Sports R4U - 97 and Older.

[ Forum Rules. ] [ Requests For Moderation. ] [ Sports R4U - 98 and Younger. ]
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

LJK 97 AA

April 18 2012 at 9:11 PM
Anonymous  (no login)

Lots of speculation as to who the coach is I heard SN from the Bandits, AS from Oakridge. Anybody heard any different and has anybody played for either.
I guess my other question is why the delay in announcing?

 
    
AuthorReply
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 18 2012, 10:57 PM 

SN getting team, not posted because he thinks his kid has a shot on gold or green so does not want it out there that he will be doing the job with the AA when the little one is cut.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 18 2012, 10:58 PM 

SN getting team, not posted because he thinks his kid has a shot on gold or green so does not want it out there that he will be doing the job with the AA when the little one is cut.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 18 2012, 11:03 PM 

Nope.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 18 2012, 11:04 PM 

then who?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 18 2012, 11:37 PM 

SN would do a good job

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 8:09 AM 

isn't SN the one who was coaching when the kid broke his collar bone and the dad sued the LJK?? do you really think they would bring him back after that? if they do then they are dummer than we all thought

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 8:50 AM 

sn has more $$$$$ than morals

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 8:51 AM 

sn has more $$$$$ than morals

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 2:17 PM 

WHY WOULD YOU EVEN TRY OUT FOR THIS TEAM WHEN YOU CAN STAY IN YOUR CENTRE. DO YOU REALLY WANT TO WEAR A LJK JACKET THAT BADLY? JUST GO BUY ONE $20 WITHOUT THE BULLSHIT. CHEERS. CHECK OUT THE MAJOR MIDGET AA HOW DID THEY DO?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 2:47 PM 

I believe the Major Midget AA won didn't they? what's your point?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 3:30 PM 

YOur right they did win, just another Forest City loser. Midget AA still much much better hockey then playing on a Forest City team

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 4:57 PM 

8:09

LJK do not care about morals. Care more about protecting the people with $$$$$$$$

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 9:26 PM 

The 97 coach from west was offered but declined. Smart decision if you ask me considering how bad this parent group is.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 19 2012, 10:05 PM 

$SN$ all the way

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 20 2012, 8:34 PM 

YOU CANCOME OUT NOW SN

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 20 2012, 10:01 PM 

Hopefully not sn if en was released first cut

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 7:34 AM 

Coach and tryout scheduled now listed for AA.

SN is the coach.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 10:52 AM 

There will be many kids returning to Forest City after this announcement! Who would want to play for a coach, when their main objective is to play his own kid and the assistant coach's kid? 'Cause everyone knows who'll be beside him on the bench..... At least the assistant coach's kid should be there.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 11:00 AM 

My kid played for him couple years ago, he was a very good coach, kids liked him. From what I seen he never over played his kid at all

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 11:07 AM 

is that you SN... give me a break you play your kid with the best line on every spring team you have had just so he can get the tap in goal.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 11:34 AM 

The sad truth is that EN is a fairly talented kid..... he's too timid for this level of hockey, though. It was apparent in his play last season with Bandits, and it won't be any different this season with LJK. Only difference......he'll see more of his dad. His dad is quite proud to wear the green and gold. Too bad EN doesn't share this same passion. And how will they get out of practice now? And who will be "designated babysitter".

 
 
anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 11:37 AM 

at all

 
 
anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 21 2012, 11:49 AM 

good

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 23 2012, 11:02 PM 

Any f1's coming?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 23 2012, 11:06 PM 

I know it is a long shot but what happens if EN makes Chatham AAA or where ever else dad is shopping him around to.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 23 2012, 11:40 PM 

And the Bandits ousted probably two of the best non parent coaches ever because they swore OMG swearing makes the kids grow a set and puts hair on their chests.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 7:00 AM 

11:40 if your talking about RG the 97 coach from last year you wrong. That guy was an idiot, constantly calling out 14 yr old kids and trying to intimidate them.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 7:25 AM 

11 40- i agree probably two of the worst coaches. Great when we are winning, but when we lost they were awful

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 8:23 AM 

There will be some F1's.

