenwick 6 to 1, and i think NTG beat fenwick 6 to 0.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: we will see

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 2:48 PM 

ph and to be clear, the score was only 5-1 due to very poor goaltending on blues part, shots were dead even. GBN if you honestly get smoked by fencwick and then start talking shit after beating blue that is sad. you have played one team this year, and lost badly. stop talking. youre awful this year. i really hope you do somehow make it out of your bracket to play green, just so we can finally show just how far youve fallen

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.70.159

we will see

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 3:59 PM 

GBN has to make it out of their joke of a bracket then face green. flat out no chance. congratulations you beat blue 5-1 when the shots were dead even, play a real team then come talk to me. NTG ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
stonewall jackson
(no login)
67.167.237.224

come on green

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 4:37 PM 

Green stop posting on this board. every year you dont win the state championship it is a disgrace if you combined North and south for hockey and got 4 teams. they would woop the shit out of Nt each and every year. but that is rhetorical idea

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: come on green

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 4:45 PM 

what the fuck are you talking about? GBN stop talking about past years. This is a new year and there will be a new champ. You can talk shot when you got beat by frnwick 6 to 1. You beat new tried's second team due to awful goaltending. Please make it to the semi's so I can come watch your game with green

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.38.233

Re: come on green

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 5:05 PM 

It's not our fault we have 4,000 students at NT opposed to 2,000 at GBN is it?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.13.86.95

New trier

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 9:01 PM 

yes it is true that we have twice as many students as GBN. Thats why we field 4 hockey teams as opposed to two. Quit crying and just accept the fact that you are not good this year. You have yet to beat a real hockey team and are treating the blue victory as a huge win. (its not)

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: New trier

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 9:09 PM 

stevenson has as many kids as new trier if not more....why arent they as good?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.12.209.217

who?

No score for this post
November 20 2008, 9:16 PM 

Where is the GBN talk? I don't see it above.

There is no transitive rule in hockey. It doesn't matter what GBN and green did against fenwick or skokie.

Play the games.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

results of culver coming to winnetka

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 2:13 PM 

Green 5 Culver 2

Green 10 Culver 0

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Fan
(no login)
99.147.220.28

Green vs Culver

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 2:28 PM 

Was it Culver's prep team or their HS team?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
69.243.144.191

Re: Green vs Culver

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 2:36 PM 

HS Team

and the first game score was 6-2 not 5-2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.13.86.95

Re: Green vs Culver

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 4:37 PM 

Shots on goal the first game were 26-21, second game was more like 35-10

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
76.16.71.171

Re: Green vs Culver

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 4:43 PM 

If Culver can get beat by NTG by a combined score of 16-2 what does that say about the future military leaders of our country? Better yet how will our country be defended when the likes of these guys will directly defend our sacred soil?

Just look at the 10-0 game. Did these Culvers lads quit? Are these kids going to be defending or borders in a few short years?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
70.9.178.195

Re: Green vs Culver

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 6:22 PM 

new rankings after today,

1. ntg
2. lag
3. fenwick
4. barrington
5. st rita
6. gbn
7. nd

rest dont matter

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.239.98.207

Re: Green vs Culver

No score for this post
November 24 2008, 6:25 AM 

Your message is totally inappropriate. How dare you impugned the courage and bravery of young men who want to serve our country. Protecting and defending our country is a little different than playing a high school hockey game. My guess is that you have never raised your hand to serve. My guess is that you are a coward.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
attention
(no login)
98.226.242.240

Culver facts

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 6:25 PM 

Remember, NT Greem just beat Culver's 3rd team....what they consider their JV team. No. 1 team: Prep No. 2 U16 No. 3 High school. The roster is made up mainly of Frosh, s0ph and some Juniors.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: Culver facts

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 6:36 PM 

I just checked their website, NTG played there second team with prep's 4th line on it.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: Culver facts

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 6:42 PM 

is there any website that shows the rankings?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.201.205.106

Re: Culver facts

No score for this post
November 23 2008, 7:38 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.163.22.214

Re: Culver facts

No score for this post
November 24 2008, 8:32 AM 

These are pretty garbage rankings. Not very up to date.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.15.74.118

