<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

New INC interpretation of John 1:3!

November 6 2009 at 11:05 AM
INCquisitor  (Login INCquisitor)

 
It used to be that the INC interpreted John 1:3 as meaning that God created everything "because of" Jesus, reasoning then that the words "by" and "through" also mean "because" as in "lost by or through default."

The last I heard, the INC now interprets John 1:3 to mean that God created everything "through the mediation" of Jesus and cites 1 Cor. 8:6 KJV and 1 Tim. 2:5 as their basis.

Can any INC minister explain how Jesus could have "mediated" the creation of the world BEFORE he was born? Has the INC finally realized that Jesus PRE-EXISTED before the creation of the world?

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Bored Again
(Login bored1234)

Any proof that that is their new version?

November 7 2009, 12:06 PM 

otherwise we will be just wasting our time here, man.

The fact that I know with INC is that Jesus in his human nature didn't exist before he was born.

 
 Respond to this message   
INCquisitor
(Login INCquisitor)

My source says it was the lesson delivered during the 11/1/09 worship services.

November 7 2009, 2:30 PM 

Four possibilities why you missed the significance of the lesson:

1) You were absent;

2) You were asleep;

3) You didn't care to listen since you were brainwashed to believe that everything the minister says is true;

4) You don't care to test whether what the minister is saying is true or not since you were brainwashed to unquestioningly believe everything the minister says.

I suggest you get a copy of the minister's message delivered during the Nov. 1 worship services. For your sake, let's both hope that my source is wrong.

 
 Respond to this message   
Pugante2010
(Login Pugante2010)

What's the use of herding us outside when you intend to just leave us

November 8 2009, 9:49 AM 

in the cold.

You are a coward and you have the guts to call yourself a Christian?

What harm you assume we will we do if you confess your religious affiliation here?

I am not asking for personal identity, I am asking for you to stand up for the group you call brothers and sisters and the beliefs you uphold.


 
 Respond to this message   
Bored Again
(Login bored1234)

your insinuations were all wrong; nothing of that sort

November 8 2009, 7:04 PM 

that i heard from my closest INC friends. indeed you got it wrong, man besides, i know they wouldn't preach something that would reverse their firm stand about Jesus.

as i have often said, check out first before throwing baseless charges.

 
 Respond to this message   
INCquisitor
(Login INCquisitor)

Get a copy of your minister's outline for the lesson that was....

November 10 2009, 10:43 PM 

delivered on Nov. 1. If the INC is indeed true and the ministers are not hiding anything, you should be able to get a copy of this outline.

The INC administration does not realize that their new interpretation of John 1:3 CONTRADICTS their doctrine that Jesus did NOT pre-exist his birth.

This proves further that their doctrine, that the INC that FYM founded and registered with the Philippine government in 1914 is the church that Chrst built, is FALSE!

If your reason for remaining an INC is to attain eternal life, it is to your best interest to test whether what the INC teaches is true or not.

Bear in mind that those who practice "heresies" (false teachings) will not inherit the kingdom of God (Gal. 5:21, 19-20) and "all liars shall have their part in th lake which burns wih fire and brimstone, which is the second death" (Rev. 21:8).

 
 Respond to this message   
Bored Again
(Login bored1234)

don't be too harsh to liars, man

November 11 2009, 2:08 PM 

you know very well that none in this forum can escape the wrath of God if He will condemn all liars now. man, while alive, can always redeem himself and recreate his own destiny. who knows the liars we see today are the blessed few tomorrow?

i also don't believe 100% the doctrines of INC, so why push me to her? but FYM didn't build any church, they said he just continued what has been started- so what's your problem, man? although i hardly believe that, well, that's their belief and we have to respect that. otherwise, do you have a better option where to go?


 
 Respond to this message   
INCquisitor
(Login INCquisitor)

We are in this forum to expose the lies, aren't we?

November 12 2009, 7:25 PM 

And by doing so, we hope to help liars renew their lives, and help the blind open their eyes and come to the knowledge of the truth, before the end of their lives or the end of the world.


 
 Respond to this message   
Bored Again
(Login bored1234)

that's right; expose the lies but don't condemn the liars

November 13 2009, 4:14 AM 

we don't know what's ahead of us, man.

 
 Respond to this message   
INCquisitor
(Login INCquisitor)

God has condemned LIARS already!

November 13 2009, 11:01 AM 

Their "part is the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death" (Rev. 21:8).


 
 Respond to this message   
OBR
(Login bulak1010)

So you mean you were not at the back row?

November 13 2009, 12:59 PM 

hmm.

 
 Respond to this message   
Bored Again
(Login bored1234)

He knew those were predoomed to hell

November 13 2009, 6:33 PM 

God knows all; and we don't know what's next and who's that liar or thief besides us, do you? Besides, who gave you the right to judge people?


 
 Respond to this message   
OBR
(Login bulak1010)

Quitor, so you are not in the back row?

November 16 2009, 10:25 PM 

Don't tell a lie.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login ninjamars)

no proof supplied

November 19 2009, 2:24 AM 

desperate blows!!!

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login Coffeemaker)
Forum Owner

What's the use of just leaving us in the cold here?

November 19 2009, 10:17 AM 

You are a coward and you have the guts to call yourself a Christian?
What harm you assume we will we do, if you share with us the lesson
of last week's worship services?

That hearing they may learn, and fear the Lord your God,
and keep, and fulfil all the words of this law



    
This message has been edited by Coffeemaker on Nov 19, 2009 10:18 AM


 
 Respond to this message   
Bored Again
(Login bored1234)

the burden of proof is on Quitor or a mere balitang barbero

November 23 2009, 9:48 AM 

otherwise we may just call it as another balitang barbero, er are you a barber, quitor?

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login Coffeemaker)
Forum Owner

Let "Minister JVC" do the preaching

November 17 2009, 11:00 AM 

Can anyone of you bring me the tape of last week worship service?

While I will look in the basement for my portable radio cassette player,
my wife will prepare a big pan of pancit canton with shrimp.

Before we eat, let "Minister JVC" do the preaching
and see who'll become enlighted,




 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - New INC interpretation of John 1:3!
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on ChristianityCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

I tell myself something's coming, but it never does.