that you now choose to attempt to redefine terms and distance yourself from everything else you've said but only after objective evidence shows your data not relevant and in the face of the author of that data telling you it was not. Clearly you are working on being a politician
The discussion is about facing the ball at impact which was defined earlier
as having the shoulder line parallel to the target line.
If you want to have a different discussion about torso orientation at impact then you should start another thread as that is not what is meant by 'facing the ball' at impact.