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 25 2008, 2:42 PM 

I can't say for sure but all i know is that NTB has a young team and if they put it all together they could have a chance of being somewhere up there.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
75.4.129.24

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 25 2008, 4:07 PM 

They tied NT White who hasn't won a game all year. Blue has talent but zero coaching. A little different than coaching a "development" team Eh?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.136.61.56

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 25 2008, 4:09 PM 

no one cares about new trier blue

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.224.127.142

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 25 2008, 4:08 PM 

I would not go far as saying NTB has talent because they dont. They have terrible defense and have one line that can barely play.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.163.22.214

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 25 2008, 4:33 PM 

If blue could clean up their defense a little then they could be a pretty solid team.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.224.127.142

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 25 2008, 4:39 PM 

well they arent going to because their defense has literally no talent

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 30 2008, 5:43 PM 

green
barrington
rockford
loyola
fenwick
rita
gbn
npc
pr
stev

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 30 2008, 6:03 PM 

how can you rank loyola that high. They Didnt make it out of their bracket in their own tournament. Come on

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 30 2008, 6:57 PM 

because they lost to a very good rockford team who dominated play against barrington

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
205.188.117.10

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 30 2008, 7:10 PM 

You wish. They had 10 power plays to Barringtons 0. Look at the Records who has beat who the most. 5 teams playing for the State title.

NTG
Barrington
St. Rita
GBN
Fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
November 30 2008, 7:48 PM 

someone explain to me why gbn is still on that list. who have they beaten? name one team

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.104.38.18

here

No score for this post
December 1 2008, 9:22 AM 

Desmet.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.238.2.197

Re: here

No score for this post
December 1 2008, 1:57 PM 

it makes no sense that GBN is ranked in front of Fenwick when Fenwick beat them 6-2

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: here

No score for this post
December 1 2008, 3:04 PM 

Desmet? good joke. desmet may have had an average height of about 7 feet but that doesnt make them a good team. They were dirty, slow, unskilled, and had an awful goalie. like i said before, gbn has played 2 top 10 teams, and got smoked by both

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
blind squirrel
(no login)
66.99.22.99

top 10

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 8:10 AM 

1.Barrington
2.Rockford
3.LAG
4.GBN
5. St. Rita
6. NTG
7.Maine Township
8. GBS
9. Prarie Ridge
10. Crystal Lake South

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
huh?
(no login)
216.112.146.184

Are you serious?

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 8:22 AM 

I am not from NTG but after seeing them play have to admit they are #1 until someone knocks them out. CLS and Maine need to wake up and realize that while they are decent teams, they are not top ten. Neither is GBS. Get serious.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
68.73.126.8

Hey Blind Squirrel

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 9:18 AM 

Where would you rank the NT Girls on your list.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
209.7.3.194

Re: top 10

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 11:52 AM 

that may be the worst ranking I have ever seen blind.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.13.86.95

...yes, you are blind

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 2:54 PM 

"1.Barrington
2.Rockford
3.LAG
4.GBN
5. St. Rita
6. NTG
7.Maine Township
8. GBS
9. Prarie Ridge
10. Crystal Lake South"

(taken from above)

So NTG blows GBN out of the water and wins against Barrington (admittedly a close and good game)and gets ranked below Rita and LAG who didn't make it out of their bracket and Rockford who lost to Barrington...makes perfect sense. NTG is once again a dominant team in this years state race. Barrington is a close contender, give them credit they built a very good team out of last years mediocre team. Rockford can not compete in the state tourny so they should not be on the list, but again, admittedly a good team. The two major forces are NTG and Barrington. Maybe if NTG's goalies and top two forwards suddenly break all their limbs then they might be #6, but until then they rank in at #1. You may not like them, but that's no reason to make such a bad ranking.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Rankings
(no login)
75.22.28.238

NTG

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 3:13 PM 

NTG has to be above GBN and GB. GBN tied Maroon and GBS just lossed to maroon so NTG has to be higher than them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.14.102.77

Re: NTG

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 4:20 PM 

Yea those were pretty bad rankings

NTG at #6..haha theyre 1 or 2 easily

and GBN at #4 thats a pretty good overstatement.

and CLS and Maine are just not top 10. maybe top 20

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
blind squirrel
(no login)
68.255.103.254

BLIND SQUIRREL STRIKES AGAIN!