Couple of pleasant surprises.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 8:52 AM 

F1's at AA, that seems like a bit much.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 9:12 AM 

Not a bit much if you want the best team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 9:21 AM 

I guess I always looked at the AA program as a development team for AAA rather than having a powerhouse to go crush other teams. But you probably are correct in saying that it would make a stronger team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 9:39 AM 

It would make a stronger team, however if you check the Alliance handbook, only AAA teams are allowed F1 granting. It makes sense, as if 3 kids from Waterloo joined Kitchener, everyone would cty foul and at the A/AA level if West grabbed 3 other kids from somewhere, everyone would cry foul. Check the handbook before you get too excited.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 9:55 AM 

I understand that they cannot come in as an F1 but they come in under the new Residency Passport system to their next available AA center

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 10:01 AM 

9:55 agree, St thomas 97's had three NRP's last year. 2 from Lambeth and 1 of them is on the AA tryout list TD for this year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 10:02 AM 

If the parents are divorced or separated you can easily "move" to another address and accomplish the same as F1s without being a F1. The Bandits 96s did that legally with 3-4 players last season and won themselves a AA Championship. However the Bandit territory is half the city and easy to setup an address. But the LJK would be able to do the same by getting EMC cuts to enrol in at STA with a relatives address under the separation premise and voila.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 10:24 AM 

Cheating to win, that is sportsmanship. Typical LJK

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 11:04 AM 

Well if LJK is going to do this, we all should be doing the same thing. I wonder what the alliance will think of this thread.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 11:06 AM 

Nobody was saying LJK was doing this, the poster was saying thats what the Bandits did last year and because it worked for them the LJK could do it. I think it was just tongue in cheek - holey relax would you, Johnny is not be cut for a fake address kid at AA

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 11:20 AM 

Its being done at the 96 age this year because EMC doesnt do Midget AAA so all the London FC teams are smoozing the Ex EMC AAA players by offering basement apartments for separated players. The Bandits 96s already have 4 EMC AAAs moved in to build a Super AA team to make a run for the National AA Telus Cup.

They also have 27 LJKs 95s & 96s registered for their fall tryouts and nearly already have Bandit addresses.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 11:40 AM 

So what, it is only a AA championship they are going after and doesn't mean anything in the big picture. This is also Midget level for the super team they are supposedly trying to build. If cheating is going to start in the Minor Midget level, then everyone should cheat is what you guys are saying. I rephrase my earlier comment, not just typical LJK to typical London.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 11:53 AM 

The import thing started in the G years ago, but has spread to EMC, LJK and now into AA and even A hockey if you look the Oakville Ranger teams. It is now if you cant beat them you may as well join philosophy.

Blame the OHF for allowing this year after year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 12:33 PM 

That doesn't make it right or sporting. Really it is AA hockey, the chances of being noticed, let alone drafted are nil.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 12:39 PM 

Copper Cliff was a AA super team and a bunch were drafted, however any AA superteam would need to enter a bunch of AAA tournies to get noticed.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 12:47 PM 

Its being done at the 96 age this year because EMC doesnt do Midget AAA so all the London FC teams are smoozing the Ex EMC AAA players by offering basement apartments for separated players. The Bandits 96s already have 4 EMC AAAs moved in to build a Super AA team to make a run for the National AA Telus Cup.

They also have 27 LJKs 95s & 96s registered for their fall tryouts and nearly already have Bandit addresses.


You people are idiots the guy is joking. Have you ever heard of the Midget AA Telus Cup, of course not there isnt one, only AAA. What good Elgin player is going to try to make a Bandits team over Midget AAA, none of them

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 12:55 PM 

It's not to far fetched if you knew the Bandits 96 summer team already has 4 EMC AAA kids on their roster. That is fact. Not sure about Telus AA Cup thing but the exodus has already begun.

And a Polish dad on the Bandit team also has 4 nephews all aged 95 & 96 'visiting' this summer and all played in the National Polish Hockey program and all he has to do is sponsor them and whammo they can play for the Bandits AA 96 team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 1:08 PM 

Well maybe the coach of the AA 97 LJK is Polish as well or has someone on the team already selected that could add 4 imports. If they want to go through that ordeal to play AA hockey, good luck.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 3:06 PM 

yu can have SN. Get ready to go broke$$$$

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 3:38 PM 

Its not that easy if you move without parents especially an international move. We had player move in samething similar without parents and stay with brother or sponsor or something took from like January till October to get him approved and even at that he could only play in Alliance season games, couldnt participate in any tournaments and had we gone out to the Bantam ohf's he was not allowed to compete in that either. We all agreed it was certainly a waste of a players card

