couldn't have said it better myself...(*turns and shoves Arwen off the bridge with her shoe and summons Aragorn so he knows it's safe to come out of hiding*)
Harry Potter was visually pleasing..buuuut..LOTR just, to me was more entertaining....it stayed better to the book and besides...it had elves...^__________^..no, anyway..umm....where was i?...oh yeah!!
Columbus could've done a much better job...it's like; when they mess up on stuff like having Hermoine going into the Boys' dorm...because it was to the left..and she went to the left!....and the scene cuts were pretty bad...like from the Dursleys in their house w/all the flying letters, to Oh god!! suddenly they're out on the sea...well, why did they pick that place? hmm, i found myself putting in parts of the book they skipped to fill in holes left in the movie...LOTR didn't do that..you could watch that movie and get basically everything (except maybe why Hobbits don't where my shoes...my mom had to lean over and ask me about that)...i just enjoyed it much more...
and let me get this straight for Christopher Columbus HARRY POTTER HAS GREEN EYES!!! NOT GREEN AND THEN SOMETIMES BLUE, NOT BLUE WHEN TAKING PICTURES...THEY ARE GREEN...*ALL THE TIME*! IT'S NOT LIKE THE BOY WHERES CONTACTS!..i mean, if they can make Madam Hooch have those cool yellow eyes...they can make the main character have green...it ain't that hard...