Sports R4U - 97 and Older.

[ Forum Rules. ] [ Requests For Moderation. ] [ Sports R4U - 98 and Younger. ]
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

London 1997 Green

May 21 2012 at 1:50 PM
Anonymous  (no login)

What's happening with the coach? Heard he was called before the board regarding the F1 screwup and not having watched any of them skate?

 
    
AuthorReply
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 21 2012, 2:03 PM 

DW straightened it out for him. All good now.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 21 2012, 3:21 PM 

What a mess. London kids suffer for other teams cuts!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 21 2012, 3:34 PM 

I didn't want my kid to play for this coach but also not willing to drive hours for practice and games. Unlike others, I am not living the dream.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 21 2012, 7:24 PM 

I highly doubt he got dragged in front of the board, but if it did happen it has happened far too late. I would love to know how many of these extra kids that were brought in at the last minute were either LFD offspring or their parents were friends or work contacts of the coach. SR came in with a ton of good will and credibility and now he has neither.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 21 2012, 8:08 PM 

If the Green team isn't going anywhere then why do you care? What about the promises and favours made to kids on the Gold team? The Gold team stinks of smoke.....LFD? I think so!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 21 2012, 10:11 PM 

Why does everything get turned to be a Gold problem. I think there are only two LFD offspring on Gold and a strong case can be made for both of them. The point is not whether the Green team is going to be any good or not but they should have to at least play by the same rules the rest of the teams do. The LJK's should stand by their own argument as to the very existance of Green.
The Alliance did not go to the LJK and say "we think there is so much talent in London and you should have a second team". Quite the opposite the LJK's went to the Alliance and asked/begged.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 22 2012, 12:03 PM 

Exactly, and coach had zero credibility before and none now. He was planted by DW as a nice guy who doesn't really have a clue what's going on around him in the hockey world. And the only way the one dman makes the team is if his LFD dad is coaching. SN told me he wouldn't even make his AA team! Deal. Joke.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 22 2012, 12:13 PM 

So kids will have fun then! 7 f1s too!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 1:24 PM 

My kid is an F1. Thanks for the opportunity by moving out of the way down to AA. You will be fine there.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 1:34 PM 

you can look at it one of two ways...a kid who has stayed in his local area playing for the team for many years and then is knocked off by an F1 in MM - one could say it was an exercise in F1 favours or you can say the green kid had all of those years to show that he was not a bubble kid and now they are going with an F1. Sucks though for the bubble green kid.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 1:37 PM 

Sucks even worse when it's CM from Brantford who bumps you!! Ouch.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 2:01 PM 

wrong side of the bubble

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 2:33 PM 

Yeah have a good year with those guys

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 2:52 PM 

You have 3 or 4 A players were not even close to being the best on their A team and F1S from Brantford 1 goalie and 1 D worst players in the alliance. 1 D who could not make a FC a team LFD


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 3:00 PM 

Yeah, how did Brantford's CM make this team any way? If he finally gets cut in Brantford, why on earth would London take him?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 3:06 PM 

The coach is an idiot

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 5:38 PM 

No he isn't. He's a nice fellow.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 5:39 PM 

I guess he could be both......

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 5:48 PM 

I dislike this situation as most do but lets not focus this on a couple of kids. Coach made deals with parents, with is sh..ty but leave the kids out of this.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 6:26 PM 

F1 summary:
7 in total
3 never attended a single LJK skate
1 attended 1 LJK skate
3 others attended some LJK skates

Not mentioning any names or initials but SR must have been sold by word of mouth on a few of them. Guess we will have to wait and see how things go.....

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 6:40 PM 

Wait till you see the big lazy goalie in action

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 9:05 PM 

He is another one who was apparently offered spot before SR saw him play! The Chief cuts were I am certain recommended by DD as he knows them and they are solid players, better than the cut london kids.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 9:06 PM 

yes there is a reason he was cut for an A goal tender

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 10:26 PM 

Yes and a A goalie that struggled all year and probably could not have made at least three of the four FC teams this year. That puts some perspective on it......

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 23 2012, 10:33 PM 

let me guess he was chosen because he is big lol, that works in house league, in AAA the players will sunburn his neck. Big, agile and mobile is great. Just big is window dressing.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 12:16 PM 

was big a couple of years ago, now average size. poor skater, slow. plays too deep in the net. wait til you see it. haha.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 12:19 PM 

you may not see him, no F1's are on roster ljk green coaches have been spanked by the brass

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 12:34 PM 

This is what happens when you give ateam to a guy with no experience. It is a develpment team and many bad player choices made. There was no need for that many F1s maybe 1 or 2 may pan out but none will have any impact on the team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 3:05 PM 

What 2 would make an impact?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 3:25 PM 

only 2 that belong at AAA are JR & NW could argue DN too

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 3:28 PM 

Relax. F1's will be there.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 4:20 PM 

12.34 "minor midget" development is over, if you don't have it now you never will!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 4:31 PM 

I don't think development is ever over. If it is a lot of teams are wasting money on practice ice all the way up to the pro level. But the development argument aside (which was one of the reasons for this team in the first place) I would love for someone to come on here and list all the reasons this team was picked on merit, skill, hardwork and talent. Unless being a buddy of the coach or the offspring of a LFD employee classifies as a good reason to be a F1 on this team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 5:50 PM 

not one of these players will make an impact on this team.We will be 4 or 5 th in our division

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 7:19 PM 

And there are 7 kids from London who are off this "development" team to make room for the coaches favour picks.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 7:21 PM 

4:31 I can tell you that based on the fact that your kid was cut and these boys made the team would indicate they will be a bigger impact on the team than your son.
Get over it, move on!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 8:48 PM 

F1 daddy we will never know as we never got to see most of them on the ice against other players. Is you kid on the roster yet? It is not an oversite that all the F1s are off the roster as of yet.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 24 2012, 10:06 PM 

Everyone in Lambeth know the picks were not on skill or ability for this team!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 6:57 AM 

Lambeth, London, Middlesex Centre, Brantford everybody knows. No matter how you slice it this is an almost a all time low for Minor hockey.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 8:41 AM 

My question is, were the directors told about this coach's forfeit history?
If so, why did they allow a coach with a history of forfeit to coach again?
It is clear with such a history he should not have gotten this team!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 9:00 AM 

Are you gossipers finished already?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 9:34 AM 

what is the forfeit history that you are talking about

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 10:02 AM 

How in the world did London EVER allow 7 F1's onto the green team, the concept of which is to develop more London kids through the Knight's program? That right there is seriously screwed up thinking.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 11:03 AM 

Same bullshit as last years 96 team ..... Secret deals for F1s that end up flopping. In the long run the entire LJK program will wane in numbers because all the chatter i hear from longtime LJK parents is fuck them and go back to FC and make super FC teams that will embarass the LJK AA offerings.