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 4:05 PM 

He may need the "imports" as he only has a hand full of players on his list that would be considered the top kids on their own FC teams let alone trying to put together a competitive AA program.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 24 2012, 4:17 PM 

Polish ice hockey, I bet their development program is top notch!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 25 2012, 12:05 PM 

You guys are a riot.
The 96 Bandit team didn't do any of that crap last year. Every player who came back from LJK was returning to their actual association zone (where they had played previously).
Spring hockey...anyone can play with anyone.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 25 2012, 6:21 PM 

Coachs son playing for Chatham aaa

Good luck with that

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 25 2012, 6:41 PM 

he is trying out but will not makw it

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 7:53 AM 

Who wants it the kid or the dad? Or does the kid not wantto play for his AA dad?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 8:40 AM 

latest on SN's kid. He is trying out with Chatham AAA team and they are playing lambton AAA team tonight. If he doesn't make Chatham he wants to tryout for Lambton AAA team. He's not going to make any AAA team....just needs to stay in London with dad.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 9:20 AM 

who in their right mind would drive to chatham for games and practices to get destroyed? If you were one of the first cut in London what makes you think that you would actually make a difference on any AAA team in SW ontario.

Parents need to stop pushing their kid to play AAA, if you get cut take it like a man and play AA or A .

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 9:40 AM 

Aren't you a positive person! Why so interested in other peoples business? If dad chooses to drive wherever for hockey it is not your concern. Maybe this is the kids dream and not the dad but he is willing to drive wherever for his son. I take it you wouldn't do the same for yours?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 10:02 AM 

No i wouldn't. Waste of time and money, play AA and focus on school.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 12:25 PM 

Trust me, school is a focus. You don't bring home the grades, you don't play AAA. Simple.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 12:50 PM 

bm doing the same thing with his kid amazing what some people will do

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 2:30 PM 

^ agreed, this is almost as bad as TD, he drove from Lambeth to St. Thomas for A hockey last year. Typical parents trying to live vicariously through their kids.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 2:31 PM 

Where did EN play last year

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 2:36 PM 

bandits

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 7:28 PM 

What's after Lambton? Brantford, Huron Perth, Windsor. When is it to much?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 26 2012, 11:06 PM 

A London arena was evacuated after several people felt dizzy and nauseous - the spell so bad one man had to be taken to hospital after his teammates found him lying on his back in the dressing room struggling to breath.

Boris Markowski said two men's teams were playing pickup hockey at the twin-pad London Ice Park at 99 Brookside St. when 90 minutes into the game, several men started feeling sick.

"At least a dozen had symptoms," he said. "One guy really felt sick, we called 911 because he was flat on his back."

Middlesex-London EMS took him to hospital. Another man was treated at the scene.

Parents with young children in hockey gear carried them outside, the children still wearing their skates.

London firefighters, who evacuated the building, uncovered elevated levels of carbon monoxide in parts of the arena, but were still trying to find its source.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 28 2012, 12:19 PM 

Anybody have any idea what happens if EN makes on of the AAA teams he is trying out for? Is there anybody else in the wings to coach? I just can't see how SN can make this work if his kid is not there?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 29 2012, 10:58 AM 

SN's double team is taking shape to be a great team with a lot of great kids to pick a team from, most with no baggage as well.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 29 2012, 12:29 PM 

Hopefully the one with baggage stays away.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 29 2012, 7:12 PM 

Okay, I have to ask.....Who is "the one with baggage?"

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 29 2012, 8:00 PM 

It is pretty hard to find any minor hockey team with no baggage. Especially with all the blown egos from being cut at AAA.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 29 2012, 11:17 PM 

for the most part baggage = parents... sad but true

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 7:23 AM 

Good job EN, but now what happens with SN?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 7:31 AM 

WOW yes well done EN, you are right, now what happens. There is almost no way SN can coach this team while his kid is playing for Chatham. Even if SN does not move on to be with his son the LJK's should have to have a hard look at this one.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 7:44 AM 

I think the fine print says either is either on the team or being evaluated. Best of luck anyway.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 9:07 AM 

Why would EN be cut from London gold? He fits right in with the size. London gold is tiny again this year!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 9:34 AM 

SN tight with DW, seen meeting with him. DW opened the door to CK

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 10:29 AM 

Minor Midget LJK AA shaping up to be a good team.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 10:52 AM 

Of course they are going to be good, its an all star 'A' team. If they dont win the alliance it would be a failed season.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

