The Asian Watch Forum function N54_noerror(msg, url, lno) { return true; } //window.onerror = N54_noerror;

AWF Sales and Trading Post.. AWF Resources Forum.. Watch Reviews Forum.. Orient Watches Info Page..

Sea-Gull Watches Info Page.. Watch Collection and Picture Forum.. Universal Currency Converter.... The AWF Cafe...

Chinese Watches Info Page... The AWF Flea Market... Watch Deal References Forum...

 

 Back to the AWF  

Could a watch company hold a world record and yet not claim it?...

February 23 2012 at 8:32 PM
No score for this post

Chascomm  (Login Chascomm_)
Chinese Watch Guru
from IP address 151.130.37.17

 

Doesn't seem likely, does it?  We are familiar with watch companies trumpeting every tiny point of uniqueness in order to sell their products (e.g. "world's first grand sonnerie with Westminster carillon"  No, I didn't make that up)

But it may be that I have stumbled upon a watch company failing to sing, dance and wave banners about achieving a world record.

I put the question of the 'world's smallest tourbillon movement' to the Watchuseek Public Forum:

http://forums.watchuseek.com/f2/what-worlds-smallest-tourbillon-movement-652835-post4757872.html

15 hours later, no response.

Here's the issue: 

Franck Muller claim the 'world's smallest tourbillon' in the sense of  'world's smallest tourbillon escapement', however the movement that contains this mechanical marvel is actually too big to fit in the case used by Sea-Gull to house their ST84 tourbillon. 

In other words, Sea-Gull have built a more compact movement to contain a tourbillon escapement larger than the one in the Muller watch.  And they've put it into production. 

Surely that is an engineering achievement worth celebrating, especially given that both the Sea-Gull and FM movements were intended for women's dress watches, and FM watch being somewhat on the large size (I have a vintage man's watch that is a similar size).  Overall size really does matter in this instance.  Therefore the 'world's smallest tourbillon movement' or 'world's smallest tourbillon watch' is a world record of genuine merit.

But surely I am mistaken.  Surely, surely Sea-Gull, while claiming 'Asia's smallest tourbillon watch' could not have somehow failed to claim the world title they deserve?  I must be missing something.

Any thoughts?


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Responses

Find more forums on WatchesCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement