One can read as many news papers and view as many news on the MTV but that will still not prove anyone guilty. We dont have to be fooled by the editions in the news papers. They are simply making their money. They could put as many lies as possible to attract your money. However, I partially agree with the last sentence of your first paragrah. There could be a procedural breach which you personally dont agree based on the findings unfolded by Dame Carol Kidu. From information I collected so far, it is neighter Jeffry Nape who placed his signatures on the document nor typed the document -get it straight. Many people are fooled by this. This could point back to how the document surfaced. Hence, Jeffry Nape referred Dame Carol and Wenge for allegations of breaching parliamentry procedures in a sense that they were unauthorized MP's who aired the issue. Nb, this does not compromise their freedom of speech. Also, this document has never been printed through the Government Owned & Authorized Government printing. While this would trigger further debate, it is now up to the court to rule. The way I see it at this point in time, the Speaker of Parliament is still innocent regardless of the growing numbers opposing him. You stated that there has been one account of another of his corruption, could you bring them up for debates please.