Anytime a player makes a team without going through the tryout process is clear signs of tampering and corrupt coaching.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 11:32 AM 

So did you F&^%$ them and go back happy.gif

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 11:33 AM 

who cares we will not win anything with the players we have. the roster that is posted consists of 1 kid that can score and the rest of them just like last year will manage a couple of goals a piece. I dont think one kid on the new roster from green got more than 5 goals last year.Correct me if I am wrong.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 11:40 AM 

if it is the same kid I am thinking of, he was held back by very poor coaching on the gold team. my son has played with him for years and he has potential beyond anyone else in this age group given the right circumstances.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 11:49 AM 

There are a few additions to green both on the front and back end that will make a difference.
Try and enjoy your summer and get over the fact that in the end your kid was cut!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 11:59 AM 

sorry my kid was not cut just stating facts

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 12:14 PM 

hey 11:49

are you a new addition? I only see 11 players on roster. And what new D and F are going to make a difference.

If you are an F1 you maybe going back to you're home centre.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 12:15 PM 

Oh sorry, just stating the facts!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 12:21 PM 

Oh sorry the facts are that you kids were picked for favours I think one of the new kids is someones boss.LFd kid is going to make a big impact on D

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 25 2012, 10:04 PM 

Board should be held accountable. Have someone from OHF and Alliance come and watch the team and then see how SR explains two of the F1 D and two of the F1 fwds. They need to see this.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 26 2012, 12:02 AM 

OHF and Alliance? How about he should have to explain it to the London parents. No child should ever get bumped by CM from Brantford.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 26 2012, 2:26 PM 

its personal opinion OHF and Alliance can't do a thing if the F1's are legit. The coach can take anyone he wants and not necessarily the best players

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 26 2012, 4:06 PM 

That doesn't make it right.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 12:48 AM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 12:38 PM 

People get on with your life and concentrate on your own kids.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 12:59 PM 

May 25 posts 11:33 > you need to be corrected
& 11:40 > one of several who were held back by him




What would you know about players stats from last year? Without the exceptional couple of forwards this team would not have done as well as they did last year. They will do even better this year. The fall of the 1 goalie hindered the rise of green to the end, and without the efforts of these forwards, who for the most part, also did the work in the weak d zone as well, this team would have totally collapased as in all past years. As we see it, the fwd from gold, as well as the other 2 strongest fwds on green, have as much potential as any of the gold players. Likely more, getting out from the seige and depression of the other team betters their chances of excelling. The other team, continues blundering with nothing different to work with and the same suppressing coaching mentality. Those parents must all agree with it: or at least the ones who have the deal arranged for their kid to run the show. Too bad!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 1:43 PM 

2 strongest forwards on green went to other teams

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 1:46 PM 

So you are saying that the 2 strongest forwards on green last year were not the 2 selected for gold this year

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 1:53 PM 

Strong forwards still on green. Sorry jn, jm, and dm they weren't talking about your kids!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 2:53 PM 

Ok daddy. Keep dreaming. If your kid was top notch he would be on gold and you and one other daddy and or mommy should think about another reason your kid got cut again. You! When a player is close, past parent behaviour is taken into account by volunteer coaches. Stay out if the Shit whether you like the coach or not or you end up bitter and your kid suffers while you cry to nobody out here. Bye now.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 4:35 PM 

Hey you live a in a fantasy world and this year your fantasy will implode. lol You are one of the biggest dw haters out there and whined about him for 6 years. you blow with the wind. typical teacher. good luck eh

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 4:44 PM 

Just be careful who you think your friends are on Gold! Say one thing to your face and trash your kid in the corners of the rink or on here behind a computer!


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 7:10 PM 

No. 07 kid in my brethen but u guys r fucked LJKs is about who you know and always has been
... My kid has outplayed every LJK kid from atom to midget and guess what ? He has had fun and proved that most LJK teams r shit and full of crap friend picks. Well FUCK them who cares they suck and any draft picks will be favour picks.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 8:50 PM 

...and now wheres your kid playing? in 6 years haven't seen 1 outstanding player. no one who is heads & tails better than another.keep kissing a$$ though

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 9:04 PM 

feel the LJK love

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 9:15 PM 

4:44 Green is just as bad there is alot of bad parents on the team .MF have another drink there is a reason your kid and the other kids are not on gold hope he can produce for green they are going to need it.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 10:38 PM 

Kids will get opportunities TO PLAY on green
Guess that won 't be the case for your kid on Gold
Have a feeling you newbies golds are in for a long disappointing season

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 27 2012, 11:06 PM 

the green kids have had the opportunity some of the kids had 90% more ice last year and could still not produce there is a reason you are greeners

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 28 2012, 6:37 PM 

Can't wait for the show to begin in the near future when JN sees his kid sit for the year. Get him some skating lessons in the summer!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 28 2012, 7:01 PM 

And your kid will get 5 goals again great contributor. If it was not for the 4 f that are gone green would have won 5 or 6 games last year they were the top scorers on the team by alot

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 28 2012, 9:07 PM 

sorry left out the goalie he was the best in the alliance

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 28 2012, 11:55 PM 

RL is a hell of a good tender, best of luck to him on Gold, but we also gained a good tender in ML. Our number two tender I don't get. Even with as tough of a year JW had he is better and I would hazzard a guess both AA tenders are stronger. Time will tell.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 6:30 AM 

701
You're delusional
Feel bad for your kid

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 8:18 AM 

7:01

the 4 fwds who are gone? lol

think of who they are and now apply that to your comment loser

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 8:52 AM 

1155 you are correct, i can't figure out that move either????????

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 10:37 AM 

Right choice was made with the goalie that went to aa. Green better off this year

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 10:45 AM 

7 01 you are correct and if he is not please tell me who had more points last year then those forwards or even close.sorry 818 630 feel bad for your kids who were cut again from gold and could not get thr job done on green. maybe this year they will get 6 goals.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 10:49 AM 

Well with that great goal tending and all the prolific goal scorers you have you should win the alliance thrn

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 12:26 PM 

1045
It is obvious who scored the points on this team
Due to political picks. They will still remain on green
Your boy will disappear on the ice like usual.
Your boy making gold will only bring the obvious shortcomings/ skill that he lacks
Good luck with his season, cause that's all he has going for him!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:08 PM 

Sorry facts are that they were the leading point guys on your team now you are left with a bunch of whanna be gold kids who each were lucky to get 5 or 6 goals last year. Jw is a far better goalie then the f1 kid so were the rest of the goalies at tryouts.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:12 PM 

where is jw playing?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:16 PM 

i think west but maybe oakridge

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:20 PM 

AA ? .. wouldn't be so bad

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:21 PM 

It does not matter there were enough goal tenders at tryout who are alot better then the F1 no need to go out and bring one in.Odviously was the coaches friend, boss, bfd, some thing ties these 2 together

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:21 PM 

108
Dyslexic ?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:33 PM 

jn and dn both deserve to be on the gold team Far better players then anyone left on green May 27 710
All you greeners are just like the person who made that comment it is great that your kid can skate up and down his wing and hit but has no real talent or skill.That is why you are on green no skill or talent


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:35 PM 

1:08 Dad(s) you are high.

Gold didn't need goal scorers and they didn't add any this year with the kids that went "down" to gold in their instance. They needed fillers who would be complacent just seeing their kids name on the gold roster OR they were cut for obvious reasons. This will ring true in a few months. The gold coach has always had who he wants and they are the kids that play. Remember you have been bitching about that for years, now you get to live it! Good Luck and enjoy. You should have had your head about you and looked out for your kid more. Green will do very well this year.

PS Last year you had nothing positive to say about the goalie you are now praising in your 1:08 post sh_t disturber.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 1:55 PM 

You must be one of the 3 or 4 parents that think there kid is really good but no one else thinks so. Give your head a shake you bitched and complained when they played for DW and then got cut.They got a ton of ice time last year and could still not produce. There is a reason you are on green.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 2:20 PM 

Hope we do have good year but will have to see how the F1s pan out.We lost a really good g but got back a really good g. Last years a little better but very close. D about the same as last year again will depend on how the F1s play. F right now not as good as last year but we have new kids that no one really knows what they will be like. So only time will tell.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 2:37 PM 

Lost some week dee and gained some strong dee. Green will be just fine!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 3:18 PM 

The F1 tender has no business being there, thats total BS!!
It should have been JW JN or PT from London...PERIOD!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 3:24 PM 

F1 goalie will be an "experience"

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 3:27 PM 

F1 goalie was cut from Brantford.
Brantford coach is a former Jr B goalie.
He may not be the more experienced coach, but he knows targets.
So if 99er's cut him, fill in the blanks.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 4:54 PM 

3:18 Have to agree. Though I can see why they let JW go. Kid is a stud in tryouts then in game situations something changes. If they could ever figure out what he would lock for one of the AAA spots. The F1 tender we have all seen play for sometime now in Brantford, he just looks like he could careless if he was there or not. ML will likely see 60% plus games if this team wants to win anything.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 5:17 PM 

hey get this 2:20

Your kid isn't good jn, can't skate and won't be missed on green fwd lines, no one wanted to play with him, the other kid is a reckless hitter only, the other were cut and not wanted for obvious reasons

yes the goalie will be missed but rec'd even talent
new F1's and what not????????? fwds are not better than the London kids period and anyone playing d would be better than the back end of last year!





 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 6:01 PM 

you lost 2 D and got 1 D that would not make a FC team and another cut from the worst team in the league

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 6:04 PM 

517 all of them better then your kid.Better hope ML plays 75% of the games

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 8:57 PM 

Ever think that is the plan, to have ML play most of the games and that is the reason they picked such a weak tender the no. 2.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 9:45 PM 

Sorry new to the your string. Why did they pick a D that could not play AA when they had better D to take?
And what kid got sent to AA for this spot?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 9:57 PM 

Better dee? Would like to know who?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 10:37 PM 

Bottom line. The coach lacks credibility and experience. Has no clue and simply not a AAA coach. Everyone I talk to says they can't believe he got team. Something stinks here. He picked the crap D man so that players dad could run practices etc for him. I heard that from board member. He didn't even understand what an f1 was and was convinced by goalie daddy to pick his kid from brantford. He gained another problem there. Team will be average at best with below average coaching. He cut more than one who should have made team. Some on the board want him replaced for embarrassing the organization with 7 outsiders. Oh well. Good luck.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 11:06 PM 

Maybe the board should worry more about team bullying, about kids quitting the team one day and back on the next, and about a coach that has one motive and that is to get his kid as much ice time as possible.
What is worse cutting a London kid so that he can actually play and contribute on a team or take a London kid knowing full well the kid will play 6-8 shifts per game?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 29 2012, 11:45 PM 

Same thing with the 96 green ljk last season ... They cut 5 or 6 that were much better players, but in their defence sometimes you need players who will play a role and get concerned when the bench shortens at crucial times.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 6:24 AM 

May 29 2012, 10:37 PM
Does the board not do a background check on these guys prior to appointing them as coaches. If he is a new guy don't they provide him a mentor so this F1 overload does not happen? This whole thing is rotten to core. There is no way around it. At AAA hockey you would expect some F1's on most teams, but 7 on the Green team (the team whose reason for existing is what.... so many AAA players in London). Not only does the coach lack any credibility neither does the board.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 7:39 AM 

6:24....amen!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 8:43 AM 

You guys just suck....great job on your picks and your f**kups....thanks in advance for your many 2pts this season!!!!!!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 8:51 AM 



After a thorough read of this thread I conclude:


This thread reeks of sour grapes parents who want to degrade and complain because their kid didn't make the cut.Stop gossiping about this coach. Did you ever consider confronting him with the rumours that consume you? If you need to contribute to slamming a situation, take advice from a few posts up written the May 29. 11:06.This is the truth and everyone in this age group should focus on this nonsense that the board has allowed and condoned for years. 6 kids will dominate the ice again this year, as always, while the rest sit, worthy or not. For those who have gone through this and advocated for their boy and what's right, they've been admonished to never be part of the gold team again. The gold team has suffered greatly because of this condoned ego bullying. Is that OK with all of you? As a predicted result, the gold team struggles with success, and with team morale. Only the ones that are silent, continue the facade of the perception that their kids are the best players, for fear their kid will suffer. A fine example of exemplary parenting don't you think? Unfourtunately, the ones who suffer the most are those very kids who have been put on a pedestal. The reward for allowing the selfish agenda of one person, who is in charge with the boards blessing, is an incohesive team, and broken spirits. If there can't be 1 AAA team, it's very transparent why there are 2 97 AAA teams.

IT'S ABOUT THE KIDS

Good luck to the Green team this year! Your rise began last year. Your rise will continue this year!


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 8:53 AM 

Board had limited options.
Tough to find coaches willing to take on this age group and its impressive parent group.
Green coach will do an excellent job.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 10:20 AM 

Coach really is clueless, he may be a nice guy but when it comes to hockey maybe throw a bag of pucks behind the bench and you'll get the same results...just ask any 95 AA parent/kid who he coached about his coaching knowledge

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 11:43 AM 

The reason it is so hard to find good non parent coaches, is because most people with any sense will not volunteer and put up with the parent bullshit, complaining and whining

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 12:16 PM 

unfortunately this group both green and gold have such a reputation that there is nobody that wants them. If you are volunteering your time and energy the last thing you want is to have to deal with a bunch of crazy parents. It is a no win situation here, I think both of our teams need to clean up our acts and let our boys focus on why they are here to play hockey. I know my son has read alot of the comments on here from the last few years and he said we were all nuts, maybe he is right

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 12:35 PM 

Why are they all nuts? Because the group has been controlled for the last 6 years by 1 person who has his own agenda. His kid was adecent player but is no longer a gold player like tg kid and others.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 12:50 PM 

I think 12:35 has a point, all the issues can be traced back to 1 person if the LJK treated this group like most other groups...ie change coaches every couple of years then we wouldnt' be in this mess, the 99 group went through the same thing for a while. Every age group has some wacko parents but if you have a coach that is wacko and only focused on his kid that fuels the wackos and then you have what you see with the 97s. The board closed their eyes on this group, the coach was allowed to get away with things other coaches were called on and reprimanded for, long story short DW is a prick

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 1:30 PM 

Previous post

YOU NAILED IT!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 3:03 PM 

Previous post did nail it. Way to much control with one coach for way to long. Past Board members tried to change the program only to be dismissed. Last convenor shocked by parent reaction. Publicly supported the coach. Privately could not disagree with the parents. Fought for change. Not invited back to the Board. What is the hold that this guy has over everyone? No one's good enough to go to the O anyway.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 7:37 PM 

12:50 said it right.
Too long of a story and dw is short pr_ _k !

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 30 2012, 9:48 PM 

DW maybe many of the things said above but I find it hard to figured out how he is responsible for this mess this year with Green.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 7:34 AM 

agreed, I wouldnt think he even probably knows him other then he is the guy coaching green

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 8:33 AM 

Obviously you were not there last year or you would know he WAS responsible for problems with green. Think about it!!! (but lets not dwell on it...history)

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 8:52 AM 

9:48 You've lived up "his" a$$ for 6 yrs now. Get back in, one more year to go.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 9:22 AM 

8:33 you have a point with last year as the coaches know each other and are not exactly friends. The new guy I dont think he knows at all. Enough crap has gone over the last few years without starting to make things up. Leave it alone, lets just get on. New year, new teams, new coaches

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 11:01 AM 

9:48

Why is green in a mess this year?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 12:37 PM 

You will know once you start playing games with your A team and unskilled players

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

May 31 2012, 12:47 PM 

11:01 its because the coach sucks and has no business coaching AAA domino's let alone AAA hockey, don't take my word for it just see for yourself come practice time

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 2:25 PM 

People are starting to find out. A coach people are laughing at, a soon to be announced LFD assistant who has zero credibiltiy but will run the show because of the joke head coach. And 7 outside players thanks to DD. I assume he was trying to make the team better than last year, but what a big mess.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 2:28 PM 

The coach didnt know the rules cause he doesnt care about anything but being friends with the kids. He coached my son in AA and was over his head there too!!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 3:39 PM 

Why are AB and JR not on the roster??

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 4:00 PM 

he lies to kids and parents had him as well have fun

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 4:21 PM 

JR went back toi Sarnia.

AB back to St T

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 4:31 PM 

so now only 5 f1's?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 5:04 PM 

so now the team has no extra skaters what an idiot

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 6:18 PM 

"LFD assistant who has zero credibiltiy"
Lambeth Minor Hockey, would not even give him the A team and he is your assistant, best of Luck!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 6:42 PM 

is he on the roster to play?

that's what would be worrisome.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 7:38 PM 

5:04 PM So he got rid of two skaters and kept the F 1 tender, who by all accounts is weak and will be lucky to see 40% of the games. Does not seem like a great use of manpower.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 7:48 PM 

Who cares about the coach all Knight's coaches are losers. There are a few really good players who should be on Gold so what. It's been like that for 6 years. Next year is a new year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 7:58 PM 

there is no one on green that should be on gold

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 8:06 PM 

7.58
You must be you of those fucken knobs who have been around DW’s ass to believe that. Put on your mask you peace of shit the DW fumes has contaminated your brain.
Or are you just fucken stupid!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 8:43 PM 

5:04 Don't worry. Word has it SR has contacted another EMC F1.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 9:15 PM 

806 your kids are not very good skill level very low have fun. Hope ML stays healthy all year

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 9:18 PM 

would green play the aa team for an exgame?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 9:21 PM 

If your kid was good enough to make gold he would have been a standout player game after game last year and putting points up on the board game after game unfortunately the kids that did do this are no longer on your team

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 9:25 PM 

what? have another beer ya loser!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 9:58 PM 

they will be keeping track of points this year we will see if your superstar kid gets more then his 2 to 5 goals per year

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 10:02 PM 

The few good kids will get more ice with green but with zero coaching will greatly suffer in development and miss the draft. That is what is most disappointing to me. The low expectations and lack of pressure sucks on green.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 10:11 PM 

Why didn't you go to Huron with the other whackos

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 10:24 PM 

HP didn't want more baggage. The dads of the two on green and two on HP never learned.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 10:24 PM 

10:02 not a green parent. Just a shit disturber who's kid was cut!!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 10:43 PM 

Nope. My kid is on Green and I have high hopes. I just have heard nothing but bad about the coach as far as any hockey knowledge goes. Maybe I will be wrong. But he is for sure connected to DW as DW himself told me he was on selection committee! I feel he put him in as coach to attempt to screw us thats all.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 6 2012, 10:59 PM 

I do not think he can take anymore F1s

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 6:54 AM 

9.15
same to Lt and Rl

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 8:52 AM 

one more F1 coming for sure (emc zone kid)


