Re: QBX Compiler

by (Login MCalkins)
Moderator

Welcome to the forums.

I'm thinking that there isn't one.

QB64 is probably the best option, although it doesn't aim for QBX 7.1 compatibility, but rather Qbasic 1.1/QB 4.x. Also, QB64 doesn't actually target Win64 yet; it targets Win32, but it will run on 64 bit Windows.

What part of your program isn't working in QB64?

The other compiler is FreeBASIC, but I don't think it targets Win64 either, and I would expect significantly less compatibility than you would get from QB64.

Proprietary compilers targeting Windows include PowerBASIC and VisualBASIC (up to version 6). I wouldn't expect very good QBX compatibility from either of them. Pete or Clippy would know more.

As far as I can tell, none of those are actually 64 bit compilers. I think they are all 32 bit compilers. But remember, 32 bit code will run on 64 bit Windows just fine.

A google search reveals PureBasic and xbasic. PureBasic is a 64 bit compiler, but it seems that you have to pay for it. I don't know if it's QBX compatible. I can't tell if xbasic is 64 bit, but it's not QBX compatible.

I still think QB64 is probably your best bet, other than actual QBX in DOSBox.

Regards,
Michael

P.S. QB64 is also a 64 bit compiler on it's non-Windows targets (Linux, Mac OS X). I believe it could be made to target Win64 with very little modification. (I think Galleon has designed for it, just hasn't enabled it yet.)



    
This message has been edited by MCalkins on May 7, 2012 8:06 PM

Posted on May 7, 2012, 8:02 PM

Respond to this message   

Return to Index


Response TitleAuthor and Date
Re: QBX CompilerNestor on May 8
 I'm not very sure. on May 9