April 30 2012, 1:00 PM 

Will be better than AAA gold

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 1 2012, 2:57 PM 

Does anybody know when EN will find out if he made the Chatham squad?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 2 2012, 9:21 PM 

Why such concern?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 2 2012, 9:47 PM 

I think the only concern is that this team may have to look for another coach. I mean how can SN be in two places at once and who can blame the man for wanting to be where his kid is. Personally EN would be good for the AA team, but wish him the best regardless.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 2 2012, 10:08 PM 

Driving to Chatham and even mooretown for practices etc and coaching the AA team sounds impossible but who knows. Let's wait and see what happens because everyone knows the MM year is unpredictable at best.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 3 2012, 8:19 AM 

SN staying with the team. I wish EN well and that he gets a spot where he wants to be. Selfishly speaking, I would not mind if EN landed back with LJK AA. This team will be strong.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 3 2012, 8:24 AM 

The best thing that could happen for this team is to be absent of SN

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 3 2012, 8:42 AM 

Disgree with 8:24.

You must be worried????

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 3 2012, 7:51 PM 

This team is taking shape with a ton of kids to pick from

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 3 2012, 10:59 PM 

Looks like there will be a ton of cuts after friday as they only have one ice time on sunday. 49 kids for 17 spots

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 7:14 AM 

After the 7 F1's made the Green team, there will be a lot of questions if non London kids make the AA team.

According to the Alliance handbook,and from OMHA rule 3.5 "A" teams are "AA" teams within the Alliance and only players from nearby centres that do not have A or AA can be allowed to try out. A/AA cannot try out for another A/AA centre unless they have been cut from their A/AA home centre. BB can try out in nearby A/AA centres. NRP (non resident players) are permitted in this case up to 3 per team.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 8:18 AM 

TD has a good chance from Lambeth, so there is 1 of 3

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 8:21 AM 

Got no problem with a maximum of 3 imports. SN knows what he needs and I am sure he will use the 3 if he needs them. 3 is a far cry from 7 on Green.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 9:29 AM 

3 potential imports on AA are not rejects or cuts from other AA/AAA teams.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 12:00 PM 

Anyone from would have been cut by EMC so that would make them rejects.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 12:32 PM 

12:00 Not necessarily.

The rule allows kids from smaller centres the ability to tryout for an A/AA team. These kids may have been the best on a small centres team and now would like to try A/AA. May not have tried out for Elgin or any other AAA team.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 12:33 PM 

A

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 12:35 PM 

All of the imports listed on the tryout list have A teams in their centres

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 3:13 PM 

I read the rule 3.5 from Alliance/OMHA and it clearly states that A players are considered AA players and that A/AA players cannot move to other A/AA centres unless they could not roster (have been cut/released) from the A/AA team in their home area. Seems pretty clear, that unless they have been cut from their home centre, only B/BB players should be trying out for LJK AA.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 3:21 PM 

Going to be alot of surprises with this team, and tryouts are just starting tonight?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 3:27 PM 

Not all of the imports listed have "A" centres. The process is pretty simple you cannot get a "passport" to tryout if you are not eligible to tryout. Alliance/OMHA won't approve the passport if you do not come from a qualifying centre.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 3:56 PM 

Alot of worried people on here

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 5:54 PM 

If the LJK AA team takes F1s and AAA cuts who were cut due to too many AAA F1s then a good argument could be made to relegate the LJK AA team to AAA status or have them banished from the A/AA league and/or Tournaments. It's called CHEATING.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 8:09 PM 

Wah wah! Let the dream go!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 8:32 PM 

All surrounding centres are members of the omha and the only A centre is st thomas,most are B, BB, C etc. So first off they would need to be cut by their zone AAA team(not ljk) and then i believe their is an omha rule stating that players can tryout for the closest A/AA centre before they tryout for their home centre. That is what allowed the Jr stars to have 3 NRP's last year. 2 from lambeth and 1 from belmont who both are B or C centres.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 8:37 PM 

Any predictions on the goalies??

