<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Yep. Seventh.

November 3 2009 at 11:09 PM
No score for this post
 
from IP address 70.18.192.110

I take small comfort from the fact that percentage-wise, I ran a snatch-hair ahead of our 2005 candidate. But not enough to matter.

It's been pretty well demonstrated that that's how well we do, whether we campaign or not. Oh, well, I can say I've done it.

huqw

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


70.18.192.110

I really should have bet the octfecta, by the way.

No score for this post
November 3 2009, 11:11 PM 

I called it right down the line.

huqw

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   



66.108.46.222

What the --

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 6:37 AM 

I stepped into the voting machine on West 52nd St. last night and there were at least three Libertarian candidates for mayor, one under the other. Besides JRI, Jim Leczynski (sp?) and Julius Clifton (sp?). Very confusing.

I thought JRI was the only candidate. In the New York Times profiles of the candidates, only JRI was profiled. (Although now that I look closely at the Times's photo of the voting machine lineup, all three candidates are there, although only JRI is highlighted in yellow.)


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


70.18.192.110

No, I was the only LP candidate for Mayor.

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 8:42 AM 

Jim was running for Public Advocate, and John Clifton for Comptroller. But, yes, the ballot is confusing. Intentionally so.

huqw

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   



159.53.110.144

Oh, now I get it.

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 9:54 AM 

I was wondering why the mayoral candidate line took a dogleg down, but now I realize that if I'd read across from the left I'd have seen that the other two were not mayoral candidates but were on the horizontal lines for the other positions, so I was looking at the Libertarian vertical column. Very confusing.

I can see how easy it might have been for those poor senior citizens in Palm Beach County to be confused by the presidential ballots in 2000.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

Holden

66.66.118.51

Did you use one of the new voting machines?

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 11:10 AM 

We did.

It felt weird.

I miss the curtain.

Joseph, I was hoping you'd win. But, good for you for trying.

Good thing that Bloomberg spent the big 100 million bucks, hmmm? Any less and he'd have lost for sure!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


70.18.192.110

Heck, I barely qualified for an asterisk.

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 11:24 AM 

But, yeah, I spent WAAAAAAAY less per vote than Miguelito did. I'm a lot more charming.

huqw

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


159.53.110.144

No, it was the old one where you draw the curtains and flick the heavy metal switches

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 1:13 PM 

next to the candidates' names.

Very satisfying to draw the lever back and register your vote with a bang.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Robert F.

208.120.116.205

Agreed

No score for this post
November 5 2009, 2:54 AM 

Same feeling I had. Thanks for representing, Joseph.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
St. Orlando

205.188.117.20

Row J?

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 11:53 AM 

Poor organizational skills. Period.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
St. Orlando

205.188.117.20

You be dumb (on this one), Gary.

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 12:06 PM 

Joseph was treated fairly by the BOE. Row J, ya gotta fit it on the machine somewhere. Where was his "support"? I be puzzled that Joseph claims that LPers just always lose, so no reason to actually campaign or take it vaguely serious-like.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


70.18.192.110

I agree that filing early would have helped, but only a very little.

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 1:00 PM 

A top-row ballot line would maybe have scored me another 50 votes.

It's been demonstrated, all over the country, that a community is Libertarian-friendly, or it's not. NYC is not. I actually did better, percentage-wise, than any other Libertarian candidate for Mayor of NYC, altho Audrey Silk had a higher vote total in 2005 because the voter turnout was far, far higher that year.

Libertarians are lazy, and I knew that going in, so I expected very little help. I reproach myself for not working harder, but we got the message out, and I'm pleased with how I conducted myself in debates, on TV, and interacting with individual voters.

huqw

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   


159.53.110.144

I know, I'm feeling pretty sheepish. My only excuse is that

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 1:16 PM 

by the time my eyes scanned all the way down the row to the Libertarian column I'd become disoriented and mixed up between the vertical (office) and horizontal (party) axes.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
LeStique

152.12.128.31

That's why I only vote in non-Cartesian coordinates...

No score for this post
November 4 2009, 1:51 PM 

Plus, it's easier to follow the politcians' circular logic that way! wink.gif

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Yep. Seventh.
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index