Hi, Dan . . . Thanks for the tribute. Also, thanks for thinking me a nice person. I have some comments on these 1960 cartoons. Mostly the parties are smiling. The young ladies may be surprised or smiling but they are seldom (if ever) screaming or crying. Also, the young ladies have pleasing shapes without the large bottoms you see in many pictures and photos.
Most of all, while the skirt is often lifted, the underpants are in place. I think this is proper and leaves something to the imagination of the spanker. It also protects the dignity of the spankee. Something I believe is critical. Also, most are hand spankings without the use of any "tools of the trade". I frankly can't imagine why a fellow would want to spank a youg woman's bottom with anything but his hand. Again, different strokes (pun here?) for different strokes.
I am a bit disturbed about how high some of the fellows have their spanking hand. A blow from that distance would create more than just a loving situation. I like the low level pats, instead. I can't imagine how the fellow gets the benefit of a nice round bottom if he strikes it hard. So I see patting as a "win" for both spanker and spankee.
I also do not think the cartoons need to show the bottom as "inflamed" in any way. Spanking can really hurt and if I am hurting I am not going to be interested in the love making that follows spanking. How is that for a "win" for everyone?
Thanks a lot for the cartoons. I love them and get off on pretending what might have happened before and after the spanking. Love and tenderness, no doubt?