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 10:08 PM 

2 will make it

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 10:22 PM 

Your kid and somebody else.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 11:46 PM 

I thought 5 goalies would make it, since when is it only 2?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 4 2012, 11:58 PM 

Theres quite a few nrp's trying out so im guessing sn will take the max of 3.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 8:43 AM 

Goalies "should" be JN and PT ...both very strong tenders. But Should be and Will be are two very different things.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 9:41 AM 

2 NRP's looked very good, he will take 2 for sure.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 12:47 PM 

Im gonna say pt and jw

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 5:32 PM 

Where was DK the goalie last night, he has to be in the mix if for no other reason that he had a good season at Oakridge.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 6:07 PM 

are there cuts

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 6:47 PM 

Wasn't DK the goalie that got kicked out for having no certification sticker on his helmet and then proceeded to throw his equipment on the ice. To top it off the dad came on the ice and starting losing it on the refs.

Was that hat dk or the other goalie

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 8:22 PM 

one of the oakridge goalies still has to serve a 20 game suspension

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 9:54 PM 

it was dk who got suspended

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 10:16 PM 

To be clear not a 20 game suspension. DK got around 10 games.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 5 2012, 10:38 PM 

For what?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 12:16 AM 

He attacked the ref

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 10:26 AM 

any new kids at tryouts today? and will there be cuts?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 10:29 AM 

has en signed with chatham or still trying out

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 10:45 AM 

Go to the chatham website, he made the team

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 10:47 AM 

Seems like a whole lot of baggage to me. I dont know how he could ever make this team considering he has to miss pretty much the first half of the season

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 10:55 AM 

No mention of players or a list on the Chatham website. i think he is still trying out not carded yet they have tryouts all the way until august.Bad situation to put the kid

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 11:13 AM 

EN will be playing AA in London, wtf up people!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 1:12 PM 

He was listed as making the team a few days ago.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 1:14 PM 

My guess is they will get a few more final f1's and EN will be cut loose.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 1:18 PM 

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=en&biw=1024&bih=268&q=cache:U0ZnRzxL3H4Jhttp://chathamkentcyclones.ca/Teams/1015/Articles/1363/Minor_Midget_Tryouts_-_Please_Check_For_Your_Name/+http%3A//chathamkentcyclones.ca/Teams/1015/Articles/1363/Minor_Midget_Tryouts/&gbv=2&gs_l=hp.3...6614.6614.0.7736.1.1.0.0.0.0.160.160.0j1.1.0...0.0.glQwc9BruuI&ct=clnk

That is a cache of what was listed a few days ago , who knows if he got carded . If he doesnt he still has a spot back home with SN

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 1:19 PM 

He wasnt listed as made the team there were 24 kids on the list tryouts still going on until august.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 1:22 PM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 1:25 PM 

There were 17 kids with no guarantee he made it. It just said evaluations were going to continue. Not 24

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 5:33 PM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 10:02 PM 

looks like some questionable cuts already on F + D

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 6 2012, 11:55 PM 

I would first cut the kids that fell down durnig the drills. That will give them something to start with. Then cut the guys in the game that passed to the other team. Now we have 20 left so that would be a good start.......you have AE kids out with a few that should have made green. trim it to 20 kids and lets see who can go tape to tape.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 7:36 AM 

Any big surprises on the list?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 7:57 AM 

Nothing really just a couple of new NRPs

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 8:13 AM 

where did the NRP goalie come from ?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 8:19 AM 

Strath

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 9:52 AM 

He played with us on the Chiefs for a year and Brantford. Wait until after the his first skate his father will be on here slamming the other goalies. Good luck with that one.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 10:10 AM 

MR dad a headcase.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 11:10 AM 

MR is a good goalie but too late coming to the table. Don't think he can unseat the top 2.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 11:32 AM 

Who is the top 2 PT and JW or JW and JN ??

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 12:46 PM 

Would have to go with JW and PT. But who knows

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 8:39 PM 

How did it look tonight.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 9:35 PM 

Who is the top 5 skaters?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 9:39 PM 

In my opion they are:
LM
CM
CH
SK (scored two goals, no hands, not fast but hard worker)
KC on Def.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 10:33 PM 

SK seemed to do that all year against us, anyone know why GP from bandits isn't trying out? he always seemed to stick out last year when we played them.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 10:50 PM 

I have wondered the same thing. The kid has a shot like a cannon. He also would bring a lot of grit to the team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 11:05 PM 

GP is a great kid, hard to motivate for every shift. He is busy with many things and doesn't want to live the dream.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 7 2012, 11:22 PM 

ahh understandable, would of added a lot of size up front that's for sure. Goalies should be solid and same with forwards. My only concern would be the 4-6 d men.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 8:13 AM 

Surprised they did not make any cuts after last night.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 8:20 AM 

New import rule may help with 4-6 D

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 8:22 AM 

Whos the coach?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:42 AM 

8:22 you must have been born last night , SN from bandits look at the website .

My guess is there won't be any cuts until the final skate so they can have full scrimmages and there is really no rush to finalize the team until Friday.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 10:32 AM 

There will be a few cuts after tonight's skate.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 11:52 AM 

Looks like EN got cut or left CK . Here come the NRP's more being added daily

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 2:46 PM 

For all the slagging EN takes he is not a bad player, his only issue is size and to be honest what kid does not have some issue at this age. We would be happy to have him back.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 3:12 PM 

Come on out if you think that you can make the AA team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 3:31 PM 

3:12 What are you talking about> Please clairify what you are talking about??????

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:20 PM 

Any cuts? How many F1's are there?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:31 PM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:32 PM 

Top D looks like a f1


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:44 PM 

I can count at least 8 that were at the tryout tonight.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:48 PM 

Who are the top 6 for D
Who are top 6 up front
Who are the top 2 tenders

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:51 PM 

Jw and PT in net maybe jn and mr in 4th

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 9:54 PM 

Top Forwards,
CM
CH
LM
SK
TC
?

Top D
NRP sorry don't know him but looks good
KC
TW
??

Top Tenders
PT
JN

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 8 2012, 10:02 PM 

I think the NRP D was 15 black TD

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 8:29 AM 


Top Forwards
CM
CH
LM
SK
TC

Top D
KC
TW
NRP 3on3
NRP Black 15?


Top Tenders
PT
JN

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 8:30 AM 

Add NRP grey socks to F list

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 8:39 AM 

8:30, not sure in game after game if he can be tough enough. Watched him pull up a few times in try-outs, what will he be like when he makes the team and the pressure is off.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 8:43 AM 

8:39

point taken. i did not notice him at all until last night.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 9:15 AM 

Does anybody know if SN is posting any cuts today?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 2:51 PM 

How many NRP are allowed in AA?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 2:58 PM 

I think 3

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:04 PM 

game tomorrow against AAA kitchener but list has not changed

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:17 PM 

LM not on list

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:21 PM 

either is PT. Wow

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:33 PM 

Neither is CW.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:41 PM 

L Mc back on list

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:43 PM 

Well it looks like on wrong has been corrected.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:45 PM 

IS SN taking 17 skaters + 2 goalies?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 3:47 PM 

Another coach who likes small players. wow.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 4:01 PM 

Some small ones won't be there in the end.

Heard 16 skaters + 2


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 4:05 PM 

Curious to see who he pick to be between the pipes now he just let the one that I had pick to be either number one or a close no. 2 go.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 4:08 PM 

LJK policy says Minor Midget allowed to roster 19.

I am guessing SN goes with that. Lots happens in Minor Midget year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 4:49 PM 

PT is on the list, why did you say he was not?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 4:52 PM 

He wasn't before.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 5:16 PM 

No he was off the list so was LM at one point as well. Hope the kids did not see the list when their names were off it would have been upsetting and more that a little confusing seeing name back on. Both those kids deserve to be on the list and on the team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 5:22 PM 

now they have put AA back on the list?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 5:26 PM 

Sounds like somebody did not check the list before their secretary posted it.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 6:49 PM 

LM goes from off the list to not even playing tomorrow.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 6:54 PM 

AA parents begged SN for another chance.
All the best. Tough being cut twice...

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 6:56 PM 

Obviously it was a mistake

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:13 PM 

just phone and you will be put back on

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:20 PM 

What startles me as he had only 3 goalies listed and playing 1 period a piece, now he has 4-- how do you play 4 goalies in 1 game?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:43 PM 

switch tenders on the fly? better question is how do you fit 4 tenders on the bench?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:44 PM 

does anyone know who was on this team two years ago? I know of JN, JO, CW, can anyone fill in the blanks?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:51 PM 

CW MC,DK, EN, BN, BG, BA, JW, SN, SW,

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:54 PM 

JN on AAA 2 years ago

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:56 PM 

JW, PT

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 7:58 PM 

No PT

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 8:00 PM 

JW DK

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 8:14 PM 

Who cares who was there 2 years ago?

Kids progress or regress a lot in 2 years especially between minor bantam and minor midget.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 9:18 PM 

How many cuts are left


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 9:19 PM 

Why are some of the best player in the ex game and some mid pack guys are sitting


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 9:22 PM 

How come EN is not on the list.

Did the coach cut his own son?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 9:48 PM 

maybe he signed his card with CK

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 10:10 PM 

How many are sitting?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 10:52 PM 

5-6 skaters to be cut and 2 left in net depends if he takes 16 0r 17 skaters. CB is injured and 4 are sitting

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 9 2012, 10:58 PM 

did cb play at last scimmage what #

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 7:09 AM 

no he hasn't skated since the weekend or something like that

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 11:12 AM 

should not be on the list he missed aaa tryouts as well

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 12:01 PM 

9:19 pm

You must be new to the London Knights?

How good you are has nothing to do with this process.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 12:19 PM 

exactly has nothing to do with who is the best they do not pick on talent enough said

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 1:53 PM 

How many kids dads play beer league with the coach?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 3:44 PM 

15

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 7:44 PM 

Will be they beat kitchener tonight? And yes i know it doesn't mean anything.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 10:21 PM 

Team looked good

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 10:48 PM 

Final score?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 10:52 PM 

lost 3-1 it was not a bad game until the third and Kitchener seemed to take over the game.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 10:53 PM 

You do realize that this wasn't just kitchener with kids from gold and green playing as well.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 10:59 PM 

Yes, sure glad nobody got hurt. DD or SR would not have been pleased.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 11:00 PM 

with this being their last tryout any predictions on players signing?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 11:14 PM 

THE KIDS THAT SAT ARE SIGNED.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 10 2012, 11:17 PM 

When will the final roster be posted?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 6:53 AM 

Considering GLHA tryouts start Monday I would have to say they will be posted today.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 7:00 AM 

correction Team is posted!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 7:15 AM 

Breakdown?

3 NRP's 1 - Goalie 2 - D

5 - West

6 - Bandits

Not sure of LM , PT, MC, and DM.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 7:41 AM 

LM AAA Gold
CM AAA Green
PT Oakridge

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 7:42 AM 

MC and DM from North

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 7:44 AM 

Only real surprise is KC and JW not on the list.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 8:36 AM 

Are the NRP's needed?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 8:42 AM 

On D for sure.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 12:26 PM 

Who are the NRP and what level did they play?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 3:09 PM 

TD is from lambeth but played for St. Thomas last year, MR (goalie) played for strathroy and i believe someone previously said he played for brantford AAA in the past. JG is from Dorchester. Even with the two NRP's there seems to be a large drop off between #1+2 D vs. D#6+7

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 3:22 PM 

All 3 NRP's played EMC at one time.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 3:28 PM 

"Even with the two NRP's there seems to be a large drop off between #1+2 D vs. D#6+7"

Maybe - but is a lot better than 2 years ago


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 3:44 PM 

3:22 in atom ?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 3:45 PM 

Some of the forwards could plays if needed. MT played well there last night


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 3:55 PM 

TD played 4 years AAA chiefs 1 year AAA green and one year St Thomas
JG played no AAA and played in Dorchester
MR played 3 years AAA (2 chiefs and one Brantford)

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 5:49 PM 

Looks like west will have the best goaltending in FC with JN and JW coming back but their D is going to suffer. Bandits will probably have a significant drop next year. North best GLHA team?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 6:05 PM 

Correcton
MR played 4 yrs AAA 3 with chiefs 1 with Brantford

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 6:24 PM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 6:39 PM 

Thanks for the update

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 8:22 PM 

correction JG from Dorchester was an AP player for the chiefs and practiced with them the past 2 seasons

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 8:34 PM 

What ever

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 11 2012, 9:53 PM 

7:15, 7:41

Who's LM?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 12 2012, 4:07 PM 

Was on AAA gold the last two years. L MC

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 13 2012, 9:38 PM 

is cm on the team? cancer... dad is a whackjob .no wonder the kid is all messed up

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 13 2012, 10:16 PM 

yea he is

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 13 2012, 10:44 PM 

good luck with that one

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 13 2012, 10:57 PM 

you guys are fucking assholes leave the kid alone

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 13 2012, 11:01 PM 

the way you leave other kids alone dm???

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 14 2012, 1:14 PM 

FC A tryouts start tonight. , can't wait to be blown out 10-0 by ljk!!!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 2:08 PM 

Drama is starting already, team budget is soaring out of control and parents aren't happy. Just wait and see some of these kids will be playing FC next year . SN thinks this a AAA team

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 2:51 PM 

Some will be playing FC this year!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 2:51 PM 

It's pretty close to a AAA team.

And I guess if you're little johnny made AAA he wouldn't be playing there neither....not much different then what you would be paying playing AAA.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 3:02 PM 

Poster is an idiot all teams are in the same range that play AA or AAA hockey

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 3:03 PM 

"Team budget soaring out of control..."

I would say it is reasonable. I believe all but one family attended the team meeting?

Don't come on here and try to be a pot stirrer, if there are any issues e-mail the manager. This team will be a strong AA team. Should be a fun year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 3:17 PM 

Yes this will be a strong team this year very strong offensive team and strong defence

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 3:23 PM 

"Drama is starting already, team budget is soaring out of control and parents aren't happy. Just wait and see some of these kids will be playing FC next year . SN thinks this a AAA team."

This team will compete with some low end AAA teams.
As for budget, if you don't agree address it with manager/coach, I am sure you can opt out of some things.




 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 3:28 PM 

WE CAN WORK IT OUT

The Beatles

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 4:02 PM 

I cant believe people on this, do your lives suck that bad to talk about team budgets?

Just take your kid and go... I am sure they have an extra skater or two signed on this team.

Suck it up or go!

Get a life.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 5:12 PM 

Serious question here, why would you pay the same amount of money as AAA to play in a weak league that is not going to have a split or even an OHF championship this year. Wait till next year when your all going to be back playing FC since EMC has no AAA.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 5:21 PM 

The facts are that most of the kids playing AAA will be back in forest city next year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 5:29 PM 

What is the amount per kid

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 5:34 PM 

I doubt anyone is going to shell out that information.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 6:30 PM 

Budget issues solved. Next topic.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 9:47 PM 

Whithout knowing a thing about the budget i was able to stir the pot pretty damn good. People on n54 think everyone is telling facts. Bye ljk

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 10:58 PM 

and the responses were to get you going ..n54 say no more

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 11:03 PM 

None of them got me going as i am not on this team nor is this my age division.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 18 2012, 11:25 PM 

say no more..n54

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 19 2012, 8:03 AM 

Say more . N54

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 19 2012, 2:23 PM 

I heard today that the Middlesex Centre Township (Komoka Arena) is going to raise the cost of all ice for all LJK programs and it would effect all ice times after June 1st. This could seriously affect all levels of LJK as the ice in Komoka is/was so much cheaper.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 19 2012, 2:37 PM 

Not if you have contracted and paid for ice already.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 20 2012, 9:11 AM 

Are we still stuck with SN for coach? His kid is playing for CK.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 21 2012, 2:12 PM 

Hope not. Maybe he will move on too!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 21 2012, 2:18 PM 

why did you try out he is a non parent coach what is your problem

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 21 2012, 3:24 PM 

SN will do a great job as coach of this group as a non parent or parent coach.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 21 2012, 8:03 PM 

you people are a bunch of rednecks cock suckers

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 22 2012, 12:11 PM 

He simply knows little about coaching. Nice guy. But should stick with A hockey, spring or hoyse league. My boy said he taught him zero.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 22 2012, 10:48 PM 

If your son learned nothing, he chose to learn nothing. SN is a very good coach. Those players who want to improve, will. My son enjoyed playing for SN and has a lot of respect for his passion for the game.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 23 2012, 7:01 AM 

Having played for SN in the past, I will have to say he is significantly better organized this time and combining that with his passion for the game. It should be a good season.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 23 2012, 7:49 AM 

ok sn

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 23 2012, 8:33 AM 

SN will do just fine with this team.

As for your boy learning nothing - maybe the apple does not fall far from the tree.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 23 2012, 8:35 AM 

why is mr the only player shown on website roster?


    
This message has been edited by SCTA_01_Observer on May 23, 2012 8:39 AM


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 23 2012, 1:17 PM 

Joke coach. Wow he likes hockey?. He is simply the only coach they could find. They were scrambling till last minute. Cares about himself only but i hope my kid plays hard regardless of lack of coaching.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 24 2012, 9:39 PM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 24 2012, 9:41 PM 

Why did this team take 19 players in AA? Does that make it cheaper for everyone on the team?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 25 2012, 9:08 AM 

1:17 dw arranged for this coach. they're =

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 26 2012, 8:01 AM 

they are what?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: LJK 97 AA

May 26 2012, 2:24 PM 

equal that is what = means

 
 
Current Topic - LJK 97 AA    
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index