<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

Blackhawk Cup 10' rankings

January 17 2010 at 8:19 PM
No score for this post
Guest  (no login)
from IP address 98.228.66.253

 
1- NTG
2- LAG
3- GBN
4- St. Viator
5- St. Rita
6- Stevenson
7- Barrington
8- Crystal Lake South
9- York
10- Fenwick
11- NTB
12- Naperville Central
13- Prairie Ridge
14- Lyons Township
15- GBS
16- Sandburg
17- Benet
18- Naperville North
19- Marist
20- Neuqua Valley
21- Lake Park
22- Naperville Central
23- Fremd
24- Providence
25- Warren
26- Mt. Carmel
27- Brother Rice
28- Lake Forest
29- St. Charles North
30- Lockport


Not sure why they have Naperville Central up there twice. Either a mistake or Hinsdale Central???

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
spareme
(no login)
192.195.66.46

Re: Blackhawk Cup 10' rankings

No score for this post
January 17 2010, 8:29 PM 

Interesting I don't have much to complain about through the top ten though I think I would have bumped Fenwick up to eight and drop CLS and York one notch.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
192.203.136.254

Re: Blackhawk Cup 10' rankings

No score for this post
January 17 2010, 8:58 PM 

Naperville Central ranked #12 and #22, Hmmmmm.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
guest
(no login)
24.14.235.181

Re: Blackhawk Cup 10' rankings

No score for this post
January 17 2010, 10:18 PM 

here's bracket. http://www.usahockey.com/uploadedFiles/USAHockey/central_district/amateur_hockey_as38/Blackhawk_Cup/Menu_High_School/RedVarsityBracket.pdf

if its not a link just copy and paste.

first round upsets?

here's my best guest
quarters
ntg vs york
rita vs viator
lag vs fenwick
stevenson vs gbn

semis
ntg vs rita
lag vs stevenson

finals
ntg over stevenson

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
99.158.171.138

Re: Blackhawk Cup 10' rankings

No score for this post
January 17 2010, 11:27 PM 

1- NTG
2- LAG
3- GBN
4- St. Viator
5- St. Rita
6- Stevenson
7- Barrington
8- Crystal Lake South
9- York
10- Fenwick

I think that GBN is the most overrated team in the state, how are they 3rd? Viator defiantly should not be ranked 4th, and it completely blows my mind that Barrington got 7th. Fenwick 10th; are you joking, easily top 5. Where's Prairie Ridge in the top ten?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
wondering too
(no login)
98.193.53.50

PR

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 5:27 AM 

since they just lost to Rockford 9-2 on Saturday (their 3rd lost to the river rats), and have a record of 25-18-5, maybe it's because they don't belong in the top ten.....

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.96.218.106

Disappointing System

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 6:49 AM 

As usual the system fails again! GBN, Barrington, and Viator all get more than they should. Fenwick, York, Providence and NPC get shorted. Coaches need to start looking at what league teams play in, who they've played, and results. myhockey is probably as close as it gets to correct. There is no perfect formula, but there are many poorly rated teams one way or the other.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
208.96.218.106

Re: Disappointing System

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 6:50 AM 

And who the he.. has CLS played to get ranked that high???????? Wake Up!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
209.242.44.203

Re: Disappointing System

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 7:38 AM 

maybe because pr plays the hardest high school schedule in the state. Not like these other teams that play in bull shit metro divisions. In the end it dosent matter anyways you have to beat everyone to get to the uc.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
12.32.95.98

Re: Disappointing System

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 7:57 AM 

Barrington and CLS play in a shit league.

Not sure how they got the rankings they got.

Fenwick # 10 ? What are these people looking at on deciding rankings?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Objective viewer
(no login)
72.166.172.2

Northside Cake Eater Committee

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 8:15 AM 

Typical Northsider Slant.

How can GBN be 3rd? =Second round loss
Viator Be ranked 4th?=Loss to Praire Ridge
Crystal Lake South 8(not even in top 20)? =Second round loss to Providence
Barrington 7? OK they'll Beat MC!but not Fenwick!
NTB 11=(25 maybe)=1st round loss to Npvl Cnt(Idiots have em listed twice).
Benet 17(30 more like it)?=1st round loss to Sandburg
Lyons Twp 14?=Marist will distroy
Who are you guys crapin?

Marist @ 19 Fenwick @ 10 Providence @24? ALL Under Rated

What kinda Kolaide are you AHAI Committeemen drinking?


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.142.183.205

Re: Northside Cake Eater Committee

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 8:43 AM 

first round winners will be:
Sandburg
Cls
York
Rita
Npc
Viator
Pr
Gbs
Barrington
Fenwick
Stevenston
Ntb
Gbn
Marist

Second round winners:
Ntg
York
Rita
Pr
Lg
Fenwick
Stevenston
Gbn

Third round winners:
Ntg
Pr
Lg
Stevenston

Finals
Ntg
Lg



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
the man
(no login)
71.228.41.120

Re: Northside Cake Eater Committee

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 9:39 AM 

wait wait wait.
How Can Viator be #4 when they lost to Fenwick twice, Rita, Stevenson, York, and Marist?
How can Stevenson be #6 only? very underated and disrespect
How can York be ahead of teams that they have never beat before or even mustered a tie?
Fenwick #10?
Prarie Ridge #13!!?
hahaha this is an absolute joke.

Marist will upset GBN
PR will advance to the sweet sixteen
Fenwick will beat LAG
MC beats Barrington
York will lose to NTG
Stevenson will walk through everyone till the semis

Final Four

NTG #1
Prarie Ridge #13

Fenwick #10
Stevenson #6

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
67.173.9.8

Re: Northside Cake Eater Committee

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 9:57 AM 

People need to understand that there is no AHIA "Commitee" that comes out with rankings. Coaches are polled, and from their responses the rankings are created.
This system is bound to be flawed, as you have coaches attempting to rank teams they have never faced. However, the only effect a flawed ranking can have is that some teams might get bounced in the earlier rounds than they would if they were ranked higher. When it comes to the later rounds of playoffs, rankings do not matter. NTG could be ranked 20th in state, and still have to face the same high-end teams later in the tournament to win the championship.

Let's not complain that the rankings are not 'objective' enough. They are not supposed to be! They are based on the collection of SUBJECTIVE opinions of the coaches.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)
32.142.80.143

Re: Northside Cake Eater Committee

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 10:49 AM 

well to prevent the coaches to rank teams they shouldn't use myhockeyrankings.com
The problem is that you have garbage teams playing in easy leagues that beat garbage teams and those coaches rate those teams high. You have quality teams that don't play garbage teams and or in easy leagues so it comes down those 10 coaches rating each other.
Example fenwick plays in cchl and hit very competive schedule then you have crystal lake south and barrington who play in the worst league in the state and beat up on garbage teams. So your garbage votes the the other teams high.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Hockey Fan
(no login)
76.200.70.238

Prairie Ridge in Final Four?

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 11:45 AM 

Is this the same poster who predicted PR in Final Four last year, when they were upset by York 4-3 in first round?

I like the PR coach, but unless he has some Herb Brooks magic, PR not likely to make it to Elite 8. But thats why they play the games, so good luck to all!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Al Franken
(no login)
204.27.169.2

not that it matters much

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 1:38 PM 

But Mundelein will walk away with the white division

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
anon
(no login)
99.141.196.92

Re: not that it matters much

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 5:07 PM 

AHAI made a mistake. Left out Hinsdale central. Switch Hinsdale and Naperville central

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Kharlamov
(no login)
99.138.166.6

Crystal Ball

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 5:33 PM 

Fremd will beat Fenwick by 2-3 goals. Will beat barrignton in OT and then barely lose to LAG.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
cchl dude
(no login)
68.60.229.133

Re: Northside Cake Eater Committee

No score for this post
January 18 2010, 8:10 PM 

The rankings are terrible! Northside cooking at it's best.CLS #8?,Barrington #7?NT Blue #11,Sandburg #16 and Benet #17 but marist is #19 are you crazy?Has Benet won a game? GBN #3? this is 2010! Fenwick is not #10 Lake Park is #21? The whole thing is a joke and those in charge should be embarrassed by their effort. If coaches decide then it is their job to look at who each team played.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
 
< Previous Page 1 2 3 4 56 Next >
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement