| 90 degree angle?November 3 2009 at 11:38 PM | 
Herbert (Login gHerbert)
SAGF Members 2001 | |
| ![[linked image]](http://www.network54.com/Realm/ghnImages/dwsAng.JPG)
Not close to 90 degrees between lead arm and clubshaft. Jason's swing looks a lot like the swing recommended by Trahnan other then the huge shoulder turn and few other things... There is a very bent trail arm I think that the trail wrist is bent way back. I am thinking that the sharp angle between lead arm and clubshaft is not really very important... As a matter of fact trying to achieve this angle might be more trouble then it is worth.
Regards, Herbert
|
| Responses Re: 90 degree angle? - Justin Cordell on Nov 4, 2009, 1:14 PM
- One thing I know for sure is - Swing Like Moe on Nov 4, 2009, 4:08 PM
- Suspicious - cd on Nov 5, 2009, 12:59 AM
- You're looking at the wrong angles - Allen on Nov 5, 2009, 9:45 AM
- THAT is one of THE BEST POSTS - mcirishman57 on Nov 5, 2009, 2:46 PM
- Well... - Herbert on Nov 5, 2009, 4:07 PM
- Trail arm at impact - Allen on Nov 5, 2009, 4:30 PM
- your swing and scott's - fdb on Nov 5, 2009, 6:12 PM
- Yes - Allen on Nov 17, 2009, 2:25 PM
- You are doing it right - Remington on Nov 6, 2009, 7:54 AM
- Allen- Re: Trail arm at impact - Justin on Nov 6, 2009, 1:28 PM
- What I was doing wrong - Allen on Nov 7, 2009, 8:40 AM
- That's the instruction,... - Peter on Nov 7, 2009, 5:16 PM
- The real problem - Allen on Nov 11, 2009, 1:34 PM
- Re: The real problem - Justin on Nov 12, 2009, 3:25 PM
- Yes, I do get the - Allen on Nov 15, 2009, 10:31 PM
- Feel This - mcirishman57 on Nov 16, 2009, 12:22 AM
- When speaking of hands - Allen on Nov 16, 2009, 12:42 PM
- Interestingly - Allen on Nov 17, 2009, 8:29 AM
- Conundrum of Arms and Body - And the Rifle Barell "Gap" - mcirishman57 on Nov 17, 2009, 5:11 PM
- Great Post! - Allen on Nov 18, 2009, 10:15 AM
- MAC- I have some questions - Justin on Nov 18, 2009, 4:41 PM
- Answers - mcirishman57 on Nov 18, 2009, 9:30 PM
- Mac... - wicker1000 on Nov 20, 2009, 6:20 PM
- I do - mcirishman57 on Nov 21, 2009, 12:46 AM
- IMA - Peter on Nov 12, 2009, 9:05 PM
- Another - Herbert on Nov 7, 2009, 1:14 AM
- Pictures - Ham on Nov 13, 2009, 8:00 AM
- Hands ahead at impact.... - Peter on Nov 13, 2009, 9:20 AM
- Re: Hands ahead at impact.... - Herbert on Nov 14, 2009, 12:46 AM
- Tain't necessarily so. - Peter on Nov 14, 2009, 2:38 PM
- Re: Tain't necessarily so. - Herbert on Nov 15, 2009, 1:35 AM
- I can answer that one - Mcirishman57 on Nov 15, 2009, 11:01 AM
- Purpose - Peter on Nov 15, 2009, 2:58 PM
- Re: Purpose - Herbert on Nov 15, 2009, 9:44 PM
- The trainer - Allen on Nov 15, 2009, 10:25 PM
- That is incorrect. - Peter on Nov 16, 2009, 6:14 PM
- I have an idea! - Herbert on Nov 16, 2009, 7:11 PM
- Did that... - Peter on Nov 16, 2009, 10:01 PM
- Huh? - Herbert on Nov 17, 2009, 2:01 AM
- Actually... - Peter on Nov 17, 2009, 11:17 AM
- Re: Actually... - Herbert on Nov 17, 2009, 1:20 PM
- Take a look... - Herbert on Nov 18, 2009, 1:51 AM
- "The ball flew almost twice as high as my normal wedge and had the same distance." - Peter on Nov 18, 2009, 10:51 AM
- Re: "The ball flew almost twice as high as my normal wedge and had the same distance." - Herbert on Nov 19, 2009, 8:37 PM
- If... - Peter on Nov 20, 2009, 8:13 AM
- Re: If... - Herbert on Nov 20, 2009, 1:41 PM
- The diagram... - Peter on Nov 20, 2009, 7:06 PM
- Actually - Herbert on Nov 20, 2009, 7:56 PM
- 2D - Peter on Nov 21, 2009, 3:57 PM
|
|
|
