<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 17 2012 at 5:30 PM
Bookmark 

 
The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 18 2012, 1:19 PM 

From the chatter among the scouts;
-Deeper with more future "household names" in the F department
-Some very good D but not as deep as last years
-Very weak in netminders hence last years early run on goalies. Top G may not go until late 2nd or early 3rd round

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 18 2012, 5:59 PM 

only in your mind

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 19 2012, 10:19 AM 

95s got bronze at U17, tells all!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 19 2012, 11:09 AM 

Not every year is a great, some are good some are not so good. The U17 performance is an OK measure, as is the number of kids that are playing in the O at 16.

You get the odd great year, '90 and '94 come to mind, you get the odd low year, OHL scouts consider 95 to be one of those.

As for 96, there is always excitement about the next crop but you won't really know how good the year is until this time next year.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 19 2012, 11:48 AM 

95 odd low year, true...

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 19 2012, 11:49 AM 

nice try

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 19 2012, 1:41 PM 

The results at the U17 hold true facts, 95 year is weakest in years in the O.
Scouts were right.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 19 2012, 2:35 PM 

You are buzzed alright

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 21 2012, 12:18 PM 

according to who, a 96 dad, nice try

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 21 2012, 10:11 PM 

The Buzz is that the 96"s are very lame, Weakest in many years, Many kids not getting the call that they think is coming!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 23 2012, 3:16 PM 

I heard the same. I even heard the so called stars are not getting a lot of respect because of the competition is not strong and in the big picture they are very average.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 24 2012, 12:24 PM 

Who cares who is stronger? Does it really matter?

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 24 2012, 3:56 PM 

3:16 If you think scouts are reading this drivel you are sadly mistaken. Why else would you go on about crap you really don't know anything about. I heard the 95's are doing great in the OHL stats are fantastic, what's the big deal? You need to chill out.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 24 2012, 4:40 PM 

97's are better than the 95's and 96's put together

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 24 2012, 8:28 PM 

95s weakest in years, no gold at U17, not even silver - explains it all!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

January 30 2012, 4:22 PM 

the buzz is real

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 6 2012, 1:02 PM 

OHL Scouts cant wait for the 96s and 97s to come on board to forget about the 95 draft.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 6 2012, 3:25 PM 

97's aren't that strong and are smaller.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 6 2012, 5:08 PM 

Crackhead imagines he knows what central scouting is thinking.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 6 2012, 9:32 PM 

Central Scouting doesnt pick the kids Mr Hockey! The GM and his scouting crew do.................sorry to let you in on that secret, to bad 95 mom and dad eh.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 7 2012, 5:26 PM 

So which one of the IP addresses is yours?

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 22 2012, 2:24 PM 

He is with the Scouting news

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 23 2012, 12:50 PM 

Bunch of 95s being drafted this year due to lack of talent in the 96s. Just saying

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 23 2012, 7:16 PM 

Most years are average, 96 looks that way.

Really good years (90, 94) and really bad years (95) don't come along that often, it's strange we had 3 bracketing years in the last 5.




 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

February 24 2012, 6:31 PM 

are you people serious? this is so boring. YAWN

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 1 2012, 3:05 PM 

Rumour is that 2012 Draft may be cancelled due to lack of skilled talent. Scouts will be reviewing 95 hidden gems and looking ahead to 97 crop.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 1 2012, 7:36 PM 

This below is true, and seriously why do you think -95 LIDS (is that your pathetic name and you still lying, insecure and jealous?) - did they move the draft this year up a month???

Answer - To forget about last years draft quicker and get the real studs now and displace the smaller 2011 crop.

Quote of a Scout >> {Most years are average, 96 looks that way or above average.