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 7:07 PM 

Everyone who has responded to that top ten list has the IQ of the average 2nd grader. NTG is a bunch of benders and would I would like to see them play a game against a real competitor and not in that gongshow league (metro north or whatever it is).
Oh and as for NT girls, who gives a fuck about girls hockey, especially from some faggot school like New Trier. I mean come on, we all know that anyone that the kids at New Trier (and most kids at Loyola) are HUGE tools.

-Blind Squirrel.

P.S. please respond to this (and make it very harsh!), its always funny to see how pissed people get.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
blind squirrel
(no login)
68.255.103.254

OOPS!

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 7:08 PM 

*I would

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: OOPS!

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 9:11 PM 

haha god youre then man, trying to get people pissed on a forum, you are one cool dude

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: OOPS!

No score for this post
December 2 2008, 9:32 PM 

your argument doesn't make any sense. New trier green isn't in metro north

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
209.242.44.203

Re: OOPS!

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 2:11 AM 

1.NTG
2.BARRINGTON
3.LOYOLA
4.ST.RITA
5.GBN
6.PRAIRIE RIDGE
7.FENWICK
8.GBS
9.NV
10.NPC

CURRENT TOP 10 LETS KEEP ROCKFORD OUT SINCE THEY WILL NOT BE PLAYING IN THE RED DIVISION.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Oval Tessier
(no login)
68.253.179.43

CLS, Maine and Rockford

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 5:55 AM 

would beat 5 of your top ten consistently.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
65.79.36.66

Re: CLS, Maine and Rockford

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 6:19 AM 

CLS lost 2 games to both Pr and Barrington how could you expect them to beat any of those top 10. They cant.

Maine has a good team this year but if they play the good teams their only line can be handled. and if that line is handled they have nothing.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
205.188.117.10

Rankings

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 6:51 AM 

Maine was down by 1 vs Barrington before the refs took over in the third, split their games with PR. CLS only lost 3-2 to Barrington last time out. Both teams can play.Hockey rankings have CLS @ #11 and Maine @ #12. Anything can and probably will happen in the last half of the seaon.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Oval Tessier
(no login)
68.253.179.43

Maine

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 10:01 AM 

was UP 1 over Barrington before refs took over in 3rd period.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
GUEST
(no login)
66.244.178.42

rankings

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 6:54 AM 

CLS also lost to P.R.E.P. last week. does that put them at #11?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.1.225

cls

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 10:27 AM 

CLS is better this year.

Added a few new faces, but very little contributions from the new ones except for one d.

CLS could be much better, but problem is not with the kids.

They have some very strong smaller soph kids and the new sr. d that can play.
Look at the stats and you can see who is leading this group.

Get yourself a coach and you will be much better off.

Should be tops in the division this year, but you will not pass the top dogs.

Losing to PR when they have several freshman making contributions for them and this coaching staff only plays a few kids during the game. Really great deal paying all those $$$s and time to a coach that allows you to warm the bench all year.

BTW - isnt the roster frozen already?
How do you get to add new kids in the middle of the season?
I am sure the bench warmers love that one.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

what

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 11:39 AM 

Who added new kids? CLS or PR. Not very clear...

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.1.225

Re: what

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 11:44 AM 

CLS added new kids and by the looks of it they have problems with math.
I was under the impression you could only roster 20 kids on a team.
They now have 41 kids rostered between JV & V.
Did kids quit or get hurt?
Unsure if someone quits if you can open your roster up to add players.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Oval Tessier
(no login)
68.253.179.43

Roster Math

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 11:59 AM 

Rosters are to be frozen October 15.

30 players can be rostered, 20 dressed per game.

Seems like letting CLS add the twins last Christmas gives them carte blanche to add player(s) this year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.1.107.205

Re: Roster Math

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 2:30 PM 

to the poster who was ripping on green...wont make it harsh but they dont play in metro north, play the hardest schedule in the state except for loyola who plays a similar schedule, beaten all the teams you listed in the top 10 and lost to one of them, as well as beating several out of state teams and MM teams, so youre argument i just funny and im glad you had fun with it. as for the other ranking, fenwick should be ahead of gbn as they beat them and gbn is very overrated. gbs should be out they are awful this year

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
payton34
(no login)
24.15.79.187

Not again

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 5:10 PM 


CLS - Pulled this same crap last year.
The twins played MM Leafs until Christmas and then they were allowed to be on the roster.
it was "well, they had a change of heart"
What is Ahai policy?
Or do they really care at all.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
205.188.117.10

Re: Not again

No score for this post
December 3 2008, 5:57 PM 

NR that was added is not going to play. He does not want to get hurt again.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
justsaying
(no login)
216.112.146.184

Maine and CLS

No score for this post
December 4 2008, 8:42 AM 

Both teams have 4 losses in Metro Central. End of story. While they both have bright spots and did have some good games, only losing by a little isn't good enough. In a 60 to 70 game season, the top teams are going to have a few off nights. But they aren't going to lose 4 games in their division in the first half of the season.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.117.188.57

Re: Maine and CLS

No score for this post
December 4 2008, 2:29 PM 

Well South could win out, they've got their games against Barrington and Ridge already out of the way. Not that finishing third in MC makes them a top ten team, but..


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
blind squirrel
(no login)
66.99.22.101

12/7

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 7:49 AM 

Maine 4 Barrington 4 final.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.99.22.101

and..

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 7:55 AM 

Maine had 6 kids out on suspension (2 captains, one of their top defensenmen, and their starting goaltender). Also one of their best players left the game in the first period with an illness.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
67.163.23.210

Re: and..

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 8:05 AM 

ugh....more excuses.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
98.206.75.61

and what

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 11:24 AM 

Having 6 kids suspended says it all.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
why
(no login)
216.112.146.184

were they suspended?

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 12:37 PM 

What happened that got two Captains suspended along with a few others? Sounds like Barrington fell asleep which can happen with some of the laugher games in Metro. Were they missing anyone good? Sounds like they played down to the competition. Either way, 4 losses and a tie in conference does not make Maine a top ten team...sorry.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(Login PictBridge)
24.15.95.248

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 5:46 PM 

Praire Ridge has weak goaltending. They also only beat providence 6-5 now that means they suck. But poor provi kids have to deal with a coaching staff like non other. AWFUL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
24.14.102.77

Re: Top 10 teams 08/09 Season

No score for this post
December 8 2008, 6:51 PM 

are you talking about the first game of the season when they won 6-5?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
66.244.178.42

Where have you been lately?

No score for this post
December 9 2008, 7:24 AM 

Hey PictBridge...P-Ridge has weak tending? I'd check your information before you write something if I were you. You sound like an Idiot.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Phil Mcracken
(no login)
68.253.176.32

scores

No score for this post
December 11 2008, 12:06 PM 

ND- PR Tuesday???

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Metro West
(no login)
71.201.231.186

Hinsdale CEntral

No score for this post
December 11 2008, 7:25 PM 

Hinsdale Central

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.86.75.146

Re: scores

No score for this post
December 12 2008, 6:17 AM 

would guess nd beat pr, otherwise the horns would but tootin

excuses anyone?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
ND-PR
(no login)
66.244.178.42

WHAT?

No score for this post
December 12 2008, 7:27 AM 

Why would anyone come on here and brag about beating ND? One would brag about beating good teams not average teams. ND beat PR 2-1. No excuses, bad play!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
65.79.36.66

Re: WHAT?

No score for this post
December 12 2008, 8:27 AM 

PR vs Barrington should be a battle again on Sunday

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.150.197

PR

No score for this post
December 12 2008, 10:07 AM 

I've seen them a bit lately. You can't go far with two lines is my opinion. A good team will have legs in the 3rd against them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
71.57.107.167

Re: PR

No score for this post
December 12 2008, 1:09 PM 

If you have seen them lately they have been missing players

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hahah
(no login)
98.223.198.12

remember

No score for this post
December 12 2008, 10:39 PM 

remember when ntg had more goals than barrington had shots three years ago? hahah

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Sowhat
(no login)
76.16.246.177

"Remember" is pretty sad...

