Was Amrat at it?

OK, here's the first serious moral and ethical issue for discussion:

Was Amrat at it? (Episode 65 - see www.pcplus.co.uk for details).

It's obvious that Llewellyn thought Amrat had deliberately compromised the company firewall in order to let Danny expose the IP address of his 'Europe's Numero Uno Larging Lifestyle Portal' website. But was Amrat guilty? And even if he was, was Llewellyn really concerned with the firewall violation, or was he looking for an opportunity to settle old scores?

What of Danny's role in all this? Can he really claim not have realised that bandwidth theft is as serious walking off with the office furniture? And can Bernard really claim not to have known what was going on, when the site was running on his very own Linux server?

Your views, please...