Really good years (90, 94) and really bad years (95) don't come along that often, it's strange we had 3 bracketing years in the last 5.}


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 3 2012, 9:57 PM 

LIDs and LAMB are getting married. Butt buddies.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 5 2012, 4:47 PM 

7:36 HILARIOUS, THAT SHOULD SHUT THE 95 LIDS UP LMAO

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 9 2012, 7:29 PM 

Still no life .... loser.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 10 2012, 11:02 AM 

729 is the 95 Lil Insecure Daddy, the Network Loser!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 12 2012, 1:30 PM 

Hey DUMB ASS, If you knew anything you would ralize the 94's draft was below average and they say the 96 draft does not have any depth after the first 2 rounds, so what does that mean Mr know it all 96 Wanna be Dad.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 12 2012, 7:23 PM 

65 players (With the exclusion of Blandisi, Wilson and Ekblad) from last years draft have been signed and most players with their respective teams. As much as the buzz before the draft was how weak they are, they have actually fared well so far this season.

http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=948963

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 15 2012, 2:11 PM 

HEY 130 and 723 who is the 95 LIDS AHole

read this............Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s. March 1 2012, 7:36 PM

This below is true, and seriously why do you think -95 LIDS (is that your pathetic name and you still lying, insecure and jealous?) - did they move the draft this year up a month???

Answer - To forget about last years draft quicker and get the real studs now and displace the smaller 2011 crop.

Quote of a Scout >> {Most years are average, 96 looks that way or above average.

Really good years (90, 94) and really bad years (95) don't come along that often, it's strange we had 3 bracketing years in the last 5.}



 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

March 16 2012, 10:24 AM 

lol

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 1 2012, 6:57 AM 

Hey OP, that buzz you're hearing is the flies circling your head, looking for a place to deposit their eggs. Maggots prefer to feed on dead tissue don't ya know - as in your brain tissue.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 1 2012, 6:37 PM 

Hey DUMB ASS, If you knew anything you would ralize the 94's draft was below average and they say the 96 draft does not have any depth after the first 2 rounds, so what does that mean Mr know it all 96 Wanna be Dad.

Rumour has it that there are to many 96's playing AAA that should be playing AA or A, but , that is how the GTHL money machine works so .. it is going to be a dry year for the 96's. Many OHL team's looking to trade after the first 2-3 rounds!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 5 2012, 10:45 AM 

Hey DUMB ASS, If you knew anything you would ralize the 94's draft was above average and they say the 96 draft does have depth after the first 2 rounds, so what does that mean Mr know it all 95 Wanna be Dad.

Rumour has it that there are to many 95's playing playing AA or A, but , that is how the GTHL money machine works so .. it is going to be a dry year for the 95's. Many OHL team's looking to trade their 95s after the first 2-3 rounds!


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 9 2012, 11:21 AM 

96 draft just proved 95s weakest in years!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 10 2012, 6:38 PM 

you don't make sense, more 95's drafted in 96 draft year than ever. That means 96 weakest year ever! LOL

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 10 2012, 7:52 PM 

95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever! lmao

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 10 2012, 9:25 PM 

Dont you worry Kreskin, the Few 1st rounders that make the O will have success but you can bet that there will be less 96's to make the O than 95's or 94's so ...as we have said but will be proven come fall... 96's are overall, a weak age group!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 11 2012, 10:01 AM 

95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever! lmao


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 11 2012, 12:49 PM 

is copy and paste your best response?

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 24 2012, 2:57 PM 

Yes it is his best response and that's why he's the LITTLE ANGRY MAN BITCH. He's just mad cause his 96 and 94 age groups stank it up and didn't win Gold and then blew another gasket when 97 McDavid went #1 in this Draft. I've been reading the other forums and that's all he posts.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

April 29 2012, 2:36 PM 

OMG TOO FUNNY<<<<<<>>>>>>> 95 LIDS WILL LOSE IT AGAIN! READ BELOW! LMAO

"95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever!" lmao


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

May 31 2012, 3:59 PM 

OMG TOO FUNNY<<<<<<>>>>>>> 95 LIDS WILL LOSE IT AGAIN! READ BELOW! LMAO

"95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever!" lmao


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 3 2012, 11:46 PM 

Except if you want to ignore facts!! Little Angry Man Bitch known to all as LAMB seems to forget that a RECORD # of 95's were drafted in this past Draft INSTEAD OF 96's!!!!

And as usual links are provided: http://ohldraft.ilap.com/ps2012/

SORRY LAMB!! THIS LAMB IDIOT PREDICTED A RECORD # OF 94'S GOING IN THE 95 DRAFT AND THERE WAS DEFINITELY A RECORD #.....RECORD LOW !!! LOL!

LINK PROVIDED: http://ohldraft.ilap.com/ps2011/


TRUTH HURTS!! BADLY!! HENCE THE REASON LAMBY SPAMMY COMES ON
AND SPAMS LIES EVERYDAY!!


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 6 2012, 5:01 PM 

OMG TOO FUNNY<<<<<<>>>>>>> 95 LIDS WILL LOSE IT AGAIN! READ BELOW! LMAO

"95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever!" lmao

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 7 2012, 4:39 PM 

Except if you want to ignore facts!! Little Angry Man Bitch known to all as LAMB seems to forget that a RECORD # of 95's were drafted in this past Draft INSTEAD OF 96's!!!!

And as usual links are provided: http://ohldraft.ilap.com/ps2012/

SORRY LAMB!! THIS LAMB IDIOT PREDICTED A RECORD # OF 94'S GOING IN THE 95 DRAFT AND THERE WAS DEFINITELY A RECORD #.....RECORD LOW !!! LOL!

LINK PROVIDED: http://ohldraft.ilap.com/ps2011/


TRUTH HURTS!! BADLY!! HENCE THE REASON LAMBY SPAMMY COMES ON
AND SPAMS LIES EVERYDAY!!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 7 2012, 7:27 PM 

OMG TOO FUNNY<<<<<<>>>>>>> 95 LIDS WILL LOSE IT AGAIN! READ BELOW! LMAO

"95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever!" lmao


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 14 2012, 9:41 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 14 2012, 9:41 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 14 2012, 2:53 PM 



LAMBY WHAMMY LISA SPAMMY:

CHECK THIS OUT BEOTCH!

1. http://ohldraft.ilap.com/ps2011/ Where PROOF! exists of the RECORD LOW 94's Drafted!!!

LINK PROVIDED U SHORT FAT BITCHH!

2. http://ohldraft.ilap.com/ps2012/ Where PROOF! exists of the RECORD HIGH 95's Drafted!!!

LINK PROVIDED U LYING SACK OF SHHEEIIT!!

3. http://ontariohockeyleague.com/article/wolves-sign-goaltender GUESS THEY'RE NOT SIGNING TOO MANY 96'S EHH?? THIS KID IS 18! WOW, MUST BE A LOT OF DEPTH AT 96 AGE EH???

LINK PROVIDED U COPY, ALTER AND PASTE WHINER!!

4. Chat With McKeen's Draft Guide Guru David Burstyn
==================================================

LINK:

http://ohlprospects.blogspot.ca/search/label/Brandon%20Robinson

Excerpt:

#9 - BRANDON ROBINSON (DRAFT ELIGIBLE IN 2014)
I'M TELLING YOU, THIS GROUP OF '95 FORWARDS THAT HAS ENTERED THE LEAGUE THIS YEAR IS AMONG THE BEST CROPS THAT I'VE EVER SEEN. SO MANY OF THESE GUYS ARE CONSISTENTLY IMPACTING THEIR CLUBS IN A POSITIVE WAY.

And so many of them are well rounded players with high offensive upsides. Robinson won't be NHL draft eligible until 2014 (October birthday), but he's got a lot of upside.

I COULD GO ON FOREVER WITH PROOF, BUT YOU'RE GONNA COPY, COPY, COPY AND PASTE
PASTE, PASTE!!

DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE WORLD CAN SEE YOU HAVE NO WORKING PROOF, LINKS OR ANYTHING AND THEY KNOW YOU'RE A FREAKIN LYING SACK OF ******* AND A TOOL! BUT U WILL CRY LIKE THE B-ITCH THAT YOU ARE. NOW, OFF TO YOUR COPY, COPY, COPY AND PASTE TECHNIQUES!!!

