[Cyberwar Central Links & Resources][Cyberwar Central][Cyberwar Central Members Area]

            
  

 

 Return to Cyberwar Central  

Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data

June 7 2012 at 10:32 AM

Varangian  (Login varangian)

 

Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data

By QUENTIN HARDY|
Danah Boyd, 34, studies children's use of social media.Erik Jacobs for The New York TimesDanah Boyd studies privacy and children’s use of social media.
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/04/rethinking-privacy-in-an-era-of-big-data/" data-sharedescription="Privacy is always a moving target in a networked world. It moves in lots of directions. Can I share my genetic information, if it's also saying something about my brother? What if my LinkedIn and Foursquare data exposes something I don't want others seeing? A well-known Internet researcher warns, "Regulation is coming." ">

Some years ago an engineer at Google told me why Google wasn’t collecting information linked to people’s names. “We don’t want the name. The name is noise.” There was enough information in Google’s large database of search queries, location, and online behavior, he said, that you could tell a lot about somebody through indirect means.

The point was that actually finding out people’s names isn’t necessary for sending them targeted ads. It can probably lead to trouble, as Google’s own adventures in Wi-Fi snooping show. Even without knowing your name, increasingly, everything about you is out there. Whether and how you guard your privacy in an online world we are building up every day has become increasingly urgent.

“Privacy is a source of tremendous tension and anxiety in Big Data,” says Danah Boyd, a senior researcher at Microsoft Research. Speaking last week at a conference on Big Data at the University of California, Berkeley, she said, “It’s a general anxiety that you can’t pinpoint, this odd moment of creepiness.” She asked, Iis this moving towards a society that we want to build?”

If conventional understanding chafes at the idea that our names are mere noise, consider the challenge in Ms. Boyd’s point about the self in a highly networked society. Take personal genetic data. “If I give away data to 23andMe, I’m giving away some of my brother’s data, my mother’s data, my future kid’s data.” For that matter, “Who owns the e-mail chain between you and me?”

Privacy is not a universal or timeless quality. It is redefined by who one is talking to, or by the expectations of the larger society. In some countries, a woman’s ankle is a private matter; in some times and places, sexual orientations away from the norm are deeply private, or publicly celebrated. Privacy, Ms. Boyd notes, is not the same as security or anonymity. It is an ability to have control over one’s definition within an environment that is fully understood. Something, arguably, no one has anymore.

“Defaults around how we interact have changed,” she said. “A conversation in the hallway is private by default, public by effort. Online, our interactions become public by default, private by effort.”

There other ways in which we can lose control of our privacy now. By triangulating different sets of data (you are suddenly asking lots of people on LinkedIn for endorsements on you as a worker, and on Foursquare you seem to be checking in at midday near a competitor’s location), people can now conclude things about you (you’re probably interviewing for a job there) that are radically different from either set of public information.

What is to be done? Ms. Boyd has made a specialty of studying young people’s behavior on the Internet. She says they are now often seeking power over their environment through misdirection, such as continually making and destroying Facebook accounts, or steganography, a cryptographic term for hiding things in plain sight by obscuring their true meaning. “Someone writes, ‘I’m sick and tired of all this,’ and it gets ‘liked’ by 32 people,” she said. “When I started doing my fieldwork I could tell you what people were talking about. Now I can’t.”

That is a placeholder solution, and Ms. Boyd sees only one certainty for which we should prepare. “Regulation is coming,” she says. “You may not like it, you may close your eyes and hold your nose, but it is coming.”

The issue is what the regulation looks like, and how well it is considered. “Technologists need to re-engage with regulators,” she says. “We need to get to a model where we really understand usage.” Right now, even among the highest geek circles, “we have very low levels of computational literacy, data literacy, media literacy, and all of these are contributing to the fears.”

Source.. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/04/rethinking-privacy-in-an-era-of-big-data/?ref=technology




 
 Respond to this message   
Response TitleAuthorDate
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data Jun 8, 2012, 11:13 AM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big DataVaraJun 10, 2012, 2:14 AM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data Jun 11, 2012, 8:24 PM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data Jun 16, 2012, 1:33 PM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big DataVarangianJun 17, 2012, 1:38 AM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big DataCTJun 19, 2012, 6:14 AM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big DataVarangianJun 20, 2012, 12:56 AM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big DataCTJun 20, 2012, 2:17 AM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data Jun 20, 2012, 8:54 PM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data Jun 20, 2012, 9:46 PM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big Data Jun 20, 2012, 11:20 PM
 Re: Rethinking Privacy in an Era of Big DataCTJun 25, 2012, 2:56 AM
Find more forums on SocietyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2014 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
      free countersMember of The Internet Defense League   [Exchange Links with CWC]