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 9:41 AM 

So 8 f1s? LOL. Or did some leave?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 10:06 AM 

none left the team. AB and JR from St Thomas are still on the team and will be this season. Their names have been left off the site to keep you whining pricks from going on about how many F1's on the team. They are skating with them right now and have been a will be through out the summer. Don't be fooled by what you don't see on a website!!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 10:57 AM 

Good so 7 F1's are still in place, assuming JR & AB's paperwork was proper.
Oh wait, it was not during the tryout period but they are working on it now.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 11:13 AM 

6 54 not the same at all both those goalies are good does not matter which one plays. You will lose every game with your backup

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 11:14 AM 

The coach is an idiot and the A team will suffer from bad picks

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 12:19 PM 

he could have very easily taken either one of the AA goalies they are both twice the goalies as this pylon..in fact JW and JN who are playing FC are better than this kid from Brantford wtf?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 12:48 PM 

have fun getting ice time with 18 skaters and 2 goalies

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 1:00 PM 

10:06

OK so SR leaves off JR & AB to "Stop the whining". Why not leave off SB, BJ or CM? Those are picks most would question....


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 1:15 PM 

You mean, have fun getting ice time with 18 skaters and 1 1/3 goalies?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 1:26 PM 

12:19 PM You could go a lot deeper than that to find better goalies.... Crap A couple of those tenders worked very hard to have a spot on one of the LJK teams and to get f..... by all three is an insult given who Green picked......

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 1:33 PM 

You know if you replace CM BJ and SB and replace with better players, then this team competes.
Other than that, its going to be a long year and a lot of ice time for a few.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 1:40 PM 

Maybe that is why SR pcked these 3...

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 1:48 PM 

SR sees CM & BJ once and signs them. Coincidence CM & BJ's dad's are buddies?
SR does not even see NW or JR skate - let alone attend a tryout - is ther not some LJK policy that you have to skate a tryout to make a team?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 2:04 PM 

Big lazy goalie didn't get 1st win last year till the last game of the year

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 2:09 PM 

seems to me that the same policy is in affect over at elgin too. a Forward from sweden and a goalie from blenheim didn't even skate but there apparently on the team.
Its to bad that kids suffer from this because of the greed of some parents that will do anything to show and shine there kid.

I think in LJK and Elgin land, that if you are the best player out there but you are not part of the show, then you will never shine!

Shame really!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 2:30 PM 

this team will finish lower then any other green team over the last 4 years

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 2:35 PM 

So he picked those kids to ride the bench? dont think so. They are not the only questionable picks there are at least 6

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 2:35 PM 

So he picked those kids to ride the bench? dont think so. They are not the only questionable picks there are at least 6

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 2:38 PM 

When all of this happened I asked the question if their was a policy that a player had to attend a tryout to make a team. I was told there are situations that a player cant attend, one being injury. Also when tryouts are winding down and a player (F1) just gets released coach can save a spot for him if he feels that he would make the team. The key is that F1's are not to displace London kids unless they are better then the London kid and not just marginally better. That seems to be the issue these kids are not better and they did displace kids from London that were probably better then the F1's. The above poster mentioned another F1 coming in and would be 18 skaters and 2 goalies. That would be wrong, I read the Alliance policy that they have online and the most you can card is 19 players in total

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 3:01 PM 

Well at least you got an answer, I asked and have recieved no answer to this BS.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 3:24 PM 

The coach does not know what he is doing he was put in this spot for a reason

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 3:29 PM 

You know, this is bullshit, I am contacting the Alliance/OHF/Hockey Canada and actually file a complaint and everyone else should too.

Its wrong what they are doing to kids here. My kid plays every year here, and then is replaced by an F1 kid and in his MM year? The kid that replaced him can't even hold my kids stick.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 3:47 PM 

No good spouting off on here now is it.
If you wasted as much time writing to real powers that be maybe it would be diffrent.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 3:48 PM 

2:38 SR looking at another F1 only if AB & JR cannot get their F1 paperwork corrected.

Direct from EMC Regulations:

"The intent of the EMHA is to recruit and offer ‘AAA’ hockey to aspiring players from within the Elgin Middlesex zone. Each team is allowed to sign up to a maximum of 3 out-of-zone players upon Board approval. An out-of-zone player can only be signed if he/she is substantially better than an in-zone player."

Shouldn't we have something like this?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 6:54 PM 

london does have something like that.... but like all their rules, they pick and choose when and where the rules apply, and especially to who they apply

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 7:16 PM 

Show me where London has this. KG tells me LJK has no such policy and to bring a motion for one to the AGM. Won't do any good for this coming season AGM already done.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 7:30 PM 

I heard from someone who actually did get a response from KG (I am still waiting for mine....) that he wrote to them and told them the number was 5.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 7:39 PM 

i heard from kg that they were told from sr that he was looking at 3-4 tops of f1's they had no idea on the 5 and were totally unaware of 7 they found out when we did. also heard that sr was called in for a meeting because of what he did

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 7:52 PM 

Sounds like the "inmates are running the asylum".

If the number is 5, then he should not have 7 - simple.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 7:57 PM 

Sounds to me like it doesn't matter what he does you people won't be happy because he cut your kid! I don't hear you complaining that Gold has taken F1's!
Get over it, move on!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 8:06 PM 

Difference is Gold has 3 F1's not 7. All of Gold's are bonafied AAA players - can you say the same about Green's F1's?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 8:12 PM 

Bonafide? There are London kids on Gold that aren't friggin bonafide!!!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 8:25 PM 

No argument there. But point is F1's on Gold can be justified. f1's selected for Green are definitely not substantially better then some London boys.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 8:30 PM 

doesn't matter how good the kid is if the dad is a pain in the ass. Some people don't get it that their behaviour affects their kid. HP will find out what they got real quick....

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 9:00 PM 

The one F1 D is not better then some of the Forest City Defence.
How was he picked? size no. skating no. shot no. what was it Coach?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 9:35 PM 

This whole F1 mess will be the downfall of the LJK .... A mass exodus back to FC is occurring now and more than a few LJK AA teams will be embarassed this season.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 9:55 PM 

12:19.... neither JW or JN are playing hockey this year. Both are in West, and West does not have an A team. Neither wants to play houseleague.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 7 2012, 11:11 PM 

I thought JW was going to Oakridge, but the point is correct. Both to some degree got screwed. Both should have at least played AA and take your pick of PT, JW or JN who should have had a shot at the other spot on green. Little question they are better than the F1 from Brantford.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 9:57 AM 

Good luck to you and your F1s

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 12:02 PM 

poster 7:35 yesterday: and many others ............

Enough already.

The "F1 mess" this year will not and is not the downfall of the LJK. The LJK BOD is the LJK's own worst enemy and they have created their own nightmare and downfall which began almost 7 years within this '97 age group. Parent coaches are the downfall and condoned corruptness are the downfall. A true AAA team, with the best kids have never been selected because of this "downfall" . The history of the gold's lack of success in the last 2 years proves this and the BOD turn their heads time after time because they are all in on it. The talent is split between the 2 AAA teams, leaving both to struggle with the misfits. It is a joke but allowed.

Shame on this org.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 12:31 PM 

No development. parents think kids are better then they really are. We will see come draft day. Where is CS now about a month ago he couldnt shut up about his kid and how great he is If he was so good he would of made the allstate team. no one from ljk goes in the first 3 rounds

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 1:08 PM 

Well said.

Gold parents think their kid is better than they are

KABOOM

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 1:17 PM 

Not just gold parents and alot of green parents are exactly the same they do not have a clue. Greener parents thinking that thier kids are better then the gold players.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 4:30 PM 

Truth is a few are

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 4:42 PM 

Truth is in the parents mind they are in the real world not. You need to have hockey IQ at this point and unfortunately your kids dont have it.To the poster above we all know who you are your kid is one with very little hockey IQ you have to be able to do more then skate up and down the ice that is why he is on green and not playing for gold any longer you just cant handle the truth.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 4:52 PM 

Please tell us who should be playing on the gold team.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 5:14 PM 

4:42 there are a few green that should be on gold, if you had hockey IQ you would know this to be true. Keep sticking up for DW and his picks. I swear you must be exhausted so many years od bending over to DW unless the poster is DW in that case F OFF

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 5:42 PM 

truth hurts but there is not one kid from green that should be on gold you are an idiot. Have seen many greener games and the skilled plaayers you had are gone you are left with low skill level and IQ starting with the coach

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 9:14 PM 

AMEN! WELL SAID. AND THATS WHY HIS KID IS ON GREEEN. SOOOO GLAD HE WAS CUT AGAIN. GIVES HIM SOMETHING TO DO OUT HERE! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLOLLOLOLO. HAVE FUN WITH THE "I DONT KNOW WHAT AN f1 IS" COACH.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 9:22 PM 

OH DW. INHALE TOO MANY FUMES TODAY

THINKING YOU'RE THE DELUSIONAL ANGRY IDIOT WHO DOESN'T WANT TO ACKOWLEDGE A FEW GREENERS
WHO SHOULD BE PLAYING GOLD

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 9:57 PM 

There is no one to acknowledge you just do not get it they took players with skill and high hockey IQ and you greeners do not fit the bill.your kid will get his 5 goals again this year and you will be telling us that he should have been drafted but was not acknowledged because o f DW

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 8 2012, 10:59 PM 

TOOK PLAYERS WITH SKILL AND HOCKEY IQ ?

SERIOUSLY. PUT DOWN THE BOTTLE!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 9 2012, 8:58 PM 

9:57

I hear a fire bell

Start the engine

Hockey IQ? Skill? on Gold?

Where? Who?

Now that's entertaining!


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 9 2012, 9:14 PM 

Well it is nowhere to be found on green get another drink big D your kid can skate but has no idea where the net is or what a 2 on 1 is . Please tell us which one of your super star players should be on gold.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 9 2012, 9:20 PM 

We will see in a couple of months all the points that your little super stars rack up

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 12:09 AM 

Appears to be a llittle animosity between big d and JN .


Let the games begin.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 2:07 AM 

Cant wait to see Gold choke out .... i watched a few practices and they are bad ... real bad. Come on they have 5 players who should be in FC .....

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 8:22 AM 

The irony is that both have their on unique style and should have been on gold from the beginning.
Too bad, if gold choose by pure skill and athleticism they would have been a power house in Ontario.
It really is too bad!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 10:43 AM 

Better keep those 2 parents away from each other during the first gold vs green game.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 11:09 AM 

own unique stlye your kid could not carry my kids stick and one kid had his chance and was brutal that is why he got 2 min a game and then cut. if he was a superstar he would havw showed it playing green but still could not do anything alot more ice timr no skill. The other kid still does not know how to skate with his head up and will get no ice time with gold

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 11:11 AM 

Just shut the fuck up.
Get on with things.
Geez
Your both getting very old already.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 11:47 AM 

207 then it should be a good battle between gold 5 fc players and greens 18 fc players

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 10:21 PM 

They are both great penalty killers and work horses on the ice.
They may not be top scores but they wear down opponents for the score's. Any other coach and both would be same team and enjoying it.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 10 2012, 10:51 PM 

thanks daddy

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 9:09 AM 

10:43 dw has nothing to fear that parent is outa here

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 10:15 AM 

which of the two is otta here 1 signed with gold one with green no one going anywhere you are a idiot

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 10:49 AM 

Correct 8:22

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 10:54 AM 

11:09 who are you talking about?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 11:37 AM 

keep up daddies both your sons are the best in your minds

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 4:44 PM 

My son is on gold now and its about 5 yrs too late

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 7:35 PM 


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 8:02 PM 

My son was telling me there was a new goalie trying out tonight? Where did he come from.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 8:15 PM 

What? Who

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 8:18 PM 

Just a fill in
One goalie unable to make it

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 11 2012, 10:07 PM 

Relax just a AA tender until ML comes back.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 12 2012, 9:45 AM 

no doubt he was better than the brantford cut.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 12 2012, 1:09 PM 

" Hockey I.Q.".....priceless.....5 out of the six d on gold can"t even spell.....I.Q

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 12 2012, 3:50 PM 

You really are an idiot the best thing gold has is there defence you are really showing your hockey IQ. Shows you know nothing about hockey. The next thing you are going to tell us is the green D ar far better then the gold D best in the league right.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 12 2012, 10:45 PM 

don't you love it when guys that start using/repeating hockey terminology buzz phrases that they have heard like " hockey I.Q" and wait for it...."time and space" from sportsnet and tsn highlights.......ok "hears" one for you...."puck possession"...talk to the parents that have forwards on your team and ask them what they think about your d's "hockey I.Q".....and while your at it ask them for their opinion on....."first pass"....from your d....now if your captain goes back to "d".....the "hockey I.Q." just jumped up by 100%.....

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 14 2012, 9:38 PM 

Green coach. Nuff said. Best of luck. Hope you finish second in the weak division. try battling sun county and elgin for 6-8 games. bye now

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 14 2012, 10:41 PM 

Did the LJK slap the coach and force him to release two F1s? Only five now?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 14 2012, 10:59 PM 

Hysterical. He got slapped with suspension when DD did exactly the same
Ironic how the season hasn't even started and LJK bod is turning a blind eye to the gold bs?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 5:53 AM 

Actually I heard DD did get the same.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 7:01 AM 

Not!

DD .. I mean DW ... I mean DD


LJK policy is the double standard

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 7:22 AM 

So both LJK coaches suspended before season even starts. The Alliance is not happy!
The one who should be suspended is KG and DW they choose all the F1s.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 7:33 AM 

Some (not all) of you guys need to get a grip. If you think DW gives a rats a.. about the Green team and had any input on the SEVEN F1's including the ones who did not skate you have to give your head a shake. I would be more inclined to think DD had more input as he and SR are friends.
Have to agree however the board needs it's collective ass kicked for all the Green F1's and allowing anybody to get selected on any team that did not tryout.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 7:45 AM 

733
How different is it with gold
It's not
They should get their asses kicked to
You are delusional if you think DW didn't have anything to do with green
FYI. They're not friends.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 7:59 AM 

Above is right DW had nothing to do with the F1's that SR took, there not even friends. SR did this all on his own. I was told that he was planning on taking 3 F1's and the board was aware of that, nobody knew that he took 5 and then 7 until he did it. Thats why he got in trouble.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 8:03 AM 

Moving sideways or backward. We didn't get any better.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 8:34 AM 

How is a kid to tryout when the tryouts are over?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 9:01 AM 

Go to cambridge have 1 import card left open. 2 spots in total

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 10:07 AM 

Gold holding out for 1 more as well.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 4:04 PM 

DW controls LJK period

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 5:59 PM 

Any coach who takes an F1 or more should be banned from coaching altogether. That is the BULLSHIT of minor hockey period. There is no excuse for and capital punishment is the requirement for these offences.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 15 2012, 10:34 PM 

Comment on your own mess gold

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 16 2012, 2:42 PM 

SR and DW are hockey buddies. SR has played several years with DW in tournaments. Anybody involved in hockey knows they are friends. Moron parents without a clue always left guessing on network 54. SR was suspended. Nobody else. And DW laughing. The mess has and will always be the sad crying parents whos kids were cut and dreams shattered (parents). And keeping 7 F1s embarrassed SR and the entire board. All know the guy shouldnt have been coaching. CD was even shocked.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 16 2012, 8:44 PM 

Tell us how you really feel

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 9:07 AM 

The only "friend(s)" dw has are kg, dd

You are a "moron parent" who guesses you kid kid is stuck with the same old crap as the last 6 years

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 3:11 PM 

Hey DR have another drink your kid was never good enough for gold

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 4:46 PM 

gold parent here....we would be better off with DR's kid then a few(old and new goldies, just saying!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 5:21 PM 

Good to see all 7 F1's are now showing on the website.
Thanks again SR.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 9:58 PM 

DW is a coach with London Knights you fuktard. Well respected in the hockey community. Thats why you on Green cause ya never figured out who was who and you fucked it for your kid. Now he has will just go away after this season, like you.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 10:04 PM 

And DR kid has zero hockey sense. Too bad. Kid can skate. But remeber the deciding factors when close to making it. Parent(s).

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 17 2012, 10:15 PM 

DW is a joke in the hockey comminity. The Hunters have him around for one reason - he works for free!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 19 2012, 3:10 PM 

You wish fucky

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 19 2012, 7:22 PM 

Is that you again DM trashing yet another kid? Your spelling gives you away. Get over it.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 19 2012, 8:01 PM 

Keep going. Almost at 300

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 19 2012, 8:01 PM 

Keep going. Almost at 300

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 7:21 AM 

310
THE ONLY THING THAT DW IS TO THE KNOGHTS IS
THEIR PUCK BITCH AND COFFEE BOY
JUST ASK THE PLAYERS

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 7:43 AM 

7:21

when you went to slam the I key you missed and slammed the O key.
Are you pisssssssed? happy.gif

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 7:49 AM 

dw has zero credibility with the knights players. linked by a back door deal

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 9:10 AM 

The man is gone, enjoy your year. Show me one Green player other than TF and ML who has a realistic shot at playing on Gold. Both who were let go by DD not DW. Yes DW has his short comings and everybody knows (or think they know) what they are. Get over it enjoy probably your kids last year playing LJK's see 90% of you in FC next year.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 9:28 AM 

Every team in the OHL has 10/40 scouts with many as free agents, all over the map. There are enough scouts within the Knights organization that despise DW that if your kid is being pushed by him they may vote the opposite. But keep listening to his bullshit and signing up for his elite teams and camps because he is laughing all the way to the bank.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 11:24 AM 

Tell DW iI take my coffee with 2 sugars

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 11:42 AM 


DW rules that's why you're kid is still there. But good luck with that!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 12:40 PM 

Didn't see DW at the press conference yesterday. His invite must have been lost in the mail.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 4:12 PM 

Tell me again, how can 2 kids (possibly more) make this team without even skating a tryout? Board should step in at this point and rule without skating a tryout they are ineligble. No injury "exceptions" here either, just a flagrant deregard of the rules/policies by the Green coach.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 4:13 PM 

^^disregard

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 4:52 PM 

mad that they're better then your kid or something? Geez let it go

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 5:39 PM 

At the end of the day the only kids getting drafted are from Gold so by now, MM, why is anyone even talking about Green?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 5:50 PM 

because there are too many green players that belong on gold. truth whether you like it or not. The road to the O will be tough for any of them green or gold. No stand out players no matter what DW has promised you. good luck

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 5:52 PM 

Oh Please enlighten us as to what Green player should be on gold.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 7:34 PM 

4:52
Mad that a process is in place but when someone (SR) neglects to follow it, the board just looks the other way.
7 F1's are not even allowed in Brantford. On top of that 2 of these F1's did not skate a lap with LJK. Then 3 of the F1's that did skate are on the bottom half, if not the bottom 3 on this team. I am OK with F1's, say a limit of 3-5, if they are on the top end of the team. I know "no written policy" and/or "the board was not aware of how many F1's were selected until it was too late". Credibilty of the board and the program has taken a huge blow but they don't seem to care and are in no hurry to fix it.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 9:40 PM 

7:34 PM Could not agree with you more. The funny bit to me at least is that discontent amoung the Green Team over the F1's is probably more than amoung the AA players who thought they had a shot.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 20 2012, 9:57 PM 

From what I have heard the AA team will be strong and they obeyed the process for F1's (or whatever they are called at AA. )

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 6:41 AM 

How is it DW did the same with his f1 's and didn't get any suspensions?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 6:50 AM 

Why is the roster not on the AA website, and how do we know this team will be strong?

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 7:13 AM 

6:41 AM


Last year DW did take one F1 who was a former chief and had played against the LJK's since minor atom - so essentially had a multiple year tryout.
This year DD did take some more F1's, again all played AAA and had been seen for number of years by DD.
RS has taken 7 F1's and by all rights you could justify 3 easily, as they had played AAA for a quality team (and I believe all had tried out -- although I could be mistaken). I think where RS gets jamed up is two fold, one takeing kids sight unseen as he has never coached this age group and two kids who have never played anything remotely close to hockey at this level.
In my opinion that is the difference.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 7:13 AM 

5:52
Oh please goldie! Shit the bed again this year!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 7:25 AM 

Oh come one Ass Hat, give it a rest your kid did not make gold. My kid did not either but he has friends on all three teams and both he and I wish all three teams sucess.
Best of to all of them. Running them down has no bearing on the sucess of your own kid.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 7:49 AM 

With all the finger pointing and kid bashing above, some saying that green is just as good as last year if not better, others complaining that this team has taken a step backwards, some think that some of the green kids should be on gold, some think that kids who are on the AA team should be on green, some thing that we have to many F1's from other centres and some thinking that the new kids aren't good enough to play.

Well I guess we will find out tomorrow night as we play the lambton sting in a couple of exhibition games coming up. I have looked at other sites from around our league and alot of them are saying the Sting are better this season but how can anyone really tell without playing any games except at tryouts but on the flip side how could they not as they have always been in the bottom of our entire league. I guess tomorrow night will give us all an indication on where we are going to stand in the league this season.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 8:27 AM 

If you are using Jr Sting as a measuring stick, you know you are in trouble.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 8:52 AM 

A few key players will not dress due to injury

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 9:00 AM 

For Green or Sting?


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 10:04 AM 

Please tell me ML is able to play

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 10:10 AM 

I doulbt it. Last couple of practices had the kid from Oakridge there fillling in.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 10:40 AM 

Can't wait to see BJ in action....

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:22 AM 

The OHF has specific rules re: F1 numbers and Green is in direct violation. There is NOT a deadline for filing protests ... It will be pretty funny if another team files a protest and all wins will be forfeited and the head coach will be suspended for 1 year minimum.

I know of 1 AAA team that plans on protesting Jan 1st, 2013 .... A dog and pony show will ensue.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:25 AM 

there are no number restrictions for f1's from the OHF, it is upto each association, this is where SR failed, the Junior Knights say approximately 3 and maybe 4, he did not have the authority for 7 and he did not inform anybody at the Jr Knights

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:25 AM 

there are no number restrictions for f1's from the OHF, it is upto each association, this is where SR failed, the Junior Knights say approximately 3 and maybe 4, he did not have the authority for 7 and he did not inform anybody at the Jr Knights

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:27 AM 

The Sting are a stepping stone right now and theirs no one else to play right now. Yes we can use them as a measurement to next season, i've also heard the Sting are improved this season and if we have beaten lambton in the past many many many times then we should be able to do so again. If Lambton has improved and we still beat them that means all around we are better also than last season. If we lose to lambton then we obviously know we have gotten weaker or stayed on par with last season and the sting have really improved. If we lose to lambton it will also expose our weakness's and hopefully our coaching staff will figure it out and know what to work on so we can compete. I know personally i'm very interested in seeing all our F1's play including our goalie.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:29 AM 

OHF has no limit on F1s, just on "imports". They are not the same.

Having said that, LJK should not have let this happen.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:31 AM 

Heard a few players aren't playing due to injuries.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:54 AM 

Yes

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:55 AM 

11:27

Thanks Brantford Goalie Dad

Enjoy your sons limited, next to no ice time this year.

Alot of travel and expense, for what?

Save the money for his beer league next year!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 11:56 AM 

will do thanks

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 12:02 PM 

F1=imports.....check your OHF language!

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 12:14 PM 

"import" only apply to the GTHL, where they can bring in a limited number of players from outside the LOR, and those players do not need to be released from their home centre.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 12:18 PM 

which players aren't playing???

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 12:20 PM 

above is right, there is difference between import and an F1, they are not the same

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 12:51 PM 

11:22

You sound threatened by this team. Relax, it's only Green

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 12:55 PM 

sounds more like parent of player that was cut and still not taking it too well, leave it alone, and get on with it. Enough already, let your son enjoy his hockey season and stop meddling

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 1:19 PM 

There is a difference between F1's and Imports.
Green F1 decisions are not able to be "protested" with OHF or Alliance.
Are 7 F1's on Green right - no, but nobody to blame but the board. They are the only governing body that could change this.


 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 1:45 PM 

If the F1 is better than the displaced kid, then who cares. This should be about talent playing with talent, not talent carrying some locals who belong in the FC B loop.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 2:08 PM 

CM signed before getting his releases alliance has been informed and will be looking into, shouldnt leave releases in mail boxes when you've already signed.

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 2:58 PM 

3 of the F1s are in fact illegal rostered and any team can file a protest and when that happens the shit will hit the fan when ALL wins and ties are DQd.

It's gonna happen since it will move the bottom teams up in the standings. The only way it wont happen is if green is in the basement.

Plus this can also apply for tournaments too ... Same thing happened to an OMHA team last season and they got tossed from 2 tournaments and had 9 league wins deleted because if a single illegal F1

 
 
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: London 1997 Green

June 21 2012, 3:01 PM 

1:45 PM
"And there sir lies the rub". If the talent is better you are correct and I would say for three of the F1's that they are better players. But the balance they would have trouble finding a position with a FC A or B team.
I find it really hard to believe that our bottom 4 F1's are better than CH, LM, SK, MT or CM from the AA team. A more glaring example was at our practice two weeks ago when that FC tender came out to replace our injuried goalie. You would have a tough time convincing me that our tender was better.
Talent is in the eye of the coach, but gezzzz. Come on.

 
 
Current Topic - London 1997 Green    
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index