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 16 2012, 7:40 PM 

OMG TOO FUNNY<<<<<<>>>>>>> 95 LIDS WILL LOSE IT AGAIN! READ BELOW! LMAO

"95s weakest ever, poorest showing in the O for the rookies ever! two bronze medals back to back never has that happened for team ontario EVER! 96 gets rookie of the year in the O over the 95 rooks, worst draft ever!" lmao


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 17 2012, 11:40 AM 

Not every year is a great, some are good some are not so good. The U17 performance is an OK measure, as is the number of kids that are playing in the O at 16.

You get the odd great year, '90 and '94 come to mind, you get the odd low year, OHL scouts consider 95 to be one of those.

As for 96, there is always excitement about the next crop but you won't really know how good the year is until this time next year.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 20 2012, 1:43 PM 

Not every year is a great, some are good some are not so good. The U17 performance is an OK measure, as is the number of kids that are playing in the O at 16.

You get the odd great year, '90 and '94 come to mind, you get the odd low year, OHL scouts consider 95 to be one of those.

As for 96, there is always excitement about the next crop but you won't really know how good the year is until this time next year.


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 21 2012, 9:17 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 22 2012, 6:00 PM 

Not every year is a great, some are good some are not so good. The U17 performance is an OK measure, as is the number of kids that are playing in the O at 16.

You get the odd great year, '90 and '94 come to mind, you get the odd low year, OHL scouts consider 95 to be one of those.

As for 96, there is always excitement about the next crop but you won't really know how good the year is until this time next year.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 23 2012, 1:03 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 23 2012, 10:39 PM 

If the 94 group was strong, then why were so few Ontario born and raised players chosen in the first round of the NHL draft?

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 23 2012, 11:42 PM 

LAMB = FUCKTARD

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 24 2012, 6:12 PM 

Again, it appears as though the 94 year wasn't quite so great! Six OHL first rounders from 2 years ago were not drafted AT ALL this past weekend......tough!

- Matthew Campagna 5th overall from Young Nats (GTHL)
- Luke Mercer 8th overall from the Young Nats (GTHL)
- Marcus McIvor 9th overall from the Whitby Wildcats (ETA)
- Chris Marchese 11th overall from the Marlies (GTHL)
- Max Iafrate 15th overall from Detroit Belle Tire (USA)
- Grant Webermin 20th overall from Detroit Belle Tire (USA)


Not trying to knock them as much as point out that they weren't so much better than the 95s as someone would have us believe.




 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 24 2012, 10:35 PM 

this is a 96 vs 95's, 94s would make the 95s look ill if we went there...

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 26 2012, 12:18 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 26 2012, 9:38 PM 

I guess we won't know for sure until next year's NHL draft. I guess if only one or two ontario raised boys get drafted in the 1st round and more than 6 OHL first round boys don't get drafted at all, then I guess you were right.

 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

June 28 2012, 11:13 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 6 2012, 1:44 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 8 2012, 4:17 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 9 2012, 6:55 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 10 2012, 3:44 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 13 2012, 11:35 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 14 2012, 3:18 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 15 2012, 3:52 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 17 2012, 10:28 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 18 2012, 11:26 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 18 2012, 5:30 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 19 2012, 12:48 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 19 2012, 8:45 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 30 2012, 9:57 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

July 31 2012, 2:43 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 3 2012, 5:23 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 5 2012, 2:30 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 6 2012, 7:26 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 7 2012, 2:15 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 8 2012, 11:36 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 8 2012, 9:16 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 9 2012, 7:22 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 10 2012, 10:37 AM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 12 2012, 8:33 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 16 2012, 7:53 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 18 2012, 2:34 PM 


 
 
Bookmark

Re: The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.

August 18 2012, 2:44 PM 


 
 
Current Topic - The Buzz is that the 96es are deeper and stronger than the 95s.  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on HockeyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Never worry about IP's being exposed.  Dirtbags might get slapped around or banned, but we're not going to 'out' you by disclosing your IP address.

Try to keep this discussion civil.  We have room in the CHIRPS forum if you need to rant, comment on hockey moms, or other things that might not be interesting to everyone. 

Thanks, Mod Team.

  • No annoying pop-ups
  • No noisy ads
  • No viruses