Return to Index
Actually, I just had another thought
December 1 2004 at 8:00 AM
from IP address 220.127.116.11
The family who stopped the preservation of a signed up member should be sued, I think.
If a majority of children can legally freeze a parent against their wishes, doesn't that infer that a majority of family members could overturn a person's desire for cryonics?
There's something to ponder...
Respond to this message
Apparently that's true-- or true enough because...
Dec 1, 2004, 8:15 AM
Copyright © 1999-2014
. All rights reserved.