No score for this post
December 13 2008, 9:10 AM 

Seriously dude. Are you sitting in the basement of a house in bumf*ck playing for a Juniot team and reminscing about a game that took place a few years ago. You are an idiot? Who the hell cares?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
68.73.126.8

Re: remember

No score for this post
December 13 2008, 11:07 AM 

That was when poor Johnny Griggs got yanked in the second period and his life was saved. Who could forget that game?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
99.144.219.107

Re: remember

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 6:31 AM 

Prairie Ridge 3
Barrinton 0

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
71.57.107.167

Re: remember

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 1:12 PM 

But i thought Barrington was #1? what happened

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.38.233

Re: remember

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 4:46 PM 

NO no no....NTG is number 1.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)
71.57.107.167

Re: remember

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 5:20 PM 

oh my bad...#2 then

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
205.188.117.10

#1

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 6:01 PM 

didnt barrington beat NTG? - Maybe PR is #1?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
snippy
(no login)
76.16.71.171

Re: #1

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 7:18 PM 

Maroon is number 1. Has been all year.

Wake up.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: #1

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 8:16 PM 

Maroon is not number 1, infact they suck. Barrington did beat NT, but it was a very early game. Championships are not won in september. We are getting to see each team's strengths and weakness', so based on all my knowledge and scouting of the top Illinois teams, I rank them:

1). New Trier Green
2). Loyola Gold
3). Barrington
4). Glenbrook North
5). Fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.194.66.100

Re: #1

No score for this post
December 15 2008, 8:16 PM 

Maroon is not number 1, infact they suck. Barrington did beat NT, but it was a very early game. Championships are not won in september. We are getting to see each team's strengths and weakness', so based on all my knowledge and scouting of the top Illinois teams, I rank them:

1). New Trier Green
2). Loyola Gold
3). Barrington
4). Glenbrook North
5). Fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Snakeskin Cowboy
(no login)
68.253.219.157

#1

No score for this post
December 16 2008, 5:23 AM 

so...

PR beats Barrington, Maine ties Barrington and beats ND who just beat PR...

looks like a lot of parity out there. Have a great finish everyone!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
205.188.117.10

the real #1 is?

No score for this post
December 16 2008, 8:02 AM 

And CG Ties PR, Ties Barrington, Beats ND twice, CG vs Maine should be good

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
24.13.150.197

having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 16 2008, 8:03 AM 

I agree with the parity. I think Green stands out right now, but after watching them lose to McDowell, they can be beaten.

So it's anyone's to win. And anyone who gets off on rankings doesn't understand what matters. Go ahead and beat your chest in December!

We'll take our chances in the end. Good luck to all!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.228.37.138

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 17 2008, 4:38 PM 

New rankings, considering jamestown and alot of good recent matchups.

1.NTG(Has shown time and time again that they can put away away top teams consistently)

2.Barrington(Have competed with the top teams, showing alot of talent when they are on)

3.LAG(Are consistently good, but not great talent wise)

4.Fenwick(Came in second at Jamestown, have beaten prarie ridge, rita, gbn, and barrington, unfortunately have a problem with consistency)

5.Rita (Good consistent team, but the team relies on Cimoch)

6.Prarie Ridge (Have shown they have promise on a good day, but haven't proven themselves yet)

7.GBN(Have had a dissapointing season so far, and have not beat any of the top teams, they have talent but haven't put it to use)

8.ND(Doing suprisingly well in CCHL, but I don't understand how, they are really not a talented team)

9.Naperville Central (A team that can compete with some of the better ones, but don't expect them to win against them)

10.Rockford(putting them this low because they aren't competing, they are worth a mention though)

only teams that matter are the first 6.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
not registered
(no login)
205.188.117.10

corrections

No score for this post
December 17 2008, 7:35 PM 

CG, CLS and Maine all belong ahead of ND. ND has proven winning a few games in the cchl doesnt really mean anything

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
71.228.37.138

Re: corrections

No score for this post
December 17 2008, 9:03 PM 

doesn't matter anyway, past the top 6 are just filler

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
NOW AND THEN
(no login)
67.206.83.194

RANK NOW

No score for this post
November 13 2009, 4:20 PM 

LOOK HOW OFF YOU ALL WERE..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.163.62.227

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
November 23 2009, 7:29 PM 

what is all this talk about barrington
i happen to know they arent that good
and as for LA Gold....they may be number one or two or whatever but they are beatable and it will happen eventually
(fyi sandburg beat barrington and played a close game with LA Gold)

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.158.77.250

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 6:19 AM 

After the loyola tourny this past weekend. How about we rerank the top 10. We all know NTG is number one. It is all over this site, so lets hold on the NTG talk. So what do we got?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.16.247.182

Read the title

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 7:15 AM 

this thread is from the 08/09 season - let it die

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.196.92

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 7:16 AM 

NTG is #1 the rest of the year. Some HS team will beat them in a single game. Green can't "get up" for 60 plus games. I feel there is a log jam from #2 - #10. Here is what I think. I'm leaving Rockford out because they are combined.

1. NTG
2 Stevenson
3. LAG
4. St. Rita
5. St. Viator
6. Fenwick
7. GBN
8.Prairie Ridge
9. York
10. GBS

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
72.166.172.2

Must be from GBS!

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 9:38 AM 

GBS shouldn't be in the top 25.

I agree with all with the exception of them. The 10th spot I choose between

-Naperville Central
-Marist
-Sanburg
-Providence

Anyone of those teams can beat the top 9 on any given day.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
99.141.196.92

Re: Must be from GBS!

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 11:58 AM 

You're right. I'm not from GBS but I try and give them benefit of the doubt. They have some injuries / suspensions right now but should sneak in top 15 by end of the year.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.253.37.60

Not in top 25-GBS

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 12:26 PM 

Silly statement. Scores against teams listed top ten or your suggested 10th spot. GBS 5-5 vs Stevenson, 3-4 vs Stevenson, 3-1 vs NTB, 1-3 vs. GBN, 3-3 vs Sandburg, etc.

Probably not top 10 right now, but top 15. They have had a lot of players out in the last month (8 in one game) but will be at full strength in the next couple of weeks.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
72.166.172.2

GBS not top 10

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 12:47 PM 

Let us see how GBS did against teams I listed:

Naperville Central - Didn't Play
Marist - Didn't Play
Sandburg - 3-3 Tie
Providence - 5-1 loss

St. Viator 6 -1 Loss

Point Made!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
72.166.172.2

GBS not top 10

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 12:59 PM 

Let us see how GBS did against teams I listed:

Naperville Central - Didn't Play
Marist - Didn't Play
Sandburg - 3-3 Tie
Providence - 5-1 loss

St. Viator 6 -1 Loss

Point Made!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
24.13.170.76

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 12:42 PM 

good list but im almost positive saint viator beat rita. shouldn't viator be ahead of them?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.163.62.227

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 2:02 PM 

who is this St Viator team?
where is the school even at?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Was there
(no login)
67.184.56.175

Where they're coming from

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 7:10 PM 

In the Stevenson Thanksgiving Tournament, St Viator beat GBN 2-0 in the semi's and lost to Stevenson 5-4 in the Championship game. Small, fast, deep and hard working.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anon
(no login)
67.173.173.221

They're okay..

No score for this post
December 8 2009, 4:28 PM 

The Stevenson Thanksgiving championship game was more one sided than the score shows..
They were down 5-2 with about ten minutes left in the game. They rallied for a little but couldn't pull it off. They're good but not great.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
24.13.170.76

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 1 2009, 8:28 PM 

arlington heights

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
75.127.67.114

Re: having seen everyone multiple times.....

No score for this post
December 8 2009, 5:48 PM 

Apparently, Mark Cuban wasn't the only one playing make-believe on Monday.

Utah Flash owner Brandt Anderson pulled off a WWE-like scripted hoax last night to the disappointment of 7,500 fans who believed that Michael Jordan and Bryon Russell, the former Utah Jazz forward, were about to play a one-on-one game during halftime of an NBA Development League game.

As you might recall, Russell challenged Jordan to a battle after remarks that MJ made about Russ during his Hall of Fame speech in September. Always one to see dollar bills and free publicity in a situation, Andersen said he would pay the winner of the challenge $100,000 for the charity of his choice.

And then things got wacky.

According to Deadspin, the Flash went so far as to hire a Jordan look-alike to walk around Provo on Monday — and even uploaded a YouTube video of "Jordan," flanked by "bodyguards," eating at a quiet local restaurant — to build some buzz.

It worked ...

... and then completely backfired.

During halftime the lights were turned off and Russell came out asking for Jordan. Then from the other side of the court a Jordan impersonator came out surrounded by bodyguards. A few moments later Russell announced it was an impersonator and then left the court while the fans booed loudly.

Well, that didn't go as smoothly as some had hoped. Quick! Give 'em free swag!

The Flash employees tried to cheer the crowd up by throwing out free t-shirts, but the boos continued, and some people even threw the t-shirts back. Most left after halftime.

Damn.

"This was done in fun," Andersen wrote on his blog after the Flash beat the Dakota Wizards by 10 points. "If you did not see it as fun or you feel we went over the top I am sorry."

As part of his apology, Andersen offered tickets for a future Flash game for fans with tickets from Monday night's game.

He promises Orien Greene will be in attendance.

UPDATE: NBA D-League President Dan Reed has released a statement on the ill-conceived promotion:

"On behalf of the NBA Development League, I apologize to our fans for a Utah Flash promotion that never should have happened. [...] Brandt Andersen, the Utah Flash owner, has apologized to the Flash fans and has reached out to Michael Jordan to apologize to him as well.

The Flash will refund the price of the tickets and has also offered free tickets to an upcoming Flash game to everyone who was in attendance at Monday night's game."


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anonymous
(no login)
67.163.93.170

top 10

No score for this post
December 8 2009, 6:01 PM 

1. NTG
2 Stevenson
3. LAG
4. St. Rita
5. St. Viator
6. Fenwick
7. GBN
8. NPC
9. York
10. WV

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
98.213.248.45

rockford

No score for this post
December 8 2009, 11:33 PM 

What about Rockford. they should be top 5 for sure. they beat loyola prarie ridge nequa fenwick

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
76.224.24.105

Re: rockford

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 4:17 AM 

Nobody likes a cheater !

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Nope - not the Iceman
(no login)
76.202.233.68

Saw them play

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 8:26 AM 

watched them stink up the joint at the Bartlett preseason tourney.
They dont make the top 15.. Go play NIHL, that's what you are,
not HS..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
66.158.77.250

Re: rockford

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 8:25 AM 

Rockford's combined, no point in ranking them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
166.196.237.6

Re: rockford

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 9:04 AM 

Here is your top ten:
1. NTG
2. LG
3. St. Rita
4. Stevenston
5. PR
6. Fenwick
7. St. Viator
8. York
9. GBN
10. Providence

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Rankings
(no login)
76.202.233.68

Not bad.. Couple shud be left off but close

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 9:20 AM 

Remove PR and Prov - You fill in the blanks. Maybe NPC snd Fremd?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
166.196.249.119

Re: Not bad.. Couple shud be left off but close

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 9:35 AM 

PR easily in top 10 maybe drop Providence but have looked solid lately. Npc and fremd are brutal.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
129.230.236.1

Re: Not bad.. Couple shud be left off but close

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 9:52 AM 

PR and Providence went through OT into a shootout at the National Showcase in NY last weekend

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
HS Special
(no login)
75.57.231.126

Top 10

No score for this post
December 9 2009, 9:55 AM 

1. NTG-clearly a one-horse show this year.
2. LG-good,but too far away from NTG to make noise
3. PR-Beat everyone there are supposed to beat. Solid.
4. St. Viator-surprise of the year, discipline may sink them.
5. Fenwick-depth is not there, but the top are as good as any.
6. St.Rita-strong d and goalies keep them in games. O is truly offfensive
7. Stevenson-solid, but don't have a go to gamer.
8. York-can move up if d and g step up.
9. GBN-use to be a contender...
10. Barrington-if they could only keep themselves under control.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
hey
(no login)
67.175.3.75

dont forget

No score for this post
December 11 2009, 8:36 AM 

crystal lake south

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Top 10 teams 08/09 Season
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement