| Re: Re ChedAugust 22 2012 at 10:04 AM No score for this post | 1066blade (no login) |
Response to Re Ched |
| BLUF65 you say - "Even if he was released on appeal I would not want him re associated with Sheffield United in any way, shape or form."
If he was released on appeal, it would be because the original guilty verdict was considered unsound and would then be overturned and he would then be declared not guilty - what is your problem?
If you've a problem with young, rich, (o.k. - thick) footballers who like to go out sh@gging - (that's probably half the current England squad covered)then you'd be left with a pretty thin squad to choose from.
|
| Responses- Re Ched - BLUF65 on Aug 22, 2012, 2:07 PM
- Re: Re Ched - HuddersfieldBlade on Aug 22, 2012, 2:41 PM
- Re: Re Ched - Mall on Aug 22, 2012, 2:55 PM
- Re: Re Ched - parisblade on Aug 22, 2012, 4:05 PM
- Re: Re Ched - broomhillblade on Aug 22, 2012, 5:39 PM
- Re: Re Ched - Duncan Disorderly on Aug 22, 2012, 6:48 PM
- Re: Re Ched - Huddersfieldblade on Aug 22, 2012, 9:57 PM
- Re: Re Ched - 1066blade on Aug 22, 2012, 3:20 PM
- Re Ched - BLUF65 on Aug 22, 2012, 4:22 PM
|
|
|