You do not need to file for a separate attorney -- the appointed GAL acts as the child's attorney. This is a little different from your normal attorney-client relationship, however, because the GAL is to act in the best interests of the child and not strictly according to the child's wishes.
I think it unlikely that your average GAL would be going on a gung-ho mission to find more abuse, primarily for practical reasons. This is a position typically held by a lawyer with his/her own private practice and other cases to attend to. Prior to the hearing, s/he must review all of the documentation and should also try to meet with the child, but beyond that I wouldn't expect him/her to do much independent investigating.
Regarding what can be discussed, I'm not sure really. Could be that GAL is an exception to that in this case. Either way, s/he will be able to talk to any therapists, detectives, etc. that have been involved.
Also not sure on the possibility of private meetings. If you were being investigated for abuse or neglect, they certainly could meet with the children privately. Or if there's any other reason to think the children couldn't speak openly in front of you. Goes to my point a few weeks ago -- you can't afford to create the impression that you are unquestioningly supporting your husband. That could make them think they need to protect your kids from you, and it sends the whole proceedings down the wrong path. So I'm really glad that you're on board with the idea of kids first, worry about husband later. Just keep emphasizing that with the people involved in your family court case in whatever way you can.
As Bree says, do feel free to email me if you have other questions or anything... it wouldn't take long for either of us to pull up some helpful info.
take care,
b
Posted on Jul 2, 2009, 8:32 PM from IP address 